Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Author(s)
Citation
Issued Date
URL
Rights
1984
http://hdl.handle.net/10722/37429
Submitted by
M a r g a r e t CHAN S a u M u i
P a r t i a l F u l f i l l m e n t o f the Requirements
f o r the Degree o f
Master of B u s i n e s s Administration
o f T h e U n i v e r s i t y o f Hong Kong
Page
PART - I N T R O D U C T I O N
CHAPTER 1
A MODEL OF COiMSUMER D E C I S I O N -
DEFINED
1o
2
3.
~^^
10
11
12
13
15
2Q
20
21
22
25
LITERATURE REVIEWS
28
30
35
1.
2
3.
4
PART 11 -
The Survey
The Q u e s t i o n n a i r e
40
41
41
44
CHAPTER 6 ~
RESULTS
51
CHAPTER 7 -
DISCUSSION
52
1
2.
3
4
Mun s s Model
A. Rank-Order Analysis
Paired Comparison Analysis
Nagashima s s Model
Mean Average Weighted Score
Roiipho] d Tnnoirip
CHAPTER 8 - CONCLUSIONS
1.
2.
3
4.
5.
6.
52
52
57
63
78
92
92
97
99
100
102
104
REFERENCES
iQg
L I S T OF T A B L E S
Table
Table
2 - Hong Kong R e t a i n e d I m p o r t f r o m T o p
T e n S u p p l i e r s ? 1983
21
36
37
Table
38
Table
38
7 S t a t e m e n t s r e l a t e d t o G e n e r a l Image
(Mun)
38
Table
8 - 1 9 8 3 Imports from S e l e c t e d C o u n t r i e s
46
Table
9 - H o n g Kong Consumer A t t i t u d e s t o w a r d s
T E L E V I S I O N S f r o m Japan^ U S A r Germany
amd Hong K o n g
53
Table
Table
Table
T a b l e 10 - H o n g Kong C o n s u m e r A t t i t u d e s t o w a r d s
WATCHES f r o m J a p a n , S w i t z e r l a n d ^ T a i w a n
a n d Hong K o n g
54
T a b l e 11 - H o n g Kong Consumer A t t i t u d e s t o w a r d s
GARMENTS f r o m J a p a n ? C h i n a f F r a n c e
a n d Hong K o n g
55
T a b l e 12 - A
58
59
60
61
T a b l e 16
Statements r e l a t e d t o " Q u a l i t y
(Kong K o n g C o n s u m e r s )
T a b l e 17 - S t a t e m e n t s r e l a t e d t o P r e s t i g e
(Hong Kong C o n s u m e r s )
T a b l e 18 - R a n k i n g s 3 b y u s i n g MAWS
T a b l e 19 - MMAWS
A W S By P l a c e o f O r i g i n o f P r o d u c t s
Owned
T a b l e 20 - MMAWS
A W S B y Age
T a b l e 2 1 MAWS B y H o u s e h o l d Income
T a b l e 22 - MM
AAW
WSS B y E d u c a t i o n L e v e l
T a b l e 23 - MM
AAW
WSS B y S e x
MAWS B y P r o d u c t o f G r e a t e s t V a l u e
T a b l e 24 - MAWS
L I S T OF FIGURES
Figure
1 -
Figure
2 - The L o w - I n v o l v e m e n t D e c i s i o n P r o c e s s
( E n g e l and B i a c k w e l l )
Figure
Figure
4 - P r o f i l e o f "Made-Inss P r o d u c t Images
T E L E V I S I O N (Hong Kong C o n s u m e r s )
Figure
Figure
Figure
7 - P r o f i l e o f "Made-n 80 P r o d u c t I m a g e s
( C o n d e n s e d f r o m F i g u r e 3)
Figure
8 - A Compar i s o n o f t h e P r o f i l e A t t i t u d e s
o f Hong K o n g C o n s u m e r s a n d N a g a s h i m a
B u s i n e s s m e n - ^ M a d e - i n Japan 1 1
Figure
9 - A Comparison o f the P r o f i l e A t t i t u d e s
o f Hong K o n g C o n s u m e r s a n d N a g a s h i m a
B u s i n e s s m e n - " M a d e - i n USA81
High-Involvement D e c i s i o n Process
(Engel a n d B i a c k w e l l )
F i g u r e 10 - A C o m p a r i s o n o f t h e P r o f i l e A t t i t u d e s
o f Hong K o n g C o n s u m e r s a n d N a g a s h i m a
Businessmen - " M a d e - i n Germany"
F i g u r e 11 - A Comparison o f t h e P r o f i l e A t t i t u d e s
o f Hong K o n g C o n s u m e r s a n d N a g a s h i m a s
Businessmen
L I S T OF A P P E N D I C E S
APPENDIX 1
AP PENDI X I I
D i s t r i b u t i o n o f Questionnaire
APPENDIX I I I
The Questionnaire
APPENDIX IV
Demographics of Respondents
APPENDIX V
APPENDIX VI
APPENDIX V I I
APPENDIX V I I I
APPENDIX I X
P A R T
INTRODUCTION
A t a r e c e n t seminar
I t should
however f b e n o t e d t h a t
i n 1982, Japan
was t h e f i f t h l a r g e s t i m p o r t e r o f Hong K o n g J s d o m e s t i c
exports
% of Japanese Impoirt
223
Jewellery
13 2
Non-fur Clothing
Fur Clothing
62
58.4
1.
2.
countr i e s
i s q u i t e encouraging
i n actual fact
be as
3
As defined by Akira Nagashima
i m a g e " means i d e a s r e m o t i o n a l b a c k g r o u n d f a n d
c o n n o t a t i o n a s s o c i a t e d w i t h a concept
Thuisf the
"made in" image is the picture f the reputation f
the stereotype that businessmen and consumers
attach to products of a specific country This
image is created by such variables as
representative products, national characteristics
economic and political background f history and
traditions. 8
1
i n t h e p u r c h a s i n g d e c i s i o n c a n be seen9
Because o f
t h i s i m p o r t a n c e , t h e p r e s e n t s t u d y has been u n d e r t a k e n
and r e a s o n s f o r t h e s t u d y a s w e l l as i t s o b j e c t i v e s
w i l l b e g i v e n i n C h a p t e r 2
In part I, a r e p o r t o n t h e s t u d y w i l l b e g i v e n
Chapter 5 describes various aspects of the methodology,
including the sample, the products chosen and the
questionnaire used e
CHAPTER 1
A MODEL OF CONSUMER DICISION-MAKING PROCESS
and "ATTITUDE" d e f i n e d
Over t h e y e a r s
consumer b e h a v i o u r h a s b e e n
s t u d i e d f r o m many d i f f e r e n t p o i n t s o f v i e w
A variety of
who i t e m i z e d w h a t h e t e r m e d t h e s t e p s i n p r o b l e m
many m o d e l s o f c o n s u m e r
H e r e r we w i l l b e l o o k i n g
4
5
Input
Information
Processing
Decision Process
D e c i s i o n P r o c e s s Variables
External
Influences
Problem
recognition
Search
Exposure
Attention
Stimuli
Marketer
dominated
Beliefs
Comprehension
Alternative
evaluation
Other
Attitude
Life-style
Intention
Normative
compliance
a n d informational i n f l u e n c e
Yi el d i ng /accep t ance
Choice
Retention
External
search
Evaluative
criteria
C u l t u r a l norm
a n d values
Reference
group/family
Unanticipated
circumstances
Outcomes
Dissonance
Satisf action
F i g u r e 1 - High-nvolvement D e c i s i o n P r o c e s s
(from E n g e l and B i a c k w e l l f 1 9 8 0 ,op.cit., p.492)
Following Petty and Capicoppo and others f
involvement
This
6.
w i t h some c l o t h i n g
other times
At
i n v o l v e m e n t i s a c t i v a t e d when t h e p r o d u c t
b e i n g c o n s i d e r e d i s c o s t l y and t h e r i s k s o f a wrong
decision are highe
I t a l s o i s s e e n when t h e r e i s
s t r o n g o u t s i d e r e f e r e n c e - g r o u p i n f l u e n c e and m o t i v a t i o n
t o comply w i t h these pressures
Involvement is high
A.
Problem Recognition
o n t h e o t h e r hand
Once this
s e l f - c o n c e p t f which r e s u l t s i n c e r t a i n g o a l
o b j e c t s becoming internalized a s permanent
i n c e n t i v e s , a n d a c c o u n t s f o r t h e n e e d s which
Maslow
calls self-actualization
and b e l o n g i n g n e s s and l o v e
self-esteemr
The self-concept
in which a
Maslow, A.H.
