Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Kaidy
Naval Architect & CEO
360 NW ALICE AVE., STUART, FL 34994
O: 772-692-8551 E: rkaidy@ocean5inc.com
www.ocean5inc.com
Presentation Goal:
Introduce design considerations for Stepped planing hull design
and optimization.
Review the use of the Wake Profile Method.
Identify strength, weaknesses, and limits of first order
approach for design and optimization.
Present examples using full size craft.
Discuss use of CFD for Design and Optimization.
Introduction
Definitions
Goals of Stepped Hull Design
Wake Profile Method
4.1
4.2
4.3
Savitsky/Morabito Validation
USNA Tow Tank Validation
7. CFD
8. Conclusions
9. References & Resources
Many craft were built to dominate the racing boat scene from the 1920s, including Gar Woods.
Widely used in racing, pleasure performance craft and offshore outboard powered fishboats.
Reduced Resistance
Increased Speed
Improved Efficiency
Improved Seakeeping
Air Lubricated
Air Bearings
Air pretty much anything
Ram Air Lift
Stepped planing hull design has classically involved the use of rough rules of thumb,
guess work and costly and some dangerous experimentation to answer the most
rudimentary design questions, including resistance, running trim angle, and effect of step
height and geometry.
Existing studies and data primarily associated with the design of seaplane floats, and
have been very limited utility as tools to develop new craft. (refer to reference list)
A new method was needed to allow small craft naval architects to directly calculate the
effects of various design parameters on the overall design performance characteristics of
the craft.
New Method for the 1st order computational analysis of stepped hulls created based on
work of Savitsky-Morabito and Hadler , Wake
Profile Method
Ocean5 has developed a new method based on the synthesis of existing data and
methods, to directly predict the performance of stepped hulls, and has incorporated this
method into new software for the naval architect, called Virtual Seatrial - VSt
Afterbod
y
Step
3.2
3.3
V=40 knots
Robert Kaidy - Naval Architect
OCEAN5 NAVAL ARCHITECTS
V=40 knots
IBEX 2013 SESSION 302
Adv. Topics in Stepped Hull Design
Page 16
Other Inputs
Variable
Chine Beam
Bab
1.2
Step Height
hS
1.3
Length
Lab
1.4
Deadrise
bab
Characteristic
Approach
2.1
Change Effective
Deadrise
2.2
Chine Section
Shape / Angle
Change Effective
Deadrise
2.3
Change Effective
Deadrise
Outputs at Equilibrium:
2.4
N/A
Air Entrainment
Devices & Effects
2.5
Strakes
Savitsky /Hadler
2.6
Step Planform
Shape
N/A
1.5
Keel Angle
aab
Other Inputs
Characteristic
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
Strakes
2.6
1.1
Chine Beam
1.2
Step Height
1.3
Length
1.4
Deadrise
1.5
Keel Angle
Soltn
Forebody
Step
Afterbody
Inputs
Outputs
Source
Displacement
Projected Chine Beam,
Deadrise
LCG, VCG
Speed
Resistance
Lift
Trim Angle
Wetted Keel Length
Wetted Chine Lengths
Savitsky /
Hadler
Step Height
Trim Angle
Speed
Deadrise
SavitskyMorabito
Resistance, Lift
Savitsky /
Hadler
Savitsky Morabito provide a model for wake profile based on tank testing:
with
Further, according to Faltinsen and Doctors, the flow separates from the step at speeds where
Ds the draft at the step relative to the running waterline.
with
Strengths:
Predicts Resistance, trim and lift forces based on primary design parameters
Ventilation systems/methods
Edge Treatments
Porpoising / Dynamics
Case
Description
Type
Garland Validation
Semi-Planing
Planing
Trim (degrees)
Savitsky Prediction
2
Unstepped Hull
Zero Step
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
Velocity (ft/s)
=
=
=
=
=
32
7.8
7.8
12.5 deg
12.5 deg
Displ.=
LCG =
Hs
=
Lab =
aab
=
10 KIP
1.9 Fwd. Step=15.4
5% Bab = 0.39
13.5
0.5 deg
Cv
V
=
=
4.3
46 MPH = 40 Knots
Results
Conclusions
Wetted Length aligned well
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
TRIM
=
=
=
=
=
4.8
1.5
1.5
15 deg
15 deg
Displ.=
LCG =
Hs
=
Hs
=
Lab =
57.45 #
0.3 step = 1.97 FWD.
2%, 4% & 6% Bab
0.03, 0.06, 0.09
1.67
aab
0.0 deg
Cv
V
=
=
varies
varies MPH
Notes:
1.
Tow Tank Model
2.
Analysis Run at model size
3.
Potential problems with
scaling
Conclusions
Results
5
8.5
8.5
0% STEP HT. - O5
0% STEP HT. USNA
4.5
7.5
4% STEP
HT. - O5
2% STEP
HT. - O5
7.5
4% STEP
HT. - USNA
7.5
2% STEP
HT. - USNA
6.5
6% STEP HT.
- O5
7
6% STEP HT.
- USNA
6.5
6.5
5.5
4.5
5.5
3.5
5.5
3.5
4.5
3
3.5
2.5
4.5
2.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
Cv (non-dim. speed)
5.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
Cv (non-dim. speed)
5.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
Cv (non-dim. speed)
Cv (non-dim. speed)
What is CFD:
Employs numerical solution to the Navier Stokes Equations by
discretization of a fluid volume within and around a solid shape.
Non-Linear Solution can solve for steady state or dynamic system in
time
Reynolds-average Navier-Stokes includes Turbulence Modelling
Various Turbulence Models and other features can be included
Full Navier Stokes solutions can include free surface and mixed
flow/multi-phase
Volume Air Fraction used to understand Mixed Air / Water System
7.0 CFD
Why is it important:
Permits simulation of effects that cannot be modelled using SemiEmpirical or Analytical Methods
7.0 CFD
Validation
Weights
Centers
Model / Mesh Quality
Propulsive Forces / Prop. Model (Lift Forces)
Time Varying Forces Modelled
Damping
Aero Model
References:
1. Savitsky, Daniel and Michael Morabito. Surface Wave Contours Associated with the Forebody
Wake of Stepped Planing Hulls. Marine Technology Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 1-16 (2010).
2. Savitsky, Daniel. Hydrodynamic Design of Planing Hulls. Marine Technology (1964).
3. Garland, William R., Midshipman First Class, Stepped Planing Hull Investigation. Senior Paper,
United States Naval Academy 2010
4. Clement, Eugene P. and Joseph G. Koelbel. Optimized Designs for Stepped Planing Monohulls
and Catamarans. High Performance Marine Vehicles (1992): PC35-43.
5. Faltinsen, Odd M. Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Marine Vehicles. New York: Cambridge
University Press, 2005.
6. Smyth, Pete, Stepping in the the Future, Professional Boatbuilder , Number 5, June/July 1990.
7. Hadler, J.B., The Prediction of Power Performance on Planing Craft. SNAME Transactions
1966
8. Milwitzky, B. ,A General Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Motions and
Hydrodynamic Loads Eperienced by V-bottom Seaplanes during Step Landing Conditions.
NACA TN 1516 Wash. DC 1948
9. Mssrs. Morabito & Savitsky, Personal Communications via Email, Summer 2010