Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Types of cores
Continuous coring, first attempted in Holland in 1908, [1] is usually most desirable, although many types of
specialized core can be obtained.[2] Data from continuous core are typically combined with wireline log and
formation test data to evaluate productivity. Diagenetically altered sandstones [2] and thinly laminated
reservoirs[3] require laboratory analysis of large diameter cores to evaluate porosity, hydrocarbon saturation,
and net pay. (For more on continuous coring, see Conventional coring.)
An alternative to continuous coring is the retrieval of discrete samples from the wellbore face known as sidewall
cores. These samples can provide useful details of the lithology, petrology, porosity, permeability, and
hydrocarbon content of the formation. [4] The analytical results can be used to verify log analysis calculations.
Selection of sidewall core points after logging allows selective sampling of specific zones. [5] (See also Sidewall
coring.)
Sampling techniques
A number of generally accepted sampling and analytical techniques have been developed for evaluating core
samples. The choice of technique depends on the type of core recovered, its lithology, and the nature of the
pore system. Core analysis can be divided into several different types: (1) conventional or plug analysis, (2)
whole core analysis, and (3) sidewall core analysis. [6]
analysis plug samples.[6] A variation of whole core analysis, called full-diameter analysis, utilizes selected
lengths of a core rather than the entire core.
core
than
values
are
almost
always
higher
At depth, reservoir rock contains some combination of liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons and water. The exact
fluids present and their relative abundance depends on the type of reservoir (gas, condensate, or oil) and the
degree to which it is charged. The fluid distribution at or near the surface is quite different from that under
reservoir conditions. These changes are due to drilling processes, gas expansion, and handling errors. [10][5]
Water saturations determined on sidewall cores from gas condensate zones are generally 10 to 15% higher
than values from conventional cores. In oil zones, the water saturation from sidewall cores may be 5 to 10%
higher relative to conventional core values (Figure 1).
The agreement between sidewall and conventional core residual oil saturations varies with oil characteristics.
When oil gravity is in the range of 35 to 40 API, sidewall core oil saturation values are slightly lower than
those obtained by conventional core analysis. As oil gravity and viscosity increase, sidewall core oil saturations
become 10 to 20% lower than conventional core saturations. [5] In gas condensate zones, sidewall cores have
measured oil saturations that are equal to or a few percent higher than conventional core values (Figure 2).
Porosity
Whole core porosity is usually less than conventional plug porosity because there is a strong tendency to
sample the more porous zones preferentially. Whole core samples incorporate tighter parts of the pore system
that are frequently excluded from conventional samples. However, whole core porosity may be higher than that
determined from conventional analysis when large solution voids are present or when the core is badly invaded
by mud solids.
In samples having a porosity greater than 30%, sidewall core porosity is 1 to 2% lower than conventional
analysis porosity. This results from slight compaction that occurs during coring. Medium and low porosity
percussion sidewall samples, especially from highly cemented rocks, display porosity that is much too high due
to fracturing and grain shattering. The deviation between measured porosity and true porosity becomes greater
as the actual porosity decreases. Uncertainty caused by systematic variation in sidewall core porosity relative
to plug analysis values can be minimized by development of correlations between sidewall core and
conventional core values.[5](For more on porosity, see Porosity.)
Permeability
Figure 3 Data compiled from 5300 sidewall core samples indicate that sidewall cores from low permeability formations have
an indicated permeability greater than that determined from conventional core analysis. Sidewall cores from formations with
more than 20 md permeability consistently have a measured permeability that is lower than that from conventional analysis.
(After [5]; data from[8].)
Whole core samples may contain vugs and fractures that are excluded from core analysis plugs and thus often
yield higher permeabilities. To offset this effect, especially in fractured samples, whole core permeability is
measured in two horizontal directions. One measurement (reported as k or kmax) is made parallel to the major
fracture planes and reflects the influence of the fractures as flow pathways. The second measurement is made
perpendicular to the first. This value, reported as k90, reflects matrix permeability and is close to conventional
core analysis permeability.[8]
Whole core permeability can be reduced by as much as 50 to 80% by the invasion of drilling mud solids into the
pore system or the build-up of powdered rock on the core surface. The relative reduction in permeability
appears to decrease as the actual value decreases. Whole core samples may require sand blasting prior to
permeability measurement to deal with the surficial buildup of powdered rock. No method is available to
address the permeability reduction caused by drilling mud fines that have penetrated the pore system. These
fines may cause whole core permeability to be significantly lower than conventional permeability. Plug samples
from the center of the core do not suffer from surface plugging, and the effects of drilling fines invasion is
minimized.[9]
Low permeability, hard formations (k k > 20 md), friable, or unconsolidated sandstones are usually reduced by
60% or more over those measured on conventional core plug (Figure 3). Partial blocking of the pore system by
drilling mud solids and by compression and grain movement resulting from bullet impact are responsible. [4] (For
details of calculating permeability form core samples, see Permeability.)