Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
INTRODUCTION
Fanconi anemia (FA) was first described in 1927
[Gordon and Rutherford, 1989]. It is an autosomal
recessive disorder with prevalence between 1/26,000
and 1/476,000 in different geographic regions [Macdougall
et al., 1994; Altay et al., 1997]. Until 1992, approximately 1,000 patients had been reported.
Among the most constant clinical characteristics are:
pancytopenia, growth delay, and skin hyperpigmentation present in over 60% of patients [Alter, 1993]. The
most frequent associated malformations are those of the
skeletal system, mainly of the radius and thumb. Less
than 50% have renal, genital, ocular, hearing, or heart
abnormalities [Alter, 1992; Porteus et al., 1992]. The
presence of malformations such as anal atresia, cardiac
defects, tracheo-esophageal fistula in FA patients may
lead to confusion with other entities such as the
VACTERL association or the BallerGerold syndrome
[Porteus et al., 1992; Rossbach et al., 1996; Perel et al.,
1998]. Approximately 20% of patients develop some
type of neoplasia, mainly hematological (leukemias) and
carcinomas, particularly liver cancer [DAndrea and
Grompe, 1997]. Generally, a FA patient has 15,000
times greater risk of developing cancer in pediatric ages
[Gordon and Rutherford, 1989; Alter, 1993], and it has
been reported that in 24% of FA patients developing
leukemia, this is the first symptom. The type of leukemia
seen with greatest frequency is acute myeloid leukemia
preceded or not by a myelodysplasic syndrome [Alter,
1996]. The FA clinical picture is extremely variable, up
to 37% of patients does not have associated congenital
malformations [Giampietro et al., 1997] and in such
36
Esmer et al.
4. Radial ray abnormalities, anal atresia, or tracheoesophageal atresia: patients with one of these isolated
congenital anomalies;
5. Myelod abnormalities: patients with myelodysplasic
syndrome or myeloid leukemia.
Chromosome Breakage Studies
Blood samples were obtained from each patient for
chromosomal instability studies, including testing for
hypersensitivity to the clastogenic effect of the DNA
cross-linking agent DEB. The cytogenetic diagnosis was
conventionally made in peripheral blood lymphocytes
stimulated with phytohemagglutinin in 72 hr cultures
[Frias et al., 1986; Auerbach, 1993], 0.5 ml of heparinized blood added to 5 ml of medium. Cultures were
paired for DEB studies, with a replicate set of cultures to
serve as untreated controls. DEB, at a final concentration in the medium of 0.1 mg/ml, was added to the treated
cultures; dilutions were prepared just before addition of
DEB to cell cultures. Untreated cultures were set and
processed under the same conditions. In addition, for
each patient, a unmatched control was studied with the
same methodology. Control subjets were phenotypically
normal individuals of both sexes ranging in age from 21
to 28 years, free of drugs, alcohol, or smoking habits who
signed the informed consent to voluntarily participate
in the study. Slides were prepared and codified for the
blind analysis of chromosome aberrations. Analysis
was performed on 50 Giemsa-stained metaphases, each
cell was scored for chromosome number and for the
numbers and types of structural abnormalities. Achromatic areas, less than a chromatid in width, were
excluded in the calculation of chromosome breakage
frequencies, while exchange configurations, translocations, dicentric and ring chromosomes were scored as
one chromosomal aberration. A patient was diagnosed
as having FA when the frequency of breaks/cell was at
least six times the frequency in the control lymphocyte
culture.
RESULTS
One hundred and seventeen patients were studied:
34 in Group 1 with probable FA; 20 in Group 2 with
only aplastic anemia; 20 in Group 3 with VACTERL
association; 39 patients in Group 4: 20 with radial ray
abnormalities, 7 with tracheo-esophageal atresia or
fistula, and 12 with anal atresia; and in Group 5, four
patients with myeloid abnormalities.
Among the 34 patients (Group 1) referred because
they had some clinical findings consistent with FA,
12 were diagnosed as affected based on the DEB test
(Table I). Table II shows the most frequent findings in
FA and non-FA patients in this group. The main clinical
manifestation in this groups FA patients was aplastic
anemia in all of the patients, associated with other
findings such as hyperpigmentation (83%) and suggestive FA facial anomalies (66%), as contrasted with
the non-FA group where only 77% of patients had
anemia and 18% had hyperpigmentation or the minor
anomalies. Short stature was seen with the same
Control
Patient
0.04
0.33
0.76
0.12
0.0
0.0
0.28
0.24
0.32
0.32
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.22
0.08
0.0
0.08
0.02
0.04
0.12
0.28
0.20
0.12
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.04
0.0
0.12
0.04
0.24
0.0
0.0
0.32
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.04
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.0
0.08
0.0
0.04
0.04
0.0
0.24
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.08
0.04
0.04
0.0
0.08
0.04
0.12
3.17
5.72
4.32
0.0
0.04
2.84
5.86
3.2
2.84
0.04
0.0
0.12
2.44
0.08
0.0
0.04
0.12
0.12
0.04
0.04
0.32
0.2
0.0
0.04
0.08
2.84
0.04
0.08
1.68
1.39
0.08
0.0
3.44
AF1
AF2a
AF3a
AF4a
AF5
AF6
AF7a
AF8a
AF9a
AF10a
F11
AF12
AF13
AF14a
AF15
AF16
AF17
AF18
AF19
AF20
AF21
AF22
AF23
AF24
AF25
AF26
AF27a
AF28
AF29
AF30a
AF31a
AF32
AF33
AF34a
a
DEB (breaks/cell)
Patient
Control
0.08
0.0
0.08
0.0
0.0
0.04
0.0
0.08
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.08
0.0
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.04
0.0
0.04
0.08
0.08
0.0
0.12
0.24
0.04
0.0
0.08
0.12
0.16
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.04
Patients
AA1
AA2
AA3
AA4
AA5
AA6
AA7
AA8
AA9
AA10a
AA11a
AA12
AA13
AA14b
AA15
AA16
AA17
AA18
AA19
AA20
Patient
Control
Patient
Control
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.08
0.0
0.48
0.08
0.0
0.04
0.12
0.24
0.0
0.04
0.12
0.16
0.08
0.0
0.16
0.08
0.08
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.12
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0
0.12
0.04
0.0
0.08
0.0
0.16
0.2
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.12
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0
4.5
4.32
0.12
0.12
1.32
0.16
0.04
0.08
0.08
0.04
0.08
0.0
0.2
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.0
0.04
0.0
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.08
0.04
0.36
0.04
0.08
0.24
0.12
0.12
0.08
Aplastic anemia
Short stature
Hyperpigmentation
Suggestive facies
Radial ray abnormalities
Renal malformation
DEB (breaks/cell)
Characteristics
37
FA (n 12) (%)
Non-FA
(n 22) (%)
12 (100)
11 (91)
10 (83)
8 (66)
7 (58)
2 (16)
17 (77)
20 (90)
4 (18)
4 (18)
15 (68)
5 (22)
Spontaneous
(breaks/cell)
Patients
V1
V2
V3
V4
V5
V6
V7
V8
V9a
V10
V11
V12
V13
V14
V15
V16
V17
V18
V19
V20
a
DEB positive.
DEB (breaks/cell)
Patient
Control
Patient
Control
0.0
0.0
0.04
0.08
0.0
0.04
0.0
0.04
0.28
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.0
0.12
0.0
0.2
0.16
0.04
0.04
0.12
0.0
0.04
0.08
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.04
0.08
0.04
0.0
0.04
0.0
0.04
0.08
0.04
0.04
0.12
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.08
0.04
0.0
0.04
0.2
0.08
0.0
0.0
4.4
0.04
0.32
0.12
0.04
0.08
0.04
0.28
0.08
0.04
0.12
0.16
0.0
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.0
0.04
0.08
0.0
0.04
0.0
0.16
0.12
0.04
0.24
0.08
0.12
0.04
0.04
0.12
0.0
38
Esmer et al.
