Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
By:
Majid Hayati
University of Kashan, Kashan, I.R. IRAN
2014
Objectives
This lecture on designing shell-and-tube HEs serves as an
introduction lecture to the subject, and covers:
Disadvantage:
The prediction of pressure drop is less satisfactory, as pressure
drop is more affected by leakage and bypassing than heat transfer
The method does not take account of the bypass and leakage
streams
5
Start
Step 1
Collect physical properties and
HE specifications
Step 2
Define duty
Make energy balance if needed
No
Yes
Step 8
Determine overall heat transfer
coefficient
Yes
No
Step 7
Calculate unspecified flow rates
Calculate TLMTD and TM
Step 3
Assume value of overall
coefficient Uo,ass
Step 4
Calculate tube number
Calculate shell diameter
Solution: Step 1
Collect physical properties and HE specifications:
Physical properties
Table 1
Physical properties at Methanol Water
fluid mean temperature
Cp (Kj/Kg C)
2.84
4.2
(mNs/m2)
0.34
0.8
kf (W/m C)
0.19
0.59
(Kg/m3)
750
995
HE specifications:
Coolant (brackish water) is corrosive, so assign to tube-side.
Use one shell pass and two tube passes.
At shell side, fluid (methanol) is relatively clean. So, use 1.25 triangular pitch
(pitch: distance between tube centers).
8
Tube Arrangements
The tubes in an exchanger are usually arranged in an
equilateral triangular, square, or rotated square pattern (Fig.
2)
Step 2
Define duty, Make energy balance if needed
To start step 2, the duty (heat transfer rate) of methanol (the hot stream or
water, the cold stream) needed to be calculated.
Heat load = Q = m
100000
Cph (T1 - T2 ) =
2.84 (95 - 40) = 4340 kW
3600
11
Step 2 (Contd)
The cold and the hot stream heat loads are equal. So, cooling water flow rate
is calculated as follow:
.
Q
CP c (t 2 _ t1)
4340
_
= 68.9 kg/s
TLMTD
31 C
T t
(95 40)
ln 1 2
ln
T2 t1
(40 25)
12
Tm Ft TLMTD
Where:
T1 T2
R
t 2 t1
t 2 t1
S
T1 t1
14
Step 2
For a 1 shell : 2 tube pass exchanger, the correction factor
is plotted in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4: Temperature correction factor: one shell pass; two or more even tube passes (available in TEMA)
15
Step 2 (Contd)
T1 T2 95 40
R
3.67
t 2 t1 40 25
(t 2 t1 ) 40 25
S
0.21
(T1 t1 ) 95 25
From Fig. 4, the correction factor (Ft) is 0.85.
Tm Ft TLMTD 0.85 31 26 C
16
Step 3
Assume value of overall coefficient Uo,ass
Typical values of the overall heat-transfer coefficient for various
types of heat exchanger are given in Table 1.
Fig. 5 can be used to estimate the overall coefficient for tubular
exchangers (shell and tube).
The film coefficients given in Fig. 5 include an allowance for fouling.
The values given in Table 1 and Fig. 5 can be used for the preliminary
sizing of equipment for process evaluation, and as trial values for
starting a detailed thermal design.
U=600 W/m2C
17
Step 3 (Contd)
Table 2: Typical overall coefficients
18
Step 3 (Contd)
Fig. 5: Overall coefficients (join process side duty to service side and read U from centre scale)
19
Step 4
Calculate tube number, Calculate shell diameter
Provisional area:
Q
4340 10 3
A=
=
= 278 m2
U TM
600 26
918
Outside surface area of one tube
0.303
20
Step 4 (Contd)
An estimate of the bundle diameter Db can be obtained from
equation below which is an empirical equation based on standard
tube layouts. The constants for use in this equation, for triangular
and square patterns, are given in Table 3.
N t 1n1
Db do ( )
K1
where Db = bundle diameter in mm, do = tube outside diameter in
mm., Nt = number of tubes.
As the shell-side fluid is relatively clean use 1.25 triangular pitch.
So, for this example:
918
Bundle diameter D b 20 (
)
0.249
2.207 826 mm
21
Step 4 (Contd)
Table 3: Constants K1 and n1
22
Step 4 (Contd)
Use a split-ring floating head type for Fig. 6.
From Fig. 6, bundle diametrical clearance is 68 mm.
Shell diameter (Ds):
Ds= Bundle diameter + Clearance = 826 + 68 = 894 mm.
Note 1: nearest standard pipe size are 863.6 or 914.4 mm.
Note 2: Shell size could be read from standard tube count tables
[Kern (1950), Ludwig (2001), Perry et al. (1997), and Saunders (1988)].
23
Step 4 (Contd)
Step 6
Estimate tube- and shell-side heat transfer coefficient
Tube-side heat transfer coefficient:
40 + 25
Mean water temperature (Tavg ) =
= 33 C = 995 kg m3
2
918
Tubes per pass =
= 459
2
Total flow area is equal to numbers of tubes per pass multiply by
tube cross sectional area:
Step 6 (Contd)
Step 6 (Contd)
Cooling water flow 68.9
Water mass velocity =
=
= 749 kg s m2
Total flow area
0.092
Water mass velocity (Gt ) 749
Water linear velocity (ut ) =
=
= 0.75 m s
Water density ()
995
27
Step 6 (Contd)
4200 (1.35 + 0.02t) u 0.8 4200 (1.35 + 0.02 33) 0.75
hi =
=
0.2
di
16 0.2
0.8
= 3852 W/m2 C
Step 6 (Contd)
Viscosity of water () from Table 1 = 0.8 mNs m2
Fluid thermal conductivity from Table 1 = 0.59 W m C
udi 995 0.75 16 10 3
Re =
=
= 14925
_
3
8 10
_
Cp 4.2 103 0.8 10 3
Pr =
=
= 5.7
kf
0.59
Neglect ( )
w
_
L 4.83 103
=
= 302 From Fig. 8, jh = 3.9 10 3
di
16
hi =
_
kf
0.59
3
0.33
0.14
2
jh Re Pr 0.33 ( )0.14 =
3.9
10
14925
5.7
1
=
3812
W
m
C
_
3
di
w
16 10
Step 6 (Contd)
Step 6 (Contd)
Shell-side heat transfer coefficient:
Baffle spacing: The baffle spacings used range from 0.2 to 1.0 shell
diameters.
A close baffle spacing will give higher heat transfer coefficients but at the
expense of higher pressure drop.
Area for cross-flow: calculate the area for cross-flow As for the hypothetical
row at the shell equator, given by:
(pt _ do )Dslb
As =
pt
Where pt = tube pitch (distance between the centers of two tubes, Fig. 7).
do = tube outside diameter, m,
Ds = shell inside diameter, m,
lb = baffle spacing, m.
(p d )
p is the ratio of the clearance between tubes and
Note: the term
the total distance between tube centers.
t
31
Step 6 (Contd)
Baffle spacing:
Choose baffle spacing = 0.2 Ds=0.2
894 = 178 mm
Tube pitch:
Pt = 1.25 do= 1.25
20 = 25 mm
Cross-flow area:
_
(p t _ do )
(25 _ 20)
As =
Dslb =
894 178 10 6 = 0.032 m2
pt
25
32
Step 6 (Contd)
Shell-side mass velocity Gs and the linear velocity ut:
Ws
As
G
us = s
Gs =
pt
1 d
0.87p t _ o ) 1.10
2
2
4 =
(p2t
do
do
2
0.917 d2o )
Step 6 (Contd)
Shell-side mass velocity Gs:
Mass velocity, Gs =
Ws
100000
1
kg
=
= 868
s m2
As
3600
0.032
de =
1.10 2
(p t
do
0.917 d2o ) =
1.1
(25 2
20
34
Step 6 (Contd)
95 + 40
Mean shell side temperatur e =
= 68 C
2
Methanol density () from Table 1 = 750 kg m3 )
Viscosity of methanol ( from Table 1 = 0.34 mNs m2 )
Heat capacity from Table 1 = 2.84 kJ kgC
Thermal conductivi ty Table 1 = 0.19 W mC
u sde G sde 868 14.4 10 - 3
Re =
=
=
= 36762
_
3
0.34 10
3
2.84 10 0.34 10 3
Pr =
=
= 5.1
kf
0.19
Cp
jh = 3.3 10
35
Step 6 (Contd)
Step 6 (Contd)
For the calculated Reynolds number, the read value of jh from Fig. 9
for 25 per cent baffle cut and the tube arrangement, we can now
calculate the shell-side heat transfer coefficient hs from:
h sde
0.14
0.19
= jh Re Pr 1 3 (
)
(without viscosity correction term) hs =
3.3 10 - 3 36762 5.1 1 3
3
kf
w
1.44 10
= 2740
Nu =
2740
37
Step 7 (Contd)
Pressure drop
Tube side: From Fig. 10, for Re = 14925
jf = 4.3
Neglecting the viscosity correction term:
10-3
L -m
u2t
Pt = Np [8jf ( )( ) + 2.5]
di w
3
995 0.75 2
- 3 4.83 10
= 2 (8 4.3 10 (
) + 2.5)
16
2
2
= 7211N m = 7.2 kPa (1.1 psi)
750
From Fig. 11, for Re = 36762
jf = 4
10-2
Step 7 (Contd)
Step 7 (Contd)
Step 7 (Contd)
Ds L u2t
4.83 103 750 1.162
- 2 894
Ps = 8jf ( )( )
= 8 4 10 (
)(
)
de L s 2
14.4
178
2
= 272019 N m2
= 272 kPa (39 psi) too high,
could be reduced by increasing the baffle pitch. Doubling the pitch halves
the shell side velocity, which reduces the pressure drop by a factor of
approximately (1/2)2
272
Ps =
= 68 kPa (10psi), acceptable
4
This will reduce the shell-side heat-transfer coefficient by a factor of
(1/2)0.8(ho Re0.8 us0.8)
ho = 2740 (1/2)0.8 = 1573 W/m2C
This gives an overall coefficient of 615 W/m2C still above assumed value of
600 W/m2C
41
Step 8 (Contd)
Take the thermal conductivity of cupro-nickel alloys from Table 1, 50
W/mC, the fouling coefficients from Table 3; methanol (light organic)
5000 Wm-2C-1, brackish water (sea water), take as highest value, 3000
Wm-2C-1
do
do ln
1
1
1
1 do 1
di do
=
+
+
+
Uo ho hod
2K w
di hid di hi
20
-3
20
10
ln
1
1
1
20
1
20
1
16
=
+
+
+
Uo 2740 5000
2 50
16 3000 16 3812
Uo = 738 W m2 C
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SAUNDERS,
(Longmans).
E.
A.
D.
(1988)
Heat
Exchangers
43
2/1/2009 8:11:44 AM
44
Step 5
Table. 3: Fouling factors (coefficients), typical values
45