Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PEDRO
P.
ISICAN,
CARMELING P. CRISOLOGO,
SPOUSES JULIO F. PARAYNO
III and RACHEL ANN A.
PARAYNO,
and
the
REGISTRAR OF DEEDS OF
BAGUIO CITY,
Defendants.
x----------------------------------------x
COMPLAINT
PLAINTIFF REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, by counsel,
respectfully states:
1.
Plaintiff is a sovereign entity to whom all lands of
the public domain belong. It may be served with judicial
processes through the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) at
134 Amorsolo Street, Legaspi Village, Makati City.
2.
Defendant Pedro P. Isican is of legal age, with
capacity to be sued, and is a resident of 140 Crystal Cave,
Baguio City where he may be served with summons and other
judicial processes.
3.
Defendant Carmeling P. Crisologo is of legal age,
widow, with capacity to be sued, and is a resident of Vigan,
Ilocos Sur, where she may be served with summons and other
judicial processes.
4.
Defendant spouses Julio F. Parayno III and Rachel
Ann A. Parayno are both of legal age, with capacity to be sued,
and residents of No. 94 Bayaoas, Urdaneta City where they
may be served with summons and other judicial processes.
5.
Defendant Registrar of Deeds of Baguio City is
impleaded as a nominal party, being the officer tasked with
the duty of registering decrees and issuing the corresponding
certificates of title over lands in Baguio City. He may be
served with summons and other judicial processes at his
office in Baguio City Hall, Baguio City.
6.
On May 21, 1965, Kosen Piraso, Samay Piraso,
Cotileng Piraso and Martina Piraso filed a petition for the
reopening of Civil Reservation Case No. 1, LRC Rec. No. 211 of
the Court of the First Instance of Baguio City, praying for the
issuance in their favor title over a parcel of land designated as
LRC-SWO-6132 (Lots 140 and 141, Baguio Cadastre),
consisting of Two Hundred Ninety Thousand Two Hundred
Eighty-Three (290,283) square meters, more or less, situated
in Baguio City.1
7.
Daisy Pacnos filed an opposition to the aforesaid
petition and prayed that she be allowed to introduce evidence
to prove her alleged right to registration of a portion of the
subject land, consisting an area of Twenty-Eight Thousand
Two Hundred Fifteen Point Fifty-Two (28,215.52) square
meters.2
8.
On January 26, 1967, the First Assistant City Fiscal
of Baguio City, on behalf of all government agencies, filed a
motion to dismiss the main petition and other related
petitions.3
9.
In its Order dated July 13, 1967, the trial court
1 Republic of the Philippines vs. Marcos, et al., 29 SCRA 517 (1969); A copy of which is hereto attached
as Annex A.
2 ibid.
3 ibid.
ibid.
ibid.
A copy of the said OCT is hereto attached as Annex B.
supra.
ibid.
ibid.
TCT Nos. T-97888,13 T-97890,14 and T9789115 under the name of Mr. Pedro P. Isican
(3)
That I caused
complaint;
the
preparation
of
the
foregoing
2.
3.
4.
5.
CLARENCE L. BAGUILAT
Affiant
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ______ of
_____________________ 2011 at Makati City.
EXPLANATION
(Pursuant to Section 11, Rule 13 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure)