En Micro Hydro Design Aids GIZ 2005

MICROHYDRO DESIGN AIDS 2010 for Microsoft Excel 2003
Small Hydropower Promotion Project (SHPP)/GTZ

By Mr. Pushpa Chitrakar
Worksheets
Collaboration Partmers
Conductivity
Hydrology
Weir
Side Intake
Bottom Intake
Headrace Canal
Headrace Pipe
Settling Basin
Penstock & Power
Loads on Anchor
Anchor Block Stability
Turbine
Electrical
Machine Foundation
Transmission Line
Loads and Benefits
Costing & Financial Analyses
Utilities
Version: 2010.04
SHPP/GTZ, Nepal
Email
Web
Entec AG, Switzerland
Email
Web
Feedback
Pushpa Chitrakar
pushpa.chitrakar@gmail.com
Help
Online Manual
Drawings
List of Reference
Small Hydropower Promotion Project 2006
Kathmandu, Nepal
Discharge Measurement by Conductivity Meter

Spreadsheet by Mr Pushpa Chitrakar
Referances: 6,12,13,15,16
Date
SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECT/GTZ
Revision
06-Apr-2016
2006.05
Golmagad SHP
Kankaimai Hydropower P Ltd
EPC Consult
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
Project
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
Meter
Salt
Given k
HANNA Instruments (HI 933000)
Iyoo Noon
Salt Const. (k)

Wt. of Salt
Nr of data
Baseline conductivity
Sum of readings
Effective Area
Discharge
Water temp:
1.8 Time intervals
11 deg C
5 sec
1.8000
1580 gm
1795 gm
91
106
24
24
3433
3997
6245
7265
455 l/s
445 l/s
Average Discharge
400 gm
70
25
2062
1560
462 l/s
0 gm
1
0
0
0
0 l/s
454 l/s
Discharge Measurement by Conductivity Meter: Golmagad SHP

80
70
Salt
Salt
Salt
Salt
60
Conductivi
ty
50
=400gm, A ef f =1560
=1580gm, A ef f =6245
=1795gm, A ef f =7265
=0gm, A ef f =0
mS
40
30
20
10
0
Discharge Measurement by Conductivity Meter: Golmagad SHP

0
50
100
150
200
250
rge = 453.89 l/s
300
350
400
450
Time(sec)
Salt =400gm, A eSalt =1580gm,
Date= 2010/10/5, 11de g C, HANNA Ins trum e nts (HI 933000), Iyoo Noon, k =1.8, Ave . Dis charge = 453.89 l/s
500
550
600
A efSalt =1795gm,0gm, A eff =0
HYDROLOGICAL CALCULATIONS FOR UNGAUGED MHP RIVERS

Referances:2,2,4, 6,12,13,15,16
Date
Revision
Project:
Upper Jogmai SHP
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
Kankai Hydropower P Ltd

EPC Consult
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
06-Apr-2016
2006.05
INPUT
River name :
Location :
Measured flow for MIP method l/s:
Month and day of flow measurement:
MIP region (1 -7) :
Area of basin below 3000m elevation A3000 km2 :
Chhyota Khola
Barand, Sertung VDC 2, Dhading
80
March
23
3
1.5
80
5%
10%
Turbine discharge Qd l/s:

Water losses due to evaporation/flushing/seepage % of Qd :
Downstream water release due to environmental reasons % of Q lowest :
OUTPUT
MIP monthly average discharge
Month
@ river
To plant
January
#NAME?
#NAME?
February
#NAME?
March
#NAME?
April
#NAME?
May
#NAME?
June
#NAME?
July
#NAME?
August
#NAME?
September
#NAME?
October
#NAME?
November
#NAME?
Hydest Flood Flows

Return Period (yrs)
December
Annual av
Q exceedence (month)
#NAME?
2
20
100
Discharges (l/s)
Qturbine (Qd)
Q diverted Qd+Qlosses
Q losses 5% of Qd
Q release 10% of Qlow
Q min required @ river
#NAME?
#NAME?
Flood Discharge (m3/s)

Daily
Instantaneous
1.952
4.197
5.747
16.334
8.987
28.669
Designed
80.000
84.211
4.211
#NAME?
#NAME?
As per MGSP
#NAME?
#NAME?
#NAME?
#NAME?
#NAME?
12
12
Long Term Average Annual Hydrograph of Chhyota Khola river, Upper Jogmai SHP
12
10
MIP Flows
Q design =80 l/s with 12-month exceedence
#NAME?
8
Discharge (l/s)
0
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Months
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Design of Stone Masonry Weir

Date
Revision
06-Apr-2016
2006.05
Upper Jogmai, Ilam
EPC Consult
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
Project
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
Weir Section & Forces @ Normal Condition
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
Height ZZ (m)
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
-0.5
XX (m)
-1.0
Foundation and Soil

Foundation on
Soil Coeff of soil at active state (ka)
Allowable bearing capacity Pall (kN/m2)

Coeff of soil at rest (ko)
180 Soil Density (kN/m3)

1 Friction coeff between block and soil m
0.33
20.000
0.5
Weir Geometry
Length L1 (m)
Length L2 (m)
Length L3 (m)
Length L4 (m)
Total length L (m)
Material
0.25
2
1
0.5
3.75
Concrete
Height H1 (m)
Height H2 (m)
Height H3 (m)
Density (kM/m3)
Head above crest during flood, hf (m)
3
1.5
1
22
0.500
OUTPUT
Weight Wi
(kN)
Forces
LA along XX (m)
Moment (kN-m)
Weir
G1
G2
G3
G4
5.500
132.000
16.500
49.500
3.625
2.500
0.833
0.750
19.938
330.000
13.750
37.125
W1
W2
W3
U1
5.000
45.000
5.000
84.375
3.625
-1.000
0.500
-2.083
18.125
-45.000
2.500
-175.781
W1
W2
W3
U1
6.250
61.250
11.250
103.125
3.625
-1.167
0.667
-2.045
22.656
-71.458
7.500
-210.938
S1
S2
1.650
11.250
-0.333
0.500
-0.550
5.625
Normal
205.731
124.125
30.400
Flood
153.648
106.625
40.400
Water (normal conditions)
Water (flood conditions)
Soil
Summantion forces
Sum of moments M (kN-m)
Sum of vertical forces V (kN)
Sum of horizontal forces H (kN)
Overturning: Equivalent distance at which SM acts from critical point

d (m)
1.657
Eccentricity e, (m)
0.218
Allowable eccentricity e all (m)
0.625
Comment on overturning moment
Ok
Bearing
Pressure at base, Pmax
Pressure at base, Pmin
Comments on bearing
Sliding
Factor of safety against sliding, FS sl
Comment of sliding
1.441
0.434
0.625
Ok
44.621
21.579
Ok
48.177
8.690
Ok
2.042
Ok
1.320
Not Ok
Design of Orifice Side Intake

Spreadsheet developed by Mr. Pushpa Chitrakar, Engineering Advisor, SHPP/GTZ
06-Apr-2016
2006.05
Ankhu HEP
Ankhu Hydropower P Ltd
HSEC P Ltd
Neeraj Shrestha
Pushpa Chitrakar
Date
Revision
Project
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
Wall Geometry
Design
Flood Level
Coarse Trashrack
Min 100 thick & 1000 wide
walkway Rcc slab
Orifice (H*B)
Normal
1
river level 3
.
Weir Crest
Gravel Flushing Gate
hbot
h -h
.
h sub
Canal
LS
Fb
River bed
hr
h rf
Gravel trap (if needed)

1:30
Compacted earth/200mm
stone soling
Trashrack calculations
Input
Output
Trashrack coeffieient kt
Bar thickness t mm
Clear spacing of bars b mm
Approach velocity Vo m/s
Angle of inclination from horizontaldeg
Flow deviation deg
Design Discharge Qd cumec
Height of trashrack bottom from river bed ht
Canal invert level (m)
2.4
15.00
75.00
1.00
75.00
90.00
33.670
1.250
890.65
2.4
Headloss due to friction hf m

236.091
Headloss due to bends hb m
0.051
Headloss coeff K 4633.103
Total headloss ht m
236.142
Trashrack coeff, K1 0.8
0.8
Surface area A surface m2
52.287
Vertical height h m
2.250
Trashrack width B m
22.447
Orifice Calculations for (B = 2H or provided) rectangular canal downstream of orifice

Input
Orifice
roof-sha
River
Velocity coeff of orifice c 0.800
0.800
Velocity through orifice Vo m/s
1.5
Crest length L m
Provided Q flood m3/s
Q flood m3/s (Q20 for MHP with Qd>100)
Manning's coeff of roughness 0.012

0.012
Downstream submergence depth hsub m
0.100
Used Q flood
Orifice height H m
1.100 Canal & Spillway
Height of orifice from canal bed h bot m
1.250
Spillway crest height above NWL m
Provided water depth in the river hr (m)
3.500
Spillway discharge coeff
Provided canal width (m)
21.000
Provided Freeboard h fb1 m
35.000
976.100
16.334
976.100
0.100
1.600
3.000
Output
Normal Condition
Canal witdth d/s of orifice
1/Slope of canal immediately d/s of orifice
Depth of water in canal hc m
Free board in canal h fb m
Area of orifice A m2
Width of orifice B m
Actual velocity through orifice Vo act m/s
Canal width Wc m
Water level difference dh m
Water depth in the river hr = hc + dh m
Height of weir (hw = hr+0.1) m
Spillway overtopping height h overtop m
Flood
21.000
40492
2.450
3.000
22.447
20.406
1.500
21.000 Spillway
0.179
3.500
3.600
2.600
Critical depth of water at crest yc m

1/Slope of canal immediately d/s of orifice
Flood head at river hf r = hw+yc m
Head difference dhf
Velocity through orifice Vof m/s
Q intake Qf cumec
Depth of water at canal (hc f) m
4.296
#NAME?
7.896
#NAME?
#NAME?
#NAME?
#NAME?
Ls1 for Qf w/o d/s Obs m

Ls2 for Qf-Qd w/o d/s obstruction m
Ls3 for Qf with d/s Obs m
Ls4 for Qf-Qd with d/s obstruction m
#NAME?
#NAME?
#NAME?
#NAME?
Design of Bottom/Drop Intake

Spreadsheet developed by Mr. Pushpa Chitrakar, Engineering Advisor, SHPP/GTZ
06-Apr-2016
2006.05
Sarbari SHP
Kullu, Himanchal Pradesh, India
Date
Revision
Project
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
Critical Depth Considered
Critical Depth Not Considered
##
##
##
##
##
#
#
Weir Geometry
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
Input
1
River Width (Br) m =
Head/Critical Depth of u/s water (ho)m =
Upstream water velocity (vo) m/s =
River gradient (i) degrees =
Trashrack gradient () deg =
Contraction coeff () =
River Width flood (Brf) m =

20
8
ho flood m =
3.000
0.226
vo flood m/s =
4
1.494
Design Discharge (Qd), m 3/s =
2.7
9.462
Trashrack witdth/diameter (t) mm =
60
36
Trashrack clearance (a) mm =
30
0.85
Invert level of crest (masl)
500
Aspect ratio (Length across the river/Breadth along the river) = 3.5464682
Output
c/c distance of trash rack bars d mm =
Total head (he) m =
kappa () =
velocity head (h) m =
Correction factor ( c) =
Length of intake (L) m =
Length (L' ) m =
Intake length across the river (b) m =
Area of intake (A=L' *b) m2 =
90
0.340
0.749
0.170
0.146
2.249
1.819
7.975
17.935
Qo u/s of intake (m3/s) normal =

Qu d/s of intake (m3/s) normal =
h d/s normal (m)
h flood u/s=
h d/s flood (m)
Qof u/s of intake = Br * hof * vof (m 3/s) =
Q in flood m3/s =
Quf d/s of intake (m 3/s) =
2.700
0.000
0.000
1.906
1.864
325.497
7.318
318.178
Side Intake
Spreadsheet
0
0
500
500
800
800
1800
1800
2100
2100
3100
3100
0
1550
Orific =1,1x20,41
0
300
300
1550
1550
300
Top =899,05
300
1800
2650
1550
1800 8695.9694
1550
2100 8695.9694
300
2100
2650
300
1800
2650
0
Canal =890,65
0
3100
300
3500
300
3100
WALL GEOMETRY
10000
9000
8000
7000
WALL (m m )
6000
0
1800
Crest =894NWL =894,HFL =898,55

3900
3800
8196
3900
3800
8196
2100
3100
NWL =893,
2750
2750
#NAME?
#NAME?
#NAME?
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
0
1000
Bottom Intake
3000
4000
Weir Geometry
Top =500
0
500
1000
1300
1300
Top =498,68
NWL =500,HFL =501,9Trashrack
Width =1,82
0 3119.3444
0
0 2048.2735
4822
1300 1821.831
1300
0 3119.3444
500
1300 2048.2735
3728 3119.3444
500 3119.3444
1821.831 3419.3444
500 3119.3444
500 2363.5406
1821.831 3719.3444
0 3419.3444
500 2363.5406
0 3919.3444
0 3719.3444
500 2363.5406
2000
BASE ( m m )
0
0
5500
4500
3500
WALL (m m )
2500
1500
500
-500
0
1000
2000
BASE ( m m )
3000
4000
5000
Canal Design: Proposed design and optimum canal sections

Date
Project
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
06-Apr-2016
2006.05
Sisne Small Hydropower Project
Gautam Buddha Hydropower P Ltd
EPC Consult
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
Revision
Input
Type and Name
Flow (m3/s)
Intake Canal
Tailrace
0.185
Roughness coefficient (n)
0.02
0.017
0.02
0.02
Sectional Profile
Rectangular
Trapezoidal
Semicircular
Triangular
Side slope N (1V:NHorizontal)
0.02
Main2
0.017
Main3
0.145
0.145
0.02
0.5
0.5
0.145
0.02
0.5
Length of the canal (m)
20
40
150
1/Canal slope (s)
77
200
30
120
72
Channel Depth/diameter D (m)
0.300
0.525
0.300
0.300
Freeboard FB (m)
0.300
0.250
0.150
0.150
Channel Width (B) m
0.500
1.000
0.400
0.400
Channel Drops di m
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Channel Drops Horizontal length hi m

Desired velocity Vo (m/s)
0.000
1.000
0.000
1.500
0.000
1.500
0.000
1.500
Output
Side slope d (degrees)
Canal slope S
Total depth H (m)
0.000
63.435
0.000
63.435
0.01299
0.00500
0.03333
0.01389
0.600
0.775
0.450
0.450
20.000
60.000
210.000
330.000
Area A m2
0.150
0.663
0.035
0.060
Top Width T (m)
0.500
1.525
0.400
0.400
Wetted Perimeter P (m)
1.100
2.174
0.471
0.671
Hydraulic Radius r (m)
0.136
0.305
0.075
0.089
0.226 high
1.249 high
0.057 low
0.071 low
Chainage L (m)
Present canal
Calculated flow (m3/s) & remarks

Comment on freeboard
Velocity V m/s
Critical Velocity Vc m/s & Remarks
Headloss hl (m)
Total headloss Hl(m)
Critical dia of sediment d crit (mm)
ok
low
ok
ok
1.233
0.219
4.103
2.417
1,72 Ok
2.06 Ok
0,93 Not Ok
1,21 Not Ok
0.260
0.200
5.000
1.667
0.260
19.481
0.460
16.769
5.460
27.500
7.126
13.665
0.1850
0.6022
1,74 Ok
0.1505
0.301
0.150
0.451
0.602
0.0050
0.100
0.100
8.271
0.0967
0.7636
1.11 Not Ok
0.1180
0.236
0.263
0.498
0.528
0.0112
0.449
0.549
14.584
0.0967
0.9949
0,98 Not Ok
0.1244
0.497
0.150
0.647
0.995
0.0145
2.175
2.724
19.834
0.0967
0.4867
1.4 Not Ok
0.1088
0.218
0.150
0.368
0.487
0.0173
2.079
4.803
20.736
Optimum canal
Area Ao m2
Top Width T (m)
Critical Velocity Vc m/s & Remarks
Hydraulic Radius ro (m)
Channel Depth/diameter Do (m)
Freeboard Fbo (m)
Total depth Ho (m)
Channel Width Bo (m)
Canal Slope
Headloss hlo (m)
Total headloss Hlo(m)
Critical dia of sediment d crito (mm)
HEADRACE PIPE CALCULATIONS

Referances: 2,4, 6,12,13,15,16

Project:
Upper Jogmai SHP

Location:
EPC Consult
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
Date
06-Apr-2016
Revision
2006.05
Jogmai
INPUT
Economic life (years)
15
0.160
U/S Invert Level (m)
1950.00
0.160
7.000
% head available or headloss hlt (m)

Entrance Type
Bending radius (r/d)
Hydraulics:
Diversion flow Qd (m3/s)
Flow in each pipe Qi (m3/s)
Gross headHg (m)
95.00%
0.8
0.3
0.80.3
Headrace pipe
HDPE
Exit (Yes/No)
Yes
NA
NA
No of pipes
Bending angle 01
1.00
20.00
NA
Burried
0
0
282
260
NA
3.0
Bending angle 02
Bending angle 03
Bending angle 04
Bending angle 05
Bending angle 06
Bending angle 07
Bending angle 08
Bending angle 09
4.00
6.00
20.00
140.000
Bending angle 10
Pipe Material
Welded / Flat rolled if steel
Rolled if steel
Type if steel
Burried or exposed
Type of valve
Non standard ultimate tensile strength (UTS) N/mm2
Estimated pipe diameter d(mm)
Provided pipe diameter d(mm)
Min pipe thickness t (mm)
Provided pipe thickness t (mm)
Pipe Length L (m)
Trashrack
t
6.00
b
20.00
Vo
1.00
60.00
0.00
Q
0.160
H
3.00
Tmax (deg)
T installation
Tmin
1st Pipe length(m)
2nd Pipe L (m)
3rd Pipe L (m)
4th Pipe L (m)
5th Pipe L (m)
40
20
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
hf
0.0213
hb
0.0000
H coeff
0.4174
H
0.0213
S
0.8006
B
0.23
2.40
k
2.40
Expansion Joints
OUTPUT
Trashrack
Min Submergence
1.39
CGL=1.5v^2/2g
0.69
Turbulent loss coefficients

K inlet
0.80
K bend 05
0.00
K bend 10
0.00
K bend 01
K bend 02
K bend 03
K bend 04
0.16
0.13
0.13
0.16
K bend 06
K bend 07
K bend 08
K bend 09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
K valve
K exit
K others
K Total
0.00
1.00
Hydraulics
Pipe Area A (m2)
Hydraulic Radius R (m)
Velocity V (m/s)
Pipe Roughness ks (mm)
Relative Roughness ks/d
Reynolds Number Re = d V /Vk
Type of Flow
Friction Factor f
Expansion Joints (mm)
0.053
0.07
3.01
0.06
0.00023
687032
Turbulent
0.0153
U/S Invert Level (mAOD)

D/S Invert Level (mAOD)
Is HL tot < HL available
Friction Losses hf (m)
Fitting Losses hfit (m)
Trashracks and intake loss (m)
Total Head Loss htot individual (m)
% of H.Loss of individual pipe
0.0E+00
EJ number
dL theoretical
dL recommended
dL for expansion
dL for contraction
2.37
1950.000
1943.000
OKAY
3.82
1.10
0.02
4.94
70.56% Ok
Settling Basin Design

Referances: 2,4, 6,9,12,13,15,16
Date
06-Apr-2016
Revision
Project:
Location:
2006.05
Jogmai
Upper Jogmai SHP

EPC Consult
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
Q flood
Manning's number M (m 1/3/s) 1/n=
Design discharge Qdesign (m3/s) =
0.000
50.000
Sediment swelling factor S =

Volume of sediment storage V (m3) =
0.421
Sediment depth Hs (m) = V/Asi
0.63
Flushing discharge Qflush (m /s) =
0.034
Inlet approach conveyance Canal/Pipe =
Canal
Total discharge Qbasins (m3/s) =
0.455
0.300
85%
15
0.037
2
8
24.000
0.241
2600
1/Bottom slope of SB Sf (1:50 to 1:20) =

Outlet approach conveyance Canal/Pipe =
Water level at inlet NWL (m) =
h flush below the base slab (L<6m)
Number of basins N
Spillway crest height above NWL m
Provided Freeboard h fb1 m
Discharge coeff for pipe as orifice (2.76 if L <6 m)
Drawdown discharge % of design discharge
50.00
Pipe
1950.00
1.70
1.00
0.05
1.60
0.30
2.76
1.00
Max section width for hydraulic flushing B (m) =

Width used B (m) =
Inlet canal width /canal diameter Bc1 (m) =
0.455
3.258
2.500
1.000
Water depth of inlet canal hc1 (m) =

Outlet canal width /canal diameter Bc2 (m) =
Water depth of outlet canal hc2 (m) =
Provided Length of the basin Lact (m)=
0.50
0.50
0.30
0.00
Length of basin L (m) (Idel L = 9,6) =

Aspect ratio (4<=AR<=10)
Min. water depth Hi (m) =
X-sectional area / basin Ai (m2) =
Wetted perimeter / basin Pi (m) =
Hydraulic radius Ri (m) =
Normal WL @ basin h b m =
Straight inlet transition length at 1:5 (m) =
Straight approach canal length (m) =
10.000
4.000
0.755
1.888
4.010
0.471
1.385
3.750
10.000
Particles to settle d (mm) =

Trapping efficiency n (%) =
water temperature t (oC) =
Fall velocity w at 15 deg C (m/s) =
Sediment concentration Cmax (kg/m3) =
Flushing Frequency FI (hours) =
Surface area / basin Asi (m2) 85 % =
Basin transit velocity Vt (m/s) =
Bulk Sed density G (kg/m3) =
Discharge per basin Qbasin (m3/s) =
1.50
15.12
Pipe does not need a straight approach! ***

Head over outlet weir h overtop (m) =
Approach inlet velocity vi1 (m/s) =
Approach outlet velocity vi2 (m/s) =
1/Energy gradient during operation So =
d 50 during operation (mm) =
Depth of water during flushing yfi (m) =
d 50f during flushing (mm) =
Length of an Ideal Basin (m) =
0.23
0.91
3.03
15763.86
0.33
#NAME?
#NAME?
10.00
Spilling of excess water

Vertical Flushing pipe
Diameter for flood d1 m =
0.000
Freeboard m
Spillway overtopping height h overtop m
Spillway length for Qf (flood and non operational)
0.300
0.125
0.000
Combination of vertical flushing pipe and spillway

Vertical flushing pipe diameter d1 m
No of vertical flushing pipe
Spillway length used (m)
0.30
1.00
1.00
Flood and Under Operation (Qf- Qd)

H overtopping
Discharge passing through vertical pipe
Discharge passing over spillway
0.00
0.00
0.00
Diameter for load rejection (u/s flood bypass) d1 m = 2 x 0,43
Spillway
Spillway length for Qd (under operation)
Spillway length for Qd (load rejection & u/s flood bypass)
Spillway length for Qd (d/s obstruction & full hovertop-50)
0.00
6.43
3.18
Flood and non operational (Qf)

Flood discharge passing through vertical pipe
Spillway length for the remaining discharge m
0.000
1.00
Load Rejection (Qd)

H overtopping
Discharge passing through vertical pipe
Discharge passing over spillway
0.262
0.240
0.215
Calculate Gate Rating Curves
Flushing of water and sediment

Flushing pipe and orifice diameter
d for incoming flow and draw down m
d for incoming flow only (empty state) m
d for incoming flow only (empty state & with y flushing) m
Gate
Opening
Hg
0.000
0.033
0.067
0.100
0.133
0.167
0.200
0.233
0.267
0.300
0.333
0.367
0.400
0.433
0.467
0.500
0.35
0.40
#NAME?
Gate
Buoyance weight of the gate W kgf
Gate Opening B, (m)
Gate Opening H (m)
Submerged area of th gate A m2
Water surface to cg of submerged area h m
Coeff of static friction mu
Lifting force F kgf
H. of water (H1)
1.800
300.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
1.14
0.90
810.84
1.39
Designed Cross Section
1.600
1.400
1.200
Penstock diameter m
Penstock velocity m/s
Submergence depth of penstock pipe m
Height of pipe above the base slab m
Min. pond depth m
Effective thickness of penstock mm
FS for air vent (5 burried, 10 exposed)
Young's modulus of elasticity E N/mm2
Penstock inlet gate (Yes/No)
Air vent diameter mm
0.800
0.600
0.400
0.200
0.000
Gradual Expansion of 1:5
half of Gr expansion
0.500
Width 2,5m
Flushing cone/spillway O
L =10
Gradual Expansion 1 in 10 (1:2 for MHP)
Spillway
0.500
Discharge
One basin
Q
0.000
0.128
0.251
0.369
0.484
0.597
0.707
0.816
0.922
1.027
1.129
1.230
1.328
1.423
1.516
1.606
Forebay cum settling basin (one basin)
1.000
1.000
Relative
Gate Openinig
Hg/H1
0.000
0.024
0.048
0.072
0.096
0.120
0.144
0.168
0.193
0.217
0.241
0.265
0.289
0.313
0.337
0.361
Water depths 0,76m & 0,96m

Sediment depth 0,63m
Slope 1:50
0.300
0.41
3.45
0.91
0.30
1.62
3
10
200000
No
Nominal
PENSTOCK AND POWER CALCULATIONS

Referances:2,4, 5,6,12,13,15,16
Project:
Jhankre mini-hydropower
Himal Power Limited
BPC Hydroconsult
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
Date
06-Apr-2016
Revision
2006.05
Location:
INPUT
General:
Project:
Location:
Hydraulics:
Diversion flow Qd (m3/s)
Flow in each pipe Qi (m3/s)
Gross head (from forebay) Hg (m)
Power:
Turbine type (CROSSFLOW/PELTON)
Jogmai I
0.450
0.450
180.00
Number of units
Penstock pipe:
Pipe Material (STEEL/HDPE/PVC)
Welded / Flat rolled if steel
Rolled if steel
Type if steel (UNGRAGED/IS)
Burried or exposed
No of pipes
Bending angle 01(degrees)
Bending angle 02
Bending angle 03
Bending angle 04
Penstock diameter d=>d estd, d act (mm)
Pipe Length L (m)
Trashrack
Valves (Sperical/Gate/Butterfly)
Taper (Yes/No)
0.3
No
Exit (Yes/No)
No
30.00
3
Non standard ult. tensile strength (UTS) N/mm2
Steel
Welded
Rolled
IS
Exposed
Safety factor for lower pipes (0 for default)

Entrance Type
Entrance with gate and air-vent (Yes/No)
Bending radius (r/d) (1/2/3/5/1.5)
Bending angle 05
1.00
2.00
11.00
4.00
11.00
475 Pipe thickness t=>t min, t act (mm)
Roughness coefficient (ks)
418
550.000
Clear spacing, b
(mm)
20.00
Approach velocity,
Vo (m/s)
1.00
Tmax (deg)
T installation
Tmin
1st Pipe length(m)
2nd Pipe L (m)
40
20
10.00
15.00
Frictional headloss, hf (m)
Bend loss, hb
(m)
0.5
No
0.45
22.00
0.45
Bending angle 06
Bending angle 07
Bending angle 08
Bending angle 09
Bending angle 10
3.0
14.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.0
0.060
Design
discharge, Q
(m3/s)
0.450
Submergence
depth @
trashrack, h (m)
0.70
3rd Pipe L (m)
4th Pipe L (m)
5th Pipe L (m)
20.00
25.00
30.00
Angle of inclination, Flow deviation,

(deg)
(deg)
71.56
0.00
thickness, t(mm)
6.00
2.40
0.3
Yes
Direct Coupling (Yes/No)

Closure time T sec
2.40
10
1213.90
16.00%
79.38%
Pelton
1 10%
No of total jets (nj) & % closure
Trashrack coefficient, kt
Economic life (years)

WL @ forebay or U/S Invert Level (m)
% head allowable headloss hlt (m)
Cumulative knowm efficiency (g,t,tr,others)
Ilam
Expansion Joints
OUTPUT
Trashrack
0.0233
Turbulent loss coefficients
K inlet
Headloss coeff Total headloss, H(m)
0.0000
0.4572
K Total
K bend 01
K bend 02
K bend 03
K bend 04
0.0233
2.79
1.76
0.49
0.50
K bend 05
0.24
K bend 10
0.00
0.18
0.21
0.19
0.21
K bend 06
K bend 07
K bend 08
K bend 09
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
K valve
K taper
K exit
K others
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
Factor of Safety
Young's modulus of elasticity E N/mm2
Thickness
Diameter (mm)
Net Head (m)
Wave Velocity a (m/s)
Critical time Tc (sec) *2 = Closing time T
Hsurge for 10% closure of one jet
Hsurge for one jet closure of Pelton(m)
Hsurge for instanteneous closure of all unit closure of Pelton (m)
Lengths (max & actual) of the specified pipe (m) & Ok
Power
Turbine efficiency as per MGSP
Available shaft power(kW)
Reqd.'Turbine Capacity (+10%) (kW)
1
4
9
5
4
2.0555
2.06
Hydraulics
Pipe Area A (m2)
Hydraulic Radius R (m)
Velocity V (m/s)
Pipe Roughness ks (mm)
Relative Roughness ks/d
Reynolds Number Re = d V /Vk
Type of Flow
Friction Factor f
Expansion Joints (mm)

EJ number
dL theoretical
dL recommended
dL for expansion
dL for contraction
Submergence @ Submergence @
trashrack width, penstock, h min penstock, h min
B (m)
(m)
(m)
Surface area, S (m2)
2
6
13
7
6
560.313
0.177
0.12
2.54
0.060
1.263E-04
1057668
Turbulent
0.0137
U/S Invert Level (mAOD)

D/S Invert Level (mAOD)
Is HLtot < HL available
Friction Losses hf (m)
Fitting Losses hfit (m)
Trashracks and intake loss (m)
Total Head Loss htot individual (m)
% of H.Loss of individual pipe
200000
1213.90
1033.90
OKAY
5.23
0.67
0.02
5.93
3.29% Ok
Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) N/mm2
410
7.000
H total for 10% closure of one jet(m)
208.33
475.000
t effective (mm)
4.30
174.074
Minimum t effictive for negative pressure (mm)
4.97
1094.981
Comment on thickness
NA, No gate
1 Ok
Safety Factor (S)
3.57
28.33338
283.334
283.334
550.000
Check on Safety Factor

Air vent diameter d vent (mm)
H total capacity of the specified pipe (m)
H static capacity of the specified pipe (m)
Ok
60.75
212.24
183.91
75.00%
576.34
633.97
Electrical Power as per MGSP GL (kW)

Electrical Power based on Hnet (kW)
Power for known cumulative eff (kW)
397.31
461.07
610.00
Coeff of linear expansion /deg C

2
4
9
11
17
22
10
12
8
10
1.2E-05
5
13
26
14
12
Forces on Anchor Block
Block # & type
Convex
Small Hydropower Promotion Projec Spreadsheet by Mr Pushpa Chitrakar

Date
06-Apr-2016
Revision
2006.05
Project
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
Golmagad SHP
EPC Consult
Input
Particulars
Central
Upstream
Pipe dimensions
Diameter (Di)
Thickness
Shaddle Spacing & number
Downstream
0.39
0.006
4.00
0.39
0.006
4.00
Elevations
Vertical angles, a & b (deg)
2.000
53.712
0.0000
27.7832
Location of Expansion Joint
D/S Expansion Joint :
Vertical angles, a & b (rad)
78.5
9.81
25
0.586
1.172
1.758
3.097
0.000000
0.484908
200
30
20
Heads (m)
Forebay WL
Tot.Transient Length (m)
Tpot Pipe Len (forebay to AB)
Total Surge Head
Static Head
Surge Head
Total (H)
Youngs Modulus of Elasticity (E)
Yes
0.586
1.172
1.758
3.097
22
Bearing capacity (kN/m2)
Yes
Output
Weight of pipe, Wp (kN/m)
Weight of water, Ww (kN/m)
Total weight, W (kN/m))
Velocity, v (m/s)
0.37
Unit Weights (kN/m3)

Mild Steel
Water
RCC
Anchor Block
Soil
818.000
Horizontal Distance (m)
Design Discharge, Q (m3/s)
0.5236
835.000
511
56.388
96.360
17.000
10.63
27.633
2.1E+11
Coefficient of Linear Expansion (a)
12E-06
GENERAL FORCES
1. Perpendicular component of Wt of pipe and water act perpendicular to the pipe CL along the anchor faces
F1=dead weight of half of anchor saddle pipe perp to pipe

3.516
3.516
F1u (kN)=wu*lmu/2*COS():
F1d (kN)=wd*lmd/2*COS()
F1 perpendicular to pipe
3.516
3.110
F1 axial
0.000
-1.639
Fixed end moment = wl^2/8 for proped cantilever FEM.
FEMu (kN-m)= Restoring moment:
FEMd (kN-m)= Overturning moment
FEM
2.
2.344
-2.344
Axial frictional force of pipe on saddle supports transferred to anchor

F2 (kN)= *w*L'*cos
0.25
US Pipe Length, L' (m):
2.00
F2 (kN) =
3.
12.305 +ve for expansion
Hydrostatic Pressure at Bend due to the vector difference of static pressure & acting towards IP
Pu (kN) = F3u =PI/4*dui^2*Ht*
32.38
Pd (kN) = F3d =PI/4*ddi^2*Ht*
32.38
F3 = 2*P*sin((-)/2)
4.
15.549
Component of weight of pipe (wp) along the pipe

F4u= wp*active arm L*sin()
F4d= wp*active arm L*sin()
F4
5.
0.000
F5 (kN)=pi()*Dmean*t*E*a*Dt
Condition
Temp at oC
F5 expansion
F5 contraction
6.
+ Expansion, - Contraction
Tmax
Tinstallation
40
20
0.000
Tmin
4
0.000
0.000
0.000
Axial friction within Expansion joint seal due to the movement against the circumferential pressure
F6=PI()*D*W*H*g*m
0.25 Seal width, W (m)
0.16
Static Pressure at Exp, Ps (m)
17.000
Dynamic Pressure at Exp, Pd (m)
10.256
11.06
Total (AH)
27.256
13.507
28.992
13.939
F6 (kN)
+ Expansion, - Contraction
for rubber packing
7.
0.546
Thermally (expansion/contraction) induced axial force ( if no EJ provided)
17.93
F6
F6
p
Axial hydrostatic pressure on exposed end of pipe in Expansion Joint

F7=PI*D*t*H*g
F7
8.
1.996
F7
2.059
Dynamic pressure at the bend due to the vector difference of momentum

F8 = 2.5*(Q^2/d^2)*sin((-)/2)
P8= mV =Q**Vi
P8 (kN)
1.146
F8
9.
F6
Pipe Movement
1.146
0.540
Axial (small diameter) force on Reducer

F9=PI()*(Dupi^2-Ddni^2)/4*g*H
Reducer:
Location & Diameter:
St. Head
Dyn. Head
No
No
3.00
17.00
10.63
F9 (kN)
0.40
0.000
4.00
18.86
10.98
0.40
0.000
10 Axial drag of flowing Water (friction of flowing water) (not considered in MHP)
F10=g*PI()*Dupi^2/4*DH(Exp to block)
F10 (kN)
0.000 No
0.000 No
11 Axial (u/s slope) force due to soil pressure upstream of the block
F11 =s*hs^2/2*cos *ka*B
F11
ka= (cosi-sqrt(cosi^2-cos^2))/(cosi+sqrt(cosi^2-cos^2))
hs = soil depth = hu
F11
0.333
1.8
21.600 Yes
Width, B(m)
@ 1/3 of hs
0.6
12 Vertical force due to the weight of the block

F12 =block*Vol of block
Vol of block
F12
SUMMARY OF CRITICAL FORCES
16.191
F12
356.202 Yes
Expansion
@ bend
1 Summation of total horizontal forces H (kN)

2 Summation of total vertical forces V (kN)
3 Summation of total moment forces M (kN-m)
Contraction
Total
@ bend
16.551
38.151
-10.41
11.19
-16.554
339.648
-3.56
352.64
0.000
0.00
Total
F7
Anchor Block Stability

Small Hydropower Promotion Proje Spreadsheet by Mr Pushpa Chitrakar
Date
Revision
Project
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
06-Apr-2016
2006.05
Golmagad SHP
Mansarawar Hydropower P Ltd
EHS
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
Input
Anchor
Upstream depth, Hu (m)
Downstream depth, Hd (m)
Width, W (m)
Length, L (m)
anchor (kN/m3)
Output
3.3
2.25
2
3
22
0.5
Concrete volume of Anchor Block

Weight of block, Wb (kN)
Centre of gravity XX
3.5
16.191
356.199
1.405
Anchor Block Se ction
3.0
2.5
Penstock
Bend at (X), (m)
Bend at (Y), (m)
Diameter, d (m)
Upstream angle, (deg)
Upstream angle, (deg)
2.0
1
2.15
0.458
13
25
1.5
0.5
Length X (m) '
0.0
-0.5
Foundation
Upstream depth hfu (m)
Soil friction , (deg)
soil (kN/m3)
Bearing Capacity, SBC (kN/m2)
1.8
30
20
200
Forces (with soil pressure and block weight)

