Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1.4
LIFE
In his 1949 essay The Relations of Production in Russia, Castoriadis developed a critique of the supposed socialist character of the government of the Soviet Union.
The central claim of the Stalinist regime at the time was
that the mode of production in Russia was socialist, but
the mode of distribution was not yet a socialist one since
the socialist edication in the country had not yet been
completed. However, according to Castoriadis analysis,
since the mode of distribution of the social product is inseparable from the mode of production,[69] the claim that
one can have control over distribution while not having
control over production is meaningless.[70]
1.5
Psychoanalyst
2.1
1.7
Sovietologist
In his 1980 Facing the War text, he took the view that
Russia had become the primary world military power. To
sustain this, in the context of the visible economic inferiority of the Soviet Union in the civilian sector, he proposed that the society may no longer be dominated by
the party-state bureaucracy but by a "stratocracy"[85] a
separate and dominant military sector with expansionist
designs on the world. He further argued that this meant
there was no internal class dynamic which could lead to
social revolution within Russian society and that change
could only occur through foreign intervention.
1.8
Later life
3
ical discontinuities that cannot be understood in terms
of any determinate causes or presented as a sequence
of events. Change emerges through the social imaginary without strict determinations, but in order to be
socially recognized it must be instituted as revolution.
Any knowledge of society and social change can exist
only by referring to (or by positing) social imaginary
signications. Thus, Castoriadis developed a conceptual framework where the sociological and philosophical category of the social imaginary has a central place
and he oered an interpretation of modernity centered
on the principal categories of social institutions and social imaginary signications;[3] in his analysis, these categories are the product of the human faculties of the radical imagination and the social imaginary, the latter faculty being the collective dimension of the former.[98] (According to Castoriadis, the sociological and philosophical
category of the radical imaginary can be manifested only
through the individual radical imagination and the social
imaginary.)[99][100][101]
4
So just like the Old Testament and the Koran claim that
'There is only one God, God', capitalism rst denes logic
as the maximization of utility and minimization of cost,
and then bases its own legitimacy on its eectiveness to
meet this criterion.
As he explains in one of his lectures in the Greek village of Leonidio in 1984,[105] many newly founded societies start from an autonomous state which is usually in
the form of direct democracy, like the town hall meetings
during the American Revolution and the local assemblies
of the Paris Commune. What they end up with, however, is a form of governance by which the citizens do
not legislate directly but delegate this power to a group of
experts who remain in power, largely unchecked by ocial means, for a number of years. The ancient Greeks on
the other hand developed a system of continuous autonomy where the people (demos) voted constantly on matters of government and law and where the elected rulers,
the archons, were mainly asked to enforce them. In such
a system, courts of law were governed by common citizens who were appointed to the degree of judge briey
and army generals were voted in by the people and had
to convince them of the correctness of their decisions.
Taking some poetic licence to expand this point, he says
that in this system, the president of the national treasury
could have been a Phoenician slave, since he would only
be asked to implement the rulings of the demos.
2 THOUGHT
tional society where mans welfare is materially measurable and innitely improvable through the expansion of
industries and advancements in science. In this respect
Marx failed to understand that technology is not, as he
claimed, the main drive of social change, since we have
historical examples where societies possessing near identical technologies formed very dierent relations to them.
An example given in the book is France and England during the industrial revolution with the second being much
more liberal than the rst.[106]
Similarly, in the issue of ecology he observes that the
problems facing our environment are only present within
the capitalist imaginary that values the continuous expansion of industries. Trying to solve it by changing or managing these industries better might fail, since it essentially
acknowledges this imaginary as real, thus perpetuating
the problem.
Thus, imaginaries are directly responsible for all aspects
of culture. The Greeks had an imaginary by which the
world stems from Chaos and the ancient Jews an imaginary by which the world stems from the will of a preexisting entity, God. The former developed therefore a
system of immediate democracy where the laws were ever
changing according to the peoples will while the second a
theocratic system according to which man is in an eternal
quest to understand and enforce the will of God.
Castoriadis also believed that the complex historical processes through which new imaginaries are born are not directly quantiable by science. This is because it is through
the imaginaries themselves that the categories upon which
science is applied are created. In the second part of
his Imaginary Institution of Society he gives the example of set theory, which is at the basis of formal logic,
which cannot function without having rst dened the elements which are to be assigned to sets.[108] This initial
schema of separation[11] (schma de sparation,
2.2 The Imaginary
) of the world into distinct elements and
The term the Imaginary originates in the writings of categories therefore, precedes the application of (formal)
the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan (see the Imagi- logic and, consequently, science.
nary) and is strongly associated with Castoriadis work.
To understand it better we might think of its usual context, the "imaginary institution of societies". By that, Cas- 2.3 Chaos
toriadis means that societies, together with their laws and
legalizations, are founded upon a basic conception of the The concept of Chaos that one encounters frequently in
world and mans place in it. Traditional societies had Castoriadis work.[109][110] According to that, the Greeks
elaborate imaginaries, expressed through various creation developed an imaginary by which the world is a product
myths, by which they explained how the world came to of Chaos, as narrated by both Homer and Hesiod. The
be and how it is sustained. Capitalism did away with this word has since been promoted to a scientic term, but
mythic imaginary by replacing it with what it claims to Castoriadis is inclined to believe that although the Greeks
be pure reason (as examined above). That same imag- had sometimes expressed Chaos in that way (as a system
inary is, interestingly enough, the foundation of its op- too complex to be understood), they mainly referred to it
posing ideology, Communism. By that measure he ob- as nothingness. He then concludes what made the ancient
serves, rst in his main criticism of Marxism, titled the Greek society dierent to other societies is exactly that
Imaginary Institution of Society,[106] as well as speaking core imaginary, which essentially says that if the world is
in Brussels,[107] that these two systems are more closely created out of nothing then man can indeed, in his brief
related than was previously thought, since they share the time on earth, model it as he sees t,[111] without trysame industrial revolution type imaginary: that of a ra- ing to conform on some pre-existing order like a divine
Castoriadis writings delve at length into the philosophy
and politics of the ancient Greeks who, as a true autonomous society knew that laws are man-made and legitimization tautological. They challenged these laws on
a constant basis and yet obeyed them to the same degree
(even to the extent of enforcing capital punishment) proving that autonomous societies can indeed exist.
5
law. He contrasted that sharply to the Biblical imaginary,
which sustains all Judaic societies to this day, according
to which, in the beginning of the world there was a God,
a willing entity and mans position therefore is to understand that Will and act accordingly.
the project of individual and collective autonomy, that is to say, of the will to freedom. This
would require an awakening of the imagination
and of the creative imaginary.[113]
He argues that, in the last two centuries, ideas about autonomy again come to the fore: This extraordinary pro2.4 The Ancient Greeks and the Modern fusion reaches a sort of pinnacle during the two centuries stretching between 1750 and 1950. This is a
West
very specic period because of the very great density
Castoriadis views the political organization of the ancient of cultural creation but also because of its very strong
[114]
Greek city states as a model of an autonomous society. subversiveness.
He argues that their direct democracy was not based, as
many assume, on the existence of slaves and/or the geography of Greece, which forced the creation of small city 3 Lasting inuence
states, since many other societies had these preconditions
but did not create democratic systems. The same goes for Castoriadis has inuenced European (especially conticolonisation since the neighbouring Phoenicians, who had nental) thought in important ways. His interventions in
a similar expansion in the Mediterranean, were monar- sociological and political theory have resulted in some of
chical till their end. During this time of colonization, the most well-known writing to emerge from the contihowever, around the time of Homers epic poems, we ob- nent (especially in the gure of Jrgen Habermas, who
serve for the rst time that the Greeks, instead of trans- often can be seen to be writing against Castoriadis).[115]
ferring their mother citys social system to the newly es- Hans Jonas published a number of articles in Amertablished colony, instead, for the rst time in known his- ican journals in order to highlight the importance of
tory, legislate anew from the ground up. What also made Castoriadis work to a North American sociological
the Greeks special was the fact that, following the above, audience,[116] and Johann Pl Arnason has been of enthey kept this system as a perpetual autonomy which led during importance both for his critical engagement with
to direct democracy.
Castoriadis thought and for his sustained eorts to introduce it to the English speaking public (especially during his editorship of the journal Thesis Eleven).[117] In
the last few years, there has been growing interest in
Castoriadiss thought, including the publication of two
monographs authored by Arnasons former students: Je
He sees a tension in the modern West between, on the one
Kloogers Castoriadis: Psyche, Society, Autonomy (Brill),
hand, the potentials for autonomy and creativity and the
and Suzi Adamss Castoriadiss Ontology: Being and Creproliferation of open societies and, on the other hand,
ation (Fordham University Press).
the spirit-crushing force of capitalism. These are respectively characterized as the creative imaginary and the capitalist imaginary:
This phenomenon of autonomy is again present in the
emergence of the states of northern Italy during the
Renaissance,[112] again as a product of small independent
merchants.
4 Major publications
Original French
Mai 68 : la brche [The Breach], Fayard, 1968
(under the pseudonym Jean-Marc Coudray; coauthored with Edgar Morin and Claude Lefort)
La Socit bureaucratique [Bureaucratic Society] in
two volumes: Les Rapports de production en Russie
and La Rvolution contre la bureaucratie, 1973
L'Exprience du mouvement ouvrier [The Experience
of the Labor Movement] in two volumes: Comment
lutter and Proltariat et organisation, 1974
L'Institution imaginaire de la socit [The Imaginary
Institution of Society], Seuil, 1975
Les Carrefours du labyrinthe [Crossroads in the
Labyrinth], Volume I, 1978
4
Le Contenu du socialisme [On the Content of Socialism], 1979
Capitalisme moderne et rvolution [Modern Capitalism and Revolution] in two volumes, 1979
Devant la guerre [Facing the War], Volume I, 1981
(a second volume was never published)
Domaines de l'homme [Domains of Man] (Les carrefours du labyrinthe II), 1986
La Brche: vingt ans aprs (rdition du livre de
1968 complt par de nouveaux textes) [The Breach:
Twenty Years After], 1988
Le Monde morcel [World in Fragments] (Les carrefours du labyrinthe III), 1990
La Monte de l'insigniance [The Rising Tide of Insignicance] (Les carrefours du labyrinthe IV), 1996
Fait et faire [Done and To Be Done] (Les carrefours
du labyrinthe V), 1997
Posthumous publications
Figures du pensable [Figures of the Thinkable] (Les
carrefours du labyrinthe VI), 1999
Sur Le Politique de Platon [Commentary on The
Statesman of Plato], 1999
Sujet et vrit dans le monde social-historique. La
cration humaine 1 [Subject and Truth in the SocialHistorical World. Human Creation 1], 2002
Ce qui fait la Grce, 1. D'Homre Hraclite. La
cration humaine 2 [What Makes Greece, 1. From
Homer to Heraclitus. Human Creation 2], 2004
MAJOR PUBLICATIONS
[What Democracy?]
.
Selected translations of works by Castoriadis
. [Philosophy and Science. A Discussion with Yorgos L. Evangelopoulos],
The Imaginary Institution of Society [IIS] (trans.
Athens: Eurasia books, 2004, ISBN 960-8187-09-5
Kathleen Blamey). MIT Press, Cambridge 1997
Une Socit la drive, entretiens et dbats 1974[1987]. 432 pp. ISBN 0-262-53155-0. (pb.)
1997 [A Society Adrift], 2005
The Castoriadis Reader (ed./trans. David Ames
Post-scriptum sur l'insigniance : entretiens avec
Curtis). Blackwell Publisher, Oxford 1997. 470 pp.
Daniel Mermet ; suivi de dialogue [Postscript on InISBN 1-55786-704-6. (pb.)
signicance], 2007
World in Fragments: Writings on Politics, Soci Fentre sur le chaos [Window to Chaos] (compiled
ety, Psychoanalysis, and the Imagination [WIF]
by Enrique Escobar, Myrto Gondicas, and Pas(ed./trans. David Ames Curtis). Stanford Univercal Vernay), Seuil, 2007, ISBN 978-202-0908-26-9
sity Press, Stanford, CA 1997. 507 pp. ISBN 0(Castoriadis writings on modern art and aesthetics)
8047-2763-5.
Ce qui fait la Grce, 2. La cit et les lois. La cration
Political and Social Writings [PSW 1]. Volume 1:
humaine 3 [What Makes Greece, 2. The City and
19461955. From the Critique of Bureaucracy to the
Laws. Human Creation 3], 2008
Positive Content of Socialism (ed./trans. David Ames
L'imaginaire comme tel [The Imaginary As Such],
Curtis). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapo2008
lis 1988. 348 pp. ISBN 0-8166-1617-5.
7
Political and Social Writings [PSW 2]. Volume 2:
19551960. From the Workers Struggle Against Bureaucracy to Revolution in the Age of Modern Capitalism (ed./trans. David Ames Curtis) University of
Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 1988. 363 pp. ISBN
0-8166-1619-1.
Political and Social Writings [PSW 3]. Volume
3: 19611979. Recommencing the Revolution:
From Socialism to the Autonomous Society (ed./trans.
David Ames Curtis) University of Minnesota Press,
Minneapolis 1992. 405 pp. ISBN 0-8166-2168-3.
Modern Capitalism and Revolution [MCR] (trans.
Maurice Brinton), London: Solidarity, 1965 (including an introduction and additional English mate- The journal Socialisme ou Barbarie.
rial by Brinton; the second English edition was published by Solidarity in 1974, with a new introduction
Gdelian argument[119]
by Castoriadis)
Philosophy of praxis
Philosophy, Politics, Autonomy. Essays in Political
Philosophy [PPA] (ed. David Ames Curtis) Oxford
Post-Lacanian psychoanalysis[120]
University Press, New York/Oxford 1991. 306 pp.
Post-Marxism
ISBN 0-19-506963-3.
Crossroads in the Labyrinth (trans. M. H. Ryle/K.
Soper). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1984. 345 pp.
On Platos Statesman [OPS] (trans. David Ames
Curtis). Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
2002. 227 pp.
The Crisis of Western Societies. TELOS 53 (Fall
1982). New York: Telos Press.
Figures of the Thinkable [FT07] (trans. Helen
Arnold). Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
2007. 304 pp. (Also trans. anon. 2005 [FT05].)
A Society Adrift. Interviews and Debates, 1974
1997 (trans. Helen Arnold). Fordham University
Press, New York 2010. 259 pp.
Psychoanalysis and Politics, in: Sonu Shamdasani
and Michael Mnchow (eds.), Speculations After
Freud: Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Culture,
Routledge, 1994, pp. 112 (also in: World in Fragments, 1997, pp. 125136)
Postscript on Insignicance: Dialogues with Cornelius Castoriadis (ed./trans. Gabriel Rockhill and
John V. Garner). Continuum, London 2011. 160
pp. ISBN 978-1-4411-3960-3. (hb.)
See also
Autopoiesis
Classical republicanism
Decentralized planning
Post-phenomenology
The French autonome movement
Verstehen
Workers council
6 References
[1] Memos 2014, p. 18: he was ... granted full French citizenship in 1970.
[2] Dosse 2014, p. 94.
[3] IIS, p. 160: We do not need, therefore, to 'explain' how
and why the imaginary, the imaginary social signications and the institutions that incarnate them, become autonomous.
[4] IIS, p. 287.
[5] IIS, p. 274.
[6] IIS, p. 282; confer Freuds term (Vorstellungs-) Reprsentanz des Triebes ideational representative of the drive
(Sigmund Freud, "Die Verdrngung" contained in the volume Internationale Zeitschrift fr rztliche Psychoanalyse,
Vol. III, Cahier 3, 1915, p. 130).
[7] WIF, pp. 131 and 263; Elliott 2003, p. 91.
[8] Les carrefours du labyrinthe: Le monde morcel (1990),
p. 218.
[9] WIF, p. 268. (Confer Fichtes original insight.)
[10] An Eigenwelt that is organized through its own time
(Eigenzeit); WIF, p. 385.
[28] Crossroads in the Labyrinth (1984), pp. 46115: Psychoanalysis: Project and Elucidation"; Elliott 2003, p. 92.
[29] Cornelius Castoriadis, The State of The Subject Today,
American Imago, 46(4) (1989:Winter), p. 371412 (also
in: WIF, pp. 137171). See also V. Karalis (2005). Castoriadis, Cornelius (192297), in: John Protevi (Ed.),
The Edinburgh Dictionary of Continental Philosophy (pp.
867). Edinburgh University Press.
[30] WIF, pp. 273310.
[31] See: Dosse 2014, p.
104; Cornelius Castoriadis, The Destinies of Totalitarianism, Salmagundi 60
(Spring/Summer 1983): 108; Peter Murphy, Romantic Modernism and the Greek Polis, Thesis Eleven, 34
(1993): 4266. For a comparative analysis of Hannah
Arendt and Cornelius Castoriadis, see Gillian Robinsons
The Greek Polis and the Democratic Imaginary, Thesis
Eleven 40 (1995): 2543. Castoriadis criticizes Arendt
in his interview The Idea of Revolution (1989) and in
his talk Athenian Democracy: False and True Questions
(1992).
[32] IIS, p. 401.
[33] Sean McMorrow, Concealed Chora in the Thought of
Cornelius Castoriadis: A Bastard Comment on TransRegional Creation, Cosmos and History: The Journal of
Natural and Social Philosophy, Vol 8, No 2 (2012).
[34] Claude Lefort, Writing: The Political Test, Duke University Press, 2000, p. xxxiii.
[35] P. Chaulieu, "Lukcs et Rosa", Socialisme ou Barbarie
n 26 (November 1958) reproduced in: Daniel Gurin.
Rosa Luxembourg et la spontanit rvolutionnaire. Paris:
Flammarion, 1971, pp. 15758.
[36] FT07, p. 61.
[37] Dosse 2014, p. 237.
[38] Dosse 2014, p. 44.
[39] Dosse 2014, p. 22.
[40] Dosse 2014, p. 441.
[41] IIS, p. 400.
REFERENCES
[71] Peter Osborne (ed.), A Critical Sense: Interviews with Intellectuals, Routledge, 2013, p. 17.
[49] Carol Atack, Radicalising the Classical Imaginary: Cornelius Castoriadis and the cole de Paris, July 8, 2011.
[50] Anthony Giddens, Social Theory Today, Stanford University Press, 1988, p. 110 n. 34.
[51] Dosse 2014, p. 454.
[52] Francisco Varela, Autonomy and closure: The resonances of Castoriadis thought in the life sciences, CNRS
and CREA, cole Polytechnique, Paris.
[53] Cornelius Castoriadis Dies at 75
[54] Tassis 2007, p. 4; Tasis 2007, pp. 278.
[80] A magma is that from which one can extract (or in which
one can construct) an indenite number of ensemblist organizations but which can never be reconstituted (ideally)
by a (nite or innite) ensemblist composition of these
organizations. (IIS, p. 343.)
[83] FT05: Imaginary and Imagination at the Crossroads (essay based on a speech given in Abrantes in November
1996), p. 151. The quote appears in a slightly dierent translation in FT07 (Figures of the Thinkable, trans.
by Helen Arnold, Stanford University Press, 2007), pp.
8990.
Introduction to Castoriadis.
[84] FT05: First Institution of Society and Second-Order Institutions (essay based on a lecture presented on December 15, 1985 in Paris), p. 163.
[85] Castoriadis, Cornelius (February 1980).
War. Telos (46): 48.
Facing the
10
8 FURTHER READING
[116] Joas, H. 1989. Institutionalization as a Creative Process: The Sociological Importance of Cornelius Castori[92] Tasis 2007, pp. 43 and 85 n. 23.
adiss Political Philosophy, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 4: 5 (March), 118499.
[93] Anon. (2003), Foreword to The Rising Tide of Insignicancy
[117] Arnason, J. P. 1989. Culture and Imaginary Signica[94] Tasis 2007, p. 81.
tions, Thesis Eleven 22, 2545.
[95] Alex Economou:
(19221997)
Obituary Cornelius Castoriadis [118] Ecrits politiques, Cornelius Castoriadis, Livres, LaProcure.com
7 Sources
Franois Dosse. Castoriadis. Une vie. Paris: La
Dcouverte, 2014. ISBN 978-270-71712-69.
Alan D. Schrift. Twentieth-Century French Philosophy: Key Themes and Thinkers. John Wiley & Sons,
2009. ISBN 978-140-51439-43.
Theofanis Tasis. .
[Castoriadis. A philosophy of autonomy]. Athens: Eurasia books. December 2007.
ISBN 978-960-8187-22-1.
Theofanis Tassis. Cornelius Castoriadis. Disposition
einer Philosophie. 2007. FU Dissertationen Online.
8 Further reading
Suzi Adams. Castoriadiss Ontology: Being and Creation. New York: Fordham University Press, 2011.
ISBN 978-082-3234-59-2.
Suzi Adams (ed.). Cornelius Castoriadis: Key Concepts. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014. ISBN 978-144-1172-90-7.
Nelly Andrikopoulou. ,
1945 [Mataroas Voyage, 1945]. Athens: Hestia
Printing House, 2007. ISBN 978-960-05-1348-6.
11
Andrew Arato. From Neo-Marxism to Democratic
Theory. Essays on the Critical Theory of Soviet-Type
Societies. M.E. Sharpe, 1993, pp. 12245. ISBN
978-076-56185-35.
Maurice Brinton.
For Workers Power.
Selected Writings (ed. David Goodway). Edinburgh/Oakland: AK Press, 2004. ISBN 1-90485907-0.
Dimitris Eleas. :
[Private Cornelius:
Personal Testimony about Castoriadis]. Athens: Angelakis, July 2014. ISBN 978-618-5011-69-7.
Andrea Gabler. Antizipierte Autonomie. Zur Theorie und Praxis der Gruppe Socialisme ou Barbarie
(1949-1967). Hanover: Ozin Verlag, 2009. ISBN
978-393-0345-64-9.
Jrgen Habermas. The Philosophical Discourse of
Modernity: Excursus on Castoriadis: The Imaginary Institution. Polity Press, 1990, pp. 32735.
ISBN 0-7456-0830-2.
Axel Honneth. Rescuing the Revolution with an
Ontology: On Cornelius Castoriadis Theory of Society. In: The Fragmanted World of the Social. Essays in Social and Political Philosophy (ed. Charles
Wright), SUNY Press, 1995, pp. 168183. ISBN
978-143-8407-00-5.
Hans Joas. Pragmatism and Social Theory, University of Chicago Press, 1993, pp. 154171. ISBN
978-022-6400-42-6
Alexandros Kioupkiolis. Freedom After the Critique
of Foundations: Marx, Liberalism, Castoriadis and
Agonistic Autonomy. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
ISBN 0230279120.
Richard Rorty. "Unger, Castoriadis, and the Romance of a National Future. Northwestern University Law Review, 82(2):33551 (1988).
Alexandros Schismenos. The Human Tempest.
Psyche and autonomy in Cornelius Castoriadis
Philosophy [ .
]. Athens: Exarcheia, 2013. ISBN
978-618-80336-5-8.
Alexandros Schismenos and Nikos Ioannou. After
Castoriadis. Routes for Autonomy in the 21st Century
[ .
21 ]. Athens: Exarcheia, 2014. ISBN
978-618-5128-03-6.
Society of Friends of Cornelius Castoriadis. ,
, [Psyche, Logos, Polis]. Athens: Ypsilon, 2007. ISBN 978-960-17-0219-3.
Yannis Stavrakakis. Creativity and its Limits: Encounters with Social Constructionism and the Political in Castoriadis and Lacan. Constellations,
9(4):522539 (2002).
Yannis Stavrakakis. The Lacanian Left: Psychoanalysis, Theory, Politics. Edinburgh University
Press, 2007, pp. 3765. ISBN 0791473295.
Thesis Eleven, Special Issue 'Cornelius Castoriadis,
Number 49, May 1997. London: Sage Publications.
ISSN 0725-5136.
John B. Thompson. Studies in the Theory of Ideology. University of California Press, 1984, Chapter 1: Ideology and the Social Imaginary. An Appraisal of Castoriadis and Lefort. ISBN 978-0520054-11-0.
12
EXTERNAL LINKS
13
10
10.1
10.2
Images
File:Socialisme_ou_barbarie.JPG Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/Socialisme_ou_barbarie.JPG License: Public domain Contributors: Own work Original artist: Sirdon
10.3
Content license