Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
STATES CELL
Room No. 542B, Udyog Bhavan, D/o Commerce, New Delhi
Tel: (011)-23062261 EPABX: 534; Email: moc_states@nic.in
Fax: (011)-23063418, 23062335; Website: www.commerce.nic.in
Page 1 of 49
Introduction
1.1 Exports h ave com e t o be regar ded as an en gine o f econ omic gr owth i n t he wake o f
liberalization an d s tructural ref orms i n t he econ omy. The gl obal econ omic s cenario
continues t o be bleak w ith India w itnessing s lowdown i n e xports w ith ou r t raditional
partners. Under the circumstances, we need to set in motion strategies and policy measures
which catalyze growth of exports in several different sectors as well as in newer markets.
1.2
In view of ou r re markable ac hievements i n t he f oreign t rade d uring 2004-09, t he
Foreign Trade P olicy 2009-14 h as envisaged two milestones: F irst, to d ouble I ndias
exports of G oods an d S ervices by 2014 by a chieving an an nual export growth of 15%
with an a nnual e xport target of U S$200 b illion b y M arch, 2011 an d ac hieving t he high
export growth path of around 25% per annum in the remaining three years i .e. upto 2014
and Secondly, to double Indias share in global trade by 2020.
Several s tudies were made t hereafter in th is c ontext namely Mid-Term A ppraisal o f
performance u nder A SIDE S cheme, Strategy f or d oubling E xports i n n ext t hree
years(2011-12 t o 201 3-14): D epartment of C ommerce, Government of I ndia, Indias
Infrastructure n eeds b y 2014 & 2020: I n vi ew of Foreign T rade T argets, Sector S pecific
Study conducted by Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI),
June 2011 etc. In the light of above studies and then findings, ASIDE guidelines have been
accordingly realigned.
While t he res ponsibility for p romotion of exp orts an d creat ing the n ecessary
1.3
specialized i nfrastructure has l argely been undertaken by the respective Ministries /
Departments of t he Central G overnment, the role of the S tate G overnments / U T
Administrations is cri tical f rom t he p oint of view of boosting production of e xportable
surplus, leveraging available and emerging opportunities in the global market. Herein the
State Governments / UT Administrations may provide the infrastructural facilities such
as l and, p ower, w ater, r oads connectivity, p ollution c ontrol m easures an d a c onducive
regulatory environment f or p roduction o f go ods an d services. It i s, therefore, felt t hat
coordinated efforts by the Central Government in cooperation with the State Governments
/ U T A dministrations are n ecessary f or d evelopment of i nfrastructure f or exp ort
promotion. The proposed infrastructure w ill cover 1st mile ( at the point of production)
and last mile (the point of evacuation ) sector specific infrastructure requirement w hich
are not reflected either in the State Plan or the other Central Government Agencies.
Page 2 of 49
2. Objective
The ob jective of t he s cheme i s to involve S tates / U Ts i n e xport e ffort b y providing
assistance to the S tate G overnments / U T A dministrations f or c reating ap propriate
infrastructure f or development an d growth of exp orts. Such involvement will be based on
the projectised approach and projects are to be prioritized by States / UTs to address the
critical lin k both at t he poi nt of production and t he poi nt of e vacuation i n t he i ndustrial
cluster, largely within the contour of the first mile and the last mile consideration.
Page 3 of 49
3.
Scheme
The scheme shall provide an outlay for development of export infrastructure which will be
distributed to the States / UTs according to a pre-defined criteria.
AS A FOOTNOTE
The E xport P romotion I ndustrial P ark (EPIP), Export P rocessing Zone (EPZ), Critical
Infrastructure Balancing (CIB) and E xport Development Fund (EDF) f or the North East
and Sikkim (implemented since 2000-2001) schemes have been merged with the new scheme
since 2002-03. After the merger of the schemes in respect of EPIP, EPZ, CIB and EDF for
NER and Sikkim with the new scheme, the ongoing projects under the schemes is funded
by States / UTs from the resources provided under the new scheme.
Page 4 of 49
The activities aimed at development of infrastructure for exports can be funded from
the scheme provided such activities have an overwhelming export content and their linkage
with exports is fully established.
4.2
The s cheme s hall b e exc lusively used for crea ting infrastructure w hich d oes not ge t
Page 5 of 49
5.
Allocation of funds
5.1
Page 6 of 49
Weightage
S tate / U T ou t of t otal
merchandise export
Population of State / UT (based on Census 2011)
Total
75%
25%
100%
Allocation to States / UTs may take into account the size of the State / UT
ii.
A certain minimum allocation must be made to each State/UT which should not be
less than the allocation of the preceding year.
iii.
There should be a cap on the maximum funds allocated to any State/UT a cap of
10% of the total funds available under the Scheme may be imposed.
iv.
v.
The allocations will be based on the data of exports of goods alone and the export of
services will not be taken into account.
Page 7 of 49
6.2
A minimum of 10% of the Scheme outlay will be reserved for expenditure in the NER
and Sikkim. The funding of Export Development Fund(EDF) for NER and Sikkim i.e. EDFNER will be made out of this earmarked outlay and the balance amount will be distributed
inter-se among the NER States including Sikkim on the basis of the criteria as laid down in
para 6.1 above.
6.3 The export performance and growth of exports from the State / UT will be assessed on
the basis of the information available from the office of the Director General of Commercial
Intelligence & Statistics (DGCIS). The office of the DGCIS will compile the State-wise data
of e xports f rom t he S hipping Bills s ubmitted by the e xporter. The Shi pping B ill form
provides a column i n w hich t he exp orter w ill en ter t he n ame of t he State/UT f rom w here
the export goods have originated. Filling up of this column is mandatory with effect from
15.6.2001 under the FT(D&R) Act. Each State/UT Government would periodically interact
with the exporters to guide and motivate them to make proper entries in the Shipping Bills
so that State of Origin of the exported goods are entered correctly. The States may set up
appropriate m echanisms a t t he f ield l evel i n c ooperation w ith t he t rade an d i ndustry
associations to disseminate this information amongst exporters.
Page 8 of 49
7.
7.1
Release of Funds
The rel ease of t he f unds t o the States / UT s shall b e s ubject to the l imit of th e
entitlement worked out on the basis of the laid down criteria. On receipt of the pre-receipt
bill from the N odal A gency nominated by the St ate Government / U T A dministration,
funds will be directly disbursed to it. Format of the bill is given at ANNEXURE III. The
funds will be kept in a separate head in the accounts of the Agencies. The unutilized funds
with States / UTs as on date, if any, out of the funds released in the preceding year(s) will
be c ounted while rel easing funds for t he current year but t he s ubmission of Utilization
Certificate(UC) will become binding only after lapse of the period prescribed as per GFR
provisions in this regard.
7.2 50 % of al location s hall b e r eleased i n the f irst q uarter of f inancial ye ar. B alance
amount shall be released based on utilization of funds and adherence of the State / UT to
guidelines o f t he s cheme. States w ould be ad vised t o take u p p rojects f or utilizing full
amount in the beginning of the year. They would also be advised to identify such projects in
advance.
Page 9 of 49
8.1.3
ensure t hat t he pr oposals are location s pecific and the selection of location an d i nter-se
prioritising of p rojects. For this, SLEPC w ill d raw a list of projects to b e f ocused f or
developing export infrastructure over next 2-3 years. The list of projects may be drawn in
consultation w ith E xport Promotion C ouncils ( EPCs) an d other e xport pr omotion bod ies.
On approval of the proposals by the SLEPC, funds shall be disbursed to the implementing
agency of the project by the Nodal Agency. State Governments are advised to put in place a
system for disbursement of funds by Nodal Agency to Implementing Agency of the project.
8.1.4
As f ar as p ossible the S tates are en couraged t o leverage t he funds rel eased b y the
DoC with other schemes and projects of the State Govt. Private Sector could be involved in
the infrastructure projects as per the guidelines given at Annexure V.
8.1.5
Before s anctioning new p rojects, the S LEPC w ill al locate funds f or t he l ikely
as per
Page 11 of 49
8.3
Page 12 of 49
9.
9.1 L and f ree f rom all en cumbrances i s p rerequisite f or con sideration of p rojects f or
assistance under ASIDE.
9.2
The proposals must show a direct linkage with the exports. The proposed investments
Page 13 of 49
10.
Eligible Agencies
10.1
Under the scheme, funds for the approved projects may be sanctioned to: -
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Apex Trade bodies recognized under the EXIM policy of Government of India and
other apex bodies recognized for this purpose by the Empowered Committee set up
under para 8.
v.
Page 14 of 49
11.
Administrative expenses
11.1
All administrative expenses connected with the implementation of the scheme will be
met by the concerned State Governments from out of their own budget and no part of the
scheme funds shall be used to meet such expenditure.
Page 15 of 49
12.
12.1 The project proposal should be exhaustive and precise. All aspects related to projects
should be supported by data, surveys and projections for future etc.
12.2 The project proposal should be accompanied by an executive summary, which should
contain the following facts:i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
viii.
ix.
x.
12.3 The estimated t otal p roject w orks cost to b e taken f or consideration f or as sistance
under A SIDE Sc heme should be ve tted ( both t echnical an d f inancial as pects) by the
competent au thority either of the State Governments/ UT Administration or Local Bodies
like municipalities et c or ot her s tatutory bodies et c on t he b asis of p revailing Schedule o f
Rates (S OR) i n th e S tate / U T concerned at t hat p oint of ti me of C ompetent A uthority of
Central Public Wor ks D epartment ( CPWD) as p er D elhi S chedule of R ates ( DSR). The
total e stimated p roject w orks c ost s hould c over u pto m aximum of 15% ot her c harges
including E TP ( Establishment, T ools an d P lant) c harges, e scalation, c ontingencies, D SR
adjustment etc over Net Cost of the project works cost subject to actual expenses.
12.4 The proposal, after technical / financial vetting must be duly recommended by the
Principal Secretary / Secretary Industries of the State Government / UT Administration to
SLEPC. In case of projects under the Central Component, the Head of the organization has
to clearly recommend the project to the Department of Commerce (DoC), New Delhi.
12.5 The assistance covered under ASIDE is only for capital infrastructure.
12.6 Details on each of the parameters indicated above should be included in the detailed
project r eport. T he r eport s hould al so c ontain, i nter al ia, d etailed cost b enefit an alysis,
details of cost of each components of the project, benefits accruing from the projects in both
qualitative and quantitative terms, for growth and exports.
Page 16 of 49
and will take steps to ensure achievements of the objectives of the Scheme.
13.3
Page 17 of 49
14.
14.1
Evaluation
There may be an Annual appraisal of all ongoing projects at the end of the year by
an independent agency.
14.2 T here may b e a mid-term eval uation o f t he s cheme a t t he en d of t hree ye ars. It i s
expected that, after i mplementation of t his s cheme, S tates / U Ts w ill b enefit f rom the
cumulative i mpact of i mproved i nfrastructure f or e xports an d t he i mpact of i ncreased
exports in their economy on employment and overall prosperity. The evaluation would also
be the basis for carrying out mid-term corrections in the scheme, if any.
Annexure-I
Page 18 of 49
ii.
The Effluent discharged from the CETP should be as per the State Pollution Board's
norms as given by the concerned State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) and should
have the consent of the State Pollution Control Board.
iii.
ANNEXURE II
Page 19 of 49
FUND
1.1 Contribution to EDF may be provided by the Ministry of Commerce & Industry
from any other budgetary and non-budgetary sources as identified by the Government.
1.2 It w ill b e m anaged b y the A gricultural & P rocessed Food Products E xport
Development A uthority (APEDA) u nder t he i nstructions of t he D epartment of
Commerce.
2.
OBJECTIVE
2.1 The ob jective of t he F und i s t o assist s pecific ac tivities f or p romotion of exp orts
from t he N orth-Eastern Region (NER) of the country including Sikkim. All activities,
which have a linkage with the exports from the region and are designed to help exports,
shall be eligible for assistance from the fund.
3.
SCOPE
3.1
ELIGIBLE AGENCIES
Page 20 of 49
(i)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
7.1 Four copies of the project proposal will be submitted by the applicant to the Export
Commissioner(ExC) of res pective S tate i n s implified s creening format ( Annex-B).
It is mandatory that all the proposals be routed through the Export Commissioners
of t he res pective S tates an d on ly after t heir recommendations on t he p roposals t o
APEDA clearly specifying the n eed an d con text f or E DF f inancing, would further
action be initiated by APEDA.
7.2 The p roposal s hould be exh austive. All as pects rel ated t o projects s hould be
supported by data, surveys, etc.
Page 22 of 49
Page 23 of 49
Page 25 of 49
Annex. A
FORMAT FOR MONITORING OF THE PROJECTS
1.1 Project Name
1.2 Project Location
1.3 Entrepreneur : Name & Address
1.4 Contact Details
Tel
Fax
Mobile
Email
2.1 Monitoring Agency Details
2.2 Date of Monitoring visit
2.3 Monitoring Officer who visited site
2.4 Work commencement Date
2.5 Projected project completion :
& Date
3.1 Total project Cost
Rs
lakhs
3.2 EC Approval Date
3.3 EC Approved Amount
Rs
lakhs
3.4 Sources of finance
(i) Term Loan: Rs
lakhs
(ii) Promoter Contribution: Rs
3.5 Date of release of term loan
3.6 Term loan released amount
4.1 Details of physical work in progress
(i) Civil Work:
lakhs
Page 26 of 49
Annex. A
(i)
Description
(ii)
Projected
(iii)
Actual
the
Signature .................................................................................
Name ........................................................................................
Designation ..............................................................................
Stamp (seal) ..............................................................................
Page 27 of 49
Annexure B
Revised screening format
1.
1.1
Project Period:
1.2
2.
Inputs
2.1
Land requirement
2.2
Land area
Survey No. /
( in acres )
Property Description
Ownership
Other Inputs
Sl. No.
Item
2.2.1
Raw material
(in value Rs. lacs / yr)
2.2.2
Machinery
and
Equipment
(in value Rs. Lacs)
2.2.3
Skilled / T
echnical
manpower requirement
(in no. of persons)
Description
Local
Out of State
Sourcing
Sourcing
Page 28 of 49
Annexure B
3.
3.1.
Output Description
3.2
Target Market
3.3
4. Funding
4.1.
4.2
Funding sources
S.No.
Financial institution
1.
Banking / F
Institutions
2.
3.
4.
Self financing
Amount
Percentage
Remarks
inancial
Total
5.
Proposed f
unding
under EDF
Grand Total
* In case of FIs / PSU please indicate the agency name and address in remarks
column.
Page 29 of 49
Annexure B
5.
5.1
Project cost
5.1.1
Total cost:
5.1.2
5.1.3
Subsidy sought:
5.1.4
Lacs)
Loan component
Self financed Component__________________
Total
___________________
5.2
Returns expected
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.3
5.3.1
5.3.2
5.4
Viability Gap
5.4.1
5.4.2
Page 30 of 49
Annexure B
An Illustration to calculate Viability Gap :
5.1
Project cost
5.1.1
Total cost
Rs. 10 lacs
5.1.2
Rs. 5 lacs
5.1.3
Subsidy funding
Rs. 3 lacs
5.1.4
Rs. 7 lacs
5.2
Returns expected
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.3
5.3.1
5.3.2
5.4.1
5.4.2
Rs. 2 lacs
Rs. 1 lac
20%
------------
Page 31 of 49
Annexure C
Standard Operating Procedure
SOP Chart
Sl.
No.
Description
1.
Techno
Economic
Feasibility
2.
3.
EDF funding
Quantum
Maximum 30%
from EDF s ubject
to a subsidy ceiling
of 70% f rom al l
sources an d E DF
put together.
Physical
verification
FI (
periodical
reports to
APEDA) u
pto
repayment of l oan
by promoters.
Financial
Institution (FI)
By concerned FI
*In case, the project is implemented by a Central / State PSU, ceiling for EDF subsidy can
be upto 50%.
-----------
Page 32 of 49
Annexure-III
GAR 34
{See rule 147, 150 and 159(1)}
GRANTINAID BILL
Bill no. _______________
Head of Account _______________
Received a s um of Rs.__________ {Rupees ______________} being the grant in aid for the
period _________________ s anctioned b y t he Department of C ommerce i n i ts l etter n o.
_________ dated ________ (copy enclosed).
Dated: ___________
Signature
Designation
Countersigned for Rs. ________________
Dated: ___________
Signature
Designation of Drawing Officer
For use in Pay and Account Office
Passed for Rs.__________ {Rupees _____________________________}
Payment by ___________________
Cheque No. ___________________
Date
Pay and Accounts Officer
(LETTER HEAD)
TO WHOM SO IT MAY CONCERN
This i s t o certify ( Name of t he N odal A gency) i s n ot i nvolved i n any k ind of c orrupt
practices.
Signature
(Head of the Nodal Agency)
Page 33 of 49
AnnexureIV
Sl.
Development
States/UTs
No. Commissioner
1.
DC, Cochin
2.
DC, Falta
3.
DC, Noida
Delhi, U ttar
DC,
Vishakhapatnam
5.
DC, Kandla
Gujarat
6.
DC, Chennai
7.
DC, SEEPZ
Page 34 of 49
Annexure V
Private Sector participation in projects to be taken up under ASIDE
a. To leverage f unds un der A SIDE, these f unds c ould be us ed f or i nviting private
sector par ticipation
infrastructure projects. For this purpose, the State Government can choose IDFC or
ILFS as a p roject d evelopment age ncy o r an y ot her age ncy as n otified b y G ovt of
India.
b. The s elected A gency would work with t he N odal A gency/Implementing Agency of
the State government and shall prepare necessary documentation for inviting offers
for the private sector participation.
c. The f unds u nder A SIDE c ould a lso be used f or incurring cost t owards project
development. Since such costs are loaded to the final cost of the project, this amount
would be t reated as an ad vance t o the pr oject an d w ould be ad justed t owards t he
final payment to be made. In case it is found at the end of the selection process that
the project does not require any support, the money spent on project development
would be treated as support to the project.
d. The projects for private sector participation could be taken by way of front loading
of c apital gr ant or t o provide an nuity p ayment or an y ot her m ode which m ay b e
agreed b y the S tate Government. However, commitment u nder A SIDE s hould b e
made keeping in view the likely allocation under the 12th Plan only.
e. Project op erator cou ld b e a
Page 35 of 49
f.
From the year 2003-04, it would be mandatory that States would spend at least 50%
of their allocation on implementing such projects. States utilising full allocation on
such projects would be given additional allocation subject to a maximum of ten per
cent of the allocation of the State.
-----------
Page 36 of 49
Annexure-VI
FORMAT-I
ASIDE
Report for the quarter ending on __________________________________
from the Government of _________________________________________
Amount i
Lakhs
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
FORMAT-II
ASIDE
Report for the Quarter ending on from the
Govt of__________
Name of
Sl.
the
No.
Project
Year of
Approval
Cost
approved f or
Through
Amount s pent
funding
Pvt. S ector
upto
last
(in l
akhs)
(Yes/No)
financial year
ASIDE S G
Pvt. Sector
Amount s pent
during
the
present f inancial
year
Upto the quarter
Page 37 of 49
Annexure-VII
FORMS
Form GFR 19A
{See Government of Indias Decision (1) below Rule 150}
"Form of Utilisation Certificate"
Sl. No
Amount
Total ____________
1. Certified t hat of R s. _________ of
Page 38 of 49
Annexure VIII
Sub: Evaluation of the projects sanctioned under ASIDE Scheme
1. It has be en de cided t o get the pr ojects unde r A SIDE vi sited by field f ormations of
Department of Commerce, with the following objectives:
a. To evaluate progress in the implementation of the project;
b. To assess the impact of the project on exports ;
c. To make reco mmendation t o State G overnment f or effective i mplementation o f
scheme ( e.g. selection of p rojects, review m echanism, fund flow m echanism,
integration with State Government scheme etc.)
d. To identify issues r equiring changes in P olicy for i ts s peedier an d ef fective
implementation;
2. The nom inated of ficer w ould vi sit e ach of t he pr ojects on w hich f unds have be en
spent under the Scheme during last f inancial year. Date of the visit would be f ixed by
him/her in consultation with the Nodal Department of the State Government. The list of
such project alongwith other details shall be provided by DoC. The inspection report for
each project would be prepared in the format given at Appendix-I
3. After inspection of all projects of the State, consolidated report would be prepared
for the State. The Report should contain:a. Broad ob servations on t he f our p oints ( a) t o ( d) ab ove an d gi ve an ov erall
assessment of the implementation of the Scheme in the State.
b. Utilisation of funds under the Scheme as per Appendix-II.
c. Implementation Report of each project on Appendix-I (as attachments to report)
4. A copy of the same would be sent by e-mail to Department of Commerce, to the State
Government and the Nodal Agency of the State. The State Government should place the
inspection r eport b efore t he SL EPC i n i ts ne xt meeting held af ter t he s ubmission of
report f or t aking appropriate d ecisions an d i ssuing appropriate d irections t o the
concerned agencies, if so required.
5. During t he ne xt vi sit, c ompliance of t he observations s o m ade b y t he I nspecting
Officer in earlier visit should also be assessed.
6. The names of the officers responsible for each of the State are given at Appendix-III.
------------Page 39 of 49
Annexure IX
1.
2.1
2.2
Under t his S cheme f unding w ill b e project specific, rather t han b lock
funding (as existing for ASIDE State component at present).
3.1
3.2
4.1
Implementation of A SIDE dur ing the pas t 9 years has al so brought i nto
focus following needs:a) Quality of output needs to be emphasized, and
b) A s ystem must b e i nstitutionalized wherein s uch s ituation m ust be
avoided t o recur, wherein S tate G overnments i mplement i n
Page 40 of 49
5.1 P rojects to be sanctioned must be visible and tangible and must fall within
the current guidelines of ASIDE Scheme.
5.2
The bas ic t hrust i s t o bring up big projects under t his i ncentive s cheme,
having p erceptible vi sibility an d t angible i mpact on e xport f ront, with
active participation of concerned State Govt. / UT Admn. on foreign trade
related i nfrastructure d evelopment. It m ay be m entioned h ere t hat s uch
projects may take ab out 2 t o 3 ye ars f or c omplete i mplementation an d
commissioning.
6.
6.1
Normally each project size should be of the order of Rs. 30 cr. ap p. This
can be for more than one project also. Project would be implemented with
funding on m atching basis ( 1:1) b y D oC an d concerned S tate Govt. / U T
Admn. However, for the current fiscal, the floor limit would be minimum
Rs. 20 cr.
To i llustrate f or f inancial ye ar 2011 -12, project s ize s hould be m inimum
Rs. 30 c r. of this maximum 50% can be given by the Govt. of India GoI(DoC) under this incentive scheme.
In cas e of p rojects, implemented u nder Public P rivate Participation
(PPP) mode, w henever vi ability gap f unding i s s anctioned, the C entral
(DoC) and State Government contribution would also be on 1:1 basis.
6.2
For the cu rrent f iscal eac h el igible S tate m ay be gi ven w ithin a ceiling of
Rs. 20 c r. b y DoC. T hat i s Government Contribution w ould b e Rs. 40 cr.
(with Rs.20 cr. minimum from State Govt. exchequer).
Page 41 of 49
7.
7.1
7.2
Of the project cost, maximum 80% can be given by DoC under this scheme.
Balance 20% would be contributed by concerned State Govt. in NER. That is
the funding would be on matching (4:1) basis.
For current fiscal, however, matching contribution would be on matching
(9:1) basis. That is concerned NER State Govt. must contribute only 10%
of project cost.
--------------------
Page 42 of 49
Appendix-I
Proforma for evaluation of the project sanctioned under ASIDE Scheme
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
a.
b.
c.
d.
7. Finance Details :
a. Cost of the project
Total cost
Total funds released during the FY
Fund released upto the FY
Funds utilized upto the FY
b. States share
Total amount
Funds released so far upto the FY
Funds utilized upto the FY
c. Share under ASIDE
Total
Funds released upto the FY
Funds released during the FY
Expenditure upto the FY
Expenditure during the FY
d. Share of private Sector
Total
e. Spent upto the FY Share of other agency
Total
Spent upto the FY
Page 43 of 49
8. Comments on
hysical
progress of
he p
roject:
Page 44 of 49
Appendix-II
Sl.
Name of
NO. Project
Page 45 of 49
Appendix - III
OFFICERS RESPONSIBLE FOR EACH OF THE STATE
S.
Name of Officer Tele
Fax No.
E-mail
No.
(Off.)
1.
DC, Cochin
04840484e-mail@cscz.com
SEZ.
42545
422530
Kakkanand,
Cochin (Kerala)
States
Kerala,
Karnataka,
Lakshadweep
2.
0332477923
fepz@wb.nic.in
West B engal,
Sikkim
3.
DC, NOIDA
SEZ,
Dadri Road,
NOIDA
95-1204562315
95-1204562315
dcnepz@nda.vsnl.net.in
U.P.,
Uttranchal
4.
0891754577
0891751259
5.
DC, Kandla
SEZ,
Gandhidham,
Kutch, Gujarat
0283653300
0283652250
kafta@wilnetonline.net
Gujarat
6.
DC, Madras
SEZ,
G.S.T. Road,
Tambaram,
Chennai
044262820
0442628218
mepz@vsnl.com
T.N.,
Andaman &
Nicobar,
Pondicherry
7.
DC , SEEPZ
SEZ,
Andheri (East)
Mumbai
0228290856
0228291385
dcseepz@vsnl.com
Maharashtra
Delhi
dc@vepz.com
Andhra
Pradesh
Page 46 of 49
8.
Jt. DGFT
4, Esplanade East,
Kolkata
0330332486426 2485892
Jdgft@jdgft.wb.nic.in
Orissa,
Bihar,
Jharkand
9.
Jt. DGFT,
UdyogBhavan,
IIIrd Floor, Tilak
Marg,
Jaipur
0141722276
0141380601
Jdgft@raj.nic.in
Rajasthan
0755553303
0755553303
Dgftbpl@mp.nic.in
M.P.,
Chhatisgarh
0361562583
Dgftnet@asm.nic.in
0172602314
0172602314
Assam,
Arunachal
Pradesh &
Nagaland
Punjab,
Haryana,
Chandigarh
0832224968
0832224968
Goa
0191435834
0191435834
J & K, H.P.
dgft@chd.nic.in
Page 47 of 49
0361223360
0361223360
0265429368
0265428789
Dgftshil@maghalaya.ren.nic.in
Meghalaya,
Mizoram,
Tripura &
Manipur
Daman &
Diu &
Dadra &
Nagar
Haveli
Page 48 of 49
Appendix IV
Sl. No.
A.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
B.
9
10
11
12
13
14
C.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
D
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35