Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I. INTRODUCTION
DG is one of the new technologies used for generation of
electric power by the consumer itself which is directly
connected at the level of distribution system of the electric
grid [1]. This is a technology which helps to have production
of renewable energy efficiently both in the developed and the
developing world. The share of distributed generators in the
electric power systems has been growing slowly in an
exponential manner from the last two to three decades. It can
be said that DG is association of small scale generation units.
The effects of DG on line losses, power transfer capability and
also on voltage profile are to calculated without any
installation of DG in to the test system. The results of such
advantages greatly show how fine these distributed generators
are installed in to the test system. Studies have proven that
nearly 70% of generated electric power is consumed as power
loss at distribution system level of power system. The main
reasons for the exponential use of DG are given as follows:
sin
...(4)
THD(%) =
100
V1i
h
nh
h=2 Vi
Branch
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Sending
end
node
1
2
3
4
2
6
6
2
9
3
11
12
4
4
Receiving
end node
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
R
(ohm)
X (ohm)
1.35309
1.17024
0.84111
1.52348
2.55727
1.08820
1.25143
2.01317
1.68671
1.79553
2.44845
2.01317
2.23081
1.19702
1.32349
1.14464
0.82271
1.02760
1.72490
0.73400
0.84410
1.35790
1.13770
1.21110
1.65150
1.35790
1.50470
0.80740
Node
KVA
Node
KVA
1
0
9
100
2
63
10
63
3
100
11
200
4
200
12
100
5
63
13
63
6
200
14
100
7
200
15
200
8
100
Bus
number
Harmonic
injection
current
Order of
injected
harmonic
10
12
14
15
15
%
15
%
17
%
15
%
17
%
17
%
20
%
Iteration No.
Bus
DG size Saving
No.
(MW)
(KW)
1
3
0.7899
17.2928
2
6
0.2309
3.5866
3
2
0.0814
0.1612
4
3
-0.0024 0.0018
The solution obtained clearly shows that the location
of DG is being repeated for every three consecutive iterations.
Hence the above solution is treated as local optimum but not
global optimum. The corresponding DG sizes to global
optimum solution are determined using PSO method [9].
Sensitivity analysis gives the candidate locations for DG
placement i.e., bus numbers 3, 6 and 2 respectively. Particle
swarm optimization (PSO) Algorithm described in section 5 is
used to describe the sizes of DGs at the candidate locations.
The sizes of DGs are purely based on the number of DG
locations. The number of DGs to be installed for the test
system is limited to three and brief explanation to this is given
in the following three cases. Case 1 represents installation of
only one DG in to the system, case 2 with two DGs and case
3 followed by three DGs. DG sizes in the four optimal
C
a
s
e
1
Bus
Loc
DG
Size
(MW)
Total
Size
(MW)
0.902
0.902
0.708
Losses
without DG
installation
(KW)
Losses
with DG
Installation
(KW)
32.789
Sav
ing
(K
W)
18.
392
Figure 3: Voltage profile without and With DG Placement
0.360
1.068
3
6
2
0.639
0.328
0.163
1.130
51.1680
29.130
22.
055
29.014
22.
171
Without
DG With
DG
installation (KW) installation (KW)
51.1680
29.0145
Similarly due to the introduction of DG in to the
system the voltage profile as been improved which is
represented in the below table.
Real power
loss
Bus
num
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Voltages
before DG
installation
1.0000
0.9746
0.9620
0.9573
0.9542
0.9626
0.9604
0.9601
0.9706
0.9689
0.9553
0.9477
0.9457
0.9559
0.9561
Voltages
after DG
installation
1.0000
0.9878
0.9834
0.9833
0.9802
0.9831
0.9839
0.9806
0.9838
0.9822
0.9768
0.9694
0.9674
0.9819
0.9821
Case
Capacitor
Size
(KVAr)
1
5
0.573
5
0.413
2
14
0.230
5
0.291
3
14
0.146
15
0.260
5
0.175
14
0.079
4
15
0.221
4
0.270
By installation of capacitors at particular buses with the
correct determined sizes results in the decrease of the
Capacitor
Location
Bus num
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case I
0
25.2186
33.9036
45.0831
47.6297
26.3988
27.8917
28.3858
26.2511
27.5337
34.6747
37.2819
38.7744
46.2696
46.1159
Case II
0
29.3833
38.1593
43.7909
46.5234
32.0191
35.7221
34.1763
30.4959
31.8514
39.0409
41.9129
43.5410
45.0633
44.8985
Case III
0
13.1230
19.6288
35.4777
37.0694
12.6660
11.5781
14.0330
13.8013
14.7109
20.0738
21.7213
22.7215
36.1623
36.0981
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
X.
BIOGRAPHIES