Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Definition
Shared Dreaming or Mutual Dreaming mentioned by Stephen LaBerge[1] and Lynda Lane
Magallon[2] is a type of dream where two or more people share the same dream content from
the their own perspective. Upon waking the participants are able to recall the same details,
settings and even conversations they had with each other during the mutual dream.
Research
Stephen LaBerge writes in his book "Lucid Dreaming"[1] that "Accounts of "mutual
dreaming," (dreams apparently shared by two or more people) raise the possibility that the
dream world may be in some cases just as objectively real as the physical world. This is
because the primary criterion of "objectivity" is that an experience is shared by more than one
person, which is supposedly true of mutual dreams. In that case, what would happen to the
traditional dichotomy between dreams and reality?"
Tom Campbell[3] who worked at The Monroe Institute[4] in Virginia writes in his trilogy
entitled "My Big Toe"[3] that during their exploration phase at the Monroe Labs during sleep;
himself and other participants practising the skill of being consciously awake when the body
is asleep were able to verify a mutual meeting that would be recorded in a control room.
The Monroe Institute is a research centre founded by Robert A. Monroe[5] for the purpose
of researching a phenomena that occurs during sleep called the Out-Of-Body experience[6]
or OOBE and OBE. Robert A. Monroe has been one of the leading pioneers in consciousness
research spanning over 40 years in the area of waking lucid awareness while the body slept.
Other research organizations have catalogued their own evidence of shared dreaming. The
International Association for the Study of Dreams[7] has had yearly dream telepathy[8]
contests which have yielded positive mutual dreaming accounts along with other
phenomenological dream experiences. Many of the researchers have themselves had mutual
dreams with each other. The IASD compiled a list of researchers to discuss the movie
Inception where many of the researchers commented on the reality of mutual dreaming.[9]
Link
Lynda Lane Magallon published a book entitled "Mutual Dreaming"[2] where she covers
history of this phenomena and personal accounts with people involved with dream research.
The president for the IASD, Robert Waggoner recently published "Lucid Dreaming: Gateway
to the Inner Self"[10] where he touches on mutual dreaming.
Personal Experience
As the author of this article, I have also enjoyed the rare opportunity to have shared dreams
with people in my 23 years of dream exploration. It is for this reason that I feel compelled to
share some of my insights into the phenomena based on personal experience and what I have
read in regards to theory.
In 1988 I would have my first confirmed shared dream with a friend during a time when I had
no idea that such a phenomena was possible. This first hand experience with shared dreaming
seemed incredible. This friend and I would have several shared dreams in the time that
followed.
The journey to have these wilfully was met with a high level of uncertainty and challenges. I
will share what I observed and learned from these explorations. For a more detail account,
read the interview with Robert Waggoner as I discuss many of the expeirences with dreaming
in greater detail for the Lucid Dream Exchange Magazine 55th June Edition.[11] link
Personal Theories
The first question you must have as a reader is how is this possible? Clearly the above list of
researchers and investigators have made some very startling claims. It would be easy to
dismiss this as fantasy and move on; however I encourage you to have open minded
scepticism when moving forward into understanding the mechanics involved in sleep related
phenomenology.
If mutual dreaming was common or easy; many more people would be reporting this with
each other, however you may be a person who has told a friend or family member about a
dream; to have it confirmed by them that they too remember the same dream if not something
very similar.
Is the dreamstate objective? That is the first question you have to really ask when trying to
discern if shared dreaming is possible at all. The evidence from personal experience is
compelling indicating some type of objectivity within dreams. Carl Jung[12] famously spoke
about a collective unconscious that we were all accessing during sleep.
A collective unconsciousness suggests that in the sleeping state; we are all part of one
collective unconscious system. Buddhist believe in Indra's Net or Web[13] which describes
that all phenomena is interconnected. Tom Campbell expands on this concept in his trilogy,
"My-Big-Toe"[3] where he describes a Reality Wide Web or RWW that we all access as
consciousness and download experience in the form of data.
It is through this interconnectedness that we have the mechanics that surround the reality of
Shared Dreaming. Another theory of interconnectedness stems from Quantum Mechanics
through entanglement.
Quantum entanglement[14] is when two or more objects are linked and affect each other in a
non-localized way when separated. Considering the Big Bang theory and the existence of a
singularity;[15] it is theoretically plausible that everything coming from the singularity has
varying degrees of entanglement affecting the entire system.
Consciousness functions at quantum states and itself may be subjective to the same quantum
mechanics that affect photons. As a result of being part of this interconnected system, our
consciousness may be linked through entanglement with all other systems at these finitely
small levels.
Just recently scientists were able to teleport information through quantum entanglement range
of 10 miles[16]. This in itself is a remarkable feat of practical use of quantum states. The
human brain already naturally use these quantum states as is evident in Pemrose-Hameroff
Orch Or model[17]. If science can teleport quantum information 10 miles; who is to say that
the human brain is not already able to achieve this type of communication.
Shared dreaming is already demonstrating that some type of information sharing is possible
and the more we understand this interconnectedness; the more we will be able to unravel how
the mechanics of information exchange work between these quantum systems.
Quantum Mechanics proves that information can be teleported between entangled photons.
The human brain uses photons in the alpha-beta tublin as part of the information processing
(Penrose-Hameroff)[17]. The human brain is natures quantum super computer.
It seems based on shared dreaming evidence that some type of information exchange is
possible during sleep. From a singularity to a massive expanding Universe one would at least
expect that anything is possible. Interconnectedness is quantum fact; not just Buddhist belief.
As to what scale or magnitude this represents is a matter for science to resolve. Shared
dreaming is just the tip of the iceburg for how information has organized itself within the
Universe.
If we can't accept Indra's Web, or Tom's Reality Wide Web; we can at least accept science fact
that there is interconnectedness within quantum states; and to what degree of entanglement
exists since the expansion of the singularity should intrigue the minds of people like Stephen
Hawkins[18].
If we came from one; are we not all part of one? With the collapse of the Universe we
inevitable become one again; or at least the quantum soup that we formed. Where
consciousness begins and ends within quantum states may be completely entangled with what
photons are. Photons after all; are the functioning energy driving the quantum computer called
the human mind. We may not measure consciousness, but we know photons play a role in
facilitating the existence of consciousness within the human brain.
Now that we have this theoretical muse done with let's get back on topic with the reality of
shared dreaming.
In some shared dreams; I have watched my friend slip back into this state. During that
segment of the shared dream recall; we find out that the person dreamed something
completely different then what I had observed until their attention was restored focusing on
me.
I feel this information is important that is why I share it. It would be nice to have further
confirmation from other mutual dream researchers as to finding people in a non-responsive
state during attempts to share dreams with them.
When a person seems to react negatively to the dream stimuli; they do retract and slip into this
state creating a type of personification of the dream that overlaps the mutual potential with a
totally subjective experience. The observation of this in action is immensely fascinating to
me.
It seems to me that the following challenges prevent everyday mutual dreaming:
1. Both participants need to be synchronized in REM sleep; any NREM and REM mix
between the participants will negate the cognitive qualities required for memory,
awareness and perception.
2. Participants need to have at least enough memory, awareness and perception to focus
and maintain a coherent experience in the dream.
3. Participants need to have developed enough skill with dreaming to invoke these
cognitive qualities to increase the probability of shared dreaming.
4. Most people are not active dreamers; they are passive. Shared dreams are possible but
may prove more difficult between active and passive dreamers.
5. People can personalize the dream to fulfill fantasies, desires and fears; this subjective
projection will override any mutual exchange.
6. Upon waking people often forget their dreams; this could be a form of waking induced
amnesia. There is clearly amnesiac states that occur with sleeping.
Clearly conscious awareness and left-brain cognitive function is a requirement of
quality dream awareness, perception and recall. It is in these three attributes that we
find a good skill set that mutual dreamers can work towards to improve the potential to
share a dream.
7. Dreams are thought-reactive so negative beliefs and disbelief can override mutual
exchange in favour of personification of the dream state.
had a connection with is the only way to start to gain real world feedback and
confirmation of a shared dream.
There is no question this is going to be a lot harder then having a lucid dream, or
precognitive dream; however the rewards of success are rich indeed. Having first hand
experience and knowledge of this reality of shared dreaming far out weighs having
only an idea or belief that it could possibly exist.
Shared dreaming should not be a belief; it should be an experience that you invoke and
create by actively participating in your dream rather then passively letting this
opportunity slip by.
You direct the experience with your belief and intent. The outcome of success lies
completely at your disposal.
Hopefully this has helped encourage your explorative and pioneer spirit. The more that
people can become aware of this reality; the greater the chances are that more shared
dreaming will occur.
I personally feel that this is an evolutionary potential that requires participation.
Everything dream related is one of active participation and exploration. We are still
pioneering this great frontier of inner-space. When you graduate from belief with first
hand knowledge and experience? What will you do to help others with this gift?
Know that organizations and research centres already exist like the IASD and the
Monroe Institute. Research and learn from these scientists, physicists and explorers of
conscious space. You can get involved on their forums and attend classes.
Form a dream group with your friends and family. Share material such as this article
and educate people that more and more knowledge and verification of this potential
exists. Most of all; find out through first hand personal experience the potential you
have as a dreamer. Don't let a gift this great go to waste.
Author
Ian Wilson
Blog | Facebook Group | Twitter
[references follow]
[edit on 22-7-2010 by YouAreDreaming]