Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Review
Abstract
A new chelating resin containing bis[2-(2-benzothiazolylthioethyl)sulfoxide] was synthesized using chloromethylated polystyrene as material
and characterized by elemental analysis and infrared spectra. The adsorption capacities of the newly formed resin for Hg2+ , Ag+ , Cu2+ , Zn2+ , Pb2+ ,
Mn2+ , Ni2+ , Cd2+ and Fe3+ were investigated over the pH range 1.06.0. The resin exhibited no affinity for alkali or alkaline earth metal ions.
The maximum adsorption capacities of the resin for Hg2+ , Ag+ , Cu2+ , Zn2+ , Pb2+ , Mn2+ , Ni2+ , Cd2+ and Fe3+ were 1.49, 0.96, 0.58, 0.11, 0.37, 0,
0.24, 0.36 and 0.25 mmol g1 , respectively. In column operation it had been observed that Hg2+ and Ag+ in trace quantity could be separated from
different binary mixtures and Hg2+ could be effectively removed from industrial wastewater and the natural water spiked with Hg2+ at usual pH.
2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Keywords: Chelating resin; Bis[2-(2-benzothiazolylthioethyl)sulfoxide]; Recovery; Metal ions
Contents
1.
2.
3.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Experimental . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1. Apparatus and reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2. Preparation of the resin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3. Water regain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.4. Resin stability test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.5. Batch experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.6. Adsorption kinetic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.7. Effect of diverse metal ions on adsorption capacities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.8. Separation of Hg2+ and Ag+ from several binary mixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.9. Removal of Hg2+ from river and ground water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.10. Removal of Hg2+ from industrial wastewater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Results and discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1. Characterization of the resin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2. Adsorption capacities for metal ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3. Separation of Hg2+ and Ag+ from alkali and alkaline earth metal ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4. Separation of Hg2+ and Ag+ from binary mixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.5. Removal of Hg2+ from natural waters and industrial wastewater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: rongjunqu@sohu.com, qurongjun@eyou.com (R. Qu).
196
196
196
196
197
197
197
197
197
198
198
198
198
198
199
199
199
200
196
4.
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1. Introduction
Much attention has been drawn to the synthesis of chelating resins and to the investigation of their adsorption behavior
for the selective and quantitative separation of specific metal
ions from various matrices, because both their adsorption ability
and adsorption selectivity are superior to those of ion exchangers in a trace or ultra concentration range [13]. In general,
the adsorption selectivity of chelating resins has been reported
to be dependent mainly on the chelate forming properties of
functional groups chemically bonded on the supports such as
silica gel, cellulose and macroporous copolymers [4]. Chelating resins containing heterocyclic functional groups receive a
great deal of attention since they display high affinity towards
heavy and noble metal ions [5]. Many chelating resins obtained
by immobilization of heterocyclic functional groups on solid
supports have been practically applied in separation of trace metals from a variety of matrices [6,7]. Several heterocycles such
as pyridine [8,9], imidazole [10], imidazolylazo [11], benzimidazolylazo [12], quinoline [13] and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole
(MBZ) [1417] have been immobilized on a resin bed for this
purpose. Among the above-mentioned chelating resins, the ones
containing 2-mercaptobenzothiazole exhibit high affinity for
heavy and noble metal ions, especially for mercury [16]. In Ref.
[18], the separation properties of the resin containing sulphur and
MBZ for Hg2+ and Ag+ has been studied. The results obtained
show that the resin can separate Hg2+ and Ag+ quantitatively in
aqueous solution.
Recently, the synthesis of chelating resins with N,N substituted diamides of malonic acid [19,20] and N,N -dialkyl
aliphatic amides [21] has been reported. These resins are proved
to have good adsorption properties for metal ions owing to the
close proximity of donor atoms, which can increase the probability of formation of stronger complexes [22].
Considering the above we have designed a new chelating
resin containing bis[2-(2-benzothiazolylthioethyl)sulfoxide] as
functional group. The present report describes the synthesis and
characterization of the resin. Its adsorption capacity for Hg2+ ,
Ag+ , Cu2+ , Zn2+ , Pb2+ , Mn2+ , Ni2+ , Fe3+ and Cd2+ was investigated. The recovery of Hg2+ and Ag+ from several binary
mixtures and the recovery of Hg2+ from natural waters spiked
with Hg2+ and industrial wastewater were also studied.
2. Experimental
2.1. Apparatus and reagents
A flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Model 932A,
made in Australia) was used for metal ion determination. The
operating condition was presented in Table 1. The infrared
spectra were recorded on a Nicolet MAGNA-IR550 (series
200
200
200
II) spectrometer (made in American); test condition: potassium bromide pellets, scanning 32 times, resolution 4 cm1 .
The elemental analysis was carried out using an Elementar Analysensysteme Gmbh Varioel (made in Germany).
Semi-automatic sequential injection hydride generation doublechannel atomic fluorescence spectrometer (Model AFS-920,
made in China) was used to determine the content of Hg2+
in river water and ground water. The BET surface area was
determined by ASAP-2020 Surface Area and Porosity Analyzer (made in American). The adjustment of pH was done
with microprocessor pH meter (Model HANNA pH211, made in
Portugal).
Chloromethylated polystyrene (PS-Cl, crosslinked with 10%
DVB, 5.49 mmol g1 Cl, 3040 mesh, BET surface area
31.85 m2 g1 ) was purchased from Chemical Factory of Nankai
University of China. 2-Mercaptoethanol, 30% hydrogen peroxide solution, urotropine, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (MBZ),
benzenesulfonyl chloride (BsCl), and other reagents, solvents
were of analytical reagent grade and were used without further
purