Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Absolute

Absolute- perfect in quality of nature, unconditional, independent, or in philosophy,


something regarded as the ultimate basis of all thought and being. It represents the
propitiator of material and ideal, objective and subjective, the mind and the matter,
all of which that exist in our view of reality.
The subjective view
Humans, as conscious beings, can observe the world only through their mind, thus
subjectively. What we can never be sure of, is if what we perceive as objects apart
from ourselves, in the outside world, objectively exists, or if it is just a phenomenon
that out mind creates. Cogito ergo sum. This does not mean that if I didnt think I
wouldnt have existed (which would completely deny the actual existence of the
outside world), but that because I do think, that must mean I do exist. If I wasnt
capable of thinking I could have been real, only I couldnt have been aware of my
existence- I wouldnt be self-conscious, and self-consciousness is the primer principle
of our mind. For our mind to be systematized, determined by principles, it has to
exist. Statement I am can be true, because my mind is.
Establishing the certanty of our existence, we confirm the existence of everything
we percieve, only the main question is if what we precieve is real or not. All of it can
actually be the product o our thoughts, a subjective idea made inside of our mind, or
indeed something that does exist apart from ourselves, objectivelly. The question
now is if what we observe as objects around us really is as we sense it or is it
modyfied by our senses. Can a human being perceieve a foreigne object the way
they are, considering the fact that we get all of the information indirectly (over the
senses)? In my opinion- not necessarily, because our observing mechanism is the
reason and its main insignia is subjectivity. We can never be sure if, looking at the
color red, you and I experience the same impression.
The objective view
Lets go back to the question of existence of beings apart from ourselves and
assume they were objectively, materially real (the still life, for an example). A rock is
probably not aware of the space surrounding it, or the time that is passing by. Taken
that it objectively existed, it would still exist even if there wasnt anyone to observe
it.
Matter doesnt need consciousness to exist, but consciousness does need the matter
(the outside world) as the fuel for the mind. The reason is a system made of rules
(the principles), divided in categories. They represent the a priori knowledge we
have at birth, the instruments that help us understand the world, but of what use is
relation (for an example of category of a human mind), if we do not perceive some
two objects (made of matter) to be put in to some relation with each other.

Concludion
The fact is just that both matter and consciousness exist parallel in the nature, and
are closely connected to each other- matter is aspiring a thought to be perceived,
mind is aspiring an object to be useful. That unbreakable bond between the two is
the ultimate law of nature that brings the two into one union that is called the
absolute. It is the subjectivity that appreciates the objectiveness, the material that
limits the reason. The golden rule of reciprocity of unconsciousness and
consciousness, unconscious itself, for it is the highest true about the world in which
we exist, invisible for an inferior being as human, unaware itself, for the truth itself
is not self-conscious.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen