Sie sind auf Seite 1von 37

10 June 2013

Asia Pacific/Indonesia
Equity Research
Tires & Rubber

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)
Rating
OUTPERFORM*
Price (07 Jun 13, Rp)
3,100.00
Target price (Rp)
4,300.00
Upside/downside (%)
38.7
Mkt cap (Rp bn)
10,802.9 (US$ 1.1)
Enterprise value (Rp bn)
14,152
Number of shares (mn)
3,484.80
Free float (%)
40.0
52-week price range
3,325.0 - 2,025.0
ADTO - 6M (US$ mn)
2.0
*Stock ratings are relative to the coverage universe in each
analyst's or each team's respective sector.
Target price is for 12 months.

Research Analysts
Dian Haryokusumo
62 21 255 37974
dian.haryokusumo@credit-suisse.com

Share price performance


Price (LHS)

Rebased Rel (RHS)

4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
Jun-11 Oct-11 Feb-12 Jun-12 Oct-12 Feb-13

120
100
80
60
40

The price relative chart measures performance against the JSX


COMPOSITE INDEX which closed at 4865.32 on 07/06/13
On 07/06/13 the spot exchange rate was Rp9790./US$1

Performance Over
Absolute (%)
Relative (%)

1M
3.3
7.7

3M
44.2
44.4

12M
31.9
5.2

INITIATION

Full of grip
Initiate coverage with an OUTPERFORM rating. Gajah Tunggal (GT) is the
largest integrated SEA tyre manufacturer with own production of synthetic
rubber and tyre cords. We believe the Indonesian tyre industry would benefit
from the growing auto industry, where we started to see an inflection point in 4W
population, growing at 11% CAGR over FY13-15E. GTs valuation is
undemanding, trading at 8.0x FY13E P/E, a 13% discount to regional tyre peers
and 33% discount to Indonesia auto. The stock is also a play on domestic
consumption, benefitting from rising middle-high income population, where it is
trading at a steep discount of around 76% to Indonesian consumer stocks.
Improvement in the replacement market by better penetrating into OEM
business. The domestic replacement tyre market is contributing more than 50%
of GTs total tyre revenue. For radial tyres, GT has 24% market share in the
replacement market. We expect its market share to improve to 27% by FY15
through better penetration into OEM tyre by: (1) being the biggest tyre supplier
for Suzuki Ertiga (the new breakthrough low-end MPV after Toyota Avanza and
Daihatsu Xenia), (2) supplying the potential low cost green car (LCGC) market.
We expect domestic radial tyre revenue to grow at 28% CAGR.
Continues to dominate 2W and bias (heavy duty) tyres. More than 70%
each of 2W and bias tyre revenue is generated from replacements, a highmargin business. GT has been the biggest tyre supplier for Yamaha and
Suzuki motorcycles. We expect the combined revenue to witness a 14%
CAGR over FY13-15, with 2W tyres as the main growth driver.
Target price at Rp4,300. We use DCF and P/E to value the company. Our
DCF indicates a target price of Rp4,900, implying 12.1x FY13E P/E. Given
regional peers are trading at an implied P/E range of 715x, we use 10.5x
FY13E P/E to arrive at our target price of Rp4,300. GTs 15% earnings
growth for FY1315E is among the highest versus its peers, with margin
gradually improving along with relatively stable raw material costs. Key
risks: commodity price and competitions from both existing and new players.
Financial and valuation metrics
Year
Revenue (Rp bn)
EBITDA (Rp bn)
EBIT (Rp bn)
Net profit (Rp bn)
EPS (CS adj.) (Rp)
Change from previous EPS (%)
Consensus EPS (Rp)
EPS growth (%)
P/E (x)
Dividend yield (%)
EV/EBITDA (x)
P/B (x)
ROE (%)
Net debt/equity (%)

12/12A
12,578.6
2,116.8
1,677.2
1,132.2
325.00
n.a.
n.a.
65.8
9.5
0.32
6.6
1.9
22.6
56.0

12/13E
13,628.1
2,296.7
1,837.6
1,410.6
404.91

12/14E
15,100.5
2,709.3
2,200.6
1,612.7
462.90

12/15E
16,584.5
3,051.2
2,492.5
1,876.3
538.58

335
24.6
7.7
0.53
6.2
1.6
22.6
52.1

374
14.3
6.7
0.66
5.1
1.3
21.0
38.2

404
16.3
5.8
0.76
4.5
1.1
20.1
28.6

Source: Company data, Thomson Reuters, Credit Suisse estimates.

DISCLOSURE APPENDIX CONTAINS ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND THE STATUS OF NON US ANALYSTS. FOR
OTHER IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, visit www.credit-suisse.com/researchdisclosures or call +1 (877) 291-2683 US

Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result,
investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors
should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.

CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS

BEYOND INFORMATION
Client-Driven Solutions, Insights, and Access

10 June 2013

Focus charts
Figure 2: to benefit Indonesias domestic tyre industry

Figure 1: Improving auto population

4W tyre (mn units)


18

18.0

120
11% CAGR 13E-15E

16

100

14
12

14.0

80

10

12.0
10.0

60

Replacement: 12% CAGR 13-15E


OEM: 10% CAGR 13-15E

16.0

8.0

40

6.0

4.0

20

2.0

2005

2007

2009

2011

4W population (mn units, LHR)

2013E

2015E

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E

2W population (mn units)

Replacement

OEM

Source: Indonesia Tyre Association, Credit Suisse estimates

Source: Indonesia Tyre association, Credit Suisse estimates

Figure 3: GT has 24% market share in replacement

Figure 4: Tyre revenue to grow at 11% YoY over FY1315E

market, despite having relatively small OEM business

on higher replacement tyre contribution


18,000

Others
5%

EP
10%

15,867

16,000

14,314
12,808

14,000

11,702

12,000

Rp bn

Bridgestone
33%
Gajah Tunggal
24%

10,721
8,996

10,000
6,979

8,000
6,000

7,244

5,713

4,000
Dunlop
28%

2,000

2007

2008

2009

2010

Replacement

2011
OEM

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E


Export

Source: Company data FY12

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Figure 5: Margins to gradually improve on relatively

Figure 6: Undemanding valuation

stable raw material costs


3,000

14.6%

14.4%

13.3% 13.5%

13.1%

2,500

15.0%

16%

2,493

14%

2,201
2,000

10.0%
1,677
8.5%

1,500

7.3% 1,145
1,000

665

1,838

1,010

2%

0%
2009

2010

2011

Operating profit (Rp bn, LHS)

NPV (Rp bn)


TV multiple

10%

4%

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E


Operating margin

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

CoE
WACC

12%

6%

581

2008

Assumptions: : 1.2

TPX (Rp/share)

8%

1,287

500

2007

DCF valuation

Implied FY13E P/E (x)


Comparisons

14%
11.4%
20,453
19
4,900
12.1
Current FY13E P/E

Regional tire peers*

9.2

Indo auto*

12.0

Indo consumer*

33.1

Gajah Tunggal
TPX (Rp/share)

4,300

Implied FY13E P/E (x)

10.5

Current FY13E P/E (x)

8.0

*CS coverage. Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

10 June 2013

Full of grip
Gajah Tunggal (GT) is the largest integrated SEA tyre manufacture with own production of
synthetic rubber and tyre cords. The tyre business includes radial, bias (heavy duty), and
motorcycle tyres with replacement market being the main contributor to total tyre revenue.
We initiate coverage on GT with an OUTPERFORM rating and a target price of Rp4,300.

Benefits from the growing auto sector


We estimate Indonesias automotive population will grow at 11% YoY over FY13-15,
benefitting from the rising middle-high income segment in Indonesia over the past years,
resulting in improving affordability. We also expect the LCGC to create a new segment
within the industry, suggesting potential room for growth. This should benefit the domestic
4W tyre industry, which we expect to grow at 11% YoY over FY13-15, with higher OEM
tyre contribution resulting in a growing replacement market. Despite a bigger export radial
tyre market, we estimate the growth will be flat due to increasing competition. Indonesia
has a huge 2W replacement tyre market, witnessing a 14% CAGR during FY05-12A,
supported by high 2W penetration. We expect it to see a 11% CAGR over FY13-15.

The largest integrated SEA tyre manufacturer


As the largest integrated tyre manufacturer in South East Asia, GT both manufactures
tyres and produces its own synthetic rubber and tyre cords. The companys revenue is
primarily coming from the sales of radial, bias and motorcycle tyres with contribution of
35%, 36%, and 24% to total sales, respectively. The domestic market plays an important
role in GTs tyre business, where revenue from the replacement market contributes more
than 50% of total tyre revenue, followed by export (33%), and OEM (14%). For radial tyres,
GT has 24% market share in replacement market, despite having a relatively small OEM
business. But, we expect its market share to increase to 27% by FY15 through better
penetration into OEM tyre by: (1) being the biggest tyre supplier for Suzuki Ertiga (the new
breakthrough low-end MPV after Toyota Avanza and Daihatsu Xenia), (2) supplying the
potential LCGC market. We expect the domestic radial tyre revenue to grow at 28% CAGR
during FY1315.
We believe GT should continue dominating the 2W and bias tyre markets. More than 70%
each of 2W and bias tyre revenue is from the replacement market; the high-margin business.
We expect the steady cash flow from these businesses to continue. GT has been the biggest
tyre supplier for Yamaha and Suzuki 2W. We expect the combined revenue to grow at 14%
over FY1315E, with 2W tyre continuing to be the main growth driver. In all, we expect total
domestic revenue for GT to grow at 14% CAGR, driven by growth in its tyre business, which
is expected to grow at 11% CAGR on the back of 8% CAGR volume growth.

Initiating with OUTPERFORM and a TP of Rp4,300


We have used DCF and P/E to value the company. Our DCF indicates a target price of
Rp4,900, implying 12.1x FY13E P/E. Given regional peers are trading at an implied P/E
range of 715x, we use 10.5x FY13E P/E to arrive at our target price of Rp4,300. GTs
current valuation is undemanding, trading at 8.0x FY13E P/E, a 13% discount to regional
tyre peers and 33% discount to Indonesia auto. The stock is also a play on domestic
consumption, benefitting from rising middle-high income population, where it is trading at a
steep discount of around 76% to Indonesian consumer stocks. GTs 15% earnings growth
for FY1315E is amongst the highest versus its peers, with margin gradually improving
along with relatively stable raw material costs.

Risks
Key risks include: (1) commodity price risk, (2) competition from both the existing and new
players, (3) regulatory risk, and (4) macroeconomic risk.
Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

10 June 2013

Gajah Tunggal GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ


Price (07 Jun 13): Rp3,100.00, Rating:: OUTPERFORM, Target Price: Rp4,300.00, Analyst: Dian Haryokusumo
Target price scenario
Scenario

TP
4,800.0
Upside
0
4,300.0
Central Case
0
4,000.0
Downside
0
Income statement (Rp bn)
Sales revenue
Cost of goods sold
SG&A
Other operating exp./(inc.)
EBITDA
Depreciation & amortisation
EBIT
Net interest expense/(inc.)
Non-operating inc./(exp.)
Associates/JV
Recurring PBT
Exceptionals/extraordinaries
Taxes
Profit after tax
Other after tax income
Minority interests
Preferred dividends
Reported net profit
Analyst adjustments
Net profit (Credit Suisse)
Cash flow (Rp bn)
EBIT
Net interest
Tax paid
Working capital
Other cash & non-cash items
Operating cash flow
Capex
Free cash flow to the firm
Disposals of fixed assets
Acquisitions
Divestments
Associate investments
Other investment/(outflows)
Investing cash flow
Equity raised
Dividends paid
Net borrowings
Other financing cash flow
Financing cash flow
Total cash flow
Adjustments
Net change in cash
Balance sheet (Rp bn)
Cash & cash equivalents
Current receivables
Inventories
Other current assets
Current assets
Property, plant & equip.
Investments
Intangibles
Other non-current assets
Total assets
Accounts payable
Short-term debt
Current provisions
Other current liabilities
Current liabilities
Long-term debt
Non-current provisions
Other non-current liab.
Total liabilities
Shareholders' equity
Minority interests
Total liabilities & equity

%Up/Dwn Assumptions
54.84 radial tyre vol to go up by 10%

Key earnings drivers


Tyre volume (mn units)
Rubber price (US
cents/kg)
Oil
price (US/bbl)

12/12A
36.6
312.6
112.8

12/13E
39.3
310.4
112.0

12/14E
42.8
304.9
110.0

12/15E
46.3
304.9
100.0

Per share data


Shares (wtd avg.) (mn)
EPS (Credit Suisse) (Rp)
DPS (Rp)
BVPS (Rp)
Operating CFPS (Rp)
Key ratios and
valuation
Growth(%)
Sales revenue
EBIT
Net profit
EPS
Margins (%)
EBITDA
EBIT
Pre-tax profit
Net profit
Valuation metrics (x)
P/E
P/B
Dividend yield (%)
P/CF
EV/sales
EV/EBITDA
EV/EBIT
ROE analysis (%)
ROE
ROIC
Asset turnover (x)
Interest burden (x)
Tax burden (x)
Financial leverage (x)
Credit ratios
Net debt/equity (%)
Net debt/EBITDA (x)
Interest cover (x)

12/12A
3,484
325
10.0
1,597
490
12/12A

12/13E
3,484
405
16.5
1,986
570
12/13E

12/14E
3,484
463
20.6
2,428
544
12/14E

12/15E
3,484
539
23.5
2,943
533
12/15E

6.2
66.1
65.4
65.8

8.3
9.6
24.6
24.6

10.8
19.8
14.3
14.3

9.8
13.3
16.3
16.3

16.8
13.3
11.6
9.0

16.9
13.5
12.9
10.4

17.9
14.6
13.3
10.7

18.4
15.0
14.1
11.3

9.5
1.94
0.32
6.33
1.10
6.55
8.27

7.7
1.56
0.53
5.44
1.04
6.16
7.70

6.7
1.28
0.66
5.69
0.92
5.11
6.30

5.8
1.05
0.76
5.81
0.82
4.46
5.46

22.6
16.0
0.98
0.87
0.78
2.35

22.6
16.0
0.97
0.96
0.80
2.19

21.0
16.9
0.94
0.92
0.80
2.00

20.1
16.9
0.91
0.94
0.80
1.85

56.0
1.45
5.06

52.1
1.46
4.93

38.2
1.13
6.03

28.6
0.92
7.23

38.71
29.03 Radial tyre vol to go down by 10%
12/12A
12,579
10,142
760
(439.7)
2,117
439.7
1,677
331.8
87.9
24.1
1,457

325.2
1,132

1,132

1,132
12/12A
1,677

(82.0)
111.9
1,707
(1,973)
(265.8)

(80.3)
704.2
(1,349)

(34.8)

(12.8)
(47.6)
310.4
7.4
317.8
12/12A
905
2,227
1,479
584.1
5,194
6,122
793.2

761
12,870
1,210
202.2

1,608
3,020
3,769

602.8
7,391
5,564

12,870

12/13E
13,628
10,891
900
(459.1)
2,297
459.1
1,838
373.0
272.6
26.1
1,763

352.7
1,411

1,411

1,411
12/13E
1,838

20.1
127.2
1,985
(1,720)
265.0

(26.1)
(9.4)
(1,755)

(57.5)

(195.4)
(252.9)
(23.4)

(23.4)
12/13E
881
2,155
1,492
529.9
5,058
7,383
819.3

824
14,084
1,332
215.4

1,542
3,090
4,015

545.1
7,650
6,917

14,084

12/14E
15,100
11,975
925
(508.7)
2,709
508.7
2,201
364.7
151.0
28.9
2,016

403.2
1,613

1,613

1,613
12/14E
2,201

(224.9)
(79.3)
1,896
(1,552)
343.9

(28.9)
(13.1)
(1,595)

(71.6)

89.6
18.0
319.8

319.8
12/14E
1,201
2,388
1,640
587.1
5,816
8,426
848.3

913
16,004
1,466
216.5

1,698
3,380
4,035

604.0
8,019
8,458

16,004

12/15E
16,585
13,076
1,016
(558.7)
3,051
558.7
2,493
344.7
165.8
31.8
2,345

469.1
1,876

1,876

1,876
12/15E
2,493

(576.8)
(57.5)
1,858
(1,552)
305.7

(31.8)
(13.2)
(1,598)

(81.9)

72.5
(9.4)
251.3

251.3
12/15E
1,452
2,623
1,791
995.1
6,861
9,420
880.0

1,003
18,164
1,602
216.5

1,855
3,674
4,035

663.4
8,372
10,253

18,164

Source: Company data, Thomson Reuters, Credit Suisse estimates.


12MF P/E multiple
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2012

2013

12MF P/B multiple


3.0
2.5

2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2008

2009

2010

2011

Source: IBES

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

10 June 2013

Benefits from a growing auto sector


Indonesias automotive industry has benefitted from the growing middle-high income
population over the past years. Based on Nielsens survey, in Indonesias 12 cities, the
proportion of middle and high income groups spending population increased from 42% in
2008 to 62% in 2010, implying around 48 mn people moved into the middle-high income
segment during the period. We expect the middle-income groups spending to continue to
grow along with an estimated rise in Indonesias GDP per capita from about US$2,985 in
2010 to US$4,139 in 2014E. Therefore, we expect affordability to improve.
Figure 7: Middle-income groups spending is rising
42%

51%

62%

8%

9%

11%

14%

18%

20%

4,000

24%

24%
27%

27%
25%
21%

4,500

22%
17%

10%

7%

12%
4%

2008

2009

2010

Below Rp 700K

Rp 700K - Rp1mn

Rp 1 mn - Rp1.5 mn

Rp 1.5 mn - Rp 2 mn

Rp 2 mn - Rp 3 mn

Over Rp 3 mn

Source: Nielsen Media Research, Media Index

3,500
GDP per capita (US$)

100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%

Figure 8: along with rising GDP per capita

3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012 2013E 2014E

Source: CEIC, Credit Suisse estimates

Potential room to grow in the 4W market


The four-wheeler (4W) industry in Indonesia has grown at 21% CAGR over the past five
years, with the MPV (multi-purpose vehicle) segment being the biggest contributor. We
remain positive on the outlook of Indonesias 4W industry, given the countrys improving
purchasing power, as well as the low penetration rate of the 4W market, where Indonesia
exhibits the second-lowest 4W penetration after India. This suggests a potential room to
grow further. We expect 4W industry volume to grow at 10% CAGR over 2013E-15E,
bringing the total 4W population to grow at 11% CAGR.
Figure 9: 4W industry to grow at 10% CAGR 2013E-15E

Figure 10: Low 4W penetration

1,800,000

35%
1,600,000

30%

4W Penetration rate

1,400,000

Units

1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000

25%
20%
15%
10%
5%

600,000

0%

400,000

Korea

Malaysia

Thailand

China

Indonesia

India

200,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E

Source: Gaikindo, Credit Suisse estimates

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

10 June 2013

to benefit 4W tyre industry


Exports play a major role in Indonesias 4W tyre industry, especially for the passenger car
radial tyre. North America is the main destination for tyre export, where Indonesia is the
fifth-largest passenger car tyre exporter to the US market after South Korea (based on
2009 data). In 2012, 4W tyre export market was down by around 10% YoY, mostly driven
by the global crisis in the US and Europe.
Figure 11: Indonesiathe fifth-largest PC tyre exporter to the US market
Units
45,000,000
40,000,000
2009

35,000,000

2008

30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000
0
China

Japan

Canada

South Indonesia Mexico


Korea

Brazil

Thailand

Costa
Rica

Germany Others

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

In contrast, the OEM 4W tyre industry has grown by 28% YoY last year, which was in line
with higher 4W new sales volume during the period. The higher 4W sales volume is mainly
driven by the contribution of MPV (multi-purpose vehicle) segment, which contributed
more than 60% of total 4W market. In particular, the low MPV segment has been the key
driver for the strong growth last year, where new models such as Suzuki Ertiga and Nissan
Evalia have entered the Indonesian MPV market starting last year. In addition, the
comeback of Honda into the industry has also contributed to higher growth, after its supply
was disrupted due to Thailand floods back in 2011.
We expect 4W volumes to grow at 10% CAGR over 2013E-15E. Starting this year, we
expect the LCGC to create a new market segment in Indonesias 4W market, which will
drive 4W volume growth, and would automatically result in potential demand growth for
4W tyres in domestic market, including both OEM and replacement tyre markets.
A higher OEM tyre contribution to the total 4W tyre market has also resulted in a higher
replacement market. Although the growth in 4W replacement tyres was only 7% YoY in
2012, the contribution to total market increased to 24% (from 22% in 2011). We believe
that the replacement market would grow by 12% CAGR over 2013E-15E, driven by OEM
market that is estimated to grow at 10% CAGR which will result in higher contribution for
both replacement and OEM to total 4W tyre market. Thus, the total domestic 4W tyre
market is estimated to grow at 11% CAGR. Combined with the expectation of a relatively
flat growth in export tyre market over the next two years, we estimate the total 4W tyre
industry (including export) will grow at 5% CAGR.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

10 June 2013

Figure 12: 4W tyre export market still plays a major role

Figure 13: while higher contribution in OEM resulted in

mn units

better penetration in the replacement market

40.0

100%

35.0

90%

80%

30.0

70%

25.0

60%

20.0

50%

15.0

40%
30%

10.0
5.0

13%

14%

14%

11%

26%

27%

29%

8%

7%

8%

8%

19%

21%

22%

21%

22%

24%

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

20%

6%

10%

0%
2007

2008

2009

2010

Replacement

2011
OEM

2012

2013E 2014E 2015E

Export

Source: Indonesia Tyre Association, Company data, Credit Suisse


estimates

Replacement

OEM

2013E 2014E 2015E

Export

Source: Indonesia Tyre Association, Company data, Credit Suisse


estimates

Highly penetrated two-wheeler market


Indonesias two-wheeler (2W) penetration per household recently surpassed 80% and our
analysis indicates the risk for higher volatility in the countrys 2W sales volume growth
ahead. Our analysis finds that being above 80% 2W penetration per household, Thailands
2W sales volume growth exhibits higher sensitivity to real GDP growth and policy rates. In
countries having below 80% penetration per household, 2W sales generally service firsttime buyers, implying 2W is perceived as a necessity product. In the case of above 80%
penetration per household, however, much of the 2W sales will be servicing replacement
and/or second 2W and thus, exhibits higher sensitivity to macroeconomic variables since it
is perceived more as discretionary rather than a necessity product.
Figure 14: 2W industry to grow at 10% CAGR 2013E-15E

Figure 15: Indonesias motorcycle per household (%)

10,000,000

100
9,000,000

2W per household (%)

90

8,000,000

Units

7,000,000
6,000,000

80

70
60
50
40
30

5,000,000

20
4,000,000

10
-

3,000,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E

Source: AISI, Credit Suisse estimates

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

2010

Source: CEIC, Credit Suisse estimates

resulted in high replacement in 2W tyre industry


We believe this supports the argument of high replacement market in 2W tyre industry in
Indonesia, in which the replacement market for 2W tyre has grown at 14% CAGR over
2005-12 and we expect it would continue to grow at around 11% CAGR for next two years.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