Row, 1954,
Harper &
d e c i s i o n making
i . e . search
which i s governed by
t h e b a l a n c e between e x p e c t e d g a i n s and t h e c o s t o f
t i m e f e n e r g y , a n d f i n a n c i a l o u t l a y t h a t m u s t be
expended
Otherwise an
10
Co
Alternative Evaluation
As i n f o r m a t i o n i s a c q u i r e d through s e a r c h
and p r o c e s s e d , t h e outcome i s f o r m a t i o n o f b e l i e f
which s p e c i f i e s the consequences o f p u r c h a s i n g a
p a r t i c u l a r make i n t e r m s o f e a c h e v a l u a t i v e
c r i t e r i o n which i s used
They may be
11
E v a l u a t i v e c r i t e r i a a r e shaped b y m o t i v e s and
memory^ a n d w i l l u n d e r g o m o d i f i c a t i o n a n d c h a n g e
b a s e d o n new i n f o r m a t i o n a n d e x p e r i e n c e
The
Choice
As mentioned in
12
circumstances
effects"
which
o r w h a t Krugman t e r m s " a c c i d e n t a l
may b e t h e l a c k o f f u n d s a t t h e
moment w h i c h w o u l d c a u s e t h e p u r c h a s e t o b e
a b o r t e d o r l e a d t o b r a n d s u b s t i t u t i o n f o r may be
the i n f l u e n c e o f a normative r e f e r e n c e group
E.
an evaluation
9,
- 1 3
D i s s o n a n c e o c c u r s when two c o g n i t i o n s o r
b e l i e f s do n o t f i t t o g e t h e r r e8 g . when one
a l t e r n a t i v e was c h o s e n and i t was b e l i e v e d t h a t
t h e unchosen a l t e r n a t i v e s a l s o had d e s i r a b l e
a t t r i b u t e s , p a r t i c u l a r l y i f the purchase a c t i o n i s
irrevocable
(1)
(2)
14
The b u y i n g
two a t t r i b u t e s a r e c o n s i d e r e d w i t h
a wide l a t i t u d e o f a c c e p t a n c e .
T h e r e w i l l be no
e x t e n s i v e p r o b l e m s o l v i n g i n v o l v i n g s e a r c h and
a l t e r n a t i v e e v a l u a t i o n f making use o f n o n - c o m p e n s a t o r y
evaluation styles
The
Input
Information Processing
Exposure
Decision Process
Problem
recognition
Beliefs
Choice
Attitude
Alternative
evaluation
Intention
Stimuli
Marketer
dominated
Other
Attention
Comprehension
Retention
Rather
15
P r o b l e m r e c o g n i t i o n more l i k e l y i s s t i m u l a t e d
w i t h i n t h e r e t a i l s t o r e when t h e product i s a c t u a l l y
seen or o b s e r v e d on d i s p l a y .
s i m i l a r i n many ways t o h y p o t h e s i s t e s t i n g i n w h i c h t h e
consumer s e e s i f i t l i v e s up t o e x p e c t a t i o n s .
F u l l y ~ f o r m e d b e l i e f s , a t t i t u d e s and i n t e n t i o n s a r e t h e
outcomes o f purchase f n o t t h e cause
Attitude
attitude
10 Yoell f William
"Determination of Consumer
Attitudes and Concepts Through Behavoral Analyses" t
Attitude Research at Sea y Lee Adler and Irving
Crespir ( e d . ) f The Attitude Research Comnittee r
American Marketing Association r 1966.
16
A t t i t u d e r e s u l t s from the c u l m i n a t i o n o f
b e l i e f s formed from i n f o r m a t i o n a c q u i r e d and
p r o c e s s e d and i s i n f l u e n c e d b y p a s t e x p e r i e n c e o f
t h e i n d i v i d u a l f c u l t u r a l no r ms a n d v a l u e s a n d
r e f e r e n c e groups
There are three models of attitude expression cognition f affects and actions f i
8
1
how a person
Fishbein
L2
On the
is
17
f o l l o w e d b y b e h a v i o u r a l c h a n g e among l a r g e number o f
p e o p il e 13
In
14
structure, since
13
14.
18
" A t t i t u d e s c l o s e l y t i e d i n w i t h the t o t a l a t t i t u d e
structure o f the i n d i v i d u a l are l e s s l i k e l y t o
c h a n g e t h a n more i s o l a t e d a t t i t u d e s .
W i t h i n t h e l a s t decade ? v a r i o u s m u l t i - a t t r i b u t e
a t t i t u d e models have been d e v e l o p e d
of:Rosenberg
15
and F i s h b e i n
16
notably those
The R o s e n b e r g m o d e l
c o n t a i n e d two v a r i a b l e s , i . e . v a l u e s ( e q u i v a l e n t t o
e v a l u a t i v e c r i t e r i a ) and p e r c e i v e d i n s t r i m e n t a l i t y
The Fishbein model was similar to Rosenberg 1 s ^ but
instead took account of belief
Where:
=
19
=
20
CHAPTER 2
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
T h i s s t u d y a t t e m p t s t o measure t h e c u r r e n t a t t i t u d e s o f
c o n s u m e r s t o w a r d s J a p a n e s e p r o d u c t s i n Hong Kong f a n d i s
i m p o r t a n t p r i m a r i l y b e c a u s e J a p a n e s e b r a n d s h a v e made
s i g n i f i c a n t i n r o a d s i n t o t h e d o m e s t i c m a r k e t a n d i n many
c a s e s have a c h i e v e d the p o s i t i o n o f brand l e a d e r s
The
21
From this, it
Table 2
Hong Kong Retained Importfem Top Ten Major
Suppliers f 1983-^^
Ranking of
Major Countr ies
of Or igin
% Share of
total imports
from country
418222156
148928321
756798778
Japan
China
U.S.A.
Taiwan
Singapore
U.K.
Rep. of Korea
FR. Germany
Australia
Switzerland
4522430125
0138557220
9339863322
22 1
1o
2
3e
4.
5.
6
78
8
9
10e
Retained
Import Value
HK$Mn
22
Eve h e l d i n J a p a n i s t e l e v i s e d l i v e on a l o c a l TV
s t a t i o n and immensely s u p p o r t e d .
In
H i s t o r i c a l Background
I t v / a s r e a l l y r a t h e r a w f u l b e c a u s e when we w e n t
p a s t t h e l o w e r Peak Tram S t a t i o n - t h e r e were
some t r e e s t h e r e t h e n - t i e d t o e a c h t r e e w e r e
t h r e e s t r i n g s l i k e beads o f C h i n e s e .
suppose
t h e y h a d b e e n c a u g h t l o o t i n g e T h e r o p e was t i e d
t o t h e t r e e a t o n e e n d t h e n i t was l o o p e d a r o u n d
t h e neck o f a Chinese then w i t h another t h r e e
f e e t l o o p e d around t h e neck o f t h e n e x t one
r i g h t down t h e l i n e 0 I 8 i n a f r a i d we h a d t o g o
p a s t them a g a i n l a t e r a n d o f c o u r s e a s o n e
d r o p p e d f r o m e x h a u s t i o n h e p u l l e d a n o t h e r down
and t h e r e t h e y were l e f t t o d i e
I know a
f r i e n d o f m i n e saw a n o l d C h i n e s e woman a n d a
g i r l s c r a p p i n g up r i c e t h a t h a d f a l l e n o f f a
t r u c k and t h e J a p a n e s e i m m e d i a t e l y s h o t them and
p u s h e d them i n t o t h e w a t e r ?
The J a p a n e s e o f c o u r s e t o o k what t h e y wanted the r i g h t o f the c o n q u e r o r . Dr Li Shu-fan
describes the pillaging of Hong Kong:
s
24
19
h a v e h a d impr i n t e d o n t h e i r memory
t h i s i n d e l i b l e e x p e r i e n c e , and i t w o u l d n o t b e
s u r p r i s i n g i f t h e y a r e s t i l l , up t o t h i s d a y f
f o r t y - t w o y e a r s l a t e r ^ h a r b o u r i n g some b i t t e r n e s s
towards the i n f l i c t o r o f the i n j u r y B
M o r e o v e r f one r e c e n t i n c i d e n t i s r e l e v a n t
In
- 2 5
i n c i t i n g p a t r i o t i c o n e s - " I am a C h i n e s e " M y
C h i n e s e H e a r t " a n d "The B r a v e C h i n e s e P e o p l e " - w h i c h
a l l have s t r o n g overtone o f t h e Chinese b r a v e r y i n the
Japanese intrusion
20
However f
This
The
A.
- 2 6
(i)
Product Pr ice
Is it high cost f or inexpensive?
Is it reasonably priced?
(ii)
Product Quality
Is it meticulously made f or has it
careless or poor workmanship?
Is it durable?
Is it inventive or imitation?
Is it made of good material?
How is its performance?
(iv)
Product Support
Is backup service satisfactory?
Is it well advertised?
As mentioned i n page 1 6 , a t t i t u d e r e s u l t s
f r o m t h e c u l m i n a t i o n ofbeliefs formed from
information aquired and gained
It is hoped
- 2 8
P A R T
II
LITERATURE REVIEW
- 2 9
this project
two b y A k i r a N a g a s h i m i n 1 9 7 0
21
,22
a n d 1 9 7 7 , and a third by Mun Kin-chok 2 3 in 1980.
