Sie sind auf Seite 1von 32

WCDMA Indoor Coverage

The one to one approach


Speakers name
WCDMA Product Management
Ericsson AB, Sweden

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

Commercial in confidence

WCDMA Indoor coverage

How can I re-use my 2G


In-Building Solution?

Do I need to build
more indoor system
for WCDMA than
in GSM?

Should I use a
separate frequency for
indoor systems?

What RBS type


is optimal ?

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

What is the most


cost-efficient solution?

Where are dedicated


indoor solutions
needed?

2005-02-24

What will HSDPA mean


for my indoor coverage?

Commercial in confidence

Indoor coverage - parameters to consider


Distance to site

Building size

Site to site distance

Kind of building

Urban, suburban or
rural environment

Penetration loss
Indoor structure

Traffic profile

Existing in-building solution

Capacity need

Multi-standard

Service requirement

Multi-operator
Accessibility

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

Commercial in confidence

WCDMA tools to address indoor coverage


GSM Handover
High output power options
Adding carriers
HSDPA introduction
Shorter site-to-site distance
Fill-in, street and micro cells
Dedicated in-building system

Drivers for dedicated in-building systems:


- Service grade, e.g. high bit rates
- High capacity demands

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

Business case:
- Revenue potential?
- Cost of solution?

Commercial in confidence

WCDMA vs GSM 900

WCDMA UL

Link budget comparison for voice


Typical Urban 3 km/h

GSM 900 DL

18

WCDMA uplink should be compared


with GSM 900 downlink for co-located
sites.

18

3+0,5
5,9
3,1+0,7
11

125

5+3
6,7
3+2

104

122,3

122,3
15

18,5
41

Noise
rise
margin
Rayleigh
Body
fading
loss
margin
21

Interference
margin
Power
control
margin
Log
Feeder
Frequency
normal
and
fading
jumper
difference
margin
loss
TX
power
RX
Antenna
Max
sensitivity
path
gain
loss
Building
penetration
loss

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

(dB)
2005-02-24

Commercial in confidence

In-building penetration test result


Commercial network with challenging indoor coverage

GSM 900
SS
(dBm)
-85
-90
-95
-100
-105

Signal
Bar
4
3
2
1
0

3G
Voice
Quality
OK
OK
OK
Marginal
Poor

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

RSCP
(dBm)
-95 to -100
-100 to -105
-105 to -110
-110 to -115
-115

2005-02-24

Ec/No
(dB)
-2 to -7
-3 to -10
-5 to -12
-6 to -19
-11 to -22

Signal Bar
3 to 4
2 to 3
1 to 2
1 to 2
1

Voice
Video Quality
Quality
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
Can't set up

Commercial in confidence

Cell borders all over

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

Commercial in confidence

Power is important but dont forget the uplink!


DL 20W wASC

UL w ASC +21

DL 30W wASC

UL w ASC +24

UL+21 no ASC

55
50
45

Simultaneous users

40
35
30
25
20
15
10

Substantial part of the indoor


subscribers are likely to be
somewhere on the DL slope

5
0
122

123

124

125

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

126

127

128

2005-02-24

129
130
131
Path loss (dB)

132

133

134

135

136

Commercial in confidence

Indoor coverage from outside


Simulation approach R99 and HSDPA (5 codes + 16QAM)
What indoor coverage
is expected from
macro outdoor?

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

Parameters:
- Building size
- Floor level
- Site to site distance
- Distance to site
- Load in neighbouring cells

2005-02-24

Building size:
- 8 floors, 120 x 60 m
- 8 floors, 45 x 45 m

Commercial in confidence

Indoor coverage probability from outside


Uplink video call, 21 dBm
Buildings:
120x60 m and 45x45 m

Site to site
distance:
1,5 km
64%

<50%

97%

Site to site
distance:
800 m

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

82%

2005-02-24

10

Commercial in confidence

Indoor coverage probability from outside


R99 and HSDPA (P4)
Site to site: 800 m
Building: 45x45 m

HSDPA

Release 99

99%
95%

Downlink
Pr { >64 kbps }

Pr { >384 kbps }

97%
88%

Uplink
Pr { 64 kbps }

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

Pr { 384 kbps }

11

Commercial in confidence

Indoor coverage probability from outside


HSDPA (5 codes+16QAM)
Site to site: 800m

Pr { DL>1 Mbps/sub }
Low load

Pr { DL>384 kbps/sub }
Low load
99,5%

83%
45x45m

92%

69%
60x120m

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

12

Commercial in confidence

Indoor coverage probability from outside


HSDPA (5 codes+16QAM)
Site to site: 800m

Pr { DL>384 kbps/sub }
High load

Pr { DL>384 kbps/sub }
Low load
99,5%

93%

45x45m

92%
85%
60x120m

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

13

Commercial in confidence

Indoor coverage priority guidelines


1) Deploy WCDMA in a one to one relation with GSM
- indoor coverage mainly provided by the macro/micro layer
- re-use existing GSM in-building solutions
2) Install new sites near target area
3) Install a new dedicated in-building solution
- select RBS based on cost, size and capacity requirements

= 20W/ 30W
= Fill-in cells
= In-buliding solution

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

14

Commercial in confidence

Additional macro cells to improve coverage


Areas with insufficient Coverage

Add 5 Macro Sites

CS 97.4 %
PS 97.2 %

CS 95.3 %
PS 94.7 %

Site to site distance is less than 800 m in 90% of dense urban areas
18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

15

Commercial in confidence

Dedicated In-Building Solutions

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

16

Commercial in confidence

Same building, different need


Low interference from macro network

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

17

Commercial in confidence

Same building, different need


High interference from macro network

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

18

Commercial in confidence

Indoor with one cell solution re-use frequency


- Strive to create dominant pilot coverage for the indoor cell
- Re-use 2G DAS with one to one relation, if feasible

UMTS f1
GSM-Preferred

UMTS f1
GSM-Preferred
GSM

UMTS f1
GSM-Preferred

GSM

GSM
GSM

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

19

Commercial in confidence

Indoor with two cell solution re-use frequency


- Some buildings need more sectors to create pilot dominance
- Some 2G DAS are designed so WCDMA sectorisation is needed

UMTS f1, cell 2


GSM-Preferred

UMTS f1
GSM-Preferred

UMTS f1
GSM-Preferred

GSM

UMTS f1, cell 1


GSM-Preferred

GSM

GSM
GSM

entrance cell
18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

20

Commercial in confidence

Indoor with two cell solution separate frequency


- Strive to create dominant pilot coverage for the indoor f1 cell
- Re-use 2G DAS with one to one relation, if feasible
- Design In-building system as it will be operating on the macro frequency

x
UMTS f2
IF-Preferred

UMTS f1
GSM-Preferred

UMTS f1
GSM-Preferred

GSM

UMTS f1
IF-Preferred

GSM

GSM
GSM

entrance cell
18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

21

Commercial in confidence

Operator Cost Analysis


Indoor solutions

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

22

Commercial in confidence

Indoor solutions analysed for two large buildings


2-way splitter
60m
2-way splitter

55m
10F
6

7dB coupler80m
30m

9F

2-way splitter

7dB coupler

8F

7dB coupler

7F

6F

10dB coupler
6

5F

10dB coupler

4F

10dB coupler

Macro 20 / 30W

Main-Remote
3W / 10W

3F

15dB coupler

Micro 5 / 20W

2F

15dB coupler
6

1F

15dB coupler

Passive DAS

RBS

Pico RBS
250 mW
RF-repeater
300 mW

Stand-alone and
with DAS

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

RBS+
Optical repeaters
100 mW / 3W
10W

2005-02-24

Optical hybrid
DAS

23

Commercial in confidence

DAS vs. low power RBS and single antenna


Distributed Antenna System
+ A multi-cast one cell solution for coverage
+ One sector provides trunking gain in channel elements and
transmission
+ Prepared for Multi OpCo in-building system
Low power RBS and single antenna
-

Many cells required for coverage


More complex mobility handling
High RBS investment cost
Many active components affecting MTBF & OPEX
Over deliver capacity due to small coverage area per RBS

Optimize quality versus cost


18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

24

Commercial in confidence

CAPEX
Example 1: Coverage 384 kbps, low macro NW interference

Transmission & Power


Site material & preparation
RNC SW
RNC HW
RBS & repeater (incl. inst.)
DAS

100%

ro

M
ic

M
ac
ro

20
W

(1
20 s)
W
M
M
(1
ai
i
c
ns)
ro
re
5W
m
ot
M
(1
e
ai
s)
10
nr
W
em
O
(1
pt
o
.r
s
te
ep
3W )
ea
O
(1
te
pt
r
.r
O
1 0 s)
pt
ep
W
.r
e
(1
a
ep
s)
ea ter
3
te
Pi
r1 W(
co
1s
00
)
25
m
Pi
W
0m
co
(1
W
25
0m s )
st
an
d- W (
al
on 3s)
e
(2
0s
)

50%

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

25

Pico stand-alone CAPEX


2.5 times higher
than other solutions

Commercial in confidence

CAPEX
Example 2: Coverage 384 kbps, high macro NW interference

RXI (incl inst. & site cost)


Transmission & Power
Site material & prep.
RNC SW

100%

Low power
solutions
not viable

RNC HW
RBS & repeater (incl. inst.)
DAS

M
M
ic
ai
ro
n5W
re
m
ot
M
e
ai
10
nW
re
O
m
pt
ot
.r
e
ep
3W
ea
O
te
pt
r1
.r
O
0W
ep
pt
e
.r
at
ep
er
ea
3W
R
te
F
r1
re
00
pe
m
at
W
er
3
Pi
00
co
m
25 Pic
W
0m o 2
50
W
m
st
W
an
dal
on
e

20
W
ro

M
ic

M
ac
ro

20
W

50%

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

26

Pico stand-alone CAPEX


5 times higher
than other solutions

Commercial in confidence

2-way splitter

Re-use of 2G IBS?

60m
55m

2-way splitter

10F

7dB coupler

80m

In general some difficulties to reuse 2G IBS for 3G

30m

2-way splitter

Higher loss in DAS, (cables)


Worse link budget indoor,
compared to GSM900

7dB coupler

9F

8F

Many existing IBS can still be reused for WCDMA.

7F

7dB coupler

6F

10dB coupler

Omni antenna

Keep cell structure for GSM but


split cell for 3G

RRU

5F

10dB coupler
1/2" Cable

4F

2-way splitter

10dB coupler

Coupler
6

Lower cable/splitting loss for


WCDMA, 2-split up to ~6dB gain

15dB coupler
Jumper Cable
6

2F

15dB coupler

Diplexer

2005-02-24

1F

15dB coupler

Also enable use of 2nd carrier for


upper part of building
18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

3F

2G RBS
RRU

27

Commercial in confidence

Indoor solutions analysis results


Best for coverage and capacity
for more than one cell

Macro 20 / 30W

Main-Remote
3W / 10W

Pico RBS
250 mW
RF-repeater
300 mW

Stand-alone and
with DAS

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

Micro 5 / 20W

High Power Micro


Best for coverage of one cell

RBS+
Optical repeaters
100 mW / 3W
10W

2005-02-24

28

Commercial in confidence

Ericsson small size RBS solutions


Flexible coverage & capacity
Macro fill-in, street cell
Power options (3-20W)
Scalable capacity (1-6 sectors)
Well suited for challenging sites
Enables fast roll out
Design is optimized for street cell
and fill in coverage

3W, 10W
Main-Remote
RBS 3402
3x1 3x2 6x1

In-building
3W in Pico RBS size (AC power supply)
Enables optimized site location
Power flexibility for frequency reuse
Cost savings due to trunking of channel
elements and transmission
20W in Micro RBS size
RRU 3W and 10W mix is possible

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

29

5W, 20W
Micro
RBS 3303
1x1

Commercial in confidence

RRU

RRU

optical fiber

RBS3412
Main unit
RRU

Main Remote RBS


The optimal indoor
product
18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

30

Commercial in confidence

Conclusions

WCDMA as good indoor coverage as GSM 900 if co-sited

A one to one relation of 3G on 2G sites, for outdoor and indoor, is


the recommended approach

Indoor coverage from outside first alternative

Main Remote and High Power micro RBS are excellent


products for indoor coverage small, high power, multisector

18/22109-FGB 101 135 Uen Rev B

2005-02-24

31

Commercial in confidence

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen