Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
wp697915.odt
C
ou
rt
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJUDICATUREOFBOMBAY
BENCHATAURANGABAD
WRITPETITIONNO.6979OF2015
Dr.Sudhirs/oMahadeoraoNimakar,
age:42years,Occ:MedicalPractitioner,
R/oGhamodiaFactoryArea,
NearDoctorslane,
Nanded,
Tq.&DistrictNanded.
Petitioner
ig
h
Versus
01TheStateofMaharashtra,
throughitsSecretary,
DepartmentofPublicHealth
andFamilyWelfare,
Mantralaya,Mumbai32.
ba
y
02MedicalHealthOfficer/
AppropriateAuthority,
MunicipalCorporation,Nanded,
Tq.&DistrictNanded.
Respondents
om
Mr.S.G.Chapalgaonkar,advocateforthepetitioner
Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar,A.G.P.forRespondentNo.1.
Mr.R.K.Ingole,advocateforRespondentNo.2.
CORAM:R.M.BORDE&
P.R.BORA,JJ.
DATE:13thAugust,2015
ORALJUDGMENT(PerR.M.Borde,J.):
1
heardfinallybyconsentoflearnedCounselforrespectiveparties.
2
SonographyCentrebynameSaketDiagnosticCentreatNanded.
{2}
wp697915.odt
rt
ThepetitionerwasissuedRegistrationCertificateforoperatingthe
Centre since 2005 and validity of the Registration expired on
C
ou
28.06.2015. Thepetitioner,assuch,tenderedanapplicationfor
ig
h
pleasedtorejectthesame.
Reporthasbeenlodgedagainstthepetitionerforallegedviolation
oftheRulesof1994andfailuretomaintainrecordinproperform.
InpursuancetolodgingofFirstInformationReport,criminalcase
isregisteredandsameispendingconsiderationbeforetheJudicial
ba
y
Magistrate,FirstClass,Nanded.
4
ThisCourt,whiledealingwithWritPetitionNo.4478
om
{3}
wp697915.odt
rt
C
ou
DiagnosticCentre.
Theapplicationreceivedforrenewalofregistrationhas
tobedealtwithinaccordancewithRule8oftheRules. Rule8
providesthattheappropriateauthorityshall,afterholdinginquiry
andaftersatisfyingitselfthattheapplicanthascompliedwithall
ig
h
therequirementsoftheActandRulesandhavingregardtothe
advice of the Advisory Committee, renew the certificate of
registration,asspecifiedinFormBforafurtherperiodoffiveyears
fromthedateofexpiryofcertificateofregistrationearliergranted.
Subrule (3) of Rule 8 provides that if, after enquiry and after
givinganopportunityofbeingheardtotheapplicantandhaving
regardtothe advice of the Advisory Committee, the Appropriate
ba
y
Authorityissatisfiedthattheapplicanthasnotcompliedwiththe
requirementsoftheActandtherules,itshall,forreasonstobe
recordedinwriting,rejecttheapplicationforrenewalofcertificate
om
ofregistrationandcommunicatesuchrejectiontotheapplicantas
specifiedinFormC.
6
{4}
wp697915.odt
rt
order,thatacriminalcaseispendingagainstthepetitioner,may
notbeaonlyvalidgroundforrefusaltograntrenewalofcertificate
C
ou
ofregistrationandassuch,thisaspectshallhavetobedealtwith
inconsonancewiththedirectionsissuedbythisCourtpermitting
theappropriateauthoritytoentertainapplicationsforrenewalof
registrationorforfreshregistrationinspiteofincorporatingRule
18A(4)(ii)intheRulesof1994.Inouropinion,merependencyof
criminalcaseorlodgingofFirstInformationReportitselfmaynot
ig
h
constituteagroundforrefusaltograntrenewalofregistration.
In view of above, order passed by the appropriate
authorityrefusingtograntrenewalofregistrationbyorderdated
ba
y
om
preferablywithinaperiodoffourweeksfromtoday.Thepetitioner
shall cause appearance before the appropriate authority on 19 th
August, 2015, and as such, no separate notice, requiring his
presencebeforetheappropriateauthority,shallbenecessary.
8
Ruleisaccordinglymadeabsolute. Thereshallbeno
orderastocosts.
P.R.BORA
JUDGE
adb/wp697915
R.M.BORDE
JUDGE