Yes
Forces with earthpressure & anchor
Expansion
H (kN)
V (kN)
Contraction
H (kN)
V (kN)
Height Y (m) '
1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Active earth pressure coeff, Ka
2.5
Overturning
3.5
4.0
0.3715
F Pa
Soil force
Acting at (m)
3.0
Fx
23.455
0.6
Fy
22.853
Bearing
5.276
Sliding
Net Forces @
SM @ O
bend
53.180
30.327 d
345.260
-16.215 eccentricity e, Ok
e allowable
563.303 P max
1.632 P min
0.132
0.500
72.681
172.63
42.4057 Ok
Ok
SM @ O
-6.19 d
-41.03 eccentricity e, Ok
473.281 P max
1.477 P min
0.023
55.8664
160.22
50.9469 Ok
Ok
16.66
320.44
Turbine Selection
06-Apr-2016
2006.05
SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECTRevision
Project
Upper Jogmai SHP
Developer
EPC Consult
Consultant
Designed
Pushpa Chitrakar
Checked
Pushpa Chitrakar
Date
Input
Discharge (l/s)
Gross head (m)
Hydraulic losses
Max turbine output kW
Turbine rpm
Cd
150 Gear ratio at turbine

69 Gear ratio at generator
15.94% No of turbines/generators
67.89 Total number of jets if Pelton n
750 Specified turbine
0.96 Cu
Output
Net head m
No Gearing
Sp speed of runner rpm (no gearing)
Pelton (12-30) => (Ns 17-42)
Turgo (Ns 20-70) => (Ns 28-99)
Crossflow (Ns 20-80)
Fracis (Ns 80-400)
Propeller or Kaplan (Ns 340-1000)
Jet velocity Vj (m/s)
Nozzle diameter, Dn (mm)
Pitch circle diameter, PCD (mm)
58.001 Generator with gearing rpm
**
Turgo
Crossflow
**
**
With Gearing
46 Sp speed of turbine
Pelton (12-30) => (Ns 17-42)
Turgo (Ns 20-70) => (Ns 28-99)
Crossflow (Ns 20-80)
Fracis (Ns 80-400)
Propeller or Kaplan (Ns 340-1000)
32.38
54.85
395.15
1
2
1
2
Pelton
0.46
1500
23
Pelton
**
Crossflow
**
**
Selection of Electrical Equipment

06-Apr-2016
2006.05
SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECT/Revision
Project
Upper Jogmai SHP
Developer
EPC Consult
Consultant
Designed
Pushpa Chitrakar
Checked
Pushpa Chitrakar
Date
INPUT
Discharge (m3/s)
Gross head (m)
Overall plant efficiency (%)
Temperature (oC)
Altitude (m)
ELC correction factor
Frequency of the system (Hz)
Capacity of used generator (kW)
Capacitor configuration
0.08 Power factor

50.968 Safety factor of generator
50% Phase
45 Type of Generator
1500 Over rating factor of MCCB
0.83 Over rating factor of cable
Delta
50 No. of poles
0 Rated rotor speed if induction generator N (rpm)
Efficiency of motor at full load
0.8
1.3
1
2
1.25
1.5
4
1450
89%
OUTPUT
Pe Electrical output (active power) (kW)
20.00 Use of 3-phase generator is mandatory
Generator
Temp.factor
Capacity (kW)
Synchronous rotational speed Ns (rpm)
0.96 Altitude factor

28.25 Actual available capacity (kW)
1500 Rotational speed of the generator (rpm)
IGC capacity (kW)
Rated Voltage (V)
20.00 Calculated Ballast capacity 1.2*Pe (kW)

Excitation Capacitance (micro F)
220 Irated for Cable & MCCB (A) at Generator side
Rating of MCCB (A)
113.64 Calculated size of MCCB (A)
Cable
Rating (A)
255.68 Size of 2-core cupper armoured cables
0.96
30.00
1550
24.00
123.16
170.45
142.04
150
Turbine and Generator Machine Foundation

Date
Revision
Project
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
06-Apr-2016
2006.05
Upper Jogmai, Ilam
EPC Consult
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
Machine Foundation Plan
Machine Foundation Section

2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.8
YY (m1.6
)
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
Height
1.2ZZ (m )
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4
XX (m )
XX (m )
INPUT
Gross head hg (m)
Surge head hs (m)
51.00 Design Discharge Qd (m3/s)

50.00
Foundation
0.150
Penstock
Foundation on
Allowable bearing capacity Pall (kN/m2)

Friction coeff between block and soil m
Length L (m)
Bredth B (m)
Height H (m)
Material of foundation
Soil
Diameter dp (m)
0.300
180
Material
0.5
Centreline above PH floor hp (m)
3.2 Turbine Pit
2.5
Length of opening Lo (m)
1.5
Bredth of opening Bo (m)
Concrete
Height of opening Ho (m)
mild steel
0.300
0.450
0.500
1.000
22
Height of tailrace canal Htr (m)
0.500
2.943
3.434
XX (m)
0.625
2.025
YY (m)
1.250
1.250
Weight Wi
(kN)
70.036
Lever Arm LA (m)

LA along XX
1.800
LA along YY
33.000
27.225
193.875
3.000
2.575
1.175
282.455
260.477
1.25
1.25
1.25
199.530
260.477
Overturning
Equivalent distance at which SM acts from critical point
d (m)
Eccentricity e, (m)
Allowable eccentricity e all (m)
Comment on overturning moment
LA along XX
1.084
0.516
0.533
Ok
LA along YY
0.766
0.484
0.417
Not Ok
Bearing
Pressure at base
Pmax
Pmin
Comments on bearing
LA along XX
64.038
1.081
Ok
LA along YY
70.379
-5.260
Not Ok
LA along XX
1.860
Ok
LA along YY
1.860
Ok
Density of foundation (kM/m3)

Electro-mechanical
Weight of turbine Wt (kN) & cl position
Weight of generator Wg (kN) & cl position
OUTPUT
Forces
Force due to h total of 101 m, Fh (kN)
Foundation
W1
W2
W3
Sum of moments M (kN-m)
Sum of vertical forces M (kN)
Sliding
Factor of safety against sliding, FS sl
Comment of sliding
Transmission and Distribution System:
Referances:2,4, 6,12,13,15,16
Date
06-Apr-2016
Revision
2006.05
Cable Summary
Project:
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
Upper Jogmai SHP

EPC Consult
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
Power factor
Voltage systems
0.8
11000
400
230
Type
Squirrel
Length(km)
4.50
Gopher
0.00
Weasel
10.00
Rabbit
3.00
Otter
1.15
Dog
5.30
Total Cost(
606600.00
Length of neutral cables (km)
Node name
Reach
name
Reach
Length
(km)
PH-A-B-C-D
Power at
next node
(kW)
Phase
1,3,11
PHA
0.300
AB
0.500
AC
0.500
AD
0.500
T1
PHT1
0.050
T2
T1 T2
1.500
T2 E
0.300
EJ
0.500
EG
0.500
GH
0.200
EK
0.500
KL
LM
PH-T1
T2
V @ next
node (V)
% voltage
drop
400.00
400.00
28.87
6.30
393.70
1.58
5 Rabbit
2500
227.30
27.50
17.60
209.70
8.82
5 Rabbit
2500
227.30
27.50
17.60
209.70
8.82
5 Rabbit
2500
227.30
27.50
17.60
209.70
8.82
37.89
1.60
398.40
1.38
5.00
10995.00
37.89
8.20
38.68
16.20
400.00
21 Otter
1050
11
400.00
400.00
11000.00
21 Squirrel
31500
11000.00
11000.00
400.00
0.05
400.00
6300
7 Dog
3500
7 Otter
3500
226.21
38.68
18.40
207.81
9.65
3 Dog
600
207.81
18.05
3.00
204.81
10.95
7 Dog
3500
226.21
38.68
16.20
210.01
8.69
0.200
3 Dog
600
210.01
17.86
3.00
207.01
10.00
0.200
2 Dog
400
207.01
12.08
2.00
205.01
10.87
E-H (y)
226.21
E-M (b)
400.00
0.40
21 Dog
E-J ( r )
E
Reach Voltage
drop (V)
4800
11
T2-E
V @ prev
node (V) Current (A)
400.00
16 Dog
T1-T2
T1
Load
Momentu
m (kW-m)
PH
PH
ACSR
type
226.21
2.05
226.21
226.21
391.80
210.01
8.69
226.21
226.21
226.21
LOADS AND BENEFITS