30
CHAPTER 3
THE NAGASHIMA STUDIES
A k i r a Nagashima c o n d u c t e d a s e r i e s o f s t u d i e s on
consumer a t t i t u d e s
The results
(op cit)
25
24
248
Osgood,
Suci f G . J and Tannenbaim, P. H,f
Measurement of Meaning r U n i v e r s i t y o f I l l i n o i s
1957 ? O s g o o d , C , E , , "The N a t u r e a n d M e a s u r e m e n t
M e a n i n g " r P s y c h o l o g i c a l B u l l e t i n f V o l 4 9 (May
pp. 1 9 7 - 2 6 ^
"The
Press r
of
1952),
25
Good :
Bad
The s u b j e c t s were a s k e d t o c o m p l e t e t h e q u e s t i o n n a i r e
a s r a p i d l y as p o s s i b l e
impression.
answer i n g a c c o r d i n g t o t h e i r f i r s t
A p r o f i l e was o b t a i n e d b y c a l c u l a t i n g
i n d i v i d u a l or g r o u p mean scores
Figure 3
Profile of "Made-In" Product Images
of Japanese Businessmen
(Results of N a g a s h i m a s 1975 S t u d y )
Price Value
Expensive
Reasonably
priced
Unreasonably
priced
Reliable
Unreliable
L u x u r y items
Necessary items
Heavy industry
product
Light m a n u f a c t u r e
product
Service and Engineering
Not s o careful a n d
meticulous
workmanships
Careful and
meticulous
workmanship
Technically
backward
Mass produced
Mostly d o m e s t i c
distribution
Imitative
Advertising snci Reputation
P r i d e of
ownership
Not m u c h pr i de of
ownership
M u c h advertising
Little advertising
Recognizable
b r a n d names
Unrecognizable
brand names
32
D e s i g n pnd Style
Large c h o i c e of
size & m o d e l
Limited c h o i c e of
size & mode!
More concerned
with outward
appearance
M o r e coC6red
with p e r f o r m a n c e
Clever use of
color
M o r e for y o u n g
people
M o r e for o l d
people
M o r e for men
M o r e for w o m e n
U p p e r class
Lower class
" M a d e in U.S.A."
" M a d e in England
" M a d e jn France.
"Made in J a p a n "
' M a d e in Germany"'
(A)
(B)
- to establish the
- 3 3
(C)
W h i c h c o u n t r y do y o u t h i n k p r o d u c e s t h e p r o d u c t o f
t h e g r e a t e s t v a l u e when o n e c o n s i d e r s p r i c e ,
quality
d e s i g n , s e r v i c e s , e t c - to explore
It was found in these studies that the "made inSi image was
naturally affected by the familiarity and availability of
the country 5 s product and the stereotype of that country.
Some representative products of that country influenced the
total product image,
f
8
11 S A.
Bi
imitativeSf.
58
commonfs f
These
34
J a p a n " l a b e l h a d s i g n i f i c a n t l y improved
Japanese products
Japan
Since the 1975 study was more recentf its results will
be used to compare with the results of the present study.
CHAPTER 4
STUDY BY MUN KIN-CHOK
A f u r t h e r a r t i c l e o f r e l e v a n c e i n t h i s r e g a r d was t h a t
w r i t t e n b y Mun K i n - C h o k i n 1980 ( o p . c i t ) w h i c h made u s e o f
t h e d a t a f r o m a p a p e r b y James A Brumer and George M.
Taoka
26
26
36
Rank i n g f o r p o s i t i v e s t a t e m e n t s
The highest percentage = 1
The lowest percentage
= 4
= 1
Table 3
U.S. Consumers' Attitudes toward Products f r o m
Japan, PRC, Taiwan and Hong Kong
(From Mun, K . C . , 1980 o p . c i t . )
(Percent Who Strongly or Moderately Agree)
Country/Area
Japan
Statements
A.
PRC
Rank
Rank
Taiwan
Rank
Hong Kong
Rank
Positive Statements
58
34
36
34
64
39
38
38
55
32
32
34
54
28
29
28
45
17
16
19
38
16
16
14
B. Negative Statements
7. Are m a d e with cheap materials
43
64
61
68
41
61
62
63
41
55
58
56
39
59
62
62
39
55
57
51
36
55
57
54
29
47
46
46
29
54
51
51
30
48
49
49
(39
(39
(41
37
two b e i n g both 3 9
The r e s u l t o f t h i s a n a l y s i s
i s shown i n T a b l e 4 below
Table 4
A Paired Comparision of t h e Ranking of t h e Products
from PRC, Taiwan and Hong Kong
(From Mun, K . C . , 1 9 8 0 o p . c i t . )
(Higher rank =Lower rank = E q u a l rank = 0)
Statements
"Quality"
11
III.
"General Image".
Table 5
Statements related to Quality
Hong Kong
S t a t e m e n t s with Taiwan
Hong Kong
with Taiwan
1 0
Hong Kong
PRC
with PRC with Taiwan
1 0
Hong Kong
PRC
with PRC with Taiwan
Table 7
S t a t e m e n t s related t o '"General mage
10
12
Statements
1
20
Hong Kong
with Taiwan
Hong Kong
PRC
with PRC
with Taiwan
F r o m t h i s l a s t a n a l y s i s , i t was f o u n d t h a t a s f a r a s
" Q u a l i t y " was c o n c e r n e d ? Hong K o n g p r o d u c t s a p p e a r e d t o b e
p o s i t i o n e d b e t t e r t h a n T a i w a n p r o d u c t s - b u t s l i g h t l y
" u n f a v o u r a b l e " c o m p a r e d w i t h PRC p r o d u c t s the "Style and
Product Design" of Hong Kong products were rated slightly
lower than that of PRC and Taiwan and products from all
three countr ies ranked equal regarding "General Image 8
although PRC appears to be viewed slightly better than
Taiwan
- 4 0
P A R T
THE
I I I
STUDY
I n t h i s p a r t o f the r e p o r t
t h e s t u d y w i l l be
7 l a s t l y r a c o n s l u s i o n i s a t t e m p t e d i n C h a p t e r 8
41
CHAPTER 5
METHODOLOGY
L.
The S u r v e y
The d a t a on w h i c h t h i s p r e s e n t s t u d y i s b a s e d w e r e
c o l l e c t e d f r o m a s u r v e y on a s a m p l e o f 108 C h i n e s e
consumer s i n Hong Kong
By
t r m
42
The u n i v e r s e o f my s u r v e y s a m p l e was t h e r e f o r e
d e f i n e d a s a l l C h i n e s e c o n s u m e r s i n Hong Kong f w h e t h e r
a c t u a l or prospective
r e l a t i v e s and c o l l e a g u e s o f t h e a u t h o r f a n d t h r o u g h
them t o o t h e r s t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n i s shown i n A p p e n d i x
II
- 4 3
example by i n t e r v i e w i n g i n the s t r e e t
Or
An
Moreover t h e n o t i o n o f s u r v e y and i t s
44
Morover
A survey by
The questionnaire
television f watch
45
worn on t h e o u t s i d e )
it was found
As regards
In
each casef Hong Kong was chosen as one of the countr ies
for compar ison since it will be recalled that one of
the objectives for this study is to compare the
attitudes towards Japanese products with those towards
locally made products so as to provide a strategic
direction for marketers of local products to improve
their image,
case were2
27#
Television:
Watch %
Garment:
Laurent, C.R.,
46
T h e s e c o u n t r i e s were c h o s e n f o r c o m p a r a t i v e
p u r p o s e s i n c e t h e i r p r o d u c t s were t h e s u b j e c t s e i t h e r
i n N a g a s h i m a s studies or in MurZs article.
1983
TABLE 8
1983 Imports from Selected Countries
Value
HK$000
(a)
T e l e v i s i o n (SITC 761)
Total
Japan
UoS,,A .
Germany
(b)
690 f 0 9 2
493,361
1,246
30,325
00.00
71.49
34,068
07,054
70 f 436
53,341
00.00
41.89
5.78
20.33
0.18
4.39
W a t c h ( S I T C 885)
Total
Japan
Taiwan
Switzerland
(c)
%age o f
t o t a l Import
Garment (SITC
845)
o 5 5 7
,673
,671
97,735
o 5 3 1
3 6 5
7 2 5
Total
Japan
China
France
47
m a r k e t s u r v e y w h i c h i s beyond t h e s c o p e o f t h e p r e s e n t
study
29
However r it
48
k i n d o f s c a l e t h e r e t e n d s t o be a r e s p o n d e n t p r e f e r e n c e
f o r t h e v e r b a l l a b e l s a t t a c h e d t o t h e e n d p o i n t s and. t h a t
r e s p o n d e n t s p r e f e r p o s i t i v e numbers t o n e g a t i v e
numbers .
