Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
This paper compares and evaluates the performance of Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation (SPWM) and Space Vector Pulse Width
Modulation (SVPWM) techniques for a three-level inverter by cascading two two-level inverters. In this topology, four power
semiconductor switches are used per phase and a total of twelve switches are required. The simulation study shows that SVPWM is
superior to SPWM in the aspects of better DC-bus utilization and offering better spectral performance.
Index Terms: space vector modulation, multi-level inverters, sine-triangle modulation, and cascaded inverter
-----------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------1. INTRODUCTION
In recent decades there has been a large number of variable
speed induction motor drives which serves many industrial
applications such as fans, pumps, machine tool cutting, steel
rolling mills, etc,. Voltage source inverters are employed for
these drives as there is a dramatic increase in the power
semiconductor technology which offers power ratings from
few hundred watts to several megawatts. Voltage source
inverters produce pulsed output waveforms, consisting of the
fundamental component which is required to drive the motor,
as well as harmonics which contribute only to the losses and
torque pulsations. Ever since the invention of multilevel
inverter topology namely Neutral-point clamped multilevel
inverter in 1981 [1], various three-level inverter topologies
such as the capacitor-clamped inverters, H-bridge inverters
and cascaded inverters have been proposed [2-4]. Cascaded
multilevel inverter topology has been proposed by
Somasekhar et. al. [5] by connecting two two-level inverters in
cascaded scheme
In this paper, a comparison is made with the two multi-carrier
PWM techniques namely sinusoidal pulse width modulation
and space vector pulse width modulation schemes pertaining
to cascaded three-level inverter and the comparative analysis
using MATLAB/Simulink is presented and the results signify
that SVPWM is better than SPWM.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 09 | Sep-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
365
Vdc if the top switch of that leg in inverter-2 and the top switch
of the corresponding leg in inverter-1 is switched-ON. Thus
the DC input points of the individual phases of inverter-2 may
be connected to a DC link voltage of either Vdc or Vdc/2 by
switching ON the top switch or the bottom switch of the
corresponding phase leg in inverter-1. The pole voltage of a
given phase of inverter-2 attains a voltage of zero, if the
bottom switch of the corresponding leg in inverter-2 is
switched ON. In this case, the DC input point of that phase of
inverter-2 is floating as the top and bottom switches are
switched complementarily in any leg in a two-level inverter.
Thus the pole voltage of a given phase for inverter-2 is
capable of assuming one of the three possible values 0, Vdc/2
and Vdc which is the characteristic of a three-level inverter.
Fig-2: Sine-triangle PWM Scheme
(1)
(2)
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 09 | Sep-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
366
Active Vectors
Space
Vector
Zero
Vectors, VO
V1
Switching
States
7(+++)
8(- - -)
1 (+--)
ON-state
Switch
S1, S3, S5
S2, S4, S6
S1, S6, S2
V2
2 (++-)
S1, S3, S2
V3
3 (-+-)
S4, S3, S2
V4
4 (-++)
S4, S3, S5
V5
5 (--+)
S4, S6, S5
V6
6 (+-+)
S1, S6, S5
Vector Definition
VO = 0
V1 = (2/3)Vd e j0
V2 = (2/3)Vd e
j/3
V3 = (2/3)Vd e
j2/3
V4 = (2/3)Vd e
j3/3
V5 = (2/3)Vd e
j4/3
V6 = (2/3)Vd e
j5/3
(3)
Where VAO ,VBO and VCO are the instantaneous load phase
voltage In a balanced three phase system, if the two quantities
are known, then the other quantity can be easily determined.
(4)
(6)
(7)
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 09 | Sep-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
367
T0 = TS T1 T2
(8)
(15)
(16)
(k-1) /3
(17)
(18)
(9)
(10)
(12)
(13)
(14)
Tgb= Tb + (T0/2)
(20)
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 09 | Sep-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
368
Tgc = (T0/2)
(21)
These are valid in sector-1. Similarly Tga, Tgb, Tgc for other
sectors can be computed.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 09 | Sep-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
369
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
BIOGRAPHIES:
Chunduri Sreeharsha was born in Hyderabad
in 1993 and currently he is doing his final
year Bachelors in Electrical Engineering at
National Institute of Technology, Warangal,
Andhra Pradesh, India. His area of interests is
Multilevel Inverters.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 02 Issue: 09 | Sep-2013, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
370