Referances: 1,2,3,4, 6,12,13,15,16
Date
Project:
06-Apr-2016
2006.05
Ladagada VDC, Doti
Revision
Location:
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
Gaddi Gad Khola

Gaddi Gad Khola MHP
Perinial
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
INPUT
General
Power Output (kW)
Name of the Source
96.1
Gaddi Gad Khola
Beneficiary HH (nos.)
Plant's operating days
471
330
Loads (kWh or W/m)

Domestic
Agro-processing
Bakery
Saw Mill
Herbs Processing
Load 5
Load 6
Operating dTariff (Rs)

330
1.00
330
6.00
320
6.00
300
5.00
180
5.50
330
330
Domestic lighting
Average subscription/household (W/HH)
System loss
10%
time
0
5
load
88
0
440
0
Probable Business Load Expected after 3 years
Operating d/y Tariff (Rs)
Load
Metal Workshop
330
6.00
Photo Studio
320
6.00
Dairy Processing
320
6.00
Cold Store
310
6.00
Load 5
Load 6
Proposed end uses and operting hours

time (hr)
0
Agro-processing
0
time (hr)
0
Bakery
0
time (hr)
0
Saw Mill
0
time (hr)
0
Herbs Processing
0
time (hr)
0
Load 5
15
time (hr)
0
Load 6
12
36
OUTPUT
Summary
Annual Available kWh
4
0
8
9
3
0
3
0
6
0
3
0
0
12
22.5
14
0
16
10
12
25
8
0
5
0
0
16
0
18
0
18
0
17
0
15
0
10
0
0
22
0
22
0
22
0
22
0
22
0
22
0
0
36.00
Annual Income
(Rs)
480,420
85
8
0
0
10
1
8
6
18
91.1
182.2
From (hr) To (hr)

12
16
8
20
8
18
8
18
Daily Energy Demand (Dd) kWh

Yearly Energy Demand (Dy) kWh
Average Load Factor
1037
378578
49.97%
761112
First 3 years
After 3 years
117060
147680
15.38
19.40
42.36
50.40
916,050
1,099,770
Yearly end use load (kWh)

Productive end use load factor (%)
Total load plant factor
Annual total (domestic + end uses) Income (Rs)
End Use
Load
Operation Period
(kW)
Hours/day
Days/year
Domestic Lighting
44.483
13.987
Existing/Committed Business Load
Agro-processing
22.5
4
Bakery
9
6
Saw Mill
10
2
Herbs Processing
25
5
Load 5
15
6
Load 6
12
3
Total
Total Annual Income from sales of electricity
Yearly Load
kWh
LF (%)
330
205326
26.98
330
320
300
180
330
330
29700
17280
6000
22500
29700
11880
117060
3.90
2.27
0.79
2.96
3.90
1.56
15.38
178200
103680
30000
123750
0
0
435,630
916,050
13200
3840
25600
18600
0
0
61240
1.73
0.50
3.36
2.44
0.00
0.00
8.05
79200
23040
153600
111600
0
0
183,720
Probable Business Load after 3 years

Metal Workshop
10
4
330
Photo Studio
1
12
320
Dairy Processing
8
10
320
Cold Store
6
10
310
Load 5
0
0
0
Load 6
0
0
0
Total additional annual income after 3 years
Productive End Use (%)
19.40
Load Duration Chart for the first three years of operation of Gaddi Gad Khola
Load Duration Chart for the first three years of operation of Gaddi Gad Khola
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
140
Installed Capacity & Load (kW)

120
Load 6
100
Load 5
Herbs Processing
80
Saw Mill
Bakery
60
Agro-processing
40
Domestic
Installed Capacity
20
0
0
10
11
Tim e (hrs)
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
20
0
23
Project Costing and Financial Analyses

Referances: 1,2,3,4, 6,7,8,12,13
Date
06-Apr-2016
Revision
2006.05
Project
Developer
Consultant
Designed
Checked
Golmagad SHP
EPC Consult
Pushpa Chitrakar
Pushpa Chitrakar
INPUT
Project size (kW):
Total Project Cost (Rs.)
Subsidy/kW
Headrace
Canal
91500 Rs/kW x 96,1 =
Interest rate i (%)
Payback period n (yr)
Plant life N (yr)
Discount Rate I (%)
Investment Cost (Rs)
Mechanical components
Electrical component
Civil component
Spare parts & tools
Transport.
96.10
12,734,865
Total subsidy
8793150
Bank loan
1,890,044
3%
7
Other loan
Cash equity
1,200,000
Kind equity
851,671
Others
0
15
4%
8,516,715
999,040 Installation
2,061,717 Commissioning
1,363,497 VAT
57,550 Contingencies
3,178,800 Others
232,500
0
623,611
0
Cost Summary
Project cost (Rs)
Annual Operation, Maintenance and other Costs (Rs)
Annual Income without probable business loads (Rs)
Annual Income with probable business loads (Rs)
Annual installment for Bank loan
Annual installment for other loan
NPV on equity without probable business load (Rs)+ve
NPV equity with probable business load (Rs)+ve
Cost/Kw =>>Ok
Subsidy/HH
O & M (Rs)
Salary
Spares
Maintenance
Office expenses
Miscellaneous
Others
305,004
114000
0
171,000
20,004
NPV Based on Different Project Costs

NPV
Probable Business Load
Without
With
Total investment cost
(3,543,677)
(2,010,846)
Total Inv Cost-Subsidy
5,249,473
6,782,304
Equity
3,773,038
5,305,869
12,734,865
305,004
916050
1099770
303364
NA
3,773,038
5,305,869
132,517
18,669
Annual Cash Flows

Without Probable Business Loads
Year
Equity
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
O & M costs
Loan repayment
Income
1,200,000
305,004
305,004
305,004
305,004
305,004
305,004
305,004
305,004
305,004
305,004
305,004
305,004
305,004
305,004
305,004
303,364
303,364
303,364
303,364
303,364
303,364
303,364
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
916,050
916,050
916,050
916,050
916,050
916,050
916,050
916,050
916,050
916,050
916,050
916,050
916,050
916,050
916,050
Cash flow
With Probable Business Loads

Income
-1,200,000
307,682
307,682
307,682
307,682
307,682
307,682
307,682
611,046
611,046
611,046
611,046
611,046
611,046
611,046
611,046
916,050
916,050
916,050
1,099,770
1,099,770
1,099,770
1,099,770
1,099,770
1,099,770
1,099,770
1,099,770
1,099,770
1,099,770
1,099,770
1,099,770
Cash flow
-1,200,000
307,682
307,682
307,682
491,402
491,402
491,402
491,402
794,766
794,766
794,766
794,766
794,766
794,766
794,766
794,766
Ulitilities and Short Calculations

Uniform Depth of a Trapezoidal Canal (Y-m)

Golmagad SHP
Date
06-Apr-2016
Stone masonry canal
Revision
2006.05
Design Discharge (l/s):
1,000
1/Mannings Coeff (M):
50.0000
1/Canal Slope (S):
300
Freeboard, FB (m)
0.2
Wall Thickness, t (m)
0.3
Width of Canal, b (m):
1.000
Z= 0.50
Z= 0.50
Top width, T (m)
Uniform Depth (Y-m)
#NAME?
#NAME?
Canal Wall Geometry
Payment of a loan
Golmagad SHP
Date
06-Apr-2016
Stone masonry canal
Revision
2006.05
Payback
Loan amount (NRs) :

Interest rate (APR):
Yearly payment and No
Yearly Payment
1,800,000 Starting Month

13.00% Starting Year
10
331,721.20
1
2
2006
Actual vs AEPC Power (Pe-kW)

Golmagad SHP
Date
06-Apr-2016
Stone masonry canal
Revision
2006.05
Discharge (l/s):
Cumulative efficiency including head loss (n%)
120
80.00%
Gross Head (H-m)
300.00
Actual Power (Pact-kW)
282.53
Power MGSP-ESAP (Pe-kW)
176.58
Spillway Lengths (m)

Golmagad SHP
Date
06-Apr-2016
Stone masonry canal
Revision
2006.05
Flood discharge (l/s):
2,000
Design discharge (l/s):
500
Overtopping height (ho) mm:
300
1.5
L spillway min for Qf m & full height
0.00
Length of spillway Ls1 for Qf m & half height
0.00
Friction Factor (f) & Net head

Golmagad SHP
Date
06-Apr-2016
Stone masonry canal
Revision
2006.05
Discharge (m3/s)
Gross head (m)
Pipe roughness ks (mm)
Pipe diameter (mm)
0.500 Flow
63 Velocity, v(m/s)
0.010 Reynold's nr, (R )
500.00 Laminar Flow
2.5464790895
1116876.79362734
5.730265000148E-005
Pipe Length (m)
100
9.170E+00
Turbulent headloss factor (K)
1.50
9.170E+00
Friction factor f
0.0119 Transitional Flow &
Headloss hl (m)
1.282
Headloss hl (%)
2.03
Net Head (m)
61.718
0.0118931351
Voltage Drop
Golmagad SHP
Date
06-Apr-2016
Stone masonry canal
Revision
2006.05
Reach length, L (km)

Voltage at 1st node, V1 (V)
Power, P (kW)
ASCR type
Phase at 1st node, (1/3)
Phase at 2nd node, (1/3)
1.000
230
20
6.00
1
1
Current, I (A)
108.70
Impedence, Z (/km)
0.4178
Voltage at 2nd node, V2 (V)
139.17
Power loss P loss (kW)
3.95
Voltage drop, dV (V)
90.83
% Voltage drop
39.49
List of References
1 Mini-Grid Support Programme, Alternative Energy Promotion Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal
(2002), Peltric Standards
2 Mini-Grid Support Programme, Alternative Energy Promotion Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal
(2003), Preliminary Feasibility Studies of Prospective Micro-hydro Projects
3 Mini-Grid Support Programme, Alternative Energy Promotion Centre , Kathmandu,
Nepal(2001), Technical Details and Cost Estimate
4 Mini-Grid Support Programme, Alternative Energy Promotion Centre , Kathmandu,
Nepal(2003), Guidelines for Detailed Feasibility Study of Micro-Hydro Projects
5 European Small Hydropower Association (1998), Layman's Guidebook on How to Develop
a Small Hydro Site
6 BPC Hydroconsult, Intermediate Technology Development Group (ITDG), Kathmandu,
Nepal (2002), Civil Works Guidelines for Micro-Hydropower in Nepal.
7 United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Report on Standardiztion of
Civil Works for Small Hydropower Plants
8 GTZ/Department of Energy Development, Energy Division, Papua New Guinea, Micro
Hydropower Training Modules (1994), Modules 1-7, 10, 13, 14 & 18B.
9 Americal Society of Civil Engineer (ASCE), Sediment Transportation.
10 KB Raina & SK Bhattacharya, New Age International (P) Ltd (1999), Electrical Design
Estimating and Costing.
11 Badri Ram & DN Vishwakarma, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi
(1995), Power System Protection and Switchgear.
12 Adam Harvey et.al. (1993), Micro-Hydro Design Manual, A guide to small-scale water
power schemes, Intermediate Technology Publications, ISBN 1 85339 103 4.
13 Allen R. Inversin (1986), Micro-Hydropower Sourcebook, A Practical Guide to Design and
Implementation in Developing Countries, NRECA International Foundation, 1800
Massachusetts Avenue N. W., Washington, DC 20036.
14 Helmut Lauterjung/Gangolf Schmidt (1989), Planning of Intake Structures, GATE/GTZ,
Vieweg.
15 Methodologies for estimating hydrologic characteristics of ungauged locations in Nepal
(1990), HMG of Nepal, Ministry of Water Resources, Water and Energy Commission
Secretariat, Department of Hydrology and Meteorology.
16 Design Manuals for Irrigation Projects in Nepal (1990), Planning and Design Strengthening
Project (PDSP), His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Ministry of Water Resources,
Department of Irrigation. United Nations Development Programme (NEP/85/013)/World
Bank.
17 Salleri Chialsa Small Hydel Project (1983), Technical Report, DEH/SATA, ITECO.
18 P.N. Khanna (1996), Indian Practical Civil Engineer's Handbook, 15th Edition, Engineer's
Publishers, Post Box 725, New Delhi - 110001.

En Micro Hydro Design Aids GIZ 2005

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

En Micro Hydro Design Aids GIZ 2005

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

MICROHYDRO DESIGN AIDS 2010 for Microsoft Excel 2003

Small Hydropower Promotion Project (SHPP)/GTZ

Small Hydropower Promotion Project 2006

Discharge Measurement by Conductivity Meter

Spreadsheet by Mr Pushpa Chitrakar

SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECT/GTZ

HANNA Instruments (HI 933000)

Salt Const. (k)

Discharge Measurement by Conductivity Meter: Golmagad SHP

Discharge Measurement by Conductivity Meter: Golmagad SHP

rge = 453.89 l/s

A efSalt =1795gm,0gm, A eff =0

HYDROLOGICAL CALCULATIONS FOR UNGAUGED MHP RIVERS

Spreadsheet by Mr Pushpa Chitrakar

SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECT/GTZ

Upper Jogmai SHP

Kankai Hydropower P Ltd

Turbine discharge Qd l/s:

Hydest Flood Flows

Flood Discharge (m3/s)

Q design =80 l/s with 12-month exceedence

Design of Stone Masonry Weir

Spreadsheet by Mr Pushpa Chitrakar

SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECT/GTZ

Weir Section & Forces @ Normal Condition

Foundation and Soil

Soil Coeff of soil at active state (ka)

Allowable bearing capacity Pall (kN/m2)

180 Soil Density (kN/m3)

Water (normal conditions)

Water (flood conditions)

Overturning: Equivalent distance at which SM acts from critical point

Design of Orifice Side Intake

SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECT/GTZ

Gravel Flushing Gate

Gravel trap (if needed)

Headloss due to friction hf m

Orifice Calculations for (B = 2H or provided) rectangular canal downstream of orifice

Manning's coeff of roughness 0.012

Critical depth of water at crest yc m

Ls1 for Qf w/o d/s Obs m

Design of Bottom/Drop Intake

SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECT/GTZ

River Width flood (Brf) m =

Qo u/s of intake (m3/s) normal =

Crest =894NWL =894,HFL =898,55

Canal Design: Proposed design and optimum canal sections

Spreadsheet by Mr Pushpa Chitrakar

SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECT/GTZ

Roughness coefficient (n)

Side slope N (1V:NHorizontal)

Length of the canal (m)

1/Canal slope (s)

Channel Depth/diameter D (m)

Channel Width (B) m

Channel Drops Horizontal length hi m

Top Width T (m)

Wetted Perimeter P (m)

Hydraulic Radius r (m)

Calculated flow (m3/s) & remarks

HEADRACE PIPE CALCULATIONS

Spreadsheet by Mr Pushpa Chitrakar

Referances: 2,4, 6,12,13,15,16

Upper Jogmai SHP