Affirmative: To fully develop, there is a need to amend the
1987 Constitution Opposition: To fully develop, there is NO need to amend the 1987 Constitution First Speaker: (If parameter is not set, set the parameter for the debate) Parameter: This debate focuses on the current situation today. The elections for NEW electoral candidates and the economic standing of the Philippines as of today. Given then this parameter, our house believes that in order for the Philippines to fully develop, THERE IS NO NEED TO AMEND THE 1987 CONSTITUTION Points: 1. Elections The Philippine elections are coming up, May 9, and by then we will already have new presidentiables sitting in the position. The new leaders should be focused on trying to fix what the previous administration has left them with. It is not proper to make adjust and amend to something new. True they may be familiar with the Constitution, but it is the fact that their attention will be diverted to something else rather than trying to focus on the problems that really need to be addressed by their administration. 2. With the MANY cases of CORRUPTION, POWER STRUGGLE among our leaders and the POLITICAL DYNASTY (State the percentage of how many families in the Philippines are in Politics out of the whole population), the amendment of the new Constitution will be of their favor in order to either make their term longer, or have benefits which the people cannot attest to since it is in the Constitution. Our leaders are not mentally ready to actually amend
something without taking away their personal bias and
interests. 3. TIME- TIME is something we all need to look at. To amend (even if it is only simple) the Constitution will take a LONG time as it is a long process that will not just happen in a snap. There will be a decision on who will amend or if there should be something like the ChaCha (Macapagal administration). The TIME should instead be used to PROMOTE and IMPLEMENT projects that have long be in the pipeline. There are more urgent matters at hand that will not be solved by changing any Constitution. Please give a few examples on what needs the focus of the government today Second Speaker: -RebuttalMain hits: 1. Why change something that has not been fully implemented again, it is not the type of CHANGE we need to develop. 2. You change the constitution TO SET THE FOUNDATION OF THE SOCEITY (Clearly of which, we have not fully set and established yet) not to suit a particular moment (political moment). Third Speaker: -RebuttalThus, with the given points mentioned by our house, it can be said that for our country to fully develop, we do NOT need to amend the Constiution. Development as said is measured on how well the country has been doing economically and even politically. But with the current scenario in our country,
it is not amendment we need, It is again the
IMPLEMENTATION and the ACTION to the constitution. With the strong points and support statements for it, our house has provided a clearer and realistic picture. Thus, we should win this debate.
Motion For Leave To File Brief Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellant's Motion For Rehearing and Rehearing en Banc, Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres, No. 11-1159 (4th Cir. Feb. 25, 2019)