Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l
of
m e dic i n e
Original Article
A BS T R AC T
BACKGROUND
The authors full names, academic degrees,
and affiliations are listed in the Appendix.
Address reprint requests to Dr. Diamond
at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgia Regents University,
1120 15th St., Rm. BA-7313, Augusta, GA
30912, or at michael.diamond@gru.edu.
* A complete list of investigators in the
National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development (NICHD) Reproductive Medicine Network is provided
in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org.
This article was updated on September 24,
2015, at NEJM.org.
N Engl J Med 2015;373:1230-40.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414827
Copyright 2015 Massachusetts Medical Society.
1230
nejm.org
Me thods
Study Design
The Assessment of Multiple Intrauterine Gestations from Ovarian Stimulation (AMIGOS) clinical
trial was conducted by the National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network; the
Collaborative Center for Statistics and Science at
Yale University served as the data coordinating
n engl j med 373;13
A Quick Take
is available
at NEJM.org
Study Treatment
Women received gonadotropin (Menopur, Ferring Pharmaceuticals), administered by subcutaneous injection, or clomiphene or letrozole, administered orally by means of coated tablets.
Gonadotropin was purchased from Ferring; clomiphene and letrozole were acquired and coated
by a third-party company; none of these companies had any involvement in the conduct of the
trial. Letrozole and clomiphene were assigned in
a double-blind fashion; letrozole was administered
for ovarian stimulation under Investigational New
Drug application 107705 with the Food and Drug
Administration. Medications were initiated on day
3, 4, or 5 of the menstrual cycle, with randomization stratified according to study site and age
group (18 to 34 years or 35 to 40 years) and
performed on the basis of a varying block design, with ovarian stimulation for up to four
treatment cycles and intrauterine insemination.
Women who conceived were followed through
pregnancy and delivery.
nejm.org
1231
The
n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l
Outcomes
of
m e dic i n e
among the three groups. Analyses were performed with SAS software, version 9.2 (SAS Institute). Statistical significance was defined as a
two-sided P value of less than 0.05.
R e sult s
Baseline Characteristics
We prescreened 3730 couples. Of the 1220 couples with unexplained infertility who provided
written informed consent and completed the
screening, 900 were randomly assigned to a treatment group (see Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org), and 746 of those
couples completed the study. There were no significant differences in the frequency of dropouts
among study groups (gonadotropin group, 17.3%;
clomiphene group, 16.3%; and letrozole group,
17.7%) (Fig. S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Appendix). Baseline characteristics have been reported previously24 and are presented in Table 1;
baseline characteristics in the per-protocol analysis are provided in Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix. Treatment-cycle cancellation rates
were 6.9% for gonadotropin, 3.3% for clomiphene,
and 3.7% for letrozole (P<0.001 for differences
among the three groups) (see Table S2 in the
Statistical Analysis
Supplementary Appendix for reasons for cycle
The power calculations and data analysis plan cancellation).
have been published previously.22 Briefly, we calculated that a sample of 900 couples in this Pregnancy Outcomes
three-group study would provide more than 80% Rates of conception, clinical pregnancy (as evipower, at a one-sided alpha level of 0.05 and as- denced by fetal heart activity), and live birth in
suming rates for the primary outcome of 25%, the letrozole group (Table S3 and Fig. S2 and S3
12.5%, and 6.25% in the gonadotropin, clomi- in the Supplementary Appendix) were within the
phene, and letrozole groups, respectively. Inten- prespecified noninferiority margin (i.e., were station-to-treat analyses were performed primarily tistically noninferior) but were statistically sigto compare the letrozole group with the com- nificantly lower than those in the standardbined gonadotropin and clomiphene groups therapy group (the combined gonadotropin and
(since the latter two groups were receiving cur- clomiphene groups) (Table 2). Rates of live birth
rent standard ovarian-stimulation agents) and were 32.2% after gonadotropin administration,
secondarily to compare the letrozole group indi- 23.3% after clomiphene administration (P = 0.02
vidually with each of the groups receiving stan- for the comparison with gonadotropin), and
dard treatment. Categorical data are reported as 18.7% after letrozole administration (P<0.001
frequencies and percentages; differences in these for the comparison with gonadotropin) (Fig. 1A
measures between treatment groups were as- and 1B). The rates of live birth, ongoing clinical
sessed by means of a chi-square analysis, with pregnancy, and conception per treatment cycle
Fishers exact test used for expected frequencies are presented in Table S4 and Fig. S4 in the
of less than 5. Continuous data are expressed as Supplementary Appendix. There was no significant
means SD, with a Wilcoxon rank-sum test used difference in the time to conception among the
for testing differences between two groups, and a three groups (Table S3 in the Supplementary ApKruskalWallis test used for testing differences pendix). Among the women who conceived, there
1232
nejm.org
Clomiphene
(N = 300)
Letrozole
(N = 299)
Age yr
32.34.1
32.04.6
32.24.3
Body-mass index
26.86.7
26.76.4
27.36.5
White
238 (79.1)
241 (80.3)
243 (81.3)
Black
23 (7.6)
31 (10.3)
30 (10.0)
Asian
28 (9.3)
17 (5.7)
14 (4.7)
9 (3.0)
7 (2.3)
9 (3.0)
29 (9.6)
30 (10.0)
35 (11.7)
34.826.2
34.224.1
35.226.8
64 (21.3)
67 (22.3)
52 (17.4)
20.612.6
20.311.3
21.211.2
6.43.1
7.03.3
6.73.1
33.740.4
32.421.5
32.728.0
2.62.1
2.62.1
2.61.9
6.92.4
7.22.8
7.02.9
Characteristic
Biometric features
Mixed race
Hispanic or Latino
Fertility history
Ultrasonographic findings
Antral follicle count, both ovaries
Endometrial thickness, sagittal plane mm
Fasting serum biochemical values
Estradiol pg/ml
* Data are from Diamond et al.24 Plusminus values are means SD. There were no significant differences (P<0.05)
among the three groups in any of the baseline characteristics.
The body-mass index is the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters.
Race or ethnic group was reported by the patients. Some patients chose more than one category, including Hispanic
or Latino.
nejm.org
1233
1234
nejm.org
3/140 (2.1)
3/106 (2.8)
28/106 (26.4)
31/106 (29.3)
1/85 (1.2)
25/85 (29.4)
26/85 (30.6)
8/56 (14.3)
8/299 (2.7)
48/299 (16.1)
56/299 (18.7)
9/67 (13.4)
67/299 (22.4)
6/246 (2.4)
76/246 (30.9)
82/246 (33.3)
35/167 (21.0)
6/601 (1.0)
29/601 (4.8)
132/601 (22.0)
167/601 (27.8)
42/192 (21.9)
192/601 (31.9)
0.7
(3.3 to 4.7)
7.9
(19.4 to 3.6)
7.2
(19.9 to 4.6)
26.2
(37.0 to 15.5)
2.0
(3.6 to 0.4)
7.0
(10.4 to 3.6)
0.1
(6.5 to 6.7)
8.9
(16.0 to 1.8)
22.4
(33.2 to 11.6)
7.2
(14.7 to 0.2)
Clomiphene vs.
Gonadotropin
Clomiphene vs.
Letrozole
1.0
(4.3 to 2.4)
4.9
(17.4 to 7.6)
5.8
(18.5 to 6.8)
17.7
(30.7 to 4.6)
2.0
(3.6 to 0.4)
5.6
(9.2 to 2.0)
5.9
(12.1 to 0.4)
13.5
(20.4 to 6.6)
18.3
(30.4 to 6.3)
13.1
(20.3 to 6.0)
1.7
(2.3 to 5.6)
3.0
(15.8 to 9.8)
1.3
(14.4 to 11.7)
8.6
(19.2 to 2.1)
1.3
(3.6 to 0.9)
6.0
(0.3 to 12.2)
4.6
(1.9 to 11.1)
4.0
(14.3 to 6.2)
5.9
(1.0 to 12.9)
Letrozole vs.
Gonadotropin
Absolute Difference
1.3
(1.7 to 4.3)
1.5
(9.8 to 12.8)
2.8
(8.7 to 14.2)
6.7
(4.4 to 17.7)
1.0
(0.1 to 2.0)
2.2
(0.4 to 4.7)
5.9
(0.6 to 11.2)
9.1
(3.4 to 14.8)
8.4
(1.6 to 18.5)
9.5
(3.5 to 15.6)
Gonadotropin
or Clomiphene
vs. Letrozole
* Clinical pregnancy was defined as an intrauterine pregnancy with fetal heart motion, as determined by transvaginal ultrasonography. Live birth was defined as the delivery of a viable
infant.
Ten patients with clinical pregnancy (one in the gonadotropin group, six in the clomiphene group, and three in the letrozole group) were excluded because they were lost to follow-up
before delivery.
Multiple gestations were calculated as the number of deliveries with multiple babies divided by the number of women with live births.
P<0.01.
P = 0.001.
48/140 (34.3)
51/140 (36.4)
4/70 (5.7)
4/300 (1.3)
66/300 (22.0)
70/300 (23.3)
8/85 (9.4)
85/300 (28.3)
Gonadotropin or
Clomiphene
(N = 601)
of
31/97 (32.0)
Letrozole
(N = 299)
Clomiphene
(N = 300)
n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l
6/301 (2.0)
66/301 (21.9)
97/301 (32.2)
34/107 (31.8)
107/301 (35.5)
Variable
Gonadotropin
(N = 301)
The
m e dic i n e
Safety
The frequency of individual serious adverse maternal events (before conception or during or after
pregnancy) and serious adverse fetal or neonatal
events did not differ significantly among the
three treatment groups, although cumulative serious adverse events were more common in the
gonadotropin group than in the other two
groups (P = 0.009) (Table 4). Overall rates of nonserious adverse events were similar among the
groups, but the frequencies of specific adverse
events differed according to the group. The frequency of abdominal bloating was higher with
gonadotropin administration than with the other
n engl j med 373;13
Gonadotropin
35
Clinical Pregnancy
(% of women enrolled)
40
Clomiphene
30
25
20
Letrozole
15
10
5
0
P=0.001
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
B
40
35
Live Birth
(% of women enrolled)
Neonatal Outcomes
Gonadotropin
30
25
Clomiphene
20
Letrozole
15
10
5
0
P<0.001
0
150
200
250
300
350
300
350
500
C
Twins
40
Triplets
P=0.006
P<0.001
35
Multiple Gestation
(% of clinical pregnancies)
The pregnancy outcomes based on a perprotocol analysis are shown in Table S5 in the
Supplementary Appendix. These results were consistent with the results of the intention-to-treat
analysis.
P=0.44
P=0.14
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Gonadotropin
Clomiphene
Letrozole
Gonadotropin
or Clomiphene
nejm.org
1235
1236
nejm.org
32/66 (48)
5/66 (8)
8.03.6
15/66 (23)
NICU admission
no./total no. (%)
Neonatal complications
no./total no. (%)
2/25 (8)
11/25 (44)
39.423.0
10/25 (40)
23/50 (46)
2271602
35.03.2
25
Twin
0/6
4/6 (67)
17.64.8
6/6 (100)
10/18 (56)
1847245
34.21.6
Triplet
Gonadotropin
3/97 (3)
30/97 (31)
24.319.9
21/97 (22)
65/134 (49)
2891726
37.42.7
97
Total
3/66 (5)
12/66 (18)
17.53.9
7/66 (11)
30/66 (46)
3215529
38.61.7
66
Singleton
0/4
1/4 (25)
NA
0/4
4/8 (50)
2693605
37.31.5
Twin
Clomiphene
3/70 (4)
13/70 (19)
17.53.9
7/70 (10)
34/74 (46)
3184543
38.51.7
70
Total
2/48 (4)
12/48 (25)
23.515.5
5/48 (10)
25/48 (52)
3267805
38.53.3
48
Singleton
0/8
3/8 (38)
17.88.1
6/8 (75)
8/16 (50)
2256439
35.01.6
Twin
Letrozole
2/56 (4)
15/56 (27)
21.112.3
11/56 (20)
33/64 (52)
3138837
37.74.0
56
Total
n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l
of
* Plusminus values are means SD. Differences in outcomes were compared among the three treatment groups. In the clomiphene group, estimated gestational age was missing for
one singleton, and birth weight was missing for two singletons; in the gonadotropin and letrozole groups, birth weights were missing for one set of twins. NA denotes not applicable,
and NICU neonatal intensive care unit.
P<0.001 for the comparison among the three treatment groups.
P<0.05 for the comparison among the three treatment groups.
P<0.05.
For multiple births, the mean birth weight of each of the twins or triplets was calculated first; this average was used in the calculation of the means SD for that treatment group.
Shown are the number of twin or triplet deliveries for which the twins (except one in the letrozole group) or triplets were admitted to the NICU.
** Data shown are only for infants hospitalized for more than 3 days. For twins and triplets, the length of hospitalization was calculated as the average number of days that the twins or
triplets were in the hospital.
One set of twins had congenital malformations; in the other set, only one neonate had a congenital malformation.
1/66 (2)
3211540
Birth weight g
Congenital malformations
no./total no. (%)
38.61.5
66
Singleton
Outcome
The
m e dic i n e
Table 4. Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events According to Treatment Group.*
Event
Gonadotropin
Clomiphene
Letrozole
P Value
21/297 (7.1)
8/298 (2.7)
8/291 (2.7)
0.009
208/297 (70.0)
212/298 (71.1)
214/291 (73.5)
0.63
Presumed pyelonephritis
1/297 (0.3)
0/298
0/291
0.66
1/297 (0.3)
0/298
0/291
0.66
Abdominal bloating
81/297 (27.3)
50/298 (16.8)
54/291 (18.6)
0.003
Breast pain
65/297 (21.9)
19/298 (6.4)
21/291 (7.2)
<0.001
<0.001
1 Adverse event
Adverse events before conception
Serious adverse events
Constipation
6/297 (2.0)
28/298 (9.4)
8/291 (2.7)
Headache
89/297 (30.0)
104/298 (34.9)
122/291 (41.9)
0.01
Hot flashes
25/297 (8.4)
92/298 (30.9)
49/291 (16.8)
<0.001
Injection-site reaction
32/297 (10.8)
6/298 (2.0)
9/291 (3.1)
<0.001
5/297 (1.7)
8/298 (2.7)
17/291 (5.8)
0.02
0/83
1.00
1/139 (0.7)
0/107
11/139 (7.9)
5/107 (4.7)
Ovarian hyperstimulation
syndrome
1/139 (0.7)
0/107
0/83
1.00
1/139 (0.7)
0/107
0/83
1.00
1/139 (0.7)
2/107 (1.9)
0/83
0.48
0/139
0/107
1/83 (1.2)
0.25
0/107
1/83 (1.2)
0.72
Ectopic pregnancy
5/83 (6.0)
0.58
1/139 (0.7)
Hyperemesis
2/139 (1.4)
0/107
Hypertension
0/139
1/107 (0.9)
Severe preeclampsia
0/139
1/107 (0.9)
0/83
0.58
1/139 (0.7)
0/107
0/83
1.00
0/139
0/107
0
1/83 (1.2)
0.51
0.33
5/83 (6.0)
0.001
2/56 (3.6)
0.90
1/56 (1.8)
0.25
3/96 (3.1)
0/96
3/70 (4.3)
0/70
* The event summary for mothers includes all women with at least one adverse event or serious adverse event. Specific
events listed in this table include all the serious adverse events and all the adverse events that were observed in at least
5% of women in any of the treatment groups and that differed significantly among the three groups.
P values are for the comparison among the three treatment groups. The chi-square test or Fishers exact test was used.
The patient was admitted to the hospital at 34 weeks of gestation for lower abdominal, pelvic, and vaginal pain, with a
second admission for management of severe groin pain.
One week after an uncomplicated delivery by cesarean section, the patient presented to the emergency department with
shortness of breath. She was admitted to the hospital and evaluated for pulmonary edema.
For details, see Table S6 in the Supplementary Appendix.
nejm.org
1237
The
n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l
Discussion
In this study of couples with unexplained infertility, the rate of multiple gestation was not significantly reduced among women treated with
letrozole for ovarian stimulation, as compared
with a combined group of women receiving current standard therapy (gonadotropin or clomiphene). The multiple-gestation rate in the letrozole group was significantly lower than the rate
in the gonadotropin group alone but was similar
to the rate in the clomiphene group; as compared
with gonadotropin, clomiphene also resulted in a
significantly lower rate of multiple gestation. The
only higher-order multiple gestations (all triplets)
occurred after gonadotropin administration.
Administration of letrozole resulted in rates
of conception, clinical pregnancy, and live birth
that were statistically noninferior to the rates
with clomiphene, according to our prespecified
noninferiority margin of 25%. However, clomiphene and letrozole each resulted in significantly
lower rates of conception, clinical pregnancy, and
live birth, as compared with gonadotropin. In
contrast, many reports in the literature have suggested a similar or improved pregnancy rate with
an aromatase inhibitor, as compared with standard therapy.12-14,16-18,25 Possible explanations for
these conflicting results may be the randomized
design of our study, our standardized criteria for
the timing of gonadotropin administration, the
standardized timing of insemination in all treatment groups, or some combination of these
factors.
1238
of
m e dic i n e
nejm.org
A previous study, which included a control group of these outcomes did not differ significantly beof women who underwent timed intracervical tween letrozole and clomiphene.
The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the
insemination without ovarian stimulation, showed
authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of
significantly lower pregnancy and delivery rates the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health
in the control group than in the gonadotropin and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health.
Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health,
group or the clomiphene group.9
the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health
In conclusion, in our study involving couples and Human Development (U10 HD39005, to Dr. Diamond; U10
with unexplained infertility, the use of letrozole HD38992, to Dr. Legro; U10 HD27049, to Dr. Coutifaris;
for ovarian stimulation resulted in significantly U10 HD38998, to Dr. Alvero; U10 HD055942, to Dr. Robinson;
U10 HD055944, to Dr. Casson; U10 HD055936, to Dr. Christreduced rates of ongoing clinical pregnancy and man; U10HD055925, to Dr. Zhang; and U10 U54-HD29834, to
live birth, but not of multiple gestations, as com- the University of Virginia Center for Research in Reproduction
pared with a combined group receiving standard Ligand Assay and Analysis Core of the Specialized Cooperative
Centers Program in Reproduction and Infertility Research), the
therapy (gonadotropin or clomiphene), but the National Center for Research Resources, and the National Centwo comparators had different effects on these ter for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR000127, to
outcomes. As compared with gonadotropin use, Pennsylvania State University) and by the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act.
the use of letrozole resulted in lower rates of live
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with
birth and multiple gestation, whereas the rates the full text of this article at NEJM.org.
Appendix
The authors full names and academic degrees are as follows: Michael P. Diamond, M.D., Richard S. Legro, M.D., Christos Coutifaris,
M.D., Ph.D, Ruben Alvero, M.D., Randal D. Robinson, M.D., Peter Casson, M.D., Gregory M. Christman, M.D., Joel Ager, Ph.D., Hao
Huang, M.D., M.P.H., Karl R. Hansen, M.D., Ph.D., Valerie Baker, M.D., Rebecca Usadi, M.D., Aimee Seungdamrong, M.D., G. Wright
Bates, M.D., R. Mitchell Rosen, M.D., Daniel Haisenleder, Ph.D., Stephen A. Krawetz, Ph.D., Kurt Barnhart, M.D., J.C. Trussell, M.D.,
Dana Ohl, M.D., Yufeng Jin, M.S., Nanette Santoro, M.D., Esther Eisenberg, M.D., M.P.H., and Heping Zhang, Ph.D., for the NICHD
Reproductive Medicine Network
The authors affiliations are as follows: the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta (M.P.D.);
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit (M.P.D., J.A., S.A.K.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey (R.S.L.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania School of
Medicine, Philadelphia (C.C., K.B.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Denver (R.A., N.S.); Department
of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio (R.D.R.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Vermont, Burlington (P.C.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor (G.M.C., D.O.); Department of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (H.H., Y.J., H.Z.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City (K.R.H.); Stanford University Medical
Center, Stanford, CA (V.B.); Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (R.U.); University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark (A.S.); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (G.W.B.); Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility,
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (R.M.R.); Ligand Core Laboratory, University of Virginia Center for Research in
Reproduction, Charlottesville (D.H.); Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY (J.C.T.); and Fertility and Infertility Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD (E.E.).
References
1. McClamrock HD, Jones HW Jr, Adashi
EY. Ovarian stimulation and intrauterine
insemination at the quarter centennial:
implications for the multiple births epidemic. Fertil Steril 2012;97:802-9.
2. Ghesquiere SL, Castelain EG, Spiessens C, Meuleman CL, DHooghe TM. Relationship between follicle number and
(multiple) live birth rate after controlled
ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Am J Obstet Gynecol
2007;197(4):589.e1-589.e5.
3. Samani FG, Farzadi L, Nezami N, Tarzamni MK, Soleimani F. Endometrial and
follicular development following letrozole intervention in unexplained infertile
patients failed to get pregnant with clomiphene citrate. Arch Gynecol Obstet
2009;280:201-5.
4. Fisch P, Casper RF, Brown SE, et al.
Unexplained infertility: evaluation of treatment with clomiphene citrate and human
nejm.org
1239
1240
nejm.org