RYLANDER

& ASSOCIATES PC
Trial and Patent Attorneys

Creatively Protecting Ideas

Patents Unfair Competition Business
Trademarks Prosecution Counseling
Copyrights Litigation Transactions
Trade Secrets Licensing Due Diligence

www.rylanderlaw.com
Patent attorneys who know business.
Trial lawyers who know patents.
Business attorneys who know the
bottom line.

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC

Physical Address:

The Centennial House

406 West 12th Street
Vancouver, WA 98660

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 250

Vancouver, WA 98666

Phone & Online:

Telephone: (360) 750-9931

Facsimile: (360) 397-0473
Website: www.rylanderlaw.com
E-mail: rylander@rylanderlaw.com

Copyright © Rylander & Associates PC 2008-2010

 What do we do?

We serve clients.
We prepare, apply for, prosecute, license, enforce, and
acquire patents, trademarks, copyrights and related
intellectual property for our clients, at home and abroad, in
court rooms and in boardrooms.

We litigate, conduct trials, and handle appeals in all areas of

intellectual property, business disputes, and commercial
claims, in Federal court and in State court, before juries and
before judges.

We represent businesses in formation, organization,

licensing, transactions, mergers and acquisition, dissolution
and winding up.

“
“
I can’t thank you enough for jumping in and taking on the court of
appeals mess. … You did an amazing job on the response!

-Client, 2009

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
“ Kurt has been very helpful in guiding my
Company in the filing, upgrading, expansion and
litigation of our intellectual property. Kurt is both
enthusiastic about what he does and very
knowledgeable about what he does. He is very
protective of his clients' IP and I would have no
hesitation in recommending Kurt to clients
“
looking for a good Patent Counsel.
-Client, 2008

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 How do we do it?

With honor and hard work.

We cross every “t” and dot every “i”. We act with honor and
integrity in every transaction. We demand the same in
return.

We strive to be as economically efficient as possible. We

integrate technology to maximize our services.

We continually update, upgrade, and seek to improve. We

take criticism seriously. We take praise with gratitude.

We are a small firm with a big mindset. We are patent

attorneys who know business, trial attorneys who know
patents, business attorneys who know the bottom line.

“ Kurt is a lawyer's lawyer. He knows the law better than most at-
torneys, he considers all sides of the issues, and he offers objective and
clear advice. His clients benefit greatly from working with one of the
best lawyers I know who also happens to be a business owner, a great
“
family man, and an aggressive trial attorney.

-Referring Attorney, November 12, 2008

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Rylander & Associates PC provides clients with comprehensive
intellectual property representation.

 Patent/Trademark/Copyright Applications and Prosecutions

 IP Enforcement, Litigation, Trials & Appeals

 Trademark Cancellations & Oppositions

 IP Audits & Due Diligence

 Licensing, Assignments & Contract Review

We work with clients to protect their intellectual property in whatever form it

takes. We examine and review an umbrella of legal rights, including patents,
trademarks, trade dress, copyrights, and rights protected by contract. We
review various contracts for intellectual property protection, including
contracts for employment, shareholders, and/or third party contracts assigning
work for hire ownership, protecting against unfair competition and providing
for nondisclosure of trade secrets. We assess and draft confidentiality control
procedures for internal company operations, policing of licenses, review of
corporate records for due diligence, and for annual IP audits as well as for
mergers or acquisitions.

We prepare and prosecute applications for patents, copyrights and trademarks

domestically and internationally. We handle intellectual property suits in
Federal courts, and appeals before the Board of Patent Appeals and
Interferences, the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board, and the U.S Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit. We provide counseling in the handling and
licensing of trade secrets. We provide counseling regarding idea submissions
and moral rights.

We analyze your business for key revenue generating assets which can and
should be protected, and we work to provide the best fit pragmatically,
economically, and strategically.

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 This chart is for informa-
tional purposes and not
SIMPLIFIED PATENT to be relied upon as sub-
PROCESS FLOWCHART stantive legal advice.

Client discloses invention, prior art and other

patent applications

Prior art search

(optional)

Specification and
Drawings

File Patent Application

Office Action File Foreign or PCT Application

within 1 year of filing a national
stage application or before public
Respond to Office use or publication

Action

Publication of File Continuation Application,

Application Appeal Final Request for Continued Examina-
(18 months) Rejection tion, Continuation in Part Appli-
cation
If
Su
cec
ss
fu
l

Allowance-pay Issue and

Publication Fees

Issuance of Patent

Payment of Utility Patent Maintenance Fees

(every 3.5, 7.5, 11.5 years)

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
Copyright © 2006-2009. Rylander & Associates PC.
The patent system added the fuel of
interest to the fire of genius.
-Abraham Lincoln

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
PATENTS & INVENTIONS
We prepare and prosecute patent applications domestically and
internationally.

As experienced jury trial lawyers, we draft patents with a jury in

mind. We understand the difficulty of drafting patent
applications over complicated arts with claims that can be
understood by the typical juror. We know that if the jury doesn’t
understand your invention and can’t read your claims, your
patent value decreases. We identify the core of your invention,
and we protect it.

We help clients develop and execute patent strategies, from the

preparation and filing of patent applications to appeal,
reexamination, reissue and interference. We provide freedom-to-
operate opinions, non-infringement and invalidity opinions,
intellectual property due diligence, and support for mergers and
acquisitions. We counsel clients on how to exploit their patent
assets, including negotiating and drafting licenses and other
contracts.

We handle an array of patent needs. Our attorneys have

substantial experience helping clients obtain, maintain, and
enforce patents. Additionally, we assist clients with patent
prosecution and enforcement strategy, portfolio management,
and evaluation of a competitor’s patent position.

Mechanical & Manufacturing arts Business method arts

Material Science arts Sports & Fitness arts

Software, Web 2.0 & E-commerce Entertainment, Toy & Game arts

Computer & Semiconductor arts Medical/dental arts,

Electronic & Opto-electronic arts Engineering arts

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
TRADE DRESS & UNFAIR COMPETITION
TRADEMARKS,

 Trademark registrations
 Appeals, Cancellations & Oppositions
 Licensing

 Trade Dress identification and protection

We prepare, submit, and prosecute applications for trademark
registration with State, Federal and International authorities. Through
our cancellation and opposition practice we assist our clients in
assuring that similar marks are not registered. We recently helped a
nationally known winery protect their label against another winery
attempting to use a similar label name. As shown in our litigation
section, we have significant experience in trademark and unfair
competition cases. We also handle all aspects of trademark and trade
dress infringement disputes.

FISH CADDY
®

SANDHILL WINERY®
®

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 This chart is for informa-
tional purposes and not to be
SIMPLIFIED TRADEMARK relied upon as substantive
APPLICATION FLOWCHART legal advice.

Client Meeting

Trademark Clearance/Search

File Trademark Application Online

Office Action

Respond to Office
Action

Notice of Allowance

Publication for Opposition

Opposition Proceedings before Trademark Trial and Appeal

Board

If Successful

Notice of Issuance

Allegation of Use
(if necessary)

Allegation of
Incontestability/
Continued Use

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
Copyright © 2006-2009. Rylander & Associates PC.
“ Kurt helped me get my trademarks registered at
both the state and national level. When we had a dispute
over who owned the trademark, Kurt pursued it very
diligently. Eventually we won the battle. Later, when I“
sold the company, Kurt helped get all of the intellectual
property rights moved across properly.
Client, 2008

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 TRADE SECRETS

We provide counsel in the handling and licensing of trade

secrets, as well as lawsuits to protect those secrets when
misappropriated. We review trade secret processes to see
if there are adequate controls and agreements in place to
maintain trade secret status of proprietary information
(such as price lists, supplier lists, customer lists,
technology, among others). We have secured court
injunctions from the use and dissemination of
misappropriated trade secrets.

COPYRIGHTS
We handle all aspects of copyright registration
and enforcement. The computer and the internet
have fundamentally altered the limits of
copyright protection, allowing copyright
registration in the areas of software, databases,
and websites, as well as in traditional areas such
as literature, arts, and music. We aim to secure
the most protection for our clients, regardless of the medium. We have filed
and secured copyright registrations for, among other works, books, artwork,
photographs, sound recordings, lyrics and music, videos and movies, software,
database arrangements, sculptures, graphical user interfaces, furniture, and
poetry.

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
“ Litigation is the pursuit of practical
ends, not a game of chess.
“
-Felix Frankfurter,
Supreme Court Justice

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 LITIGATION, TRIALS

& APPEALS
We conduct trials and appeals. Mr. Rylander has conducted numerous
jury trials to verdict. He has thousands of court appearances, State and
Federal. We know how to prepare a case for jury trial, and make a case
for the jury, and have done so numerous times.

Mr. Rylander has appeared in courts and administrative tribunals

nationwide. His experience includes areas such as patent infringement,
patent interference, patent appeal, intellectual property ownership, trademark
opposition, unfair competition, trademark and copyright infringement,
government contracts, federal tort claims, construction disputes, bid protests,
and commercial disputes, among others.

We handle Federal and State appellate work both in and outside of the
intellectual property realm. Recently, we secured a victory in the precedential
opinion by the Federal Circuit, Campbell Pet Company v. Miale et al., 542 F.3d
879 (Fed. Cir. 2008). We also successfully represented clients on appeal in
Custom Auto Interiors, Inc. v. Custom RV Interiors, Inc., Wash. Court of
Appeals No. 35869-7-II, 2008 WL 6693460 (May 20, 2008), pet. denied, No.
81976-9 (Jan. 6, 2009), and Hambleton Lumber Co. v. Balkin Ent., 397 F.3d
1217 (9th Cir. 2005), among others.

We handle disputes concerning intellectual property, commercial, business,

and trade disputes. We help our clients with corporate disputes, such as
shareholder litigation, corporate control contests, suits to pierce the veil, and
labor management disputes.

We handle creditor bankruptcy litigation, file objections to confirmation of

plan filings, and have succeeded in adversary litigation to deny discharge. In
one case, a defendant filed bankruptcy the day before trial. We pursued fraud
claims against the debtor in an adversary proceeding, and after trial before the
bankruptcy court, secured a denial of discharge and a judgment of $150,000
which was upheld on appeal.

We handle probate litigation as well. We have been referred matters a number

of times to defend decedent estates from probate claims, including going
through full probate trial and appeal.

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

We represent government contractors. We handle bid

protests, claims and requests for equitable adjustments
for changes, terminations, differing site conditions, and
delays, among other things. We have experience
representing contractors before the various Federal
boards of contract appeals and before the U.S. Court of
Federal Claims. We handle suits against government
agencies for tortious conduct, unfair business practices,
administrative review of regulations and actions, and
constitutional issues, taking advantage of special
exceptions to the doctrine of sovereign immunity which
normally provides protection to the government from
lawsuits.

In ENSR Corp. v. Associated Universities, Mr. Rylander

was part of a trial team that represented a Federal
contractor in a suit against a DOE Federal facilities
contractor for interference with a hazardous waste
cleanup contract through the operation of a linear
accelerator emitting alpha particles during contract
cleanup. The jury returned a $1.5 Million dollar verdict
for Mr. Rylander’s client.

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
Mr. Rylander successfully combines his intellectual property
practice and his government contract litigation experience to
provide the unique specialty of conducting intellectual property
suits against the Federal Government. Most such suits are
required to be brought in the Court of Federal Claims, a
jurisdiction in which Mr. Rylander has significant

GOVERNMENT
experience.
In Blueport Company v. United States, we represented a
small company in a software infringement suit against the
United States Air Force.
In Safran v. United States, we represented an individual in a
software infringement suit against the U.S. Small Business
Administration.

AGAINST THE
In Gaudet Sheet Metal v. United States, we represented an
inventor in a suit against the U.S. Postal Service on claims of
negligent inspection and unfair competition related to a
novel, patented secure mailbox conversion apparatus.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SUITS

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 True business is about
making a deal that works.

It’s a two way street.

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
BUSINESS, LICENSING

We handle business & TRANSACTIONAL WORK

formation, organization,
transaction, acquisition, and licensing representation. Today it is no longer
the exception, but instead the rule that intellectual property (IP) drives
modern business. Clients and other attorneys ask our attorneys to draft and/
or review business transaction documents, including technology licenses,
assignments, acquisitions, employment agreements, work for hire agreements,
non disclosure agreements, shareholder buy-sell agreements, vendor
manufacturing agreements, among others. Business attorneys ask our firm to
conduct due diligence on the IP aspects of business transactions, including
mergers, acquisitions and buyouts, and to prepare, and record, the paperwork
necessary.

We help entrepreneurs with new IP enterprises. A common scenario involves

an inventor or entrepreneur coming in with a new product idea. We help them
identify what IP could protect the product, as well as guide them on business
formation options, and what types of agreements should be set in place.

We conduct IP audits of employment, vendor, and business relationships. We

review and draft shareholder and employment agreements to cover issues of
noncompetition, nondisclosure, work for hire, and assignment of past, current
and future IP rights, among others. We review trade secret processes to see if
there are adequate controls and agreements in place to maintain trade secret
status of proprietary information (such as price lists, supplier lists,
customer lists, technology), among others.

We review, and help draft, state of the business records for intellectual
property control and ownership issues, including formation documents such as
membership agreements, articles of incorporation, partnership agreements,
buy-sell agreements, shareholder agreements, bylaws, shareholder registers,
annual meetings, board and shareholder resolutions, meeting minutes, written
employee policy manuals and trade secrecy procedures.

We answer the question: What IP does the client have, and how can it
best be protected or secured.

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
CASE STUDIES

Case Study #1. A client came to us after losing a patent priority

interference before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
(BPAI). The client had represented himself/herself against a large
law firm. Every possible ruling of the BPAI appeared to go against
the client. With only days left in the statutory time limit to appeal,
we recognized that a de novo appeal to Federal District Court
provided a better opportunity for the client than a review on the
record by the Federal Circuit. By quick action and thorough
investigation of all possible witnesses, and navigating the complex
interference legal requirements, we succeed in bringing the client
favorable relief. The BPAI decision was reversed, and priority
awarded to our client.

“
“
I've always been impressed with Kurt's
professionalism and knowledge. I would
gladly recommend his services.

-Client, 2008

Case Study #2. A business owner retained us to examine a

competitor’s use of the business owner’s name in a nearby city.
Investigators snapped pictures showing the offending use. The
competitor refused to back down and so we filed suit for trademark
infringement. We succeeded in receiving an injunction for our
client against the competitor’s use of the name, requiring the
competitor to change the name.

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 Case Study #3. A business person
who created a unique line of furniture
asked us to look into available
protection. We determined the
possibility of protection under trade
dress laws and under copyright law.
We quickly filed copyright applications
on each furniture piece, and had the
applications in place for the client
when the client met with a large
regional retailer. The client received
favorable results after the retailer’s
representative confided that if the
copyright applications had not been
filed, the retailer had intended to just
run the line itself, without making a
deal.

Case Study #4. A business owner retained us to examine actions of former

employees who had left the company and taken up similar positions with
another company. Further, evidence existed that the employees had
transferred vendor and customer and pricing information from their work
computers to disks and removed the disks from the work place. Through quick
action we secured a temporary restraining order, later converted to a
preliminary injunction against the employee working for the competitor, and
against use of the confidential client information.

Case Study #5. A business owner and inventor asked us to examine acts of
the Postal Service. The Postal Service had “approved” for placement in rural
mailboxes a patented secure mailbox conversion device. After the client had
incurred significant costs in running a line and marketing the invention, the
Postal Service, without explanation, voided the “approval” leaving the client
out significant sums. Through suit in Federal District Court, we succeeded in
providing favorable relief for the client to compensate this damage.

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
KURT M. RYLANDER
Mr. Rylander is a veteran trial
attorney and a registered patent
attorney. After receiving his law degree with cum laude honors and serving
on law review, he practiced law in Washington, DC for a number of years
before returning to the Pacific Northwest. He has tried numerous jury trials to
verdict. He has successfully argued before the Ninth Circuit and the Federal
Circuit appellate courts, among others.

He has handled cases for patent, trademark, and copyright infringement, as

well as government contract cases and general litigation. He has secured
preliminary injunctions against infringement, trade secret misappropriation,
and against hiring of key personnel in violation of noncompetition agreements.

He has prosecuted numerous patent applications in the mechanical, chemical,

software, and electrical arts, among others. He has conducted successful
patent appeals before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. He is
one of the few patent practitioners to handle a Section 146 civil action in
District Court to review (and successfully reverse) a priority interference
decision by the BPAI. He has prosecuted trademark applications and
successfully handled opposition proceedings before the Trademark Trial and
Appeals Board.

He has spoken in the U.S. Capitol for the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of
Commerce, re-broadcast on C-SPAN, and conducted numerous seminars for
public and private entities. He has authored and co-
authored numerous articles. He has coached mock trial
teams and served as a mock trial judge. He has conducted
CLEs on a variety of legal topics. He is a regular guest
lecturer at Washington State University on Negotiation.

He served as Lawyer Representative to the Ninth Circuit

from the Western District of Washington. He currently
serves as Chair of the Clark County Superior Court Bench/
Bar Committee, and he was recently elected Treasurer of
the Clark County Bar Association. He has served on State
and Local judicial evaluation committees to make
recommendations on judicial candidates for appointment
by the Governor.

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 KURT M. RYLANDER
Registered: Patent Attorney, U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, Canadian Patent Office

Licensed: Washington, Oregon, and District of Columbia

Courts: U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Ninth Circuit, and D.C.
Circuit; U.S. Court of International Trade; U.S. Court of Federal Claims, U.S. District Courts
for the District of Columbia, Western and Eastern Districts of Washington, District of
Maryland, District of Oregon, Eastern District of New York pro hac, Middle District of
Florida pro hac, District of Utah pro hac

Member: American Bar Ass’n (Sections on Intellectual Property), American Intellectual Property Law
Ass’n, Oregon State Bar Ass’n, Washington State Patent Law Ass’n, Washington State Bar
Ass’n (Sections on Intellectual Property and Litigation), District of Columbia Bar Ass’n,
Clark County Bar Ass’n, American Inns of Court, Rotary

Education Juris Doctor, cum laude honors

Honors: Law School Dean's Fellowship for Excellence in Academics

Am. Jur. Award for Excellence in Conflict of Laws
Law Review Member
Law Review writing contest award winner

Articles: Stealth Expert, Intellectual Property Today (December 2008)

Inventors' Rights Act of 1999 Gives Inventors New Weapon, WSTLA Trial News
Protecting Your Invention, Vancouver Bus. Journal
Saving a Disappearing Exemption to CERCLA Liability, NYU Envt’l Law Jrnl
Scanwell Plus: Challenging Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Awards, ABA Public
Contract Law Journal
A Review Of Federal Laboratory Credentials, American Environmental Laboratory
Is This The End Of Federal Minority Contracting?, The Federal Lawyer

Recent: Guest Lecturer, Negotiation and the Law, Washington State University (2005-present)
Activities: Chair & Presenter, Practical Ethical Dilemmas, Wash. State Bar Ass’n CLE (2009)
Panelist, Graduate Fellows Program, Lewis & Clark Law School (2009)
Chair & Presenter, Pre-filing Considerations-From Intake to Complaint Filing, WSBA
Litigation Bootcamp, Washington State Bar Ass’n CLE (2009)
Panelist, Lincoln on Professionalism, Wash. State Bar Ass’n CLE (2009)
Speaker, Inventors and Invention, Camp Invention, Franklin Elementary (2008)
Speaker, Civil Practice in the Federal & State Courts of Washington-A Selective Comparison,
Clark County Bar Ass’n CLE (2008)
Panelist & Moderator, Ethical Dilemmas for the Practicing Lawyer-In House Counsel, Wash.
State Bar Ass’n CLE (2008)
Panelist & Moderator, Interview with U.S. District Judge Marsha Pechman, Clark County
Bar Ass’n CLE (2008)
Panelist, Practical Ethical Dilemmas re Experts, Wash. State Bar Ass’n CLE (2007)
Speaker, Law Firm Practice Management, Clark County Bar Ass’n CLE (2007)
Speaker, Corporate Recordkeeping for Fun & Profit, Clark County Bar Ass’n CLE (2006)
Speaker, Overview of Intellectual Property, Clark County Bar Ass’n CLE (2005)
Assistant Coach, Ridgefield High School Mock Trial Team (2001, 2002)
Judge, Oregon Fall Mock Trial Demonstration (2001)
Interests: Marathon runner; Cyclist; Triathlete; Ju Jutsu Black Belt

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
MARK E. BEATTY

Mr. Beatty is a registered patent attorney. His

practice includes intellectual property litigation,
protection, acquisition, application, prosecution, and
licensing.

After graduating from the United States Naval

Academy with a B.S. in Engineering, he served as a
Commissioned Officer in the United States Navy,
serving aboard the U.S.S. Rodney M. Davis FFG 60
and the U.S.S. Nimitz CVN 68 where he achieved
qualification as a Naval Nuclear Engineer. After
service, he worked for several years as an engineer for
SEH America in silicon wafer manufacturing.

Mr. Beatty has represented clients before juries, in

court, and on appeal.

Mr. Beatty has drafted and prosecuted patent

applications in the mechanical, medical/dental,
manufacturing, and electrical arts, among others. He
drafts and reviews patent reexamination requests.
He handles third party submissions of
prior art to the Patent Office. He reviews
and drafts small business buy-sell
agreements where intellectual property is
a key asset. He reviews intellectual
property licensing and technology
transfer agreements. He consults with
clients on a wide range of intellectual
property issues.

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 MARK E. BEATTY

Registered: Registered patent attorney, USPTO

Licensed: Washington, Oregon

Federal: U.S. District Court, W. Dist. of Washington,

U.S. Court of Federal Claims pro hac,
U.S District Court, District of Oregon pro hac

Education: B.S. Engineering in Nav. Arch.,

U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD

Juris Doctor,
Lewis & Clark Law School, Portland, OR

Honors: Cornelius Honor Society,

Lewis & Clark Law School

Award, Outstanding Oral Advocate,

Moot Court Competition,
Lewis & Clark Law School

Lieutenant, United States Navy

Qualified Naval Nuclear Engineer

Member: Washington State Bar Association

Oregon State Bar Association
American Inns of Court

Activities: Speaker, How to Keep your Secrets Safe, Clark

County Chamber of Commerce (2009)

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 N
JO C.
REALI
Mr. Reali is a registered patent attorney. His
practice includes intellectual property
enforcement, protection, acquisition,
application, and prosecution.

Mr. Reali graduated from Princeton University with a B.S.E. in Electrical

Engineering, with a concentration in electronic and opto-electronic materials.
He attended and graduated from the University of Notre Dame Law School
and University of Notre Dame Mendoza College of Business receiving both law
and MBA degrees. Notre Dame selected Jon to compete on behalf of the school
in the prestigious Venture Capital Investment Competition.

Mr. Reali's practice focuses on preparing and prosecuting patent applications

directed to electronic and computer-related inventions. More specifically, his
experience includes preparing and prosecuting domestic and international
patent applications related to electronic materials, semiconductor devices,
semiconductor processing techniques, wireless communications, and graphics
processing techniques. As an example, Mr. Reali prepared an application for a
Parallel systolic CORDIC algorithm with reduced latency for unitary transform
of complex matrices and application to MIMO detection.

Mr. Reali enjoys tournament target archery, trap and pistol shooting, fishing,
and cooking. He recently volunteered to serve as an AP Calculus mentor to
public high school students through the non-profit organization nConnectNW.

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
 JON C. REALI

Registered: Registered patent attorney, USPTO

Licensed: Oregon

Federal: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,

United States District Court, District of Oregon

Education: B.S.E. Electrical Engineering,

Princeton University

Juris Doctor,
University of Notre Dame Law School

Master of Business Administration,

University of Notre Dame Mendoza School of Business

Oregon Episcopal School, Portland, OR

Honors: Team Member, Notre Dame,

Venture Capital Investment Competition, 2003

2004 Science Hero in Action, Oregon Museum of Science & Industry

Member: Oregon State Bar

Clark County Sheriff’s Advisory Board
American Inns of Court

Activities: AP Calculus Mentor, nConnectNW

Panelist: Do Opinions of Counsel Still Make Sense in Light of the Seagate Deci-
sion, Corporate Intellectual Property Seminar, Chicago, IL (2008)

RYLANDER
& ASSOCIATES PC
We strive to look at our
client’s problems from
different perspectives.