Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Content of Presentation
Introduction to 3PL
Evolution of 3PL
Benefits & Services Provided by 3PL
Types of 3PL
New Technology in 3PL
Relationship Management in 3PL
Environmental Concern in 3PL
CASE STUDY: Selecting a 3PL using M.C.D.M.
Kuldeep Uttam IIT Roorkee
Introduction
1PL:These can be the shipper (such as a
manufacturing firm delivering to customers) or the
consignee (such as a retailer picking up goods from
a supplier). They dictates the origin (supply) and
the destination (demand) of the goods.
owns the means of transportation. Typical 2PLs would be shipping lines which own, lease or
charter their ships; airlines which own, lease or charter their planes and truck companies
which own or lease their trucks
3PL: A firm which provides multiple logistics services for use by customers.
These firms facilitate the movement of parts and materials from suppliers to manufacturers
and finished products from manufacturers to distributors and retailers.
Among the services which they provide are transportation, warehousing, cross-docking,
inventory management, packaging and freight forwarding.
4PL: The most innovative and upcoming form of outsourcing logistics is Fourth Party
Logistics.
4PL can be considered as a comprehensive supply chain solution which combines the
capabilities of management consulting, IT technology and 3PL-providers.
4PL not necessarily mean that four parties are involved. The number 4 refers to the fact
that this kind of logistics services is one
level higher than 3PL.
Kuldeep Uttam IIT Roorkee
Evolution of 3PL
The evolution of 3PL market is explained with reference to three distinct phases
In 1980's many transportation and warehousing firms developed into 3PL
providers( e.g. Excel Logistics )
In the early 1990's firms that specialized in express parcel deliveries entered the
markets
( e.g. DHL, TNT , UPS and FedEx )
Benefits of 3PL
173 logistics professionals from manufacturing and retail
companies responded to the survey, which was conducted by
Eye for transport.
Responses were contacted in a targeted email campaign.
Supplier
Supplier
Supplier
Supplier
Supplier
Supplier
Supplier
Supplier
Freight flow
Manufacturer
Manufacturer
3PL
Distributor
Distributor
Customer
Push
Returns / Recycling
Pull
Kuldeep Uttam IIT Roorkee
Point-of-sale data
Customer
Advanced Technologies
RF barcode scanning and RFID
EDI
Integrated interf aces f or wireless mobile
devices
Web access and real-time data visibility
Tools to automate customer communications
Real-time business intelligence and reporting
Document imaging and management
Kuldeep Uttam IIT Roorkee
Camelot: Partners
Customers of 3PLs
Industry
Global
Costs
Automotive
Technology
Retailing
Consumer Products
Food and Grocery
Healthcare
Industrial and Elements
Other
Total Costs
$98.2
$156.4
$98.6
$13.6
$32.2
$38.4
$179.7
$63
$678.3
Domestic Costs
(USA)
$37.4
$77.4
$67.2
$13.3
$27.8
$34.0
$84
$25.3
$366.3
$100
$80
$60
$40
$20
$0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Source: 2005 Tenth Annual 3PL Study, Georgia Tech and Cap Gemini LLC. Used with permission
Kuldeep Uttam IIT Roorkee
WMS / TMS
E-logistics
Orders
Predictable
Variable
Weekly
Daily or hourly
Customer
Strategic
Broader base
Customer service
Reactive, rigid
Responsive, flexible
Replenishment
Scheduled
Real-time
Distribution model
Supply-driven (push)
Demand-driven (pull)
Demand
Stable, consistent
More cyclical
Shipment type
Bulk
Smaller lots
Destinations
Concentrated
More dispersion
Warehouse reconfiguration
Weekly or monthly
Continual, rules-based
Manual
Automated
Nature of E Commerce
Relationship Perspectives
AS Supply chain MANAGER CAN YOU AFFORD TO KEEP A 3PL AT ARMS LENGTH
OR SHOULD YOU BUILD A CLOSE STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP WITH YOUR 3PL
PROVIDER ?
Transactional Relationship
Both parties in a vendor relationship are said to be at
arms length
There isnt much discussion with the 3PL company.
Pricing is one of the Most important factors.
Contracts in this scenario are the shortest.
Collaborative Relationship
The relationship suggested by a strategic alliance is one in
which two or more business organizations cooperate and
willingly, modify their business objectives and practices to
help achieve long-term goals and objectives.
There is a greater interaction and discussion between the 3PL
company as compared to transactional relationship.
Strategic Relationship
Multi criteria
decision
making
(MCDM)
process in
which a
decision
maker
chooses,
under
several
selection
criteria, the
best option
among
alternatives.
Evaluate
Process
Kuldeep Uttam IIT Roorkee
Select
Objective Factors
Transportation Cost
Insurance Cost
IT
Material Handling cost
Reverse Logistics
IT
Material Handling
cost
Reverse
Logistics
Sum
OFM
DHL
8.3
1.64
0.25
0.025
FedEx
6.3
1.26
0.2
1.5
0.065
Hitachi
7.4
1.42
0.35
3.6
0.034
12.804 0.58681
Nippon
Express
1.8
0.56
6.3
0.085
17.745
12.215 0.65677
9.325
Subjective Factors
Reliability
Responsiveness
Safety & Security
Experience & Reputation
Benefits & Risk Sharing
FedEx
Hitachi
Nippon
Express
Safety &
Security
Experience &
Reputation
0.25
0.35
0.2
0.1
0.1
4 : Extremely Favorable.
3: Moderately Favorable.
2: Unfavorable.
1: Bad Service.
Kuldeep Uttam IIT Roorkee
Responsiveness
Safety &
Security
Experience &
Reputation
Weights
0.25
0.35
0.2
0.1
0.1
DHL
0.75
0.5
0.5
SFM
0.7125
FedEx
0.5
0.75
1
0.875
Hitachi
0.5
0.25
0.75
0.5
0.75
0.4875
Nippon
Express
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.25
0.5
Weights
DHL
FedEx
Hitachi
NipponExpress
Decision
Measure
SFM
OFM
0.6
0.4
0.7125
0.656769596
0.69021
0.875
0.925
0.4875
0.586817102
0.52723
0.5
0.3
Future Concern
The total market for freight transportation intermediaries is still growing
with the boom of e-commerce;
The conventional 3PLs will not fade, but will face with the competition
from the online logistics providers;
The companies have to combine the logistics expertise with advanced
technology to evolve.
Strategic alliance will be important to obtain comprehensive and
integrated supply chain solution capability.
Medium sized and Large carriers may resist and try to continue business as
usual or simply become e-commerce enabled using current business
models