Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
What can this mean for your brand? Consider this example.
purchase behavior.
redemptions by 10 33%.
Again, what does this mean for your brand? Our same
By Charlie Brown
Recommendations
IN
the promotion.
within a market.
purchase requirements.
CPG
by 1015%.
costly; not only are you getting a larger response, you also
In Conclusion:
Four categories were selected for the case studies. Each had
free product offers, and the brand itself. The remaining 30%
marketplace factors.
NCH Coupon
Attractiveness
Index with
Savings Gap
125
100
were offered.
80
76
69
100
66
94
64
1994
1995
1996
56
54
1997
1998
59
61
61
57
59
52
1999
2000
2001
2002
52
58
2003
Index of Coupon Offer Characteristics: Duration, Face Value and Purchase Requirements,
as Indicator of Consumers Propensity to Redeem
Index of SAVINGS GAP between advertised face value and actual per item discount
Index reveals how dramatic the change has been over the
past decade.
94
IN
Measurement of
Coupon Attractiveness
Contact Us: For more information on this study, request a copy of the
Redemption Rate Whitepaper at info@nchmarketing.com or contact
your NCH or Valassis representative.
In 2003 the Savings Gap per item worsened, reducing the actual
savings once again for the consumer, as shown in the trend line
on the chart. The declining actual discount consumers receive
when purchasing products using coupons impacts redemption
results, and can be directly linked to the marketers ROI on a
coupon event.
CPG
by 1015%.
costly; not only are you getting a larger response, you also
In Conclusion:
Four categories were selected for the case studies. Each had
free product offers, and the brand itself. The remaining 30%
marketplace factors.
NCH Coupon
Attractiveness
Index with
Savings Gap
125
100
were offered.
80
76
69
100
66
94
64
1994
1995
1996
56
54
1997
1998
59
61
61
57
59
52
1999
2000
2001
2002
52
58
2003
Index of Coupon Offer Characteristics: Duration, Face Value and Purchase Requirements,
as Indicator of Consumers Propensity to Redeem
Index of SAVINGS GAP between advertised face value and actual per item discount
Index reveals how dramatic the change has been over the
past decade.
94
IN
Measurement of
Coupon Attractiveness
Contact Us: For more information on this study, request a copy of the
Redemption Rate Whitepaper at info@nchmarketing.com or contact
your NCH or Valassis representative.
In 2003 the Savings Gap per item worsened, reducing the actual
savings once again for the consumer, as shown in the trend line
on the chart. The declining actual discount consumers receive
when purchasing products using coupons impacts redemption
results, and can be directly linked to the marketers ROI on a
coupon event.