Chi-square analysis 1

Null hypothesis: There is significant no association between variables location at

work and welfare

Alternate hypothesis: There is significant association between variables, location

at work and welfare measures.

Table No. 1: Chi-Square Tests- location at work and welfare measures

Value df Asymp.
Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson 28.603 16 .027
Chi-
Square

From the table we find that significance value is low, which means that the null
hypothesis is rejected. Also it shows that some relationship between location at work and
welfare measures exist.

atmosphere at workplace

Frequency Percent

highly satisfied 34 17.0

satisfied 79 39.5

somewhat satisfied 67 33.5

dissatisfied 20 10.0

Total 200 100.0

From the table we can find that 17% of respondents are highly satisfied with atmosphere

at workplace.almost 40%of respondents are satisfied with the atmosphere,so this shows
that majority is satisfied with the environment.
Table no: 3 canteen&mess

Frequency Percent
highly satisfied 56 28.0
satisfied 101 50.5
somewhat 39 19.5
satisfied
dissatisfied 4 2.0
Total 200 100.0
From the table
we can find that 28% of the respondents are highly satisfied with the canteen and mess
facility and almost 51% of respondents are satisfied with the canteen and mess
facilities,so this showsthat majority of respondents are satisfied with the canteen and
mess facilities.

Table no.4sanitation facility

Valid Percent
highly satisfied 7.0
satisfied 69.5
somewhat 15.5
satisfied
dissatisfied 4.5
highly dissatisfied 3.5
Total 100.0

Interpretation:

1. Nearly 70% respondents are satisfied

2. 7% are highly satisfied

table no.5 health promotion efforts

Frequency Percent
highly 7 3.5
satisfied
satisfied 141 70.5
somewhat 34 17.0
satisfied
dissatisfied 16 8.0
Total 200 100.0

1 Nearly 71% of
respondents are satisfied
2 4% of respondents are highly satisfied
table no 6 safety at work place
Frequency Percent
very safe 11 5.5
safe 95 47.5
ok 70 35.0
unsafe 12 6.0
accident 12 6.0
prone
Total 200 100.0

Interpretation
1 Nearly 48% of respondents are satisfied with safety at work place
2 6% are highly satisfied with satisfied with safety at work place

table no. 7 efforts taken by co to promote safety

Frequency Percent
highly 19 9.5
satisfied
satisfied 107 53.5
somewhat 64 32.0
satisfied
dissatisfied 10 5.0
Total 200 100.0

Interpretation
1. Nearly 54% of respondents are satisfied with the efforts taken by the organization to
promote safety
2 about 9.5 % of respondents are highly satisfied with the efforts taken by the
organization to promote safety

employee grade
 zz Fr Percent Valid Cumulativ
eq Percent e Percent
ue
nc
y
Valid e1-e4 87 43.5 43.5 43.5
e5 & above em 10.0 10.0 53.5
plo
ye
e
gra Percent
1TO 10de 16.5
supervisors 58 29.0 29.0 82.5
10 TO 20
others 35 43.5
17.5 17.5 100.0
20 TO 30
Total 20 37.0
100.0 100.0
above 300 3.0
Total 100.0

employee grade
Percent
Valid e1-e4 43.5
e5 & 10.0
above
supervisor 29.0
s
others 17.5
Total 100.0

E
Experience(in years)
experience (in years)

Percentage
1-10 16.5
10-20 43.5
20-30 37.0
above 30 3.0
Total 100.0
 planned
job rotation
Valid

planned
job rotation
Frequency Percent
Valid
canteen & highly 56 28.0
mess satisfied
satisfied 101 50.5
somewhat 39 19.5
satisfied
dissatisfie 4 2.0
d
Total 200 100.0

planned
job rotation
Valid

planned job rotation

Percent
highly 5.0
satisfied
satisfied 41.5
somewhat 28.0
satisfied
dissatisfie 20.5
planned d
job rotation
highly 5.0
dissatisfied Valid
Total 100.0

planned job rotation

planned
job rotation
Valid

planned
job rotation
Valid