I n o r d e r t o overcome t h i s b i a s rj a n d b e c a u s e
some o f my s a m p l e s m i g h t h a v e d i f f i c u l t y i n
c o n c e p t u a l i z i n g t h e N a g a s h i m a s c a l e w h i c h was u s e d o n
more k n o w l e d g e a b l e b u s i n e s s m e n f t h i s p r e s e n t
q u e s t i o n n a i r e i s s e t out i n the "Agree-with-statement11
f o r m f and t h e seven p o i n t s on t h e s c a l e were l a b e l l e d a s
agree completely
agree mostly
agree somewhat
don1 1 know
. . .
disagree somewhat
disagree mostly
disagree completely
49
r e s p o n s e s t y l e , p a r t i c u l a r l y when t h e s t a t e m e n t s w e r e
p o s i t i v e l y worded
questionnaire
For t h i s reason
i n the present
c a r e has been t a k e n t o i n t e r s p e r s e
n e g a t i v e s t a t e m e n t s among p o s i t i v e ones
(1)
Not so important
(2)
3)
Quite Important
(4)
Extremely Important
(5)
(B) was
- 5 0
CHAPTER 6
RESULTS
A s m e n t i o n e d e a r l i e r i n C h a p t e r 5 f a t o t a l o f 113
q u e s t i o n n a i r e s were r e t u r n e d by r e s p o n d e n t s and 10 8 h a v e b e e n
used.
The f o l l o w i n g A p p e n d i c e s a r e t a b u l a t i o n s o f t h e d a t a :
Appendix IV -
Demographics o f t h e respondents
Appendix V
Mean S c o r e s o f t h e t h r e e p r o d u c t s f r o m
t h e v a r i o u s c o u n t r i e s on S t a t e m e n t s i t o 34
Appendix VI -
- 5 2
CHAPTER 7
DISCUSSION
T h e d a t a f r o m t h i s s t u d y h a v e be e n a n a l y s e d i n
v a r i o u s w a y s : f i r s t l y b a s e d on t h e m o d e l u s e d b y Mun (1980
op cit) and then on that used by Nagashima (1970 and 1977 f
op. cit.) a
1o
M u n 1 s Model
Rank-Order Analysis
These percentages
Table 9
Hong Kong Consumer A t t i t u d e s towards
T E L E V I S IONS from Japan, U.S.A.Germany a n d Hong K o n g
(P e r ce n t who agree c o m p l e t e l y or m o s t l y )
Country/Area
Statements
A.
Japan
Rank
U.S.A.
% Rank
Germany
% Rank
Hong K o n g
% Rank
P o s i t i v e Statements
1. a r e inexpensive
2. has good r e p a i r
service
64.8
63 .9
(1)
(1)
2,8
(4)
4-6
(3)
50.0
(2)
25.0
(3)
43.5
(2)
11-1
(4)
3 are reasonably
priced c o n s i d e r i n g
their quality
78.7
(1)
24.1
(4)
50-0
(2)
35-2
(3)
4 . have good s t y l e
82.4
(1)
25.9
(3)
54-6
(2)
20.4
(4)
97.2
(1)
15.7
(3)
38.0
(2)
7.4
(4)
35.2
( 2)
21-3
(3)
52.8
(1)
3.7
(4)
7 h a v e large choice
o f size and model
93-5
(1)
19.4
(3)
39.8
(2)
17.6
(4)
0.9
(2)
(1)
0.9
(2)
16.7
(4)
9 . are of poor
workmanship
0.9
(1)
0.9
(1)
14.8
(4)
0.0
(1)
0.9
8.3
(4)
1.9
( 2)
0.9
14-8
(4)
B.
Negative Statements
(14)
(1)
(1)
(28)
2.8
(3)
(22)
(41)
Table IQ
Hong K o n g Consumer A t t i t u d e s t o w a r d s
WATCHES f r o m J a p a n Switzerland, Taiwan and Hong Kong
(Percent who agree completely or mostly)
Country/Area
Statements
A.
Japan
Rank
Switzerland
% Rank
Taiwan
i' Rank
Hong Kong
% Rank
Positive Statements
1 a r e inexpensive
55.6
(2)
2-8
(4)
52.8
(3)
86.1
(1)
69.4
(2)
64.8
(1)
7.4
(4)
12.0
(3)
3 are reasonably
priced considering
their quality
75.9
(1)
47.2
(3)
35.2
(4)
70.4
(2)
81.5
(1)
80.6
(2)
11.1
(4)
43.5
(3)
5. a r e much advertised
94.4
(1)
76.9
(2)
0-9
(4)
6.5
(3)
6.
48.2
(2)
72-2
(1)
1.9
(4)
14-8
(3)
88.0
(1)
69-4
(2)
10.2
(4)
39.8
(3)
a r e made of poor
material
0-9
(2)
0.0
(1)
25-0
(4)
15.7
(3)
are of poor
workmanship
2.8
(1)
2.8
(1)
25.9
(4)
15-7
(3)
1.9
(1)
3.7
(2)
20.4
(4)
13.9
(3)
0.9
(1)
0.9
(1)
24.1
(4)
14-8
(3)
are v e r y durable
7. h a v e large choice
o f size and model
Negative Statements
(15)
(20)
(43)
(30)
Table 1 1
Hong Kong Consumer A t t i t u d e s towards
GARMENTS from Japan China, France and Hong Kong
(Percent who agree completely or mostly)
Country/Area
Statements
k.
Japan
Rank
Ch ina
Rank
France
Rank
Hong Kong
% Rank
(3)
60.2
(2)
2.8
(4)
61.1
(1)
2 are reasonably
priced c o n s i d e r i n g
their quality
24.1
(3)
67.6
(2)
18.5
(4)
68.5
(1)
78.7
(1)
0.9
(4)
71,3
(2)
46.3
(3)
45.4
(1)
8-3
(4)
37.0
(2)
14.8
(3)
16.7
(4)
52-8
(1)
25,0
(2)
16-8
(3)
6 h a v e large choice
o f size and model
58.3
(2)
57.4
(3)
30.6
(4)
68-5
(1)
0.9
(1)
15.7
(4)
).9
(1)
9-3
(3)
8. are of poor
workmanship
0.9
(1)
15.7
(4)
0-9
(1)
7.4
(3)
9 h a v e low prestige
so I d o n 1 1 tell
others I buy them
1.9
(2)
15.7
(4)
0.9
(1)
7.4
(3)
1 are inexpensive
B.
Negative Statements
(18)
(28)
(21)
(21)
- 5 6
I t w i l l be r e c a l l e d t h a t i n Mun 8 s a n a l y s i s ^ t h e
t o t a l s c o r e o f r a n k i n g f o r t h e J a p a n e s e p r o d u c t was
1 5 f t h e l o w e s t among t h e f o u r a r e a s
and t h a t t h e
Hong K o n g p r o d u c t o b t a i n e d t h e h i g h e s t s c o r e
indicating its unfavourable 1 positioning compared
with the other three products in the U.S. consumers 1
mindsr though the difference between Plong Kong and
China or Taiwan was rather small
P a i r e d Comparison A n a l y s i s
Mun f u r t h e r a n a l y s e d t h e p o s i t i o n i n g o f t h e
p r o d u c t s o f Hong K o n g , PRC a n d T a i w a n b y means o f a
p a i r ed comparison o f t h e r a n k i n g s c o r e o f e a c h
a t t i t u d e s t a t e m e n t among t h e s e t h r e e a r e a s
The
These
The
(1)
TABLE 1 2
A P a i r e d Comparison o f the Ranking o f TELEVISION f r o m
JapanGermany, U.S.A. and Hong Kong.
(Hong Kong Consumers)
t a t e m e n t S
t-u^nca
Wlt:h U S A
.faPan
Japan
with Germany with H.K.
USA
USA
with Germany with H.K.
8+
8+
2-
1-
2+
7-
10
20
20
(2)
Germany
with H.K.
9+
2-
1-
Table
13 s t i l l shows
the o t h e r t h r e e c o u n t r i e s
i n 11 a q a i n s t S w i t z e r l a n d ,
and 10+ against Hong Kong
t h a t Japan e x c e l s a l l
i n Watch, s c o r i n g
6+
11+ a g a i n s t Taiwan
Switzerland, though
is
in
Statements
Jap an
with Swit
Japan
with Taiwan
Japan
with H.K.
Switzerland
with Taiwan
Switzer
with H.K.
Taiwan
with H
(3)
14 below shows
the r e s u l t o f a s i m i l a r p a i r e d compar i s o n w i t h
r e s p e c t t o Garment.
Table
14 shows t h a t , w h i l s t Japan i s
TABLE 14
A P a i r e d C o m p a r i s o n o f t h e R a n k i n g o f GARMENT f r o m
J a p a n , C h i n a , F r a n c e and Hong K o n g .
(Hong Kong C o n s u m e r s )
5tatements
Japan
w i t h China
Japan
w i t h France
Japan
with H.K.
China
w i t h France
China
with H.K.
France
with H.K.
- 6 1
France gained
(1)
Statements
Japan
with China
Japan
with France
Japan
with H. K.
China
with France
China
with H. K.
France
with H. K,
f a v o u r a b l y than F r a n c e , which i s
c o n s i d e r e d to be the most e x p e n s i v e i n
the four p l a c e s .
S u r p r i s i n g l y , Hong Kong
(2)
Table 16
Statements related to "Quality11
(Hong Kong Consumers)
China
Statements
with China
with France
with H.K.
with France
C hi n a
with H. K.
with H.
20
This
(3)
P r e s t i q e ( T a b l e 17)
Table
17
S t a t e m e n t s r e l a t e d t o l ! P r e st i g e "
(Hong Kong C o n s u m e r s )
Statements
with France
with H.K.
with H.K,
As
Nagashima's model
A, Television (Figure 4)
inexpensive
Expensive
Good
Material
Poor
Material
Good Service
Poor S e r v i c e
Inventive
Imitative
Reasonably
Priced
Unreasonably
Priced
Good
Style
Bad
Style
Much
Advertised
Little
Advertised
Good
Workmanship
Poor
Workmanship
Durable
Not durable
igh
Low P r e s t i g e
Prestige
Large Choice
Limited Choice
Good
Performance
Bad
Performance
TELEVISION
Japan
U.S.A.
Germany
Hong Kong
"*
- 6 5
television
S on the scale
66
B.
WATCH (Figure 5)
we can
whilst
It is
Inexpensive
Expensive
Good
Material
Poor
Material
Good Service
Poor Service
Inventive
Imitative
Reasonably
Priced
Unreasonably
Priced
,Sood S t y l e
Poor S t y l e
Much A d v e r t i s e d
Little
Good
Workmanship
Poor
Workmanship
Advertise
Not
Durable
Durable
I
gh
Prestige
Low
Prestige
Large Choice
Limited Choice
Good
Performance
Bad
Performance
Figure 5
Profile of "Made in Product" Images - WATCH
(Hong Kong Consumers)
Japan
Switzerland
wan
Hong Kong
on w h i c h t h e
A s i n t h e c a s e o f t e l e v i s i o n , Hong Kong
o n l y nidriaged t o come n e a r t o J a p a n i n t e r m s o f
b e i n g i n e x p e n s i v e and r e a s o n a b l y p r i c e d
GARMENT (Figure 6)
However f
On
Inexpensive
Expensive
arH
i
r
de
o t
G H
c
Poor
Material
4
Inventive
Imitative
Reasonably
Priced
Unreasonably
Priced
Good S t y l e
Bad Style
Much
Advertised
Little
Advertised
Good
Workmanship
Poor
Workmanship
Durable
Not durable
Low
Prestige
)High
Prestige
Limited Choice
Large Choice
Figure 6
Profile of "Made in Product" Images - GARMENT
(Hong Kong Consumers)
Japan
China
France
Hong Kong
70
I t s w e a k e s t p o i n t r a g a i n
i s being
i m i t a t i v e t o a n enormous e x t e n t , a n d a l o n g w i t h t h e
Chinesef l i t t l e advertised^
General
mater i a l , p o o r s e r v i c e , p o o r w o r k m a n s h i p , a n d b e i n g
n o t d u r a b l e and d e f i n i t e l y v e r y " c o p y - c a t 1 8
Furthermore f
It is f however F inexpensive
Whilst it Is considered to
The same is
Inexpensive
Expensive
Reasonably
Priced
Unreasonably
Priced
Reliable
Unreliable
Good
Workmanship
Bad
Workmanship
Inventive
Imitative
Pride of
Ownership
Much
Advertising
Little
Advertising
Large Choice
of size etc.
Linrited Choice
of size etc.
Figure 7
Germany
France
(1)
Japan (Figure 8)
Figure 8
A Comparison o f the P r o f i l e A t t i t u d e s o f Hong Kong
Consumers and Nagashima 1 s Bus inessmen
"Made-in Japan
Inexpensive
Expensive
Inventive
Imitative
Reasonably Priced*
Unreasonably priced
Much
Advertised
Little
Advertised
Good
Workmanship
Poor Workmanship
High Prestige
Low Prestige
Large Choice
Limited Choice
74
I t c a n be s e e n t h a t b o t h t h e Hong K o n g
c o n s u m e r s and N a g a s h i m a 1 s b u s i n e s s m e n
c o n s i d e r Japanese p r o d u c t s a r e i m i t a t i v e
( t h o u g h t h e l a t t e r t o a much g r e a t e r
degree)
b u t i n e x p e n s i v e and much
advertised
(2)
U.S.A.
(Figure 9)
- 7 5
t e l e v i s i o n s a s h a v i n g f a i r l y good
workmanship and p e r f o r m a n c e and f e e l p r i d e
i n o w n e r s h i p , whereas N a g a s h i m a
businessmen did not share this vlew
Moreover f U.S televisions are little
advertised
Inexpensive
Expensive
Inventive
Imitative
Reasonably
Priced
Unreasonably
Priced
Much
Advertised
Little
Advertised
Good
Workmanship
Poor
Workmanship
High Prestige
Low P r e s t i g e
Large Choice
L i t t l e Choice
Hong Kong C on s u me r s
Nagashima's Businessmen
Because Japanese t e l e v i s i o n s a r e s u c h
a f a v o u r i t e w i t h t h e Hong Kong c o n s u m e r s ,
the r e l a t i v e p o s i t i o n i n g of U.S. t e l e v i s i o n s
a p p e a r s t o have l a g g e d c o n s i d e r a b l y b e h i n d .
(3)
Germany
( F i g u r e 10)
F i g u r e 10
A Compar i s o n o f t h e P r o f i l e A t t i t u d e s o f Hong Kong
Consumers and N a g a s h i m a ' s B u s i n e s s m e n
" M a d e - i n Germany"
Inexpensive
Expensive
Inventive
Imitative
Reasonably
Priced
Unreasonably
Priced
Much
Advertised
Little
Advertised
Good
Workmanship
Poor
Workmanship
High Prestige
Low P r e s t i g e
Large
Limited Choice
Specifically,
However f
France
(Figure 11)
They have
- 7 8
F i g u r e 11
A C o m p a r i s o n o f t h e P r o f i l e A t t i t u d e s o f Hong K o n g
Consumers and N a g a s h i m a 1 s Businessmen
Made-in France"
Expensive
Inexpensive
Inventive
Imitative
Reasonably
Priced
Unreasonably
Priced
Much
Advertised
Little
Advertised
Poor
Workmanship
Good
Workmanship
Low P r e s t i g e
High Prestige
{
Large Choice
L i t t l e Choice
7
t h e i r weak p o i n t s
79
(such as t h e i r i m i t a t i v e n e s s )
A s noted o n
8S
evaluations represent an a t t i t u d e .
A n attempt has
where:
discussion following)
W.
ib
However
- 8 0
f o r n i and some p o s i t i v e f t h e s c o r e s o f t h e
p o s i t i v e s t a t e m e n t s were c o n v e r t e d b y
deducting the scores g i v e n f o r the
s t a t e m e n t f r o m "8"^ s o t h a t
i f the score g i v e n i s
15
f o r example ^
5" f t h e c o n v e r t e d
s c o r e u s e d w o u l d be "3"
n
( = number
81
Table 13
Rankings by using Mean Average Weighted Scores (MAWS)
MAWS
Ranking per
MAWS
Ranking per
rank-order
TELEVISION
Japan
Germany
U.S.A.
Hong Kong
S t a n d a r d Dev.
192
17.1
15.1
13-8
WATCH
19
18
4^3.
Japan
Switzerland
Hong Kong
Taiwan
S t a n d a r d Dev.
GARMENT
5 4 4
0 4 o
1 XX
Hong Kong
Japan
France
China
Standard Dev.
The scores
82
each score
The
towards
1 9
TABLE 19
MAWS By P l a c e o f O r i g i n o f P r o d u c t s Owned
( F r e q u e n c i e s shown i n b r a c k e t s )
TELEVISION
T . V . owned made i n
MAWS
Japan
S,
19
5.53
.24
19
84
.23
20
13
9.82
14.6 4
19
7-32
14.5 3
Others (5)
19
Germany
Hong Kong
3.0 4
A v e r a g e Standard Deviation
WATCH
W a t c h owned made i n
Watch
MAWS
Japan
Japan
ffor
or W
a t c h MMade
Watch
a d e In
In
Switzerland
Switzerland
Taiwan
Taiwan
Hong Kong
J a p a n ((46)
Japan
46)
1 9 . 2 11
19.2
18.4
1
8 . 4 22
12
12.64
1
4. 3
14.6
S w i t z e r l a n d ((35)
Switzerland
35)
2 0 . 5 11
20.5
. 2 22
20.2
20,
13
13.7 4
1 4 . 63
T a i w a n ((2)
Taiwan
2)
114.3
4 . 3 11
. 4 33
13.
13-4
13
. 34
13.
1 3 . 82
Hong K
Hong
Kong
o n g ((24)
24)
119-5
9 - 5 11
. 9 22
18,
18.9
4
14
13
13.1
16. 63
Others (1)
1
21.5
2L51
20.5
20.522
4
04
15
15.0
18. 03
2.6
MAWS
Japan
Japan (32)
6.11
China (11)
34
France (2)
O t h e r s (7)
Ch ina
Hong Kong
France
14.9 3
5.62
17,8 2
I3
84
15.51
93
84
73
14.0 1
92
34
16.9 1
73
A v e r a g e Standard Deviation
"84
I n garmentf there i s a c l e a r c o r r e l a t i o n i n
t h a t t h e p l a c e o f o r i g i n o f the l a s t garment
bought i s i n most cases from the c o u n t r y w i t h the
h i g h e s t MAWS r a p a r t p e r h a p s f r o m F r a n c e
which
c o m e s a v e r y c l o s e second
This seems to
to
TABLE 20
MAWS By Age
mcies in Brackets)
20-29
30-39
40-49
(57)
(26)
(12)
19.6 1
19-6 1
19.1 1
20.41
18.82
15.6 3
15.83
15.73
17.0 3
18.03
50-60
(5)
Over 60
(2)
Germany
18.7 2
17.2 2
17.8 2
17.8 2
18.3 2
19-2 1
H o n g Kong
13-7 4
14.2 4
13.7 4
15.5 4
15.6 4
13.34
2.8
2.3
2.5
1.7
19-81
19-6 1
19-6 1
19.4 1
20-21
19.02
2
19.0 2
18-9 2
19-1 2
19.1 2
22 00 .. 00 22
1
20.2
2
0.21
Taiwan
10.9 4
13.5 4
12.7 4
13.8 4
1 1 - 9 44
12.54
Hong Kong
13.8 3
15,8 3
13.7 3
15.7 3
13.5 33
15.73
4.3
3.5
2.8
2.8
3.6
2.7
4.3
3.5
Japan
1
15.6 1
15.6 1
15-4 2
14-8 3
13.6 3
19.91
China
14.6 2
14.1 4
14.44
15.12
13.8 2
17.6 2
France
14-233
14.9 3
15.1 3
14.4 4
13.91
16.24
Hong Kong
13-9 4
15.7 2
15-9 1
16.01
13-5 44
16.6 3
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.2
1.6
Standard Dev.
A v e r a g e S.D.
2.7
2.3
WATCH
Japan
Switzerland
Standard Dev.
A v e r a g e S.D.
GARMENT
Standard Dev.
A v e r a g e S.D.
0.8
c.
TABLE 21
Household Income
MAWS
(Frequencies in Brackets)
$3,000-
LT
3,000
$5,999
(10)
(22)
$6,000
^9,999
(26)
10,000
$14,999
(20)
$15,000
^20,000
(U)
Over
2000C
(19)
TELEVISION
Japan
20.31
20.11
19.51
20.51
19.01
U . S . A-
16.13
15.93
15.84
15.73
15.43
17.92
17.12
17-82
18.92
17.42
04
0
3
13.94
2.7
14.44
15.93
.1.7
14.14
2.9
14,54
2.0
5:
20.71
18.8 1
20.01
20.11
19.31
Germany
Hong Kong
WATCH
S.D.
Ave
Japan
Switzerland
8.32
20-12
18-02
19-02
19.82
18.92
Taiwan
3.84
13.2 4
13-34
13.84
13.34
11.6 4
5.93
2.2
3.0
15.43
3.6
14.93
2.6
15.83
2.9
14.13
14.23
3.7
16.61
14.62
14-82
15.42
15-82
15.43
14-53
13.54
14-44
14.34
63
15.82
13.94
14.23
15.42
15-03
16.4:
OT1
O.i
15.14
0.7
15-11
15.31
15.71
16.61
1.0
Hong Kong
GARMENT
S.D.
Ave,
Japan
China
France
Hong Kong
S.D.
Avp
0.6
TABLE 22
MAWS by Education Level
(Frequencies in Brackets)
Primary Education
Secondary Education
Post Secondary
(3)
(59)
(46)
20-81
19.31
20.01
16-23
15.5 2
16.13
Germany
17.82
15.52
17.62
Hong Kong
14.54
14.0 4
14.54
2.7
2.3
2.2
TELEVISION
Japan
WATCH
Standard D e v .
A v e . S.D.
2.4
Japan
22-51
19.31
19.81
Switzerland
21.12
18.62
19.42
Taiwan
13.64
13.4 4
12.84
Hong Kong
14.8 3
15.3 3
14.7 3
4.6
3-4
2.8
2.9
Japan
16.01
15.4 2
15.52
China
15-4 2
14.44
14.44
France
15.13
14.7 3
15.0 3
Hong Kong
11.94
15.51
16-01
Standard D e v .
GARMENT
A v e . S.D.
Standard D e v .
A v e SD
1.8
1.0
0.7
E,
TABLE 23
MAWS by Sex
(Frequencies in Brackets)
Male
Fema 1 e
(61)
(47)
Japan
19-61
19-71
U.S.A.
15.4 3
16.23
Germany
17.52
17.62
Hong Kong
14.24
14.34
2,4
2.4
2.3
Japan
19-91
19.21
Switzerland
19-22
18-72
Taiwan
13.04
13.34
Hong Kong
14.9 3
15-23
3.3
3.1
2.8
Japan
15.62
15.21
China
14.84
13.94
F ranee
15.23
14.5 3
Hong Kong
16.31
14.62
0.6
0.6
0.5
TELEVISION
WATCH
GARMENT
Standard Dev.
Ave. S.D,
Standard Dev.
A v e . S.D.
Standard Dev.
Ave. S.D.
B y P r o d u c t o f G r e a t e s t V a l u e ( T a b l e 24)
I n Garment^ t h e p a t t e r n o f c o r r e l a t i o n i n
T a b l e 19 r e a p p e a r s and we c a n s e e t h a t f o r p e o p l e
who c o n s i d e r J a p a n e s e p r o d u c t s a r e o f t h e g r e a t e s t
v a l u e ? t h e h i g h e s t s c o r e s a r e g i v e n t o Japan t h e
same a p p l i e s t o C h i n e s e and Hong Kong g a r m e n t s
(see
page 49)
In t h i s c o n n e c t i o n
if
i n F i g u r e 3 on page 32,
we r e f e r t o Nagashima s s f i n d i n g s
we w i l l see t h a t a t the bottom
Japanese
1
8
lower c l a s s "
TABLE 24
MAWS By Product of Greatest Value
(Frequencies in Brackets)
Japan
(77)
(1)
(0)
(7)
(0)
(18)
(5)
(0)
TELEVISION
Japan
20 . 0 1
19.41
18.9 1
18.81
18-71
U.S.A.
16 .0 3
17.6 2
16-2 3
14.9 3
15.5 3
Germany
17 6 2
16.2 4
18.62
17.02
17.62
Hong K o n g
14 .0^
16.8 3
14.7 4
1.4
2.0
14.64
2.0
14.74
1.8
Ave.
WATCH
1.9
18.22
20,41
Switzerland
19.12
20,.71
18.5 2
18.61
19-62
Taiwan
13
15,.5^
12.44
13.34
13-94
Hong Kong
14 83
17,.33
13.9 3
2.2
3.2
16.23
2.4
15.43
3.2
9 .8 4
14.2 3
15.83
15.54
14.2 3
15-9 2
16.51
A v e . S.D.
GARMENT
18.7 1
18<.62
20 .0^
Japan
Japan
15.51
China
14.04
13 0
France
14.83
12 32
15.0 2
15.0 4
15.6 3
Hong Kong
15.42
0.7
11 .8 3
15.1 1
0.5
16-81
0.7
16.22
0.5
S.D.
Ave.
0.8
1.4
91
Household Income
Section
higher weightings
low percentage
92
CHAPTER 8
CONCLUSIONS
As
However f unfortunately
T h i s s t u d y s u g g e s t s t h a t t h e image o f J a p a n e s e
p r o d u c t s h a s n o t been t a i n t e d t o a n y e x t e n t b y t h e
a t r o c i t i e s o f t h e c o u n t r y d u r i n g t h e S e c o n d W o r l d War
a s h y p o t h e s i z e d i n C h a p t e r 2 f s i n c e no v a r i a n c e h a s
shown up when the a t t i t u d e s f o r T e l e v i s i o n and Watch
w e r e a n a l y s e d by the ages o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t s .
Although
i t s e e m s t h a t p e o p l e o v e r 40 do n o t l i k e J a p a n e s e
g a r m e n t s a s much a s t h e y o u n g e r g e n e r a t i o n # I w o u l d
a t t r i b u t e t h i s t o the f a c t t h a t the s t y l e s o f Japanese
clothes
a r e more s u i t a b l e
Another reason
post-war years
The reasons he
94
The f a t h e r and t h e
o t h e r s o n were d i e - h a r d p a t r i o t s and s t e a d f a s t l y
refused
It can
If,
if something is
In those days f
it must be
Japanese marketing
95
. i
e the ir heavy
advertising
However r the se
- 9 6
o f J a p a n e s e p r o d u c t s i n Hong Kong i s t h e f a c t t h a t t h e
J a p a n e s e c u l t u r e h i s t o r i c a l l y had i t s r o o t s i n C h i n a
a n d many o f h e r p h i l o s o p h i e s f s u c h a s Z e n r a r e a k i n t o
t h e C h i n e s e c l a s s i c a l thoughts
Because of this
w h a t t h e y a r e , and b e c a u s e a t t i t u d e s a r e r e s i s t a n t t o
c h a n g e ( s e e C h a p t e r 1 f page 17) p a r t i c u l a r l y t h o s e
which a r e t i e d i n with the t o t a l a t t i t u d e s t r u c t u r e o f
. . .
30
.
t h e i n d i v i d u a l . , there i s no reason to suppose t h a t
t h e p r e s e n t t r e n d w i l l n o t c o n t i n u e f o r some y e a r s t o
come
garments) bad
originality-
99
i n c r e a s i n g l y t o e s t a b l i s h t h ei r fames i n o t h e r
c o u n t r i e s , a n d have been more a d v e n t u r o u s i n o w n i n g up
t o t h ei r own d e s i g n s when r e t a i l i n g t h ei r f a s h i o n s i n
Hong K o n g u n d e r t h ei r own l a b e l s
instead o f g i v i n g the
This
3.
Stereotype Image
In the circumstances, it
I would postulate
" T h e 8 m a d e - i n 1 image i s n a t u r a l l y a f f e c t e d b y t h e
f a m i l i a r i t y and a v a i l a b i l i t y o f t h e c o u n t r y 1 s
p r o d u c t f and t h e s t e r e o t y p e o f t h a t c o u n t r y .
Some
representative products o f the country i n f l u e n c e
t h e t o t a l p r o d u c t image. Such p r o d u c t s a s
C o c a - C o l a , C h e v r o l e t ^ F o r d f IBM and S u n k i s t f a r e
f o r m i n g t h e J a p a n e s e image o f s Made i n U . S . A . 1
On t h e o t h e r h a n d f s u c h p r o m i n e n t J a p a n e s e
p r o d u c t s a s Sony^ N i k o n r T o y o t a f a n d Honda a r e t h e
d r i v i n g f o r c e i n c h a n g i n g t h e image o f "Made i n
J a p a n " i n t h e U . S . m a r k e t . (Nagashima 1 9 7 0 f o p
cit)
I t may b e s u g g e s t e d
t h a t garment i s a h i g h - i n v o l v e m e n t p r o d u c t and t h a t
extended p r o b l e m - s o l v i n g behaviour has been a c t i v a t e d .
However f I w o u l d s u g g e s t t h a t p e o p l e who b o u g h t S w i s s
w a t c h e s w o u l d have r e g a r d e d t h a t a s a h i g h - m v o l v e m e n t
p r o d u c t t o o and y e t t h e same c o r r e l a t i o n c a n n o t b e
detected
One p o s s i b l e e x p l a n a t i o n f o r t h i s phenomenon c a n
b e t h a t some o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t s a r e n o t t h e d e c i s i o n
maker s i n p u r c h a s i n g t h ei r t e l e v i s i o n s and f p r o b a b l y
t h e i r w a t c h e s t o o f a s i t has been f o u n d i n an
u n p u b l i s h e d s t u d y by d
L a u r e n t two y e a r s ago t h a t
approval
b u t whetner
o r n o t t h e y w i l l choose t h e p r o d u c t o f t h e c o u n t r y t o
w h i c h t h e y have g i v e n t h e h i g h e s t s c o r e r e m a i n s t o be
s e e n , s i n c e , a s s t a t e d i n page 11, i n t e r v e n i n g b e t w e e n
t h e i n t e n t i o n and t h e a c t u a l a c t o f p u r c h a s e
t h e r e are
unanticipated circumstances."
I have q u o t e d Y o e l l 1 s
d e f i n i t i o n o f " A t t i t u d e i n C h a p t e r 1 ( s e e N o t e 10 o n
p a g e 15)
a n d t h e f o l l o w i n g s h o u l d be g i v e n s p e ci a l
emphasis :
"An a t t i t u d e i s learned^ I t i s c o n d i t i o n e d by
p r i o r e x p e r i e n c e and r e i n f o r c e d t h r o u g h b e h a v i o u r 1 1
and the "behaviour88 will be demonstrate when the
consumer next makes a purchase.
31
5S
accidential
t h e r e i s a l s o r e a s o n f o r t h e two t e r m s n o t t o
c o - i n c i d e , s i n c e the number o f c r i t e r i a which e n t e r
i n t o t h e d e c i s i o n v a r i e s w i t h the e x t e n t o f i n v o l v e m e n t
t h e p u r c h a s e r f e e l s f o r t h e p r o d u c t ( s e e page 1 1 ) ,
T h i s would e x p l a i n the c o r r e l a t i o n w i t h r e s p e c t t o
Garment s i n c e t h i s i s a h i g h - i n v o l v e m e n t p r o d u c t
They therefore
Kenneth
- 1 0 4
a car
c l a i m e d t h e y d i d n o t i n t e n d t o b u y ? one o u t o f s i x
wound up b u y i n g one
One
Summary
- 1 0 5
- 1 0 6
REFERENCES
B e t t m a n ^ ^ James R . and K a k k a r , Piradeep, " E f f e c t s o f
I n f o r m a t i o n P r e s e n t a t i o n F o r m a t on Consumer I n f o r m a t i o n
A c q u i s i t i o n dt r a t e g i e s s i # J o u r r i a l o f Consuirier R e s e a r c h .<
V o l . 3 ( M a r c h 1977)
^
Jr.f
"
M. " A t t i t u d e and t h e P r e d i c t i o n o f B e h a v i o u r
11
1
(New
Y o r k f J o h n W i l e y & S o n s , 1967)
- 1 0 7
Katona, George,
8a
The P o w e r f u l Consumer 1 1 , M c G r a w - H i l l
I960.
K o t l e r f P h i l i p f " M a r k e t i n g Management^ A n a l y s i s f P l a n n i n g
a n d C o n t r o l " y P r e n t i c e - H a l T ^ o f I n d i a P r i v a t e L t d . , 1980.
Krugman, H . E . "The Impact o f T e l e v i s i o n A d v e r t i s i n g :
L e a r n i n g Without Involvement", P u b l i c Opinion Q u a r t e r l y
XXIX r 1965.
"
^
^
Laurentr d
108 -
S e c Achenbauxn f A l v i n A f A d v e r t i s i n g Doesn s t M a n i p u l a t e
C o n s u m e r s / 8 J o u r n a l o f A d v e r t i s i n a R e s e a r c h V o l . 12 f A n r i l
1972) .
L e e A d l e r and I r v i n g C r e s p i , E d i t o r s , ( o p . c i t . )
APPENDIX I
Page 1
P r o f i l e o f "Made I n P r o d u c t Images
f US Businessmen
( R e s u l t s o f Nagashima 1 s 1965 Study)
6,
|Vlade in U.S.A."
"Made in England'
^ 'M i
"Made in Italy"
''Made in Germahy"
iphicK'l VALUE
Ihexpehsive
Expensive
ReaSdhably priced
Unreasonably priced
Reliablfe
Unreliable
Luxul^ items
Necessary items
ExclllSive
Comiiion
Heavy ihdustry
C^refiil'& meticulous
Woricitiknship
.'V
Technically backward
T^ciiiiically advanced
. .
"!*
M a ^ prtidiiced
Hand m a d e
Wofld w i d e distributioil
InV-eji..^:V
ille .
: , d '
Imitative
ADVEFiftfelfSlG
M S
Ptidi Slo^hershit
rIpUtation
Little advertising
Miicil^ivertisiiig
U
'
:v
, L a r g ^ c lo ic e o f size &
r^
# 4'
Mor6 f o r y o u n g people
More f o r itien
Upjber class
appeirincb
1 ' r
.<
CONSUMlEftS' PftOFlLE
APPENDIX I
Page 2
P r o f i l e o f "Made In" P r o d u c t Images
o f Japanese Businessmen
( R e s u l t s o f N a g a s h i m a 1 9 6 7 Study)
"Made in U.S.A."
"Made in Japan"
"Made in England"
"Made in Germany"
"Made in France"
Inexpensive
Reasonably priced
Unreasonably price4
Reliable
Unreliable
L u x u r y items
Necessary items
Exclusive
Cominpn
Heavy industry p r o d u c t
U g h t manufactured procfuct
Careful a n d meticulous
workmanship
SERVICE A N
-PENGINEERING
N o t so careful and
meticvilous workmanship
Technically advanced
Tephnically backw^rcl
Mass produced
Hand m a d e
World w i d e distribution
Inventive
Imitative
.
Pride o f ownership
N o t xnmlx
p _
Much advertising
Little gujvprtising
Recognizable b r a n d names
Unre.Qpgnizable
b r a n d names
:
,
. * ' V' ' ^
:
P E S I P D STYLE
Clever u s e o f color
CONSUMERS' PROFILE
More f o r m e n
U p p e r class
More f o r y o u n g people
o f ownership
-t
More f p r oldp 1
Lower class
Appendix
DISTRIBUTION OF QUESTIONNAIRE
10
t o employees o f s m a l l p r i n t i n g company
10
t o teachers i n a kindergarten
10
t o n u r s e s a t a Government h e a l t h c l i n i c
10
t o members o f a C h i n e s e b o x i n g ( k u n g - f u ) s o c i e t y
10
t o students o f a Chinese p a i n t i n g c l a s s
20
t o employees o f a l a r g e B r i t i s h c o n g l o m e r a t e
20
t o employees o f a l a r g e Government d e p a r t m e n t
10
to relatives
20
t o members o f t h e M , B 0 A . c l a s s
15
t h r o u g h c o l l e a g u e s , f r i e n d s and r e l a t i v e s t o
t h e i r f r i e n d s and r e l a t i v e s a t t h e i r c h o i c e
10
d r o p p e d i n t o l e t t e r box o f b u i l d i n g o f a u t h o r ' s
residence
145
iviLiUKiN jb^irUKh
MARCH 984
3
4 ] i \ 3
b 11
I
&
- I f .
1 _
f 4 t _ T f
^-o
f u T
i i
\i T
9 ^ , 1 l
A T
1 ^
1 1
Agree Completely
..
'I
Disagree Somewhat
. I J
the right
.%
1.
are inexpensive
2,
a r e made o f poor m a t e r i a l
to
<
iB
jii
Hong Kong
1(
Japan
TELEVISIONS
IE}
Disagree Completely
Germany
Disagree Mostlyf d
Agree
Agree
Agree
Don't
Completely
Mostly
Somewhat
Know
1
2
.. 3
4
w .
Disagree Somewhat
Disagree Mostly
Disagree Completely
rw
,
iF]^ .
c
C
O
P.
3
T
C
h-j
3.
has good r e p a i r s e r v i c e
4.
a r e cheap i m i t a t i o n s of b e t t e r t e l e v i s i o n s
3 C
r
i
e
h
t
.s
i
s
n
o
c
r
l
d
e
c
5.
n f
o
n
s
w
n.
a y
e t
rit
e a IX
r u 1
a q
6f x
bO
a
o
^ 7^"
/!
>
6.
7.
a r e much a d v e r t i s e d
8.
a r e o f poor workmanship
9.
a r e v e r y durable
A
kt
buy t h e m ] ^
tbfc / ^
fa ( 1 % I t K
WATCHES
Watches made i n the countries l i s ted to the
right
0 j1 I
11t
g |
Z-^1
18, have
W M
good s t y l e
J ^
dd
c
a
d
c
h"5
nd
a
cJt
i-1
M
d)
N
J
4
H
c
n
bQ
Q
O
C
J "
oj .
*H
{
i
!
G O
H
m
Agree C o m p l e t e l y ,
.V/
1
Agr 00 Mos 11 y Z : \ * 2
A g r e e Somewhat . I W
. 3
Don11 Know
are much a d v e r t i s e d
y doable
i L
Taiwan
Switzerland
D
O
a
o ,.
- A
Hi
Japan
Disagree Somewhat
5
Disagree Mostly . .'if^
. . 6
Disagree Completely z-o 7
g i v e bad performance
t%
4 / 1 1 1f
&
29. have
good s t y l e
ffTJ^
t
i A
U
A
j k
Mi
France
China
Japan
Hong Kong
5 1 t
/ f
I I t i i ^ 1 1 ^
%f t .
Not important at a l l
XI)
Not so important
(2)
Important
(3)
Quite important
(4)
Extremely important
(5)
Television
Price
Watches
Garments
Q u a l i t y ( M a t e r i a l and D u r a b i l i t y )
-
Performance
Workmanship
Advertising
Design
prestigious
%x
Choice o f model/size
,
N/A
Service
)A
U
[ 40-49
= 3 20-29
C U
C = l 30-39
50-60
C Z l O v e r 60
r-j
Below $3,000
K TCZ3
t = 3 $10,000^14,999
No formal education
\ Post secondary
$3 3 000^5,999
CZl $15,000^20,000
7V
N/A
h
5
.
E = 3 $6,000-^9,999
C=3Over $20000
^ ^
Primary education S e c o n d a r y e d u c a t i o n
(/f
H H l Hale
] F e m a l e
Hong Kong
'U.S.A.
( Germany
1.
k A
jf
.Jk ^
Japan
Hong Kong
1 Switzerland
Taiwan
Other (Please s p e c i f y )
1-1 , 4
Japan
China
Hong Kong
France
t
8 Other (Please s p e c i f y ) ^
j!
%> (/%
I=J
jfpan^ Q
i f 4
^
C Z D Germany . 1
i
1 C h i n a
it
^ = 1U . S . A . _
1 = 3 Taiwan
= 1 Switzerland
1 = 1 France
,
: _
Hong Kong
APPENDIX l y
DEMOGRAPHICS OF RESPONDENTS
LT
$3000
$3,000$5,999
$6,0009,999
$10,000$14,999
$15,000- Over
$20,000 $20,000
Total
Below 20
20 - 29
28
29
30 - 39
16
10
40 - 49
50 - 60
Over 60
Total
14
12
15
10
14
60
48
Education Level
Post Secondary
Secondary
Primary
Total
Below 20
20 - 29
10
22
17
28
29
30 - 39
11
16
10
40 - 4 9
50 - 60
Over 60
Total
26
33
32
14
60
48
Appendix
.V
Japan
A.
Germany
1.
a r e inexpensi v e
2.
a r e made o f p o o r m a t e r i a l
5o
h a v e good style
7.
8o
9-
are v e r y durable
Hong Kong
Japan
Switzerland
Ta iwan
Hong Kong
13 a r e inexpensive
2-8
5.6
2.7
1.8
5.6
6-3
3.5
4.0
2.3
2.4
4.6
4-5
4.5
5.6
3.5
3.2
Appendix
2.2
L 9
2,0
1,4
2.0
5.7
6.2
2.8
2.1
V - 2
5.9
1,8
6.1
2.3
5.8
6!
Japan
Ch ina
GARMENTS
Garments made i n t h e c o u n t r i e s l i s ted
to the r i g h t
25 are inexpensive
2-5
5.5
4.6
4e6
4.8
2.4
5-5
4.6
5.6
4.3
3,9
2.8
4-7
France
Hong Kong
APPENDIX V I
P l a c e Of Ori g i n Of P r o d u c t s Owned
^
( Q u e s t i o n s 40-42)"""""^
Televisions
Japan
Number
77
US A
Germany
1
23
Hong Kong
Others
2
_ 5
7130
0a 9 3
21.30
L85
4,63
108
100
Watch
Japan
46
42.59
Switzerland
35
32^41
Taiwan
Hong Kong
Others
L85
24
22 22
0,93
108
100
Garments
Japan
32
2963
China
11
10.19
Hong Kong
56
51.85
France
Others
L85
6 48
APPENDIX V I I
77
71.30
U.S.A.
0.93
France
Germany
6o48
Taiwan
Hong Kong
18
China
16-67
4.63
Switzerland
108
100
APPENDIX V I I !
Statements
A v e r a g e Mean S c o r e s
1 inexpens ive
3-4
4. poor material
4.5
5 reasonably priced
2.1
7 much advertised
1,9
8o poor workmanship
5.6
5-9
11 large choice
2,0
APPENDIX I X
BREAKDOWN OF HOUSEHOLD INCOMES
(Frequencies i n brackets)
( i ) By W e i g h t i n g s g i v e n t o P r i c e
( P e r c e n t a g e g i v i n g 4 and 5 - P e r c e n t a g e )
LT
$3 3 000
(10)
$3,000$5,999
(22)
$6000
9,999
(27)
$10,000
14,999
(19)
$15,000
$20,000
(11)
Over
20,000
(19)
Television
20.0
54^6
51.3
52.6
45.5
305
Watch
20.0
36.4
48 1
63,,4
27.3
42 1
Garment
30.0
36,3
29.6
31.6
9.1
42.1
23.3
424
43.2
49.2
27.3
38,2
Average Percentage
Japan (77)
LT
$3000
$3000$5,999
10.4
22.
$6,000
9,999
26 e 0
16 e 7
Germany (6)
China (6)
156
HJ
100.0
U.S.A. (1)
$10,000 T I S T O O O
$14,999
$20,000
11.1
11.1
50.0
389
Over
20,000
14.3
0
33^3
50.0
16.1
22.2
333
16^7
APPENDIX I X
Page 2
( i i i ) By P l a c e o f O r i g i n o f P r o d u c t s Owned ( P e r c e n t a g e )
_ -
..
$3000
^3,000
$6,000
$5,999
$107000$15,000
$9999
$14,999
OveT"
$20,000
"
20,000
TELEVISION
Japan (78)
10.3
U-S.A. (1)
Germany (23)
20.5
100
8.7
130
28.2-
19.2
7.7
0
17,4
14.1
0
17 A
21.7*
21.7
100
40.0
20.0
40.0
WATCH
Japan (45)
4^4
22.2
Switzerland (36)
56
25.0
Taiwan (2)
25.0
12.5
11.8
3.9
15.6
139
13.9
13.9
27a 8*
50.0
50.0
25.0
42
29.2^
100 0
GARMENTS
Japan (31)
12.9
16 A
355*
16.1
605
12.9
China (12)
83
25.0
16 0 7
25
25.0
8 ,9
25.0^
23.2
17,9
12-5
12.5
France (3)
33,3
33,3
33.3
Others (6)
^"Highest percentage
16.7
83a 3