Patient
Esophageal atresia
AE1
0.0
AE2
0.04
AE3
0.2
AE4
0.0
AE5
0.08
AE6
0.04
AE7
0.04
Radial ray abnormality
R1
0.0
R2
0.04
R3
0.08
R4
0.08
R5
0.24
R6
0.0
a
0.16
R7
R8
0.04
R9
0.12
R10
0.16
R11
0.40
R12
0.04
R13
0.04
R14
0.0
R15
0.04
R16
0.2
R17
0.08
R18
0.04
R19
0.04
a
1.60
R20
Anorectal malformation
AR1
0.12
AR2
0.0
AR3
0.12
AR4
0.08
AR5
0.08
AR6
0.04
AR7
0.24
AR8
0.0
AR9
0.04
AR10
0.2
AR11
0.0
AR12
0.16
a
DEB (breaks/cell)
Control
Patient
Control
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.08
0.08
0.0
0.04
0.08
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.16
0.08
0.16
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.28
0.28
0.04
0.0
0.02
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.08
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.12
0.02
0.08
0.0
0.08
0.24
1.44
3.84
0.04
0.17
0.08
0.72
0.0
0.0
0.08
0.04
0.0
0.08
0.04
0.10
3.0
0.12
0.16
0.0
0.12
0.24
1.68
0.04
0.04
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.12
0.0
0.20
0.20
0.12
0.0
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.04
0.04
0.32
0.12
0.0
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.08
0.12
0.12
0.04
0.04
0.0
0.04
0.12
0.08
0.0
0.04
0.24
0.04
0.16
0.04
0.0
0.04
0.0
0.16
0.04
0.04
0.24
0.2
0.08
0.08
0.16
0.16
DEB (breaks/cell)
Patient
Control
Patient
Control
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.28
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0
0.0
0.08
for these two groups. The mean DEB-induced chromosomal breakage in the FA group was 3.39 breaks/cell
(range 1.325.86), while the mean breakage frequency
for the non-FA patients was 0.09 breaks/cell (range 0
1.44). As expected, differences between FA vs. non-FA
or controls were statistically significant (Table VII).
DISCUSSION
FA is one of several disorders that have in common
the presence of increased chromosomal fragility or
cellular hypersensitivity to mutagenic chemicals, associated with developmental defects. Cells from FA patients are uniquely hypersensitive to the clastogenic
effect of DNA cross-linking agents such as DEB, and can
thus be distinguished from cells of the patients with
other syndromes on this basis.
Clinical diagnosis of FA is complicated because of
other disorders, both genetic and non-genetic, are characterized by many of the clinical manifestations seen
in FA. Familial associations of various combinations of
radial, renal, cardiac, hearing, growth, skin pigmentation, and hematologic abnormalities have been well
documented, and a number of different syndromes
delineated. Among these are dyskeratosis congenita,
TAR syndrome, HoltOram syndrome, Aase syndrome,
WT syndrome, Shwachman syndrome, IVIC syndrome,
and the VACTERL association. Thumb abnormalities have been reported in a number of patients with
BlackfanDiamond anemia. The extreme phenotypic
diversity associated with FA makes the availability of a
diagnostic laboratory test especially valuable.
In the present study we found 12/34 (30%) FA patients
among cases suspected of having FA on the basis of
anemia characteristic facial appearence, short stature,
hyperpigmentation, renal or radial ray anomalies. This
result coincides with that reported by Auerbach et al.
[1989], who found 104/328 (29%) patients with these
TABLE VII. Mean Chromosomal Breaks Among Controls, FA,
and Non-FA Patients
Control (n 117)
FA (n 18)
Non-FA (n 99)
Spontaneous
(breaks/cell)
0.04
0.30
0.07
0.09
3.39
0.10
39