PHP vs. ASP.

NET
• PHP and ASP.NET are both technologies that allow us to create websites where the
webpages are dynamically constructured (in contrast to an HTML website, where the
webpages are pre-existing static files).
• But if we put technical reasons to one side, there are some personal reasons why you
might want to either learn or switch to PHP.
• The first is that it is PHP is open-source. Depending on your viewpoint of open-source,
this may or may not be a telling factor.
• The second is that PHP is cheaper. The hosting is cheaper, there are more free
components, and there is more free information about it.
• The third is that PHP is much more "scripty" than the object-oriented ASP.NET. For
some this will be a good thing, for others it will be a bad thing.
• So that's my summary. Technically, they do the same thing. But they have different
personalities, and you should use whichever is most similar to your own style and your
own personality.
• To do simple applications PHP/MySQL seems to be better but with larger more complex
stuff ASP.NET is better.

6 Great Reasons to Use .NET

1. Speed

Just like all .NET applications, ASP.NET applications are compiled. This makes them
much faster than PHP, whose applications are interpreted. To achieve the same effect
with PHP, Zend and PHP accelerator must be installed on the server, and this is rarely
the case at most Web hosting companies. Also, OO is much faster in ASP.NET than it is
in PHP.

2. More Language Support

ASP.NET is written using "real" OO (Object Oriented) programming languages of your
choice. PHP is just a simple scripting language in comparison to .NET languages like
C++, VB.NET or C# -- languages that give you more control, and more reusability.
That said, these languages are also harder to learn and master, and might be
intimidating if you haven't been programming for very long. ASP.NET, for example,
can't be picked up as easily as PHP, though C# is not very hard to learn if you already
know PHP.

Another good thing about .NET is that it has multi-language support. You can currently
write (or will be able to in the very near future) ASP.NET applications in C++, C#,
Visual Basic.NET, Jscript.NET, Python, Perl, Java (J#), COBOL, Eiffel and Delphi. You
may even find yourself writing your ASP.NET applications in PHP in the future -- it's
not impossible!

What's nice about this is that you can mix the code. can instantiate an object in C#
from a class written in C++ or VB.NET. This increases the programmer hiring pool for
companies, and improves your chances of finding a suitable pre-written class for your
project on the Web.
 3. Your Choice of Development Environments

This is an area where ASP.NET shines!

Microsoft has released a free development environment for ASP.NET called Web Matrix,
which blows all other free development environments for PHP out of the water. It has a
built-in Web server, database administration interface FTP integration, and more. Not
only that, Microsoft has also released MSDE -- a free development edition of MS SQL
server. It has precisely all the features of the full MS SQL server 2000, and any
application you write for MSDE will run fine on MS SQL Server.
If you can afford Visual Studio .NET, it, too, offers some amazing qualities. It allows
you to:

• automatically create reports and diagrams from your databases,

• debug the code line by line, while at the same time seeing what happens in the
application,
• assign a temporary value to a variable in the middle of execution, in order to test out
different scenario,
• hover the cursor over variables in your code while debugging, to see what value they
have "right now",

...and much more.

4. It's Part of .NET

ASP.NET is a part of .NET, and that benefit is too large to simply ignore. If you know
how to write ASP.NET applications, you know how to write ordinary applications too.
Even windows apps, if you read up a little on the Windows Forms classes (as opposed
to the Web Forms). PHP has PHP-GTK, but it's currently very immature compared to
.NET.

5. It's Cheaper to Develop for

Didn't expect that one, did ya? It even surprised me! Due to the fact that ASP.NET is
such a powerful application, and it's offered for free (including the code editor, Web
server, and FTP client), I actually ended up paying less ($0) than I did for my PHP
Development Environment composed of UltraEdit ($35), Bullet Proof FTP ($30) and
mySQLfront ($0). With that said, hosting ASP.NET is still more expensive than PHP.

6. It's Cross-Platform

.NET is currently pretty much tied to the Windows platform. This is a bad thing, but
I'm quite confident that .NET will become very cross-platform in a few years. Why? A
while back, Microsoft released Rotor, a Shared Source implementation of the CLR (CLR
= The thing that runs code) and most of the non-windows specific class libraries for
Windows and BSD Unix, with source code for both. When I first heard this, I didn't
believe it -- that REALLY didn't sound like something Microsoft would do. And when I
realized that it was in fact true, I expected Rotor to be the smallest and most feeble
implementation Microsoft could possibly get away with.

I couldn't have been more wrong. Rotor hasn't been built on the cheap -- it's
practically identical to its commercial counterpart in most important respects. .NET
also has a very powerful Platform Abstraction Layer, making ports to other operating
systems pretty easy to achieve. Not only that, but the CLI and C# are now
standardized by ECMA. And the Mono project, with Ximian behind it, is working on an
Open Source implementation of the .NET framework right now. All these factors lead
me to believe that the chances for .NET to become cross-platform are very high.