Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.profheath.org
Presentation (c) Robert W. Heath Jr. 2013
Outline
MIMO in cellular networks
Coordinated Multipoint a.k.a. network MIMO
Massive MIMO
Millimeter wave MIMO
Comparison between technologies
Parting thoughts
2 data streams
Point-to-point MIMO
2 data streams
2 data streams
Multiuser MIMO
limited by # BS antennas
Coordinated MIMO
Massive MIMO
B
mmWave MIMO
Outline
MIMO in cellular networks
Coordinated Multipoint a.k.a. network MIMO
Massive MIMO
Millimeter wave MIMO
Comparison between technologies
Parting thoughts
eNodeB
eNodeB
eNodeB
Like DAS uses local
coordination
Cloud RAN
Coordination clusters
Dynamic coordination
1000
90
BS
MS
80
500
70
Sum-rates (bits/sec/Hz)
500
K=1
K=3
K=9
60
Linear increase
50
40
Unbounded gains
30
20
1000
1500
1500
10
1000
500
500
1000
1500
10
15
SNR (dB)
20
25
30
1000
25
BS
MS
20
Sum-rates (bits/sec/Hz)
500
500
K=1
K=3
K=9
15
Bounded gains
10
Sum-rates saturation
5
1000
1500
1500
1000
500
500
1000
1500
10
15
SNR (dB)
20
25
30
Feedback overhead
Need channel state information
Performance seriously degrades
eNodeB
eNodeB
Backhaul delay
Reference signal
Data payload
10
Forecast
Already incorporated into 4G, coordination will be part of 5G as well
Architectures will evolve to support network MIMO-like coordination
11
Outline
MIMO in cellular networks
Coordinated Multipoint a.k.a. network MIMO
Massive MIMO
Millimeter wave MIMO
Comparison between technologies
Parting thoughts
12
hundreds of BS antennas
tens of users
13
pilot
contamination
14
channel
reciprocity
interference
asymptotic
orthogonality
14
Distributed
BS antenna
clusters
BS
15
Downlink
60
45
55
40
50
35
number of
number of
45
30
40
25
35
30
20
25
15
10
24
20
48
72
96
120
144
Number of base station antennas
168
15
24
48
72
96
120
144
Number of base station antennas
168
7 cells without sectorization, 12 users uniformly distributed in each cell, ISD = 500m
16
17
Forecast
Massive MIMO will probably not be used in isolation
Will be combined with distributed antennas or base station coordination
* K. T. Truong and R. W. Heath, Jr., Effects of Channel Aging in Massive MIMO Systems, to appear in the Journal of
Communications and Networks, Special Issue on Massive MIMO, February 2013.
(c) Robert W. Heath Jr. 2013
18
Outline
MIMO in cellular networks
Coordinated Multipoint a.k.a. network MIMO
Massive MIMO
Millimeter wave MIMO
Comparison between technologies
Parting thoughts
19
300 MHz
3 GHz
5G cellular
millimeter wave
28 GHz
38-49 GHz
70-90 GHz
300 GHz
20
Baseband
Processing
Baseband
Processing
used at TX and RX
21
0.9
Serving BS
Typical User
Buildings
Coverage Probability
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
Omni Directional
0.3
Directional: HPBW=40
Directional: HPBW=10o
0.2
10
10
SINR Threshold in dB
Fig. 1.
mmWave networks
can provide acceptable coverage
0.8
22
23
mmWave Conclusions
Observations
Coverage may be acceptable with the right system configuration
Strong candidate for higher per-link data rates
Hardware can leverage insights from 60GHz LAN and PAN
Highly directional antennas may radically change system design
Supporting mobility may be a challenge
Forecast
Will be part of 5G if access to new spectrum becomes viable
Most likely will co-exist with microwave cellular systems
Will remain useful for niche applications like backhaul
24
Outline
MIMO in cellular networks
Coordinated Multipoint a.k.a. network MIMO
Massive MIMO
Millimeter wave MIMO
Comparison between technologies
Parting thoughts
25
J. G. Andrews, F. Baccelli, and R. K. Ganti, "A Tractable Approach to Coverage and Rate in Cellular Networks", IEEE Transactions on Communications, November 2011.
T. X. Brown, "Cellular performance bounds via shotgun cellular systems," IEEE JSAC, vol.18, no.11, pp.2443,2455, Nov. 2000.
26
mmWave model
Directional antennas are incorporated as marks of the base station PPP
Blockages due to buildings incorporated via random shape theory
27
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
CoMP: Nt=4, 2 Users, 3 BSs/ Cluster
0.3
0.2
SU MIMO: 4X4
0.1
10
5
SINR Threhold in dB
10
15
20
Fig. 1.
28
Rate Comparison
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
Gain from
serving multiple users
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
Fig. 3.
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Cell Throughput in Mbps
3500
4000
4500
5000
29
Rate Comparison
Massive
MIMO
MMwave
CoMP
SU MIMO
Signal BW
50 MHz
500 MHz
50 MHz
50 MHz
User/ Cell
Rate/Cell
Capacity/ Cell
4.00 Gbps
434 Mbps
248 Mbps
30
Outline
MIMO in cellular networks
Coordinated Multipoint a.k.a. network MIMO
Massive MIMO
Millimeter wave MIMO
Comparison between technologies
Parting thoughts
31
Parting Thoughts
Conclusions
cooperation will be used in some form, more powerful
cooperative
with better infrastructure, need to be mindful of overheads
MIMO
in system design
massive
MIMO
mmWave
MIMO
32
Questions?
Robert W. Heath Jr.
The University of Texas at Austin
www.profheath.org