Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Electrochimica Acta
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/electacta
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 6 November 2010
Received in revised form 7 February 2011
Accepted 10 February 2011
Available online 17 February 2011
Keywords:
Silane coating
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
Magnesium alloys
a b s t r a c t
The protective performance of the coatings of bis-1,2-(triethoxysilyl) ethane (BTSE) on ZE41 magnesium
alloy with different surface pre-treatments were evaluated using potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in 0.1 M sodium chloride solution. Electrical equivalent circuits
were developed based upon hypothetical corrosion mechanisms and simulated to correspond to the
experimental data. The morphology and cross section of the alloy subjected to different pre-treatments
and coatings were characterized using scanning electron microscope. A specic alkaline pre-treatment
of the substrate prior to the coating has been found to improve the corrosion resistance of the alloy.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Magnesium alloys are the lightest metallic material with excellent physical and mechanical properties [1]. High strength to
weight ratio makes them very attractive to the automobile and
aerospace industries. But the use of magnesium alloys is restricted
due to their poor corrosion resistance. The surface lm formed upon
immersion of magnesium in aqueous solution consists of a noncompact duplex layer comprising of an inner MgO layer next to
the metal and an external porous layer of Mg(OH)2 [2]. The protection offered by this lm is highly dependent on the conditions
of exposure [3]. Moreover, the presence of several anions such as,
chloride, sulphate and nitrate in the aqueous solution hinder the
formation of the surface lm and also disrupts the existing lm,
which in turn accelerate the corrosion rate [3]. The partially protective surface lm, low standard reduction potential, presence
of certain impurities (viz., Fe, Cu, Ni) and microgalvanic coupling
between the secondary phases and the -solid solution, as well as
galvanic coupling with other metals accelerate the corrosion problems of magnesium and its alloys. Thus magnesium alloys undergo
different types of corrosion, such as, general, galvanic, pitting and
granular corrosion [3]. It is believed that desired corrosion resis-
Corresponding author at: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC-3800, Australia. Tel.: +61 3 9905 3671;
fax: +61 3 9905 1825.
E-mail address: raman.singh@eng.monash.edu.au (R.K. Singh Raman).
0013-4686/$ see front matter 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.050
wt%
3791
Mg
Zn
Ce
La
Nd
Pr
Zr
Fe
Cu
Ni
94.4
3.82
0.64
0.27
0.14
0.06
0.69
0.002
0.002
<0.001
2. Experimental
2.1. Test material
3792
-1.1
-1.2
E vs SCE/V
-1.3
-1.4
-1.5
-1.6
-1.7
-1.8
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
Since the structure of the hydroxide lm determines the bonding of silane with the metal as well as the performance of silane
coatings in corrosive media, it became essential to develop a broad
understanding of the hydroxide lm formed on the metal surface
upon different pre-treatments. SEM of the surface and cross section
of the alloy after different pre-treatments provided some useful
information. Fig. 3 shows a thick (average thickness 20 m) and
uniform hydroxide layer on the specimen that was pre-dipped in
hydroxide for 48 h. The surface hydroxide lms formed on the other
two specimens (polarized in hydroxide and held in desiccator for
24 h) were too thin to be observed by SEM. Surface topography
of the polarized specimen (Fig. 4(b)) conrmed that the surface
hydroxide layer was indeed very thin, which allowed imaging of
the intermetallics at the grain boundaries of the underlying alloy
microstructure. The topographic features of the specimen that was
held in desiccator for 24 h were similar to those shown in Fig. 4(b).
However, the very thick hydroxide layer that developed over the
specimen dipped in hydroxide for 48 h (Fig. 3) did not allow observation of the underlying microstructure (Fig. 4(c)).
3000
Z"/ cm
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
As shown in Fig. 5, the silane coated specimens with different pre-treatments have different surface morphologies. Thickness
of the coatings that are developed upon the silane treatments is
expected to be limited to a few hundreds of nanometres [19], which
allows the features underneath the coating to be observed. Therefore, it was possible to observe intermetallic precipitates present at
the surface of the coated specimens without alkaline pre-treatment
(Fig. 5(a)) and, to some degree, even in the case of the alloy with
presumably very thin hydroxide layer as developed upon polarization (Fig. 5(b)). In this context, it is interesting to observe a few
precipitates on the alloy pre-dipped in hydroxide for 48 h and then
BTSE coated (Fig. 5(c)), in spite of the considerably thicker hydroxide layer developed upon this pre-treatment (Figs. 3 and 4(c)).
However, a careful observation of the cross section of the specimen pre-dipped in sodium hydroxide (Fig. 3(a)) would suggest
that though the alloy matrix had reacted with sodium hydroxide
to produce a thick hydroxide layer, the intermetallic particles had
not reacted and were embedded into the hydroxide layer. In fact,
some of these particles extend right up to the surface of the hydroxide layer, which explains the observed particles under the silane
coated specimens (Fig. 5(c)). Examination of the cross section of this
specimen (Fig. 6) conrms the silane coating to be thinner in comparison with the thickness of the hydroxide layer and it is barely
distinguishable.
2500
3000
Z'/ cm
Fig. 2. Nyquist plots of the alloy with different pre-treatments and untreated alloy.
3793
Fig. 3. Back scattered electron (BSE) image of the cross section of the alloy pre-dipped in hydroxide.
may be interesting to note that the Ecorr of the BTSE coated (with
and without alkaline pre-treatment) specimens varied over a wide
range (maximum variation is about 200 mV). However, this kind
of difference in Ecorr between different coated magnesium alloys
has been observed in several other studies [10,2026]. It is quite
plausible to assume that the nature (uniformity and thickness) of
the silane lms formed after different pre-treatments will be dissimilar. In the present study, the observed variation in Ecorr (which
is a measure of the corrosion susceptibility [27]) of the different
BTSE coated specimens, may be attributed to the different corro-
Fig. 4. SEM images of the surface morphology of the alloy: (a) untreated, (b) polarized in hydroxide and (c) dipped in hydroxide for 48 h.
3794
Fig. 5. SEM images of the surface morphology of silane coated alloy: (a) without alkaline pre-treatment, (b) polarized in hydroxide for 600 s and (c) pre-dipped in hydroxide
for 48 h (arrows show the intermetallic particles underneath the coatings).
each EEC. The experimental data sets were compared with the corresponding simulated data sets, in order to arrive at an appropriate
corrosion mechanism for each scenario. It was possible to calculate interfacial resistances and capacitances that can be related to
the homogeneity of the lms and can describe the corrosion mechanisms. The relative magnitudes of these components provide an
estimation of the protection provided by a given coating.
In the present study, complex nonlinear least squares tting
(CNLS) was used to analyse the impedance data. In this method, all
the data are simultaneously tted to a given EEC containing a set of
unknown parameters (for example, circuit elements), which may
enter nonlinearly in the formula for the measured function of frequency and impedance. It also provides uncertainty estimates for
all the estimated parameters in a given EEC. Unlike the other methods (KronigKramers relations, ordinary nonlinear least squares,
etc. [28]) it allows to t a very complicated model with large number of circuit elements. CNLS procedure implies minimization of
the sum of square functions [28],
S=
k
(1)
i=1
3795
Fig. 6. SEM images of the cross section of the pre-dipped in hydroxide and then BTSE coated specimen: (a) secondary electron image, (b) back scattered electron image and
(c) secondary electron image (higher magnication).
ting procedure was chosen to be unity weighted (i.e., wia = wib = 1).
The circuit description code (CDC) used by Boukamp [29], has been
followed in the present study.
For the uncoated alloy, a simple EEC was used to simulate
the data corresponding to a hypothetical corrosion mechanism,
where electrical double layer and naturally formed surface hydroxide lm behave as a set of capacitance and resistance in parallel
(as shown in Fig. 9). Theoretical simulation was conducted using
a Rs (Cf [Rf (Cdl Rc )]) electrical equivalent circuit (Fig. 9), where the
solution resistance is represented by Rs . The surface lm, which is
represented by a parallel combination of a capacitance (Cf ) and the
surface lm resistance (Rf ), is in parallel with the electrical double layer (represented by the parallel combination of the electrical
double layer capacitance (Cdl ) and charge transfer resistance (Rc )).
A comparison with the simulated results based upon other EECs
suggested that Rs (Cf [Rf (Cdl Rc )]) was the closest t to the experimental impedance data for the uncoated alloy with a relatively low
chi square value (2 103 ) as well as a low error (4%) in impedance
measurement. The calculated parameters for the proposed EEC are
shown in Table 2.
The simulated results and the observed Bode impedance plots
for the uncoated ZE41 alloy are shown in Fig. 10. Error plots (Fig. 11)
for the uncoated alloy show that the maximum error in simulated
data is less than 7% for both |Z| and angle. Though the coated specimens were found to conform to a different EEC, the trend of error
plots for all of them was similar to that shown in Fig. 11.
-1.1
Uncoated
BTSE coated (without alkaline pre-treatment)
Dipped in hydroxide and BTSE coated
Polarized in hydroxide and BTSE coated
Only hydroxide pre-treated (dipped)
-1.2
E vs SCE/V
related to the ith data point. feia and feib are the experimentally
-1.3
-1.4
-1.5
-1.6
-1.7
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
3796
6000
Z"/ cm2
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Fig. 11. Error plots for measured and calculated values of uncoated ZE41 alloy.
Z'/ cm
Fig. 8. Nyquist plots of the BTSE coated (with and without alkaline pre-treatment),
hydroxide pre-treated (without any coating) and uncoated ZE41 alloy.
Rs
Surface film
Cf
Electrical
double layer
Rf
Cdl
Rc
Metal
Fig. 9. The electrical equivalent circuit tted to the experimentally obtained
impedance data of the uncoated alloy.
Table 2
Calculated parameters for the components in Rs (Cf [Rf (Cdl Rc )]).
Parameters
Estimated values
Rs / cm2
Cf /F cm2
Rf / cm2
Cdl /F cm2
Rc / cm2
157
1.1 105
364
1.3 105
523
1
5
17
18
11
Rs
Silane film
Qsi Rsi
Electrical
double layer
Cfdl Rc
Metal
Fig. 10. Bode plots for measured and calculated values of uncoated ZE41 alloy.
Fig. 12. The electrical equivalent circuit tted to the experimentally obtained
impedance data of the different BTSE coated specimens.
3797
Fig. 13. Bode plots for measured and calculated values of the different coated specimens: (a) only BTSE coated, (b) pre-dipped in hydroxide and then BTSE coated and (c)
pre-polarized in hydroxide and then BTSE coated.
Table 3
Calculated parameters of the proposed EEC for the coated specimens.
Specication
Rsi / cm2
Rc / cm2
Qsi /F cm2
Value
Error/%
Value
Error/%
Value
3167
4620
4881
1
2
24
899
352
997
12
11
6
1.1 105 3
1.1 105 2
1.3 105 8
Cfdl /F cm2
Error/%
Value
Error/%
Value
0.9
0.9
0.7
1
1
2
2.1 103 12
7.5 104 6
9.7 107 18
Chi squared
value
Total
error/%
8.3 104
7.5 104
2.8 103
3
3
5
Error/%
3798
Acknowledgements
Authors would like to acknowledge DSTO for their nancial support for investigation of silane coating for ZE41 alloy. The kind
assistance of Abhishek Saxena is also gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] G. Abbas, Z. Liu, P. Skeldon, Appl. Surf. Sci. 247 (2005) 347.
[2] M. Liu, S. Zanna, H. Ardelean, I. Frateur, P. Schmutz, G. Song, A. Atrens, P. Marcus,
Corros. Sci. 51 (2009) 1115.
[3] G.L. Markar, J. Kruger, Int. Mater. Rev. 38 (1993) 138.
[4] M.F. Montemor, M.G.S. Ferreira, Electrochim. Acta 52 (2007) 7486.
[5] A.M. Beccaria, L. Chiaruttini, Corros. Sci. 41 (1999) 885.
[6] H. Wang, R. Akid, Corros. Sci. 49 (2007) 4491.
[7] L.M. Palomino, P.H. Suegama, I.V. Aoki, M.F. Montemor, H.G. De Melo, Corros.
Sci. 51 (2009) 1238.
[8] R. Supplit, T. Koch, U. Schubert, Corros. Sci. 49 (2007) 3015.
[9] W.J. van Ooij, D. Zhu, M. Stacy, A. Seth, T. Mugada, J. Gandhi, P. Puomi, Tsinghua
Sci. Technol. 10 (2005) 639.
[10] F. Zucchi, V. Grassi, A. Frignani, G. Trabanelli, Corros. Sci. 46 (2004) 2853.
[11] E.P. Plueddamann, Silane Coupling Agents, Plenum Press, New York, 1991.
[12] A. Franquet, H. Terryn, J. Vereecken, Surf. Interface Anal. 36 (2004) 681.
[13] M. Teo, J. Kim, P.C. Wong, K.C. Wong, K.A.R. Mitchell, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 (2005)
1293.
[14] D. Susac, X. Sun, K.A.R. Mitchell, Appl. Surf. Sci. 207 (2003) 40.
[15] J. Kim, P.C. Wong, K.C. Wong, R.N.S. Sodhi, K.A.R. Mitchell, Appl. Surf. Sci. 253
(2007) 3133.
[16] A.M. Cabral, R.G. Duarte, M.F. Montemor, M.G.S. Ferreira, Prog. Org. Coat. 54
(2005) 322.
[17] G. Baril, N. Pbre, Corros. Sci. 43 (2001) 471.
[18] F. Zucchi, V. Grassi, A. Frignani, C. Monticelli, G. Trabanelli, J. Appl. Electrochem.
36 (2006) 195.
[19] A. Franquet, J. De Laet, T. Schram, H. Terryn, V. Subramanian, W.J. van Ooij, J.
Vereecken, Thin Solid Films 384 (2001) 37.
[20] M.F. Montemor, R. Pinto, M.G.S. Ferreira, Electrochim. Acta 54 (2009) 5179.
[21] J. Liang, P.B. Srinivasan, C. Blawert, W. Dietzel, Corros. Sci. 51 (2009) 2483.
[22] H.H. Elsentriecy, K. Azumi, H. Konno, Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 (2007) 532.
[23] M. Zhao, S. Wu, P. An, J. Luo, Mater. Chem. Phys. 103 (2007) 475.
[24] G.H. Lv, H. Chen, L. Li, E.W. Niu, H. Pang, B. Zou, S.Z. Yang, Curr. Appl. Phys. 9
(2009) 126.
[25] A.N. Khramov, V.N. Balbyshev, L.S. Kasten, R.A. Mantz, Thin Solid Films 514
(2006) 174.
[26] M.B. Kannan, D. Gomes, W. Dietzel, V. Abetz, Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 (2008)
4598.
[27] R.K.S. Raman, S. Murray, M. Brandt, Surf. Eng. 23 (2007) 107.
[28] J.R. Macdonald, Impedance spectroscopy theory, experiment, and applications,
in: E. Barsoukov, J.R. Macdonald (Eds.), Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
Hoboken, NJ, 2005.
[29] B.A. Boukamp, Solid State Ionics 169 (2004) 65.
[30] X. Zhong, Q. Li, J. Hu, S. Zhang, B. Chen, S. Xu, F. Luo, Electrochim. Acta 55 (2010)
2424.
[31] L.E.M. Palomino, P.H. Suegama, I.V. Aoki, Z. Pszti, H.G. de Melo, Electrochim.
Acta 52 (2007) 7496.
[32] B. Conway, Impedance spectroscopy theory, experiment, and applications, in:
E. Barsoukov, J.R. Macdonald (Eds.), Impedance Behavior of Electrochemical
Supercapacitors and Porous Electrodes, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New
Jersey, 2005.
[33] M. Pourbaix, Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions, National
Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, TX, 1974.
[34] G.L. Song, A. Atrens, Adv. Eng. Mater. 1 (1999) 11.
[35] G.L. Makar, J. Kruger, J. Electrochem. Soc. 137 (1990) 414.
[36] G. Song, A. Atrens, W. Xianliang, B. Zhang, Corros. Sci. 40 (1998) 1769.
[37] B. Beverskog, I. Puigdomenech, Corros. Sci. 39 (1997) 107.