STA

School:

School:

Criteria
Weightage

Weighted
Average
Score

Originality and uniqueness of ideas

generated and implementation of
activities

10%

Impact of project on the target

audience

30%

Creativity of the team and activities

20%

Sustainability of the project

implemented long term.

30%

Score

Score

Clarity of Presentation

Total Score

10%

100%

Note: Please refer to the following for additional guidance notes:

a) Participation Guidelines
b) Rules and Terms of Participation
c) Scoring guide
Evaluated by appointed judge:

Name:
Date:

STATE LEVEL SCORE SHEET

ol:

School:

Weightage

Weighted
Average
Score

10%

School:

Weightage

Weighted
Average
Score

10%

10%

30%

30%

30%

20%

20%

20%

30%

30%

30%

Score

Score

Weightage

10%

100%

10%

100%

10%

100%

Score:
5 - Excellent
4 - Good
3 - Average
2 - Mediocre
1 - Poor
Weighted average score = weightage x score

School:
Weighted
Average
Score

Weightage

Weighted
Average
Score

10%

30%

20%

30%

Score

10%

100%

JUDGES SCORING GUIDE

No

Criteria and Description

1 Originality and uniqueness of ideas and activities

- The project itself is unique or the activities implemented are unique even
though the project itself is "common".

Weightage

10%

2 Impact of project on the target audience

3 : strong impact on the team and the target audience but the impact is however, short lived
30%

3 Creativity of the team and activities

- Uniqueness, originality and variety of ideas compared to other schools

- The activities display and promote students' creativity

4 Sustainability
- The project has a longer life span than the 6 weeks implementation and
the team has a sustainability plan for the project or there is viability in the
project through PETRONAS's involvement

20%

TOTAL SCORE

4 - 5 : the impact is strongly felt by the team and the target audience. Leaving a lasting positive
impressions and implications. Added advantage would be testimony from target audience/stakeholders

1 - 3 : Ideas ranges from normal to average

4 - 5 : New, different and outstanding ideas- media coverage, social media exposure and target audience
testimonials will be added advantage

1 - 3 : The project and activities carried out do not appear to have a life after the 6 weeks period and the
team does not have a sustainability plan
30%

4 - 5 :The project can be continued over a longer period either by team own efforts via a sustainability
plan or the project can be linked back to PETRONAS.

1 - 2 : Less structured presentation that requires further explanation upon being prompted by the judges

5 Clarity of Presentation
How well the team articulate the details of their projects highlighting the
key information (objectives, mechanics, impact, etc) to convince the judges.

1 - 3 : Project and activities are "ordinary" and "typical"

4 - 5 : Project and/or activities implemented are unique and original. Team exhibits going "the extra mile"
in execution.

1 - 2 : impact is limited to the team with minimal impact on others

Report shows clear evidence that the project had made a marked difference
to the target audience as per earlier set objectives.
The degree of impact is also felt by the team members through positive self
improvements

Scoring guide

3: Basic presentation that highlights most of the key info of the project within the time given
10%

100%

4 - 5 : Excellent presentation that covers all aspects of the project within the time given. Questions from
judges are addressed professionally and clearly