Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
4, 1-11
http://jtsr.biopublisher.ca
Research Article
Open Access
Abstract Drought is one of the important environmental stress affecting agricultural productivity around the world. In this study, an
attempt has been made to understand drought induced biochemical alterations in different clones of Camellia sinensis [TV-1, TV-20,
TV-29 and TV-30]. Drought stress induced decrease in total chlorophyll and carotenoid, phenolics concentration and increases in
proline concentration, lipid peroxidation and polyphenols oxidase activity as a consequent of decrease in leaf relative water content
(RWC). Decreased Na+ and K+ concentration caused osmotic stress in leaves decreasing NR activity, and ultimately reducing leaf
relative growth rate. Thus, drought induced a range of physiological and biochemical alterations causing membrane damage and loss
in cellular functions ultimately leading to reduction in growth of one of the most important economic crop like tea. In comparison ,
TV-1 showed better drought tolerance by maintaining higher endogenous K+ and proline content and a balance Na+/K+ ratio in leaves.
Keywords Drought. relative growth rate(RGR); chlorophyll; phenols.proline; lipid peroxidation; Camellia sinensis.
1 Introduction
RGR=(InM2-InM1)/(t2-t1)
where M2 was the final total fresh mass (g), M1 was
the initial total fresh mass (g), t2 was the number of
days since initiation of experiment and t1 was day 0.
Relative water content (RWC) was measured by
following the methods of Barrs and Weatherly (1962).
Tea leaves were sampled, oven dried and digested in a
HNO 3-HCl (3:1,v/v) mixture and Na + and K +
concentrations were determined by Flame Photometer
(Systronics, India) (Jackson, 1973)
The stability of leaf membranes, was assessed by
determining leakage of electrolytes from leaf discs
placed in 20 ml of deionised water for 24 h at room
temperature and measuring the electrical conductivity
before and after autoclaving the samples and
Electrolytic leakage was determined as described by
Dionisio Sese and Tobita (1998) and calculated using
formula.
EL = EC1/EC2 X 100
Where - EC1 is the initial conductivity of the sample
before autoclaving and EC2 is the final conductivity
measured after autoclaving the sample.
Leaves were extracted in cold with 80 % acetone. The
chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were estimated as
per the methods of Arnon (1949).
Proline concentration in tea leaves was determined
following the method of Bates et al. (1973). Leaf
sample (0.5 g)was homogenized with 5 ml of
sulfosalicylic acid (3%) using mortar and pestle and
filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The
volume of filtrate was made upto 10 ml with
sulfosalicylic acid and 2.0 ml of filtrate was incubated
with 2.0 ml glacial acetic acid and 2.0 ml ninhydrin
3 Results
Relative growth rate (RGR) of leaf showed uniformly
decline trend with progressive soil moisture stress in
all the tested clones (Figure 1B). Changes in RGR of
leaf due to10d of stress imposition was minimum in
TV-30 and TV-1 but after 20d of stress RGR changes
among the clones was not significant though decrease
growth was about 95%.The amount of solute
leakage is an index of membrane damage. Drought
induced increase in solute leakage in all the tested
clones of Camellia sinensis (Figure 1A). After 20d of
stress, in comparison with control plants solute
leakage increases to 130.84, 89.75, 150 and 153.92%
in TV-1, TV-17, TV-20, TV-29 and TV-30 respectively.
However, TV-1 and TV-20 showed comparatively
lesser amount of solute leakage during stress
conditions. Relative water content (RWC) of leaf
uniformly decreased with decreasing soil moisture
4 Discussion
Drought imposition resulted in significant changes of
growth and biochemical responses in various clones of
Camellia sinensis. The contents of Na+ ion increased
with the progress of water stress imposition,
apparently showing highest Na+ content in TV-29 with
lowest in TV-1 as a result of 20 d of drought stress in
6
Figure 6 Relationship between relative water content and proline accumulation (A), K+ content of leaf and its RWC (B), lipid
peroxidation and solute leakage of leaf tissue (C), lipid peroxidation and decrease in RWC of leaf (D), relative growth rate of leaf and
changes in total chlorophyll content in four clonal varieties of Camellia sinensis subjected to drought . The open square, closed
triangle, open circle and closed circle denotes TV-1, TV-20, TV-29 and TV-30 variety of tea subjected to drought treatment
respectively. *, ** and *** indicates significant correlation at P<.05,.01 and .001 respectively.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Mr S.M. Bhati, General Manager,
Tocklai Tea Estate, Silcoorie, Silchar for providing Tea
seedlings throughout the experimental work.
References
Arnon D. I., 1949, Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol
oxidase in Beta vulgaris, Plant Physiology, 29, 1 15.
tolerance in tea. The Assam Review and Tea News, 79, 18-21.
Bars H.D., and Weatherly P.E., 1962, Are examination of the relative
Journal of
Bates L.S., Waldern R.P., and Teare I. K., 1973, Rapid determination of free
proline for water stress studies, Plant and Soil, 39
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1
, 205 207.
Higdon J.V., and Frei B., 2003, Tea Catechins and Polyphenols : Health
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
Boyer J. S., 1982, Plant productivity and environment, Science, 218 , 443-448.
Science and
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.218.4571.443
Critical Review
Food
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408690390826464
Bradford M. M., 1976, A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification
Ingram J., and Bartels D., 1996, The molceular basis of dehydration
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.377
Cabrera C., Artacho R., and Gimenez R., 2006, Benefecial effect of green
Jackson M. L., 1973, Soil Chemical Analysis. - Prentice Hall of India Pvt.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2006.10719518
Caia Y., Luob Q., Sunc M., and Corke H., 2004, Antioxidant activity
413-419.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.047
Plant Physiology,
162,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.09.004
Chakraborty V., Dutta S., and Chakraborty B. N., 2002, Responses of tea plant to
Kabir S.E., 2002, Present Tea scenarios and tips on efficient management
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022377126056
Kar R.K., 2002, Studying the plant response to water stress: An Overview.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00025-9
Pp 61-79.
Kar M., and Mishra D., 1976, Catalase, Peroxidase and Polyphenol oxidase
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.57.2.315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.7.7.1085
Egilla J.N., Davies F.T., and Drew M.C., 2001. Effect of potassium on
Journal of Biochemistry,
growth, leaf macro- and micro nutrient content and root longevity.
105, 265270.
Martiniz J. P., Ledent J. F., Bajji M., Kinet J. M., and Lutls S., 2003. Effect
DC,
pp. 114.
Foyer C.H., Valadier M.H., Migge A., and Becker T.W., 1998,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1027359613325
Matysik J., Ali B.B., and Mohanty P., 2002, Molecular mechanism of
Maize
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.117.1.283
Mayer A.M., and Harel E., 1991, Phenoloxidases and their significance in
Francois T., 2003, Virtual plants: Modelling as a tool for the genomics of
tolerance of water defecit. Trends in Plant Science,
fruit and vegetables, in: P.F. Fox (Ed.), Food Enzymology, Elsevier,
8(1), 9-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(02)00008-0
Nakayama T., Yonekura-Sakakibara K., Sato T., Kikuchi S., Fukui Y.,
Grima F.S., and Krieg D.A., 1992 b, Osmotic adjustment of sorghurn II.
Relationship to gas exchange rates, Plant Physiology
Fukuchi-Mizutani M., Ueda T., Nakao M., Tanaka Y., Kusumi T., and
99, 583-588.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.99.2.583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5494.1163
Ohashi Y., Nakayama N., Saneoka1 H., and Fujita K., 2006, Effects of
99, 577-582.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.99.2.577
Handique A.C., and Manivel L., 1990, Selection Criteria for drought
50 (1), 138-141.
10
Singh M. B., and Mallik C. P., 1980, Plant enzyme assay some
New York.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67637-6
Panda R.K., Stephens W., and Modhews R., 2003, Modelling the
Plant
http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479702001151
Tahi H., Wahbi S., Wakrim R., Aganchich B., Serraj R., and Centritto M.,
Panda S. K . , 20 0 2 , Wa t e r st r e s s in d u c e d ch a n g e s in ni tr ate
Journal of
Indian
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11263500701401927
Tona L., Cimangac R.K., Mesia K., Musuambaa Ct., De Bruyne T., Apers S.,
Hernans N., Van Miert S., Pieters L., Totte J., and Vlietinck A.J., 2004,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.013
Sakuma Y., Maruyama K., Osakabe Y., Qin F., Seki M., Shinozaki K., and
Drought-Responsive
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.02.022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.035881
Sankar B., Jaleel C.A., Manivannan P., Kishorekumar A., Somasundaram R.,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOP.0000047158.53482.37
Wu Q.S., Xia R.X., Zou Y.N., and Wang G.Y., 2007, Osmotic solute
Xu Z.Z., and Zhou G.S., 2006, Combined effects of water stress and high
temperature
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02703703
10.1007/s00425 006-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.00033.x
Shinozaki K.Y., Kasuga M., Liu Q., Nakashima
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11738-007-0065-y
K., Sarcuma
http://dx.doi.org/10.1626/pps.10.277
Shinwari Z. K., Seki M., and Shinozaki K., 2002, Biological mechanism of
Yordanov I., Velikova V., and Tsonev T., 2003, Plant responses to drought
187-206.
11