Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
Part I
The principles of criminological
research
Division: chap01
Sequential 1
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 2 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 0397B57F
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
Division: chap01
Sequential 2
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 3 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 48C81ECC
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
What is research?
The term research is used to refer to a wide range of activities.
Sometimes it means nothing more than looking up information in
established sources. So is there anything special about the kind of
activity that takes place in academic institutions and certain research
centres? How does academic research differ from, say, good journalism? Is it different in kind, or only in degree? Should we distinguish
between academic researchers and researchers who work for nonacademic organizations, such as market researchers?
There are no recognized standards or regulations that determine
that one person is a bona fide researcher while another is not. We
are not therefore going to attempt a prescriptive or proscriptive
definition of research. But we are going to suggest that the kind of
research engaged in by those who aspire to a genuine pursuit of
knowledge has certain features. First, research is likely to be in some
degree original; it is not merely looking up some information that is
already known and reproducing that information. This does not
necessarily mean that research requires the collection of new data at
first hand. It may be a new analysis of existing data, or the
re-interpretation of extant material; it may be a new synthesis.
Second, the kind of research that we are referring to will usually
be theoretically informed: it attempts to advance a corpus of ideas and
existing knowledge. It is not coming from nowhere and going to
nowhere. From this it follows that research will also be systematic in
nature. This does not mean that it has to follow a set of rules
rigidly, but it will approximate to something called the scientific
Division: chap01
Sequential 3
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 4 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 53D1FB66
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
Researching criminology
Division: chap01
Sequential 4
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 5 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 4E05F18A
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
Division: chap01
Sequential 5
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 6 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 49C6F534
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
10
Researching criminology
This forms the basis of Part II of the book, and we will therefore be
considering all three of these activities in more detail there. First,
however, it is worth referring to some important distinctions that are
often found in criminology and in social research generally.
A distinction is often made between quantitative data, involving
the use of numbers, and qualitative data, which usually means the
use of words or images. The former is sometimes referred to as
hard data, and the latter as soft data. Much social research is
quantitative in nature, involving statistical analysis. Examples of such
research include study of the criminal statistics and opinion polls,
and major social surveys, such as the British Household Panel
Survey, and the British Crime Survey. Quantitative research is
sometimes, wrongly, seen as synonymous with a positivist approach
to inquiry. Positivism, as we explain in a later chapter, is a more
broadly based philosophy of science which involves using methods
derived from the natural sciences, which does include numerical
measurement, but this is far from being the whole story. On the
other hand, methods which involve qualitative inquiry, such as
ethnography, participant observation and discourse analysis, are often
associated with a different perspective, most commonly referred to as
interpretive inquiry, but encompassing such things as hermeneutics,
ethnomethodology, phenomenology and structuralism. Such
approaches tend to concentrate on understanding the meaning of
social interaction.
The relationship between these different research perspectives
might be viewed diagrammatically (Figure 1.1). The main point we
want to make is that this simplistic distinction between positivist
and interpretive inquiry is a crude, and even misleading one. Even
those who are experts in statistical analysis are aware of its
limitations, and would probably reject the label positivist, and those
concerned with subcultural theory and ethnography also recognize
the need to sample and count.
Returning to our identification of the three main components of
research as observations, words and numbers, what we want to
emphasize is that there is considerable interchange between them.
Different research perspectives often have more in common with
each other than may at first be apparent, each needing to have
regard to such matters as the unit of observation, sampling and
Division: chap01
Sequential 6
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 7 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 5346D154
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
11
Division: chap01
Sequential 7
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 8 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 3402FDAC
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
12
Researching criminology
Division: chap01
Sequential 8
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 9 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 4EFDDC0C
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
13
world which goes beyond what we can see and measure (Marshall
1994). The nature of social theory, and the role of theory in
research, will be considered further in the next chapter. However,
what needs to be noted here is that empirical criminological inquiry
is seldom if ever theory-free, and it is one of the basic principles of
this book that the theory underlying a criminological research
project, and the methods used in undertaking the research are
closely related.
Like all social research, criminological research usually starts with
the posing of a question or the addressing of a problem. Research
may come about in a number of ways. It may be a response to a
specific problem, such as an apparent rise in a particular type of
crime, or as a result of new criminal justice legislation. It may be
that after reading an article, or reviewing the literature on a topic, a
researcher believes there is a gap in the knowledge, or that previous
research is wrong, or out of date. Not infrequently research is
prompted by a perceived wrong or injustice, such as the belief that
a particular group is being discriminated against. In all these
instances it can seem that the theoretical basis for a particular
investigation is self-evident, and it is all too easy for the theory that
underlies a research project to be unexamined. Whatever prompted
the research, the theoretical basis of inquiry should be critically
analysed. A competent researcher considers the theoretical context of
an inquiry, even if s/he is not undertaking research directly associated with the investigation of a particular theory.
Having said this, not all research is about the examination of
grand theory. Much research is usefully conducted at lower levels of
theoretical analysis. Research may be exploratory in nature, concerned with the development and formulation of concepts and
propositions, rather than putting a theory to the test. But even
exploratory research should have a clearly defined focus (Glaser and
Strauss 1967). The point is that some theoretical element is
invariably present in empirical investigation, and the more clearly
this is set out, the more valid and valuable the research will be.
Hypotheses
Theoretical propositions are often of a rather general, abstract,
nature. For example, the proposition may be that certain groups in
society are more alienated than others and therefore more predisposed towards committing crimes. This may be related to certain
forms of social theory concerned with class and conflict, and clearly
there is much here that needs examination, definition and clarification before the proposition and the theory on which it is based can
be tested empirically. Hypotheses are empirically testable statements,
usually involving relationships between concepts which form part of
Division: chap01
Sequential 9
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 10 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 4E45C568
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
14
Researching criminology
Division: chap01
Sequential 10
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 11 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 4C3C6D86
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
15
Operationalization
This is a crucial part of the research process. It includes the
following:
1 The definition of any concepts, and the basis for examining them
have to be spelled out. In other words, it is necessary to say just
what is meant by a term such as alienation, and how you are able
to tell whether someone is more or less alienated.5 If the
hypothesis is that People without family commitments are
inclined to be more radical than those with such commitments,
then what is meant by family commitments has to be specified,
and we have to say what we mean by more radical. Only when
this is done will it be possible to construct a questionnaire that
can be used on a sample to see whether (at a certain level of
statistical probability) those without family commitments satisfy
the criterion of radicalness more than those who have family
commitments.
2 Operationalizing a project involves developing a research design. In
the example above, this may involve obtaining two groups of
people who are comparable in certain respects, except that one
group has family commitments and the other does not. More will
be said about this in Chapter 3.
3 The advantages and disadvantages of alternative methods of
inquiry have to be considered whether to use a questionnaire,
in-depth interviews, observation, or some other method. The
methods judged to be most appropriate for testing a hypothesis
are chosen and justified. In doing this, an important consideration
will be the resources available to carry out the research; research is
often a compromise between what would be ideal and what is
practical.
4 Any scales, scores or other measures need to be developed and
validated. For example, one may need to develop a scale of
alienation or radicalness.
Division: chap01
Sequential 11
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 12 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 43DA2FED
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
16
Researching criminology
Division: chap01
Sequential 12
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 13 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 51F0DBD0
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
17
will be coded, whether you have the right computer program, and,
not least, whether you have sufficient statistical knowledge for the
task that faces you. It is no good, for example, finding out that the
technique you need to use is multi-level modelling if you have
neither the software nor the knowledge to use it. If you need help
from a statistician, it is better to contact someone in advance than
put them on the spot at the last minute. Conversely, there is no
point in spending time planning to use sophisticated multi-variate
techniques if your data will not meet the statistical assumptions
required for, say, a multiple regression, when simpler techniques will
suffice. Qualitative analysis involves a constant checking of emerging
concepts and their interpretation against the fieldwork material (see
Rose 1982: 1235), and you need to decide in advance such things
as whether you are going to use a computer-based package to
analyse qualitative material, and whether the data needs to be
transcribed verbatim.
Inference and presentation
This is where you draw appropriate conclusions and relate findings
back to the hypotheses and theoretical context considered earlier.
The skill is to make the best use of the data without over-reading
it or trying to get your material to tell you things that it was never
intended for. It may also include drawing out implications for policy
and practice. The presentation and dissemination of findings are also
important at this stage. This may involve providing feedback to
agencies and individuals who have co-operated with you during the
investigation. This can be done in the form of a presentation, or in
a short and accessible summary of the research.7 Producing feedback
to participants fulfils several functions. First, it is a way of
discharging your ethical obligations, handing back some of the
information to where it came from. Second, it may provide the
opportunity to have your conclusions implemented by practitioners
and policy-makers. Finally, such presentations can be a useful
rehearsal for presenting results to the wider world. This wider
presentation will usually involve publication in some form. Presenting a paper at a conference is also a useful way of running through
your research in preparation for publication.
Further reading
There are several books on methods of social research in general.
These include Alan Brymans Social Research Methods (2004), which
covers both quantitative and qualitative methods. Research Training
for Social Scientists (2000), edited by Dawn Burton, is reasonably
Division: chap01
Sequential 13
JOBNAME: Mcgrawcrowsemmens PAGE: 14 SESS: 32 OUTPUT: Tue Aug 28 15:02:37 2007 SUM: 2027EBF2
/production/mcgrawhill/booksxml/crowsemmens11pt/chap01
18
Researching criminology
Division: chap01
Sequential 14