10 June 2013

Last year, the 2W replacement tyre market grew at an estimated 21% YoY, while the 2W
OEM tyre market softened, which was mostly as a result of the softening of 2W industry in
Indonesia. The soft 2W industry last year was led by: (1) softening commodity prices,
which we believe has impacted the purchasing power of 2W customers. As Indonesias
2W penetration has reached above 80%, we believe that most of the 2W customers are
secondary and/ or replacement buyers, in which fluctuation in commodity prices becomes
more sensitive to them; and (2) the introduction of minimum down payment regulation for
conventional loan for cars and motorcycles to 2530%, and 2025%, respectively. This
has resulted in softened 2W new sales volume as the customers preferred to postpone
their 2W purchases in order to save their money to meet the required down payment.
We believe this year 2W industry would grow at around 10% YoY on the back of low base
from last year. In addition, we expect this years commodity price to normalise, thus 2W
purchasing power should recover, which would also support the growth of 2W tyre
industry. We expect the 2W OEM tyre to grow at 10% CAGR over 2013E15E. We
believe the introduction of minimum down payment regulation for Sharia auto loans would
not have a significant impact to automotive industry, particularly the 2W market, given
Sharia loans as percentage to total loans in Indonesia only accounts for less than 5%.
Unlike the 4W tyre market, export in 2W tyre industry is relatively small in terms of
contribution to total 2W tyre volume. More than 90% of the 2W tyre in Indonesia is
servicing the domestic market, given the high 2W penetration.
Figure 16: Growing replacement market in 2W tyre

Figure 17: which contributes 67% of total domestic 2W

mn units

tyre market

45.0

100%

40.0

90%

35.0

80%

41%

45%

43%

39%

40%

59%

55%

57%

61%

60%

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

33%

33%

33%

32%

67%

67%

67%

68%

70%

30.0

60%

25.0

50%

20.0

40%

15.0

30%

10.0

20%

5.0

10%

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Replacement

2012

2013E 2014E 2015E

OEM

Source: Indonesia Tyre Association, Company data, Credit Suisse


estimates

0%
Replacement

2012

2013E 2014E 2015E

OEM

Source: Indonesia Tyre Association, Company data, Credit Suisse


estimates

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

10 June 2013

The largest integrated SEA tyre


manufacturer
Established in 1951, Gajah Tunggal (GT) is the largest integrated South East Asian tyre
manufacturer with own production of synthetic rubber and tyre cords. The companys
revenue comes mainly from sales of radial, bias and motorcycle tyres with contributions of
35%, 36% and 24% to total sales, respectively. Rest of the revenue comes from sales of
synthetic rubber and tyre cords, which are mostly sold internally.
Figure 18: Tyres is the key business with 95%

Figure 19: Replacement tyres to be the major contributor

contribution
Synthetic
rubber
4%

Tire cord
1%

Export
33%

Radial tires
35%

Motorcycle tires
24%

Replacement
53%

OEM
14%

Bias tires
36%

--- GTs tyre revenue. Source: Credit Suisse estimates FY13E

Source: Credit Suisse estimates FY13E

In terms of total tyre revenue, replacement tyre is the majority contributor, where in more
than half of the revenue comes from Java, followed by Sumatra (29%), Kalimantan (11%)
and Eastern Indonesia (9%). Exports are expected to contribute 33% of FY13 tyre revenue
(mostly from radial and bias tyres), with the US as the main destination. In addition, in line
with the companys strategy, we expect OEM revenue to increase gradually, which will
improve the performance of GTs replacement tyre market.
Figure 20: Domestic replacement sales breakdown, FY12

Figure 21: Export sales breakdown, 1Q13

Source: Company data

Source: Company data

We expect total GT revenue to see a 10% CAGR 2013-15 mostly driven by the growth in
the tyre business, which we expect to grow at 11% p.a. on the back of an 8% volume
CAGR. We expect revenue from its other businesses, i.e., synthetic rubber and tyre cords,
to decline as the company gradually reduces the proportion of sales to external parties.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

10 June 2013

Figure 22: Tyre volume to see an 8% CAGR FY13-15E


50.0
43

45.0
40.0

36

30.0

27

29

37

18,000

46

15,100

16,000

39

11,836

12,000

28

25.0
20.0

12,576

9,854

10,000

7,963 7,935

8,000 6,660

15.0

6,000

10.0

4,000

5.0

16,585

13,628

14,000

Rp bn

mn units

35.0

36

Figure 23: Total revenue to see a 10% CAGR FY13-15E

2,000

2007

2008

2009

2010

Radial

2011

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E

Bias

MC tire

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E

Radial tires

Bias tires

Motorcycle tires

Synthetic rubber

Tire cord

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Radial tyres
GTs radial tyres are mostly exported (79% of FY13E radial tyre revenue) to more than 90
countries, with the US being the main destination, while 17% of FY13E radial tyre revenue
should come from the replacement market, and the remaining from the OEM business.
To increase the replacement market by a better penetrating OEM business
For the radial replacement market in Indonesia, GT has a market share of 24% (est. 2012
excluding Multistrada). The market is led by Bridgestone (33% market share) of PT
Bridgestone Indonesia (Not-listed) and Dunlop (28% market share) of PT Sumi Rubber
Indonesia (Not-listed). To increase its competitiveness in the replacement market, the
company aims to improve or better penetrate into the OEM market. The Indonesian
customers tend to choose their replacement tyres based on the original tyres of the
vehicles. Thus, if a tyre company successfully manages its OEM business relation, then it
would be able to control the replacement market as well.
Figure 24: GT has a 24% market share in the radial

Figure 25: Volume of GT replacement and OEM tyres to

replacement market, FY12

see a 21% CAGR FY13-15E


3.0

Others
5%

2.5

2.5
2.1
Bridgestone
33%

Gajah Tunggal
24%

2.0

mn units

EP
10%

1.5
1.0

Dunlop
28%

1.7
1.5
1.2
0.9

1.0

1.3

1.0
0.8
0.4

0.5

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

2007

2008

2009

2010

0.8

0.6

0.2

Replacement

Source: Company data

2011

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E

OEM

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

10

10 June 2013

GTs OEM passenger car tyre exposure includes Suzuki Ertiga (biggest tyre supplier) and
some of Daihatsu Xenia, besides Toyota Avanza. Suzuki Ertiga has been doing very well
since it was launched in April last year. It targets the same segment as Daihatsu Xenia
and Toyota Avanza are in. GTs exposure to Suzuki Ertigas OEM business plays an
important role for the company as it will drive future growth of both OEM tyres as well as
replacement tyres. In addition, the launch of LCGC should bring in additional growth to
tyre demand as a whole and GT in particular. In the global OEM tyre market, the company
supplies tyres to Proton Malaysia and Mitsubishi Thailand.
We expect the volume of replacement radial tyre for GT to grow by 14% YoY this year to
1.7 mn units, with OEM tyres to grow by 40% YoY, which will be contributed by the growth
of domestic car sales from both non-LCGC and LCGC cars.
US import tariffs for China have expired
In 2012 volumes of GTs radial export tyres softened by about 13% YoY, mostly driven by
softer demand in the US and Europe markets. In addition, the three-year US import tyre
tariffs for China expired on 27 September 2012. These tariffs were enacted in 200935%
import tariff in the first year, 30% in the second year and 25% in the third yearto reduce
unemployment in the US tyre industry. After the tariff expired last September, imported
tyre volumes from China have doubled starting October-November 2012. As a result, we
believe the export market would become more competitive, hence expect GTs radial
export tyre volumes to remain relatively flat over the next two years.
Off-take agreement with Michelin
GT has signed an off-take agreement with Michelin in 2004. Last year, the off-take volume
from Michelin reached 2.9 mn units, which is expected to reach around 2.8 mn units this year.
In addition, the company has a strategic relationship with GITI which allows synergies in
various marketing and technical aspects of the tyre business. In 2011 the company signed an
off-take agreement with GITI China of up to 1 mn tyres to serve the US market.
Figure 26: Export volumes to remain relatively flat

Figure 27: Michelin off-take agreement

11.0

4.0
10.3

3.5

10.0

9.1

8.0

9.0

8.5

8.8

8.8

8.8

3.0

mn units

mn units

9.0

7.9

7.0

2.5
2.0

6.5

1.5

6.0

1.0

5.0
2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E

Export

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E

Michelin - off take volume

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Competitive pricing
We expect the average blended selling price to see a 2% CAGR 2013-15E on the back of
relatively flat export selling prices due to intense competition. Based on our channel checks,
GT Radials domestic selling prices are considered to be competitive versus other tyre
players prices. For example, for a tyre size of 165/55/16, Bridgestones tyres are about 46%
expensive, while Good Years are at a 22% premium. The company is planning to improve
its relationships with OEM players to better penetrate into the replacement market.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

11

10 June 2013

We estimate radial tyre revenue from the replacement market to see a 28% CAGR over
the next two years with OEM revenue to grow by 29% YoY. Thus, total domestic radial
tyres revenue should grow at 28% YoY FY13-15E. However, we expect revenue from the
export radial market to increase by only 1% YoY given potential higher competition.
Figure 28: Competitive retail price for passenger car tyre

Figure 29: GT Radial Champiro Eco

1,800,000
68% premium

1,600,000
46% premium

Selling price per unit (Rp)

1,400,000

22% premium

1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000

200,000
Bridgestone

Gajah Tunggal

Good Year

Continental

*Original retail price prior to discount. Source: kiosban.com, Credit


Suisse

Source: Company data

Figure 30: Replacement and OEM revenue to post a

Figure 31: Radial export revenue to remain flat

strong 28-29% CAGR


1,400

4,500

1,286
1,026

647
538

600

446
350

Rp bn

Rp bn

3,000

785

800

3,807 3,727 3,793 3,793

3,500

1,000

400

3,972

4,000

1,200

2,500

2,775

2,531
2,208

2,054

2,000
1,500

352

1,000

265

500

200

2007

2008

2009

2010

Replacement

2011

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E

2007

2008

2009

2010

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E

Export

OEM

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

2011

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Bias tyres
Most of GTs bias tyres serve the domestic replacement market, where the company
continues to be the dominant player. Given the advancement of radial tyres over the
period, bias tyres are now used less frequently. In the developed countries, radial tyres are
preferred for commercial vehicles as the road infrastructure is well developed. However, in
developing countries such as Indonesia, the use of bias tyres is still relatively high as they
normally contain more natural rubber versus synthetic rubber enabling the tyres to become
more flexible, and thus better manoeuvring of bad roads or poor infrastructure.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

12

10 June 2013

Figure 32: Dominates the bias tyre replacement market

Figure 33: Volumes to see a 5% CAGR 2013-15E


4.0

Others
Dunlop 6%
7%

3.5
3.0

3.0

Swallow
21%

mn units

2.5
Gajah Tunggal
49%

2.2

2.2

2.0
1.5

1.1

0.9

1.0
Bridgestone
17%

2.6

2.5

2.3

3.5

3.3

3.2

1.1

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.7

0.8

0.8

0.5

2007

2008

2009

2010

Replacement

Source: Company data

2011
OEM

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E


Export

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

As infrastructure continues to be developed in Indonesia, the company plans to reduce the


proportion of bias tyre volumes gradually in the longer term. We expect total volumes of
bias tyres to see a 5% CAGR over the next two years. According to GT, it is able to
maintain high margins for bias tyres which we believe is due to its dominance in the
replacement market. Thus, the contribution of revenue from this segment is estimated to
remain 38% of total FY13 revenue.
Figure 34: Bias tyre volume contribution to gradually

Figure 35: but the contribution to total revenue remains

decline

high backed by higher margins

100%

100%

90%

90%

80%

80%

70%

53%

55%

59%

61%

56%

58%

60%

62%

63%

60%

40%

38%

36%

50%

13%

13%

30%
20%

22%

33%

33%

10%

12%

12%

27%

29%

11%

33%

12%

30%

12%

28%

26%

26%

39%

38%

35%

36%

2009

2010

23%

23%

25%

27%

28%

35%

37%

38%

38%

38%

43%

39%

37%

36%

34%

2011

2012

70%

60%

50%

21%

40%

11%

11%

27%

26%

30%
20%

41%

41%

2007

2008

10%

0%
2007

2008

2009

2010

Radial

2011
Bias

2012
MC tire

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

2013E 2014E 2015E

0%

Radial tires

Bias tires

2013E 2014E 2015E

Motorcycle tires

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

We expect the average selling price to grow at 6% YoY over FY13-15E on the back of
relatively flat rubber prices ahead and estimated average inflation of around 6%. Thus,
total bias tyre revenue should increase by 11% YoY over the next two years, with
replacement tyres continuing to be the major revenue contributor.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

13

10 June 2013

Figure 36: Total bias tyre revenue to see a 11% CAGR

Figure 37: GT Super Grip

5,000
4,373

4,500
3,921

4,000

3,524

3,500

3,149

Rp bn

3,000
2,370

2,500
2,000
1,500

1,821

2,591

2,043

1,495

1,000
500

87

278

252

2008

2009

515

666

743

832

926

1,032

2007

2010

Replacement

2011
OEM

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E


Export

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Source: Company data

Motorcycle tyres
Leader in the replacement market
GTs IRC brand is very popular among the 2W tyre customers. GT dominates the 2W tyre
replacement market with a 50% market share as of last year. It has a licence to
manufacture and sell IRC motorcycle brand tyres in Indonesia since 1973. GT has been
one of the biggest suppliers for 2W tyre OEMs such as Yamaha, Suzuki, Kawasaki and
TVS. The company has also supplied around 10% of Hondas total 2W tyres. However,
majority of Hondas 2W tyres are supplied by PT Suryaraya Rubberindo Industries, a
subsidiary of Astra Honda Motor, under the brand name Federal, which has around 28%
market share.
Given high 2W penetration in Indonesia, we expect the replacement tyre market, the main
focus of 2W tyres, to continue to grow. We expect total motorcycle tyre volumes to grow at
11% YoY over the next two years.
Figure 38: Leading the motorcycle tyre market

Figure 39: Continue to see a 11% CAGR over 2013-15E


25.0

Dunlop
7%

20.8

Others
6%

16.9

15.2
mn units

Swallow
9%
Gajah Tunggal
50%

Federal
28%

18.7

20.0

15.0

10.0

5.0

13.2
9.5

9.5

12.6

10.5

6.4

6.4

2008

2009

7.8

7.6

4.8

6.2

6.9

7.6

8.3

2007

2010

Replacement

Source: Company data

2011
OEM

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E


Export

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

14

10 June 2013

Launched new brand Zeneos


The company launched its new 2W tyre brand Zeneos in June 2012, targeting medium
and low-end customers, at about 10% lower prices compared to IRC. The company
expects to enter the export market in 1Q14, at the earliest.
Still the preferred brand
Based on our channel checks, IRC is still customers most preferred option for 2W
replacement tyres. The selling price of IRC is also relatively low versus its closest rival,
FDR (Federal), whose price is at about 8% premium to IRC. While brands like Swallow are
relatively cheap versus IRC and FDR, they dont have much brand value. Branding is
crucial for any consumer product, including tyres. As IRC offers both a strong brand value
and competitive pricing, it continues to be popular.
Figure 40: IRC offers competitive pricing

Figure 41: 2W tyre revenue to grow at 18% YoY


4,000

160,000
8% premium

140,000

3% discount

2,857

3,000

120,000

2,425

2,500

100,000

Rp bn

Selling price per unit (Rp)

3,363

3,500

80,000

2,057

2,000

1,702 1,721

1,500

60,000

1,000

40,000

500

20,000

953
269
2007

Gajah Tunggal (IRC)

FDR

*Non-tubeless back tyre. Source: Credit Suisse

1,137

421

2008

1,350
629

525

2009

2010

Replacement

Swallow

738

2011
OEM

686

808

944

1,103

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E


Export

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

We expect the average selling price to see a 6% CAGR over 2013-15E on the back of
relatively flat rubber prices going forward and estimated average inflation of around 6%.
Thus, total motorcycle tyre revenue should increase 18% YoY over the next two years,
with replacement tyres continuing to be the major revenue contributor.

Margins to benefit from relatively stable costs


Relatively stable costs ahead
More than 70% of total cost of a tyre company is raw materials, out of which 36% is
natural rubber and 27% is synthetic rubber. GT sources natural rubber mostly from a
domestic trader under a supply contract that is set on an annual basis based on volumes,
while the average price of the tyre is based on the average price of raw materials on the
previous month. We estimate that rubber prices will be relatively stable going forward,
benefiting the companys natural rubber costs.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

15

10 June 2013

Figure 42: More than 70% of total cost is raw materials


Depreciation
4%

Figure 43: with more than half related to rubber

Others
4%
Others
15%

Energy
7%
Labour
8%

Natural rubber
36%

Carbon black
10%
Tire cord
12%

Raw materials
77%

Source: Credit Suisse estimates FY13E

Synthetic
rubber
27%

Source: Credit Suisse estimates FY13E

As the largest South East Asia tyre manufacturer, GT produces the synthetic rubber inhouse, accounting for around 27% of FY13E costs. The raw material for synthetic rubber
is butadiene, which is mostly imported from Korea. We expect the price of butadiene to be
relatively flat.
Based on our report, Auto Parts Sector: Bridgestone & Sumitomo Rubber Industries have
firm grip on profits (refer Appendix 2), according to the International Rubber Study Group
(IRSG), global inventories of natural and synthetic rubber are on the rise. In other words,
given lingering uncertainties on the demand side, the current supply-demand balance
makes a sudden sharp rise in materials prices unlikely. In particular, we believe the current
increase in production of natural rubber by such major producing countries as Thailand will
contribute to more stable natural rubber prices.
Figure 44: Global natural rubber production and

Figure 45: Global synthetic rubber production and

consumption

consumption

000 tonnes

000 tonnes

3,500

1,800
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0

3,000
2,500
2,000

1,500
1,000
500

0
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q
2010
NR Production (LHS)

2011

2012

NR Consumption (LHS)

Source: IRSG (International Rubber Study Group)

3,900

4,300

3,800

4,200

3,700

4,100

3,600

4,000

3,500

3,900

3,400

3,800

3,300

3,700

3,200

3,600

3,100

3,500
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q

2010
NR Stock (RHS)

SR Production (LHS)

2011

2012

SR Consumption (LHS)

SR Stock (RHS)

Source: IRSG (International Rubber Study Group)

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

16

10 June 2013

Figure 46: Historical natural rubber prices

Figure 47: High correlation between butadiene and oil


prices

500

Rubber price (US cents/ kg)

450

4500

160

4000

140

3500

400

120

3000

350

2500

300

2000

100
80
60

1500

250

40

1000
200

20

500

150

0
0
Apr-05 Apr-06 Apr-07 Apr-08 Apr-09 Apr-10 Apr-11 Apr-12 Apr-13

100
2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Butadiene (US$/t, LHS)

2012

Source: Malaysian Rubber Board

Brent oil price (US$/barrel)

Source: Bloomberg

In addition to synthetic rubber, GT has in-house production of tyre cords, which is based
on polyester or nylon. The cord filament is sourced from Filamendo Sakti (Not-listed), a
subsidiary of Polychem Indonesia (25.6% owned by GT). Carbon black is added to rubber
as both filter and as a strengthening or reinforcing agent. It is an oil-based product sourced
from a US firm located in Indonesia called Cabot.
Margins to benefit
The relatively stable raw material costs, which account for more than 70% of GTs total
costs, should benefit the companys overall margins, which are expected to improve
gradually with a higher contribution from the replacement market due to GTs growing tyre
OEM business.
We estimate GTs earnings this year will grow by 25% YoY. We continue to believe that
the companys earnings will continue to see positive strong growtha 15% CAGR over
the next two yearsgiven relatively stable costs.
Figure 49: with a gradual improvement in margins

Figure 48: Gross profit to see a 13% CAGR


4,000

25%

23.0%

3,500
3,000

19.4%

19.7%

17.6%

20.1%

20%

14.1%2,437 2,737

14.3%

2,000

1,500
1,000

1,822
1,175

1,135

2007

2008

0%

2010

1,677
8.5%

1,500

7.3% 1,145
1,000

2009

10.0%

15%

5%

2011

Gross profit (Rp bn, LHS)

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E


Gross margin

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

15.0%

16%

2,493

14%

2,201
2,000

1,669

13.3% 13.5%

13.1%

2,500

10%

1,939

14.6%

14.4%

21.2%

3,126 3,508

2,500

500

20.7%

3,000

665

1,838

12%
10%
8%

1,287
1,010

6%

581

4%

500

2%

0%
2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Operating profit (Rp bn, LHS)

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E


Operating margin

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

17

10 June 2013

Sensitivity of rubber prices to earnings


We have done a sensitivity analysis of rubber prices to the companys total earnings.
Assuming other variables remain constant, if rubber prices move up by 1%, total earnings
will decline by 2%. Conversely, if rubber prices go down by 1%, the company will enjoy
lower costs, and thus earnings will go up by 2%.
On an expansion mode
GTs radial tyre production facility is running at 45,000 units/day, with an approximately
64% utilisation rate. The company plans to increase its capacity to 55,000 units/day by
2014 through debottlenecking. GTs bias tyre production facility is about 14,300 units/day,
with 90% utilisation. It targets to increase the production to 14,500 units/day by this year
through debottlenecking. Motorcycle tyre capacity is 90,000 units/day (79% utilisation),
which is planned to be expanded to 105,000 units/day by 2014E. The company is also
planning to build a new facility for TBR (truck & bus radial) tyres, which would be a new
revenue contributor. Its current capacity is still minimal at 350 units/day, and expected to
reach 2,200 units/day by 2016.
In addition, the company is building a new R&D centre in Tangerang, West Java, which
will be used to develop new tyre products. GT is also building its own tyre proving ground
at the recently acquired Karawang land (approximately 60 ha).
The companys capex for this year is estimated to reach US$170 mn, out of which US$50
mn will be used for TBR facility, US$40 mn for debottlenecking, US$30 mn for R&D and
the remaining for maintenance.
We estimate the companys total debt will reach Rp4.2 tn in 2013. In February 2013 GT
issued US$500 mn bond with a five-year tenor, expiring in 2018, with a 7.75% coupon.
The proceeds are used to refinance its matured bond, while the remaining will be used for
expansion.
Figure 50: GTCapital expenditure

Figure 51: GTNet debt


5,000

2,500

4,500

1,973

4,000

1,720
1,553 1,553
1,500

1,000

840

913

382

3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500

669
500

3,500
Net debt (Rp bn)

Capital expenditure (Rp bn)

2,000

1,000

346

500
-

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012 2013E 2014E 2015E

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

18

10 June 2013

Initiating with OUTPERFORM and a


target price of Rp4,300
We initiate coverage on Gajah Tunggal (GT) with an OUTPERFORM rating and a target
price of Rp4,300. We use DCF and P/E to value the company. Our DCF indicates a target
price of Rp4,900, implying 12.1x FY13E P/E. Given regional peers are trading at an implied
P/E range of 715x, we use 10.5x FY13E P/E to arrive at our target price of Rp4,300. Over
the past three months, the stock has traded at an average of US$2.9 mn per day.
Figure 52: Peers valuation comparisons
Ticker

Company name

2105.TW
5108.T
5110.T

Cheng Shin Rubber


Bridgestone
Sumitomo Rubber
Industries
APLO.BO Apollo Tyres
MICP.PA Michelin
Weighted average
GJTL.JK

Gajah Tunggal

Mkt cap Rating

Curr. Target

US$ mn

price price

8,451
25,797
4,102

O
O
O

827
16,259

U
N

1,157

Upside

P/E (x)

EV/EBITDA (x)

Implied P/E (x)

EPS

13E

14E

13E

14E

13E

14E

18%
25%
31%

12.8
9.2
8.0

10.9
8.7
7.5

9.2
6.3
5.3

7.9
5.8
5.0

15.1
11.5
10.5

12.9
10.8
9.9

CAGR
13E-15E
14%
7%
6%

89
60

-5%
-11%

7.0
7.8
9.2

6.1
7.8
8.6

4.8
5.2
6.3

4.3
5.1
5.8

6.8
7.0
10.6

5.9
7.0
9.8

14%
6%
6%

3,250 4,300

32%

8.0

7.0

6.4

5.3

10.5

9.3

15%

89
105
3,210 4,000
1,523 2,000
93
67

Source: Credit Suisse estimates

We derive our DCF valuation by assuming 11.4% WACC (a 7.5% risk-free rate, 1.2 beta,
and 5% risk premium) with 5.8% terminal growth. The Rp4,900/share equates to 12.1x
FY13E P/E.
Figure 53: DCF valuation
Rp bn

2013E

Risk-free rate
Beta
Risk premium
Ke
Kd
Tax
Debt/Capital
Equty/Capital
WACC
Terminal value multiple
Growth
Net Present Value (Rp bn)
Add: Cash (Rp bn)
Minus: Debt (Rp bn)
Shareholder value (Rp bn)
Shareholder value (Rp/share)
Implied FY13E P/E

7.5%
1.2
5%
14%
11%
22%
0.4
0.6
11.4%
19
5.8%
20,453
881
(4,231)
17,104
4,909
12.1x

Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Undemanding valuation
GTs current valuation is undemanding, trading at 8.0x FY13E P/E, a 13% discount to
regional tyre peers and 33% discount to Indonesia auto. The stock is also a play on
domestic consumption, benefitting from rising middle-high income population, where it is
trading at a steep discount of around 76% to Indonesian consumer stocks. GTs 15%
earnings growth for FY1315E is amongst the highest versus its peers, with margin
gradually improving along with relatively stable raw material costs.
Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

19

10 June 2013

Figure 54: Undemanding valuation


35.0

33.1

30.0

FY13E P/E (x)

25.0
20.0
15.0

12.0

10.0

9.2

8.0

5.0

Gajah Tunggal

Regional tire peers*

Indo auto*

Indo consumer*

Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Figure 55: GJTLFwd P/E band

Figure 56:Currently trades at 7.5x fwd P/E vs. historical


peak of 13.1x

4500
14.0

4000

12.0

3500
3000

10.0

Fwd P/E (x)

2500
2000
1500
1000

8.0
6.0

7.5
6.1

4.0

500
0
Jun-09

13.1

2.0

Dec-09
Price

Jun-10

Dec-10
4X

Jun-11

Dec-11

6X

Source: Bloomberg, Credit Suisse estimates

8X

Jun-12

Dec-12
10 X

Jun-13

Jun-09 Dec-09 Jun-10 Dec-10 Jun-11 Dec-11 Jun-12 Dec-12 Jun-13

Source: Bloomberg, Credit Suisse estimates

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

20

10 June 2013

Risks
Commodity prices
Natural rubber and synthetic rubber comprise more than 50% of total raw material costs.
Synthetic rubber is positively correlated with oil prices. Thus, fluctuations in prices of
natural rubber, synthetic rubber and oil would have a significant impact on the total cost of
a tyre company.

Competition
A number of tyre companies manufacture four-wheel and two-wheel tyres in Indonesia.
They include Gajah Tunggal (GT Radial, GT, IRC), Goodyear Indonesia (Good Year),
Bridgestone Tyre Indonesia (Bridgestone), Sumi Rubber Indonesia (Dunlop), Multistrada
(Achiles, Corsa), and Suryaraya Rubberindo Industries (specialises in 2W tyres Federal,
FDR).
Gajah Tunggal is the market leader in motorcycle and bias replacement tyres with 50%
and 49% shares, respectively. It is No 3 in terms of market share (24%) in the radial
replacement market, behind Bridgestone (33%) and Dunlop (28%).
Many foreign players, such as Hankook Tyre (South Korea), recently entered the
Indonesia tyre industry. Hankook started the construction of its first factory in Cikarang in
4Q12. This year, total capacity of the Hankook factory in Indonesia is expected to reach
17,000 units/day. Total investment is estimated to reach US$1.1 bn till 2018. Most of the
production is going to be exported to North America, the Middle East, ASEAN and
Australia, while only around 20% of it would be sold in the domestic market.
Figure 57: Tyre companies in Indonesia
Company name

4W tyre

2W tyre

1
2

PT Goodyear Indonesia
PT Bridgestone Indonesia

n.a
n.a

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

PT Gajah Tunggal
PT Industry karet Deli
PT Sumi Rubber Indonesia
PT Suryaraya Rubberindo Industries
PT Elangperdana Tyre Industry
PT Banteng Pratama Rubber Co.
PT Hung-A Indonesia
PT United King-Land
PT Surabaya Kencana Tyre Industri
PT Multistrada

Good Year
Bridgestone, Turanza,
Ecopia, Potenza
GT Radial, GT
Delium Spectra
Dunlop
n.a
EP
n.a
n.a
n.a
n.a
Corsa, Achilles, Strada

IRC
Swallow Deli Tyre
Dunlop
Federal (OEM Honda), FDR
n.a
Mizzle
Thunderbird
King-Land
Skityre
Corsa

Source: APBI (Indonesia tyre companies association), Company data, Credit Suisse

Regulations
The three-year US import tyre tariffs for China expired on 27 September 2012. These
tariffs were enacted in 200935% import tariff in the first year, 30% in the second year
and 25% in the third yearto reduce unemployment in the US tyre industry. After the tariff
expired last September, imported tyre volumes from China have doubled starting OctoberNovember 2012. As a result, we believe the export market would become more
competitive.

Macroeconomic risks
The other risks that the company may face would be macroeconomic risks such as
changes in inflation and exchange rate.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

21

10 June 2013

Appendix 1: Financial summary


Figure 58: GTProfit & loss
(As at 31 Dec 2012)
Rp bn
Volume (mn units)
Radial

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013E

2014E

2015E

CAGR
13E-15E

8.8

9.6

7.5

10.3

11.8

10.9

11.0

11.7

12.1

5%

Replacement
OEM
Export
Bias

0.90
0.04
7.90
3.6

1.00
0.06
8.50
3.7

1.00
0.04
6.50
3.4

1.20
0.04
9.10
4.2

1.30
0.16
10.30
3.9

1.50
0.41
9.00
4.3

1.71
0.57
8.75
4.5

2.11
0.81
8.75
4.7

2.49
0.85
8.75
5.0

21%
21%
0%
5%

Replacement
OEM
Export
MC tyre

2.20
0.30
1.10
14.3

2.30
0.50
0.90
15.9

2.20
0.30
0.90
16.9

2.50
0.60
1.10
21.0

2.60
0.50
0.80
20.2

3.00
0.60
0.70
21.4

3.16
0.63
0.74
23.8

3.31
0.66
0.77
26.3

3.48
0.70
0.81
29.2

5%
5%
5%
11%

Replacement
OEM
Export
Total tyres

9.50
4.80
26.7

9.50
6.40
29.2

10.50
6.40
27.8

13.20
7.80
35.5

12.60
7.60
35.9

15.20
6.20
36.6

16.88
6.88
39.3

18.72
7.57
0.05
42.8

20.75
8.33
0.10
46.3

11%
10%

Net sales

6,660

7,963

7,936

9,854

11,841

12,579

13,628

15,100

16,585

10%

Tyre
Radial tyres
Bias tyres
Motorcycle tyres
Synthetic rubber
Tyre cord
COGS
Gross profit

5,713
2,324
2,167
1,222
503
444
5,485
1,175

6,979
2,892
2,529
1,558
361
623
6,828
1,135

7,244
2,571
2,798
1,875
225
466
6,115
1,822

8,996
3,230
3,435
2,331
318
540
7,915
1,939

10,721
4,560
3,702
2,459
642
473
10,172
1,669

11,702
4,587
4,373
2,742
577
297
10,142
2,437

12,808
4,709
4,866
3,233
613
206
10,891
2,737

14,314
5,114
5,391
3,809
644
142
11,975
3,126

15,867
5,408
5,977
4,482
627
90
13,076
3,508

11%
7%
11%
18%
1%
-34%
10%
13%

304
207
665

308
245
581

473
204
1,145

435
216
1,287

408
252
1,010

479
280
1,677

573
327
1,838

590
335
2,201

648
368
2,493

6%
6%
16%

(524)
140

(1,356)
(774)

129
1,274

(167)
1,120

(153)
857

(220)
1,457

(74)
1,763

(185)
2,016

(147)
2,345

41%
15%

(49)
91

149
(625)

(368)
905

(290)
831

(172)
685

(325)
1,132

(353)
1,411

(403)
1,613

(469)
1,876

15%

17.6%
10.0%
1.4%

14.3%
7.3%
-7.8%

23.0%
14.4%
11.4%

19.7%
13.1%
8.4%

14.1%
8.5%
5.8%

19.4%
13.3%
9.0%

20.1%
13.5%
10.4%

20.7%
14.6%
10.7%

21.2%
15.0%
11.3%

22%
24%
29%
17%
27%
45%
-11%
61%
82%
-40%
-23%

20%
22%
24%
17%
27%
-28%
40%
-3%
-13%
-652%
-788%

0%
4%
-11%
11%
20%
-38%
-25%
60%
97%
-265%
-245%

24%
24%
26%
23%
24%
41%
16%
6%
12%
-12%
-8%

20%
19%
41%
8%
5%
102%
-12%
-14%
-22%
-24%
-18%

6%
9%
1%
18%
12%
-10%
-37%
46%
66%
70%
65%

8%
9%
3%
11%
18%
6%
-30%
12%
10%
21%
25%

11%
12%
9%
11%
18%
5%
-31%
14%
20%
14%
14%

10%
11%
6%
11%
18%
-3%
-36%
12%
13%
16%
16%

Selling expenses
G&A expenses
Operating profit
Other income (charges)
Pre-tax profit
Income tax
Minority interest
Net profit

8%

15%

Margins:
Gross margin
Operating margin
Net margin
%YoY
Net sales
Tyre
Radial tyres
Bias tyres
Motorcycle tyres
Synthetic rubber
Tyre cord
Gross profit
Operating profit
Pre-tax profit
Net profit

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

22

10 June 2013

Figure 59: GTBalance sheet


(As at 31 Dec 2012) Rp bn

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013E

2014E

2015E

573
821
936
1,029
3,359

170
670
1,399
818
3,057

815
728
862
970
3,375

843
1,549
1,089
1,007
4,489

587
1,861
1,660
965
5,073

905
2,227
1,479
584
5,194

881
2,155
1,492
530
5,058

1,201
2,388
1,640
587
5,816

1,452
2,623
1,791
995
6,861

Non-trade receivable
Investment in associates
Fixed assets
Other non-current assets
Total non-current assets

760
396
3,270
669
5,095

736
296
3,619
1,005
5,656

850
315
3,609
728
5,502

710
361
4,076
735
5,882

718
713
4,588
516
6,536

648
793
6,122
112
7,676

703
819
7,383
122
9,026

778
848
8,426
135
10,188

855
880
9,420
148
11,303

Total assets

8,455

8,714

8,877

10,372

11,610

12,870

14,084

16,004

18,164

607
117
-

34
1,345
346
-

811
261
483

1,194
244
884

13
1,395
188
885

1,210
178
952

1,332
187
954

1,466
196
1,057

1,602
206
1,161

524
312
1,560

12
334
2,071

263
1,818

98
227
2,647

97
322
2,900

202
478
3,020

215
401
3,090

216
444
3,380

216
488
3,674

3,939
271

4,581
312

4,044
345

3,779
419

3,722
501

3,769
603

4,015
545

4,035
604

4,035
663

299
4,509

100
4,993

4,389

4,198

4,223

4,371

4,560

4,639

4,698

6,069

7,064

6,206

6,845

7,123

7,391

7,650

8,019

8,372

Capital stock
Additional paid-in capital
Diff arising from restructuring trx
Retained earnings
Others
Total equity

1,742
52
(495)
654
433
2,386

1,742
52
(495)
12
338
1,649

1,742
52
(495)
1,330
42
2,671

1,742
52
(495)
2,108
119
3,527

1,742
52
(495)
2,673
514
4,486

1,742
52
(554)
3,770
468
5,478

1,742
52
(554)
5,123
71
6,434

1,742
52
(554)
6,664
81
7,985

1,742
52
(554)
8,459
94
9,793

Total liabilities & equity

8,455

8,714

8,877

10,372

11,610

12,870

14,084

16,004

18,164

Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable
Inventory
Others
Total current assets
Non-current assets

Current liabilities
Bank loans
Accounts payable
Sales advances
Dealer's guarantee
Current maturities
Bonds payable
Other current liabilities
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Long-term debt net of current
Bonds payable
Post-employment benefits
obligations
Others
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Shareholders' equity

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

23

10 June 2013

Figure 60: GTCash flows


(As at 31 Dec 2012) Rp bn

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013E

2014E

2015E

450

571

1,137

1,011

304

1,707

1,985

1,896

1,858

(382)

(669)

(346)

(840)

(913)

(1,973)

(1,720)

(1,553)

(1,553)

(577)
(959)

175
(494)

(48)
(394)

(41)
(882)

407
(506)

624
(1,349)

(35)
(1,755)

(42)
(1,595)

(45)
(1,598)

68

(98)

792

171

(609)

(266)

265

344

306

Net cash used in


financing activities

840

(513)

(50)

(59)

(32)

(48)

(253)

18

(9)

Net increase in cash and


cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents
at beginning of year
Net effects of changes in
exchange rate
Cash and cash equivalents
at end of year

330

(437)

693

70

(234)

310

(23)

320

251

240

573

170

815

843

587

905

881

1,201

34

(47)

(42)

(22)

573

170

815

843

587

905

881

1,201

1,452

Net cash provided by


operating activities
Acquisition of fixed
assets (capex)
Others
Net cash used in
investing activities
Free cash flows

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

24

10 June 2013

Appendix 2: Global industry outlook


An excerpt from our report titled: Auto Parts Sector: Bridgestone & Sumitomo Rubber
Industries have firm grip on profits: initiate coverage of both at OUTPERFORM by
Masahiro Akita (24 October 2012).

Global tyre demand continues to expand


Tyre sector is a defensive growth sector
The tyre sector represents a large market with a large commercial aftermarket business. In
that sense, tyre companies are defensive stocks. At the same time, the continuing
expansion of the global tyre market makes the sector a growth sector. From 1995 to 2011,
the global tyre market witnessed a CAGR of 7.4%. That growth has become even more
pronounced since 2004 amid the motorisation of newly emerging countries. The trend has
not only pushed up annual demand for tyres used in new vehicles but has also contributed
to the progressive growth of the key determinant of aftermarket demand, the total number
of vehicles in operation throughout the world.
Figure 61: Global tyre market has expanded significantly

Figure 62: Increase of vehicles in operation contributing


to expansion of global tyre demand

200

Billion Yen

1200

Million Vehicles

180
1000

160
140

CAGR 7.4%

800

120
100

600

80
400

60

40

200

20
0

Global Tire Market Demand

Source: Tyre Business, Credit Suisse

Vehicles in Operation

Source: Wards, Credit Suisse estimates

Global tyre demand has softened, with demand in Europe and Asia particularly being
weak. Although the tyre sector is a relatively defensive sector, especially within the auto
parts sector, it is not immune to macroeconomic weakness and economic cycles. Indeed,
global tyre demand softened recently, reflecting the impact of weak demand in Europe and
Asia in particular. In 1H 2012, global demand for tyres used in new passenger cars and
light trucks increased 10% YoY, with key contributions from the North American and Asian
markets. However, aftermarket demand in Europe and Asia was weak across all vehicle
types. As a result, global aftermarket sales of replacement tyres used in passenger cars
and light trucks fell 5% YoY, while sales of replacement tyres for trucks and buses
declined 7%.
Global tyre demand should grow steadily over the medium term
Although currently weak, global tyre demand should rebound next year and grow steadily
over the medium term. We expect the global tyre market to witness a CAGR of a bit more
than 3% during 2011-14 (unit sales base). By region, we expect the Japanese and
European markets to be stable or perhaps shrink somewhat, while we foresee a 2-3%
CAGR in the North American market and a more than 8% CAGR in Asia including China.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

25

10 June 2013

Figure 63: Stable growth expected both for OE and

Figure 64: Asia and North America expected to lead

replacement tyre demand

global tyre demand

15%

25%
20%

10%
15%
10%

5%

5%
0%

0%
-5%

-5%
-10%
-10%

-15%
FY09/12

FY10/12
Global

FY11/12

FY12/12E

Replacement

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

FY13/12E

FY14/12E
OE

2009

2010

Japan

2011
US

2012E
EU

2013E

2014E

Asia / Others

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Material prices likely to linger at high levels but


further sharp increases unlikely
Tyre makers have in no small measure been affected by the sharp and sustained climb
since 2002 of prices of their key raw materials, including natural rubber used in tyres
(RSS#3 and TSR20) and butadiene and crude oil used to produce synthetic rubber. While
prices of these materials have plateaued, we expect them to remain at current lofty levels
over the medium term. On a slightly more positive note, we also believe they are unlikely
to rise much from these levels.
According to the International Rubber Study Group (IRSG), global inventories of natural
and synthetic rubber are on the rise. In other words, given lingering uncertainties on the
demand side, the current supply-demand balance makes a sudden sharp rise in materials
prices unlikely. In particular, we believe the current increase in production of natural rubber
by such major producing countries as Thailand will contribute to more stable natural
rubber prices in the future.
For example, Thai natural rubber production statistics show that from 2000 to 2010
planted area expanded at a CAGR of 3.8% but harvested area grew only 2.4% and
production rose only 2.5%. In 2011, however, planted area increased by the same 3.8%
YoY but harvested area expanded 5.4% and actual production was up 8.6% YoY.
In August 2012, Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia agreed to reduce their exports of
natural rubber by a combined total of 300,000 tonnes beginning this October in an effort to
halt the recent fall in natural rubber prices. At the same time, the three countries agreed to
reduce output by a total of 150,000 tonnes by cutting down older trees at natural rubber
plantations. Natural rubber prices have already reacted to the agreement by the worlds
three leading producers but, while these measures are affecting prices in the near term,
we think they will have limited impact over the medium term. The export restrictions by the
three countries are to be implemented over a two-year period ending in 2014. Considering
the current annual global natural rubber output of about 11 mn tonnes, removing a total of
450,000 tonnes from supply over a two-year span should have little impact on the market.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

26

10 June 2013

Figure 65: Global natural rubber production &

Figure 66: Global synthetic rubber production &

consumption

consumption

000 tonnes

000 tonnes

3,500

1,800
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0

3,000
2,500
2,000

1,500
1,000
500

0
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q
2010
NR Production (LHS)

2011

2012

NR Consumption (LHS)

Source: IRSG (International Rubber Study Group)

3,900

4,300

3,800

4,200

3,700

4,100

3,600

4,000

3,500

3,900

3,400

3,800

3,300

3,700

3,200

3,600

3,100

3,500
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q

2010
NR Stock (RHS)

SR Production (LHS)

2011

2012

SR Consumption (LHS)

SR Stock (RHS)

Source: IRSG (International Rubber Study Group)

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

27

10 June 2013

Appendix 3: Corporate ownership


structure
Figure 67: Gajah Tunggals ownership structure

Denham PTE Ltd

Michelin (France)

Public shareholders

10.0%

49.7%

40.3%

Gajah Tunggal

Tire Business

Synthetic Rubber

Tire Cord

25.6%
Polychem Indonesia
(Chemicals - Textile)

99.0%
Prima Sentra Megah
(External SBR/TC)

Source: Company data

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

28

10 June 2013

Appendix 4: GJTLs management


Figure 68: Gajah Tunggals management
Name

Positions

Board of Commissioners
Sean Gustav Standish Hughes
Mulyati Gozali
Gautama Hartarto
Benny Gozali
Sang Nyoman Suwisma
Doktorandus Sunaria Tadjuddin
Board of Directors

President Commissioner
Vice President Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Independent Commissioner
Independent Commissioner

Christopher Chan Siew Choong


Budhi Santoso Tanasaleh
Tan Enk Ee
Irene Chan
Catharina Widjaja
Hendra Soerijadi
Kisyuwono
Ferry Lawrentius Hollen
Michel Dube
Lin Jong Jeng

President Director
Vice President Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Independent Director

Source: Company data

Christopher Chan Siew Choong President Director

Joined the company in 1991 and was appointed as President Director in 2004. Mr. Chan
graduated from Kolej Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia in 1979. Prior to
joining Gajah Tunggal, he had held positions as internal audit manager, Head of Budget
and Financial Accounting Manager with Nestle Malaysia Berhad, Malaysia.
Budi Santoso Tanasaleh Vice President, Director

Joined the company as an export manager in 2001 and was appointed as a Director in
2004, and currently serves as VP Director of Gajah Tunggal. Mr. Tanasaleh received his
Bachelors and Masters of Science degrees in Electrical Engineering from University of
Texas Arlington in 1983 and 1989, respectively. Prior to joining the company, he worked in
Motorola, Inc, USA for eight years, and PT Motorola Indonesia for six years, last position
as country manager at the pager division. He had also spent one year as VP for marketing
at Citibank, N.A, Jakarta in 1998.
Tan Enk Ee Director

Appointed as Director of the company in 2006. He serves as executive chairman of


GITI Tyre, a position he has held since 2009. Furthermore, he is a member of several
boards, including Conservation International and the MIT Asia Executive Board. Prior
to joining GT, he had served as chief executive director of Gul Technologies
Singapore Ltd., a SGX-ST listed company, for three years. Mr. Tan obtained Master
of Business Administration from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2000.
Mr. Tan is one of the three beneficial owners of the company.
Irene Chan Director

Appointed as Director of the company in 2007. Prior to this, she was director at PT
Polychem Indonesia Tbk from 2004 to 2007. From 1970 to 1974, she served as
auditor staff at Kenden, Mills, Muldon & Browne Public Accountants in New Zealand.
From 1975 to 1976, she was an internal audit manager at Drs. Agus Hanadi Akuntan
and, from 1979 to 1983, she was manager of reinsurance accounts at Central Asia
Insurance. Her career at the Gajah Tunggal group began in 1983 as Finance
Manager of the company.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

29

10 June 2013

Catharina Widjaja Director

Appointed as Director of the company in 2004. Ms. Widjaja was Executive Vice
President, Corporate Communications of the Gajah Tunggal group from 2000 to 2004.
Prior to joining the Gajah Tunggal group, Ms. Widjaja had worked for various
multinational companies including The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation,
Jakarta, for nine years, where she last held the position of country treasurer, and
Deutsche Bank AG, Jakarta, as a foreign exchange dealer for two years.
Kisyuwono Prawirohardjo Director

Appointed as Director of the company in 2004. He joined the company as Assistant


Accounting Manager in 1992. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Kisyuwono
Prawirohardjo worked as an auditor with the Governments Internal Audit Financial
and Development Supervisory Board (Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan
Pembangunan, or BPKP) from 1982 to 1992. Mr. Kisyuwono Prawirohardjo graduated
with a Bachelor of Accounting from Sekolah Tinggi Akuntansi Negara.
Ferry Lawrentius Hollen Director

Appointed as Director of the company in 2010. Prior to this, he was General Manager
of Human Resources and General Affairs, beginning in 2006. He had previously held
several managerial positions in the areas of finance and administration, as well as
sales, marketing and operations. Mr. Hollen has a Masters Degree in Management
from the Asian Institute of Management in Manila, Philippines.
Michel Dube Director

Appointed as Director of the company in 2012. Prior to this, he had been Executive
Vice President Manufacturing since 2010. He was also Executive Quality Director for
GITI China from 2007 to 2011. Dr. Dube had previously worked for the Michelin Tyre
group of companies in Europe, North America and Asia from 1983 to 2007. Prior to
this, he was Senior Research Group Manager at American Enka Company in
Asheville, North Carolina, from 1979 to 1983. He holds a Ph.D. in Chemistry from the
University of Montreal in Canada.
Lin Jong Jeng Director

Appointed as Director of the company in 2007. He has been with the company since
1983, starting as Research and Development Manager. He subsequently became
Plant Manager and Executive Vice President Manufacturing and finally the Head of
Production in 2006. Before joining the company, he had worked for Tay Feng
(Federal) Tyre Co. Ltd in Taiwan as research and development manager. He has a
Bachelors Degree in Chemical Engineering from the Chung-Yuan College of Science
and Technology.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

30

10 June 2013

Appendix 5: GJTLs milestones


Figure 69: Gajah Tunggals milestones
1951
1973
1981
1990
1991
1993
1994
1995

1996

1997

2001
2002

2004

2005

2006
2007

2008
2009

2010

Gajah Tunggal was established to produce bicycle tyres and inner tubes.
Technical assistance agreement was signed with Inoue Rubber Company of Japan to produce motorcycle tyres.
Company started producing bias tyres for passenger and commercial vehicles with technical assistance from Yokohama Rubber
Company of Japan.
PT Gajah Tunggal Tbk was listed on the Jakarta and Surabaya Stock Exchange.
PT Gajah Tunggal Tbk acquired GT Petrochem Industries, a producer of tyre cord and nylon filament.
Company started producing radial tyres for passenger cars and light trucks.
PT Gajah Tunggal Tbk received quality certifications such as the E-Mark from the European community and passed the
regulatory requirement of the US Department of Transportation.
PT Gajah Tunggal Tbk acquired Langgeng Baja Pratama (LBP), a steel and bead wire producer.
PT Gajah Tunggal Tbk received ISO 9002 international quality certification for its radial tyre production quality control system, as
well as receiving the TUV CERT quality certification from Germany.
PT Gajah Tunggal Tbk acquired Meshindo Alloy Wheel Corporation, the second largest manufacturer of aluminium alloy wheels
in Indonesia.
PT Gajah Tunggal Tbks main subsidiary, PT GT Petrochem Industries, expanded its operations to include synthetic rubber,
ethylene glycol, polyester filament and polyester staple fibre.
PT Gajah Tunggal Tbk entered into an off-take agreement with Pirelli Tyre to produce Pirelli designed passenger car radial tyres
for North America and Europe. This agreement was mutually terminated in 2001.
PT Gajah Tunggal Tbks radial tyre plant obtained ISO 9001 certification for its quality design, development and installation
systems.
The company entered into a manufacturing agreement with Nokian Tyres Group, a leading tyre manufacturer based in Finland,
to produce a selected range of passenger car tyres, including winter (snow) tyres, for markets outside Indonesia.
The company received QS 9000 quality certification, one of the requirements to supply to US "Big Three".
PT Gajah Tunggal Tbk completed its restructuring, enabling the company to lower its debt burden by more than US$200 mn and
convert debt in to FRN.
Completion of corporate restructuring in which PT GT Petrochem Industries was deconsolidated, and at the same time acquired
the TC and SBR assets.
Divestment of Steel Wire Producer Langgeng Bajapratama.
Start of off-take agreement with Michelin, in which Gajah Tunggal is to produce 5 million tyres per year for Michelin in export
markets by the year 2010. Launch of TyreZone outlets.
The company issued a US$325 mn Maiden Global Bond, and used the proceeds to buy back some of its notes as well as to
finance the expansion.
Divestment of aluminium alloy wheels producer Meshindo Alloy Wheel.
The company received ISO/TS 16949 quality certification, an upgrade form the QS 9000 achieved in 2002.
Start of the production of tyres for the Michelin off-take program.
PT Gajah Tunggal Tbk was awarded Best Managed Company in Indonesia by Euromoney Magazine
Additional US$95 mn Bond re-tap, to finance the remainder of the expansion as well as capital expenditures relating to its
research and development activities.
The company also re-entered the equity market with a 10-to-1 Rights issue, totalling Rp158.4 bn (around US$17 mn) for working
capital needs.
The company received the Primaniyarta award from The President of Republic Indonesia.
Michelin off-take reached 2.8 mn tyres.
The company successfully completed an Exchange Offer of its outstanding bonds. Gajah Tunggal also was the proud recipient of
numerous awards, most notably the Anugerah Produk Asli Indonesia Award 2009 from Bisnis Indonesia. The company also
achieved ISO 14001 certification for its management systems.
The company's net sales surpassed US$1 bn for the first time in its corporate history. Furthermore, Gajah Tunggal receives
three prestigious awards from Museum-Rekor Dunia Indonesia (MURI) for first green/ecological tyre produced in Indonesia, first
studded/snow tyre and first multi-colour smoke tyre made in Indonesia.

Source: Company data

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

31

10 June 2013

Appendix 6: 4W Tyre
Figure 70: Tyre in details

Source: Good Year Indonesia

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

32

10 June 2013

Appendix 7: HOLT
Figure 71: Gajah Tunggal TerbukaHOLT default showing 37% upside
Relative Wealth Chart
Tires & Rubber
Market Cap: 1.156 USD

Source: Credit Suisse HOLT LensTM

Price: 3,250 (Jun 6, 2013)


Warranted Price: 4,438 IDR (+37%)

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

33

10 June 2013

Companies Mentioned (Price as of 07-Jun-2013)


Apollo Tyres (APLO.BO, Rs90.95)
Astra International (ASII.JK, Rp6,800)
Bridgestone (5108.T, 3,055)
Cheng Shin Rubber (2105.TW, NT$90.5)
Gajah Tunggal (GJTL.JK, Rp3,100, OUTPERFORM, TP Rp4,300)
Michelin (MICP.PA, 68.4)
Multistrada Arah (MASA.JK, Rp380)
Polychem IDN (ADMG.JK, Rp250)
S Giti Tire (600182.SS, Rmb12.43)
Sumitomo Rubber Industries (5110.T, 1,463)

Disclosure Appendix
Important Global Disclosures
I, Dian Haryokusumo, certify that (1) the views expressed in this report accurately reflect my personal views about all of the subject companies and
securities and (2) no part of my compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in
this report.
The analyst(s) responsible for preparing this research report received Compensation that is based upon various factors including Credit Suisse's
total revenues, a portion of which are generated by Credit Suisse's investment banking activities

As of December 10, 2012 Analysts stock rating are defined as follows:


Outperform (O) : The stocks total return is expected to outperform the relevant benchmark*over the next 12 months.
Neutral (N) : The stocks total return is expected to be in line with the relevant benchmark* over the next 12 months.
Underperform (U) : The stocks total return is expected to underperform the relevant benchmark* over the next 12 months.
*Relevant benchmark by region: As of 10th December 2012, Japanese ratings are based on a stocks total return relative to the analyst's coverage universe which
consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector, with Outperforms representing the most attractiv e, Neutrals the less attractive, and
Underperforms the least attractive investment opportunities. As of 2nd October 2012, U.S. and Canadian as well as European ratings are based on a stocks total
return relative to the analyst's coverage universe which consists of all companies covered by the analyst within t he relevant sector, with Outperforms representing the
most attractive, Neutrals the less attractive, and Underperforms the least attractive investment opportunities. For Latin Ame rican and non-Japan Asia stocks, ratings
are based on a stocks total return relative to the average total return of the relevant country or regional benchmark; Australia, New Zealand are, and prior to 2nd
October 2012 U.S. and Canadian ratings were based on (1) a stocks absolute total return potential to its current share price and (2) the relative attractiveness of a
stocks total return potential within an analysts coverage universe. For Australian and New Zealand stocks, 12 -month rolling yield is incorporated in the absolute total
return calculation and a 15% and a 7.5% threshold replace the 10-15% level in the Outperform and Underperform stock rating definitions, respectively. The 15% and
7.5% thresholds replace the +10-15% and -10-15% levels in the Neutral stock rating definition, respectively. Prior to 10th December 2012, Ja panese ratings were
based on a stocks total return relative to the average total return of the relevant country or regional benchmark.

Restricted (R) : In certain circumstances, Credit Suisse policy and/or applicable law and regulations preclude certain types of communications,
including an investment recommendation, during the course of Credit Suisse's engagement in an investment banking transaction and in certain other
circumstances.
Volatility Indicator [V] : A stock is defined as volatile if the stock price has moved up or down by 20% or more in a month in at least 8 of the past 24
months or the analyst expects significant volatility going forward.
Analysts sector weightings are distinct from analysts stock ratings and are based on the analysts expectations for the fundamentals and/or
valuation of the sector* relative to the groups historic fundamentals and/or valuation:
Overweight : The analysts expectation for the sectors fundamentals and/or valuation is favorable over the next 12 months.
Market Weight : The analysts expectation for the sectors fundamentals and/or valuation is neutral over the next 12 months.
Underweight : The analysts expectation for the sectors fundamentals and/or valuation is cautious over the next 12 months.
*An analysts coverage sector consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector. An analyst may cover multiple se ctors.

Credit Suisse's distribution of stock ratings (and banking clients) is:


Global Ratings Distribution

Rating

Versus universe (%)

Of which banking clients (%)

Outperform/Buy*
42%
(54% banking clients)
Neutral/Hold*
39%
(48% banking clients)
Underperform/Sell*
15%
(39% banking clients)
Restricted
3%
*For purposes of the NYSE and NASD ratings distribution disclosure requirements, our stock ratings of Outperform, Neutral, and Underperform most closely
correspond to Buy, Hold, and Sell, respectively; however, the meanings are not the same, as our stock ratings are determined on a relative basis. (Please refer to
definitions above.) An investor's decision to buy or sell a security should be based on investment objectives, current holdings, and other i ndividual factors.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

34

10 June 2013

Credit Suisses policy is to update research reports as it deems appropriate, based on developments with the subject company, the sector or the
market that may have a material impact on the research views or opinions stated herein.
Credit Suisse's policy is only to publish investment research that is impartial, independent, clear, fair and not misleading. For more detail please refer
to Credit Suisse's Policies for Managing Conflicts of Interest in connection with Investment Research: http://www.csfb.com/research and
analytics/disclaimer/managing_conflicts_disclaimer.html
Credit Suisse does not provide any tax advice. Any statement herein regarding any US federal tax is not intended or written to be used, and cannot
be used, by any taxpayer for the purposes of avoiding any penalties.
Price Target: (12 months) for Gajah Tunggal (GJTL.JK)
Method: We derive our target price of Rp4,300 for Gajah Tunggal by assumming 10.5x FY13E P/E (price-to-earnings), the regional average
implied P/E of tire companies under our coverage.
Risk:

Risks that could impede achievement of our Rp4,300 target price for Gajah Tunggal include: Fluctuation in commodity prices such as
rubber; competition from existing and new players; regulations; and macroeconomic risks.

Please refer to the firm's disclosure website at www.credit-suisse.com/researchdisclosures for the definitions of abbreviations typically used in the
target price method and risk sections.
See the Companies Mentioned section for full company names

The subject company (APLO.BO) currently is, or was during the 12-month period preceding the date of distribution of this report, a client of Credit
Suisse.
Credit Suisse expects to receive or intends to seek investment banking related compensation from the subject company (5108.T, 5110.T, APLO.BO)
within the next 3 months.
Credit Suisse may have interest in (GJTL.JK, ASII.JK)
As of the end of the preceding month, Credit Suisse beneficially own 1% or more of a class of common equity securities of (2105.TW).

Important Regional Disclosures


Singapore recipients should contact Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch for any matters arising from this research report.
The analyst(s) involved in the preparation of this report have not visited the material operations of the subject company (GJTL.JK, 2105.TW,
APLO.BO, MICP.PA, ASII.JK) within the past 12 months
Restrictions on certain Canadian securities are indicated by the following abbreviations: NVS--Non-Voting shares; RVS--Restricted Voting Shares;
SVS--Subordinate Voting Shares.
Individuals receiving this report from a Canadian investment dealer that is not affiliated with Credit Suisse should be advised that this report may not
contain regulatory disclosures the non-affiliated Canadian investment dealer would be required to make if this were its own report.
For Credit Suisse Securities (Canada), Inc.'s policies and procedures regarding the dissemination of equity research, please visit
http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/canada_research_policy.shtml.
The following disclosed European company/ies have estimates that comply with IFRS: (MICP.PA).
As of the date of this report, Credit Suisse acts as a market maker or liquidity provider in the equities securities that are the subject of this report.
Principal is not guaranteed in the case of equities because equity prices are variable.
Commission is the commission rate or the amount agreed with a customer when setting up an account or at any time after that.
To the extent this is a report authored in whole or in part by a non-U.S. analyst and is made available in the U.S., the following are important
disclosures regarding any non-U.S. analyst contributors: The non-U.S. research analysts listed below (if any) are not registered/qualified as research
analysts with FINRA. The non-U.S. research analysts listed below may not be associated persons of CSSU and therefore may not be subject to the
NASD Rule 2711 and NYSE Rule 472 restrictions on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a
research analyst account.
PT Credit Suisse Securities Indonesia ....................................................................................................................................... Dian Haryokusumo

Important Credit Suisse HOLT Disclosures


With respect to the analysis in this report based on the Credit Suisse HOLT methodology, Credit Suisse certifies that (1) the views expressed in this
report accurately reflect the Credit Suisse HOLT methodology and (2) no part of the Firms compensation was, is, or will be directly related to the
specific views disclosed in this report.
The Credit Suisse HOLT methodology does not assign ratings to a security. It is an analytical tool that involves use of a set of proprietary
quantitative algorithms and warranted value calculations, collectively called the Credit Suisse HOLT valuation model, that are consistently applied to
all the companies included in its database. Third-part data (including consensus earnings estimates) are systematically translated into a number of

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

35

10 June 2013

default algorithms available in the Credit Suisse HOLT valuation model. The source financial statement, pricing, and earnings data provided by
outside data vendors are subject to quality control and may also be adjusted to more closely measure the underlying economics of firm performance.
The adjustments provide consistency when analyzing a single company across time, or analyzing multiple companies across industries or national
borders. The default scenario that is produced by the Credit Suisse HOLT valuation model establishes the baseline valuation for a security, and a
user then may adjust the default variables to produce alternative scenarios, any of which could occur.
Additional information about the Credit Suisse HOLT methodology is available on request.
The Credit Suisse HOLT methodology does not assign a price target to a security. The default scenario that is produced by the Credit Suisse HOLT
valuation model establishes a warranted price for a security, and as the third-party data are updated, the warranted price may also change. The
default variable may also be adjusted to produce alternative warranted prices, any of which could occur.
CFROI, HOLT, HOLTfolio, ValueSearch, AggreGator, Signal Flag and Powered by HOLT are trademarks or service marks or registered
trademarks or registered service marks of Credit Suisse or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. HOLT is a corporate performance
and valuation advisory service of Credit Suisse.
For Credit Suisse disclosure information on other companies mentioned in this report, please visit the website at www.creditsuisse.com/researchdisclosures or call +1 (877) 291-2683.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

36

10 June 2013

References in this report to Credit Suisse include all of the subsidiaries and affiliates of Credit Suisse operating under its investment banking division. For more information on our structure, please use the
following link: https://www.credit-suisse.com/who_we_are/en/.This report may contain material that is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of
or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject Credit Suisse AG or its affiliates
("CS") to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. All material presented in this report, unless specifically indicated otherwise, is under copyright to CS. None of the material, nor its
content, nor any copy of it, may be altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed to any other party, without the prior express written permission of CS. All trademarks, service marks and logos used
in this report are trademarks or service marks or registered trademarks or service marks of CS or its affiliates. The information, tools and material presented in this report are provided to you for information
purposes only and are not to be used or considered as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or to buy or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. CS may not have taken any steps to
ensure that the securities referred to in this report are suitable for any particular investor. CS will not treat recipients of this report as its customers by virtue of their receiving this report. The investments and
services contained or referred to in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about such investments or investment
services. Nothing in this report constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your individual circumstances, or
otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation to you. CS does not advise on the tax consequences of investments and you are advised to contact an independent tax adviser. Please note in particular
that the bases and levels of taxation may change. Information and opinions presented in this report have been obtained or derived from sources believed by CS to be reliable, but CS makes no representation
as to their accuracy or completeness. CS accepts no liability for loss arising from the use of the material presented in this report, except that this exclusion of liability does not apply to the extent that such
liability arises under specific statutes or regulations applicable to CS. This report is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. CS may have issued, and may in the future
issue, other communications that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in this report. Those communications reflect the different assumptions, views and
analytical methods of the analysts who prepared them and CS is under no obligation to ensure that such other communications are brought to the attention of any recipient of this report. CS may, to the extent
permitted by law, participate or invest in financing transactions with the issuer(s) of the securities referred to in this report, perform services for or solicit business from such issuers, and/or have a position or
holding, or other material interest, or effect transactions, in such securities or options thereon, or other investments related thereto. In addition, it may make markets in the securities mentioned in the material
presented in this report. CS may have, within the last three years, served as manager or co-manager of a public offering of securities for, or currently may make a primary market in issues of, any or all of the
entities mentioned in this report or may be providing, or have provided within the previous 12 months, significant advice or investment services in relation to the investment concerned or a related investment.
Additional information is, subject to duties of confidentiality, available on request. Some investments referred to in this report will be offered solely by a single entity and in the case of some investments solely
by CS, or an associate of CS or CS may be the only market maker in such investments. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or
warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance. Information, opinions and estimates contained in this report reflect a judgment at its original date of publication by CS and are subject to
change without notice. The price, value of and income from any of the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise. The value of securities and financial instruments is
subject to exchange rate fluctuation that may have a positive or adverse effect on the price or income of such securities or financial instruments. Investors in securities such as ADR's, the values of which are
influenced by currency volatility, effectively assume this risk. Structured securities are complex instruments, typically involve a high degree of risk and are intended for sale only to sophisticated investors who
are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. The market value of any structured security may be affected by changes in economic, financial and political factors (including, but not limited to,
spot and forward interest and exchange rates), time to maturity, market conditions and volatility, and the credit quality of any issuer or reference issuer. Any investor interested in purchasing a structured
product should conduct their own investigation and analysis of the product and consult with their own professional advisers as to the risks involved in making such a purchase. Some investments discussed in
this report may have a high level of volatility. High volatility investments may experience sudden and large falls in their value causing losses when that investment is realised. Those losses may equal your
original investment. Indeed, in the case of some investments the potential losses may exceed the amount of initial investment and, in such circumstances, you may be required to pay more money to support
those losses. Income yields from investments may fluctuate and, in consequence, initial capital paid to make the investment may be used as part of that income yield. Some investments may not be readily
realisable and it may be difficult to sell or realise those investments, similarly it may prove difficult for you to obtain reliable information about the value, or risks, to which such an investment is exposed. This
report may provide the addresses of, or contain hyperlinks to, websites. Except to the extent to which the report refers to website material of CS, CS has not reviewed any such site and takes no responsibility
for the content contained therein. Such address or hyperlink (including addresses or hyperlinks to CS's own website material) is provided solely for your convenience and information and the content of any
such website does not in any way form part of this document. Accessing such website or following such link through this report or CS's website shall be at your own risk. This report is issued and distributed in
Europe (except Switzerland) by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, One Cabot Square, London E14 4QJ, England, which is regulated in the United Kingdom by The Financial Services Authority
("FSA"). This report is being distributed in Germany by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) This report is being distributed in the United States and Canada by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC; in Switzerland
by Credit Suisse AG; in Brazil by Banco de Investimentos Credit Suisse (Brasil) S.A or its affiliates; in Mexico by Banco Credit Suisse (Mxico), S.A. (transactions related to the securities mentioned in this
report will only be effected in compliance with applicable regulation); in Japan by Credit Suisse Securities (Japan) Limited, Financial Instruments Firm, Director-General of Kanto Local Finance Bureau
(Kinsho) No. 66, a member of Japan Securities Dealers Association, The Financial Futures Association of Japan, Japan Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association;
elsewhere in Asia/ Pacific by whichever of the following is the appropriately authorised entity in the relevant jurisdiction: Credit Suisse (Hong Kong) Limited, Credit Suisse Equities (Australia) Limited, Credit
Suisse Securities (Thailand) Limited, having registered address at 990 Abdulrahim Place, 27 Floor, Unit 2701, Rama IV Road, Silom, Bangrak, Bangkok 10500, Thailand, Tel. +66 2614 6000, Credit Suisse
Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch, Credit Suisse Securities (India) Private Limited regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (registration Nos.
INB230970637; INF230970637; INB010970631; INF010970631), having registered address at 9th Floor, Ceejay House, Dr.A.B. Road, Worli, Mumbai - 18, India, T- +91-22 6777 3777, Credit Suisse
Securities (Europe) Limited, Seoul Branch, Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch, PT Credit Suisse Securities Indonesia, Credit Suisse Securities (Philippines ) Inc., and elsewhere in the world by the
relevant authorised affiliate of the above. Research on Taiwanese securities produced by Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch has been prepared by a registered Senior Business Person. Research
provided to residents of Malaysia is authorised by the Head of Research for Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, to whom they should direct any queries on +603 2723 2020. This report has been
prepared and issued for distribution in Singapore to institutional investors, accredited investors and expert investors (each as defined under the Financial Advisers Regulations) only, and is also distributed by
Credit Suisse AG, Singapore branch to overseas investors (as defined under the Financial Advisers Regulations). By virtue of your status as an institutional investor, accredited investor, expert investor or
overseas investor, Credit Suisse AG, Singapore branch is exempted from complying with certain compliance requirements under the Financial Advisers Act, Chapter 110 of Singapore (the "FAA"), the
Financial Advisers Regulations and the relevant Notices and Guidelines issued thereunder, in respect of any financial advisory service which Credit Suisse AG, Singapore branch may provide to you. This
research may not conform to Canadian disclosure requirements. In jurisdictions where CS is not already registered or licensed to trade in securities, transactions will only be effected in accordance with
applicable securities legislation, which will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may require that the trade be made in accordance with applicable exemptions from registration or licensing requirements.
Non-U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction should contact a CS entity in their local jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise. U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction should do so only
by contacting a representative at Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC in the U.S. Please note that this research was originally prepared and issued by CS for distribution to their market professional and
institutional investor customers. Recipients who are not market professional or institutional investor customers of CS should seek the advice of their independent financial advisor prior to taking any investment
decision based on this report or for any necessary explanation of its contents. This research may relate to investments or services of a person outside of the UK or to other matters which are not regulated by
the FSA or in respect of which the protections of the FSA for private customers and/or the UK compensation scheme may not be available, and further details as to where this may be the case are available
upon request in respect of this report. CS may provide various services to US municipal entities or obligated persons ("municipalities"), including suggesting individual transactions or trades and entering into
such transactions. Any services CS provides to municipalities are not viewed as "advice" within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. CS is
providing any such services and related information solely on an arm's length basis and not as an advisor or fiduciary to the municipality. In connection with the provision of the any such services, there is no
agreement, direct or indirect, between any municipality (including the officials, management, employees or agents thereof) and CS for CS to provide advice to the municipality. Municipalities should consult
with their financial, accounting and legal advisors regarding any such services provided by CS. In addition, CS is not acting for direct or indirect compensation to solicit the municipality on behalf of an
unaffiliated broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, or investment adviser for the purpose of obtaining or retaining an engagement by the municipality for or in connection with Municipal
Financial Products, the issuance of municipal securities, or of an investment adviser to provide investment advisory services to or on behalf of the municipality. If this report is being distributed by a financial
institution other than Credit Suisse AG, or its affiliates, that financial institution is solely responsible for distribution. Clients of that institution should contact that institution to effect a transaction in the securities
mentioned in this report or require further information. This report does not constitute investment advice by Credit Suisse to the clients of the distributing financial institution, and neither Credit Suisse AG, its
affiliates, and their respective officers, directors and employees accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from their use of this report or its content. Principal is not guaranteed.
Commission is the commission rate or the amount agreed with a customer when setting up an account or at any time after that.
Copyright 2013 CREDIT SUISSE AG and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Investment principal on bonds can be eroded depending on sale price or market price. In addition, there are bonds on which investment principal can
be eroded due to changes in redemption amounts. Care is required when investing in such instruments.
When you purchase non-listed Japanese fixed income securities (Japanese government bonds, Japanese municipal bonds, Japanese government guaranteed bonds, Japanese corporate bonds) from CS
as a seller, you will be requested to pay the purchase price only.

Gajah Tunggal
(GJTL.JK / GJTL IJ)

CS0671.doc

37

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen