Research Design/Creswell.

A framework is necesary to situate observation and the research process and it

procedures. If the framework change dependig on the scientific progress and
the innovations (fortuitous in some cases) to influence the frameworks then the
typology of this methodological resource will change in almost the same way to
this progressions, when not, is just literature or history of science: data,
evidence, and rational considerations shape knowledge but history shape a
research.
The time we decide to design a research proposal, the time we invest reading
the state of the art: proceeding in the opposite way is just socialize a sepia
delined sketch of what we are about to do. Whatever the theoretical perspective
should be, it would be useful to follow the outcomes tracing them in a period of
time (according to the authors perspective on this text: long, medium or short).
It is know that when a researcher dot not reach the outcomes expected, he can
go back and reanalyze the things done and reconstruct the frame. The
procedures a man uses in a research seems to me like writing poetry: strategies
are a formalism that might scientifisize the languaje, but are not the metric and
the prosody for itself; in a research process I guess to choose and using a
strategie (focusing it space of influence) are not doing an inquiry.
I assume that our bakground shapes the way we doing research but if human
beings construct theories, methodology, problems, a technical lenguaje for
giving answers to a certain questions, I dont understand the way some people
use the notion of human nature, only to opposite one theory or an
epistemological perspective.
When a researcher uses a mixed methods there would be a lack of profundity
on the mode he does research. I believe that is consecuence of a desire to
prove satisfactory a hypothesis or is a fiability trouble. Stratospherical
perspective of social theory isnt flowig in the same way all the time. The
categories constructed should be modified by this interrelationship. Sometimes
it is necesary to make it clear the time we are writing sciense or literature. In the
case that both are mixed by (...) the autor and found it so througout the text, I
dont really know what to say. I believe that the amount of money of the Nobel is
the same for both cathegories and I rather writing in a style that allow me to see
what Iam writing after processing information so then, I can be taken as a
literacy object and see what is within me as a mirror effect.
I think that in grounded theory an approach to a certain problema must consider
the personal interest as the money you will get for every paper you write or
political policy you design, in a Word, public o private investment.