Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
duty to take care is the duty to avoid doing or omitting to do anything, the doing or
omitting to do which may have as its reasonable and probable consequence injury to others and
the duty is owed to those to whom injury may reasonably and probably be anticipated if the duty
is not observed
duty of government can sue the government may owe a duty (e.g. highway)
MGT 393 HANDOUT TORT LAW
if the negligence does no damage no action lies; actual damage must be proved
not sufficient to prove merely an accident and negligent act of defendant -- must prove that
accident was due to the negligent act
mental and nervous shock is nothing more than a particular type of damage;
consider thin skull (egg shell) rule
to constitute a cause of action the breach must be the cause of the damage; but for
judges have said: efficient and effective cause; direct cause; immediate cause; proximate
cause;
consider also remoteness of damages reasonably foreseeable one which
would occur to the mind of a real man in the position of the defendant; CONSIDER
Mustapha case (fly in bottled water) court found that mental illness was not a
reasonably foreseeable type of damage in the circumstances; average person would not
suffer a mental disorder given these facts
12
The remoteness inquiry asks whether "the harm [is] too unrelated to the wrongful conduct to hold the
defendant fairly liable" (Linden and Feldthusen, at p. 360). Since The Wagon Mound (No. 1), the principle
has been that "it is the foresight of the reasonable man which alone can determine responsibility" (Overseas
Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co., [1961] A.C. 388 (P.C.), at p. 424).
Mustapha failed to show that it was foreseeable that a person of ordinary fortitude would suffer serious injury
from seeing the flies in the bottle of water he was about to install. Unusual or extreme reactions to events
caused by negligence are imaginable but not reasonably foreseeable.
DEFENSES:
VOLENTI NON FIT INJURE (aka Voluntary assumption of risk)
no act is actionable by a person who has expressly or impliedly assented to it; idea in law that
a man cannot enforce a right which he has voluntarily waived (essentially the plaintiff has
voluntarily put him/her self in danger and thus assumed the legal as well as physical risk
this is typically a complete bar to recovery.
CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE
contributory negligence is set up as a defense
must prove to judge/jury that the injured party did not in his own interest take reasonable care
of himself, and contributed, by that want of care, to his own injury; court apportions the
damages.
WHERE A PERSON WHO FOR HIS OWN PURPOSES BRINGS ON HIS LAND AND
COLLECTS AND KEEPS THERE ANYTHING LIKELY TO DO MISCHIEF IF IT ESCAPES,
HE MUST KEEP IT AT HIS PERIL AND IS ANSWERABLE FOR ALL THE DAMAGES
SHOULD IT ESCAPE
TO SUMMARIZE PRINCIPLE IN RYLANDS V. FLETCHER
A) MUST BE ESCAPE
B) NON NATURAL USE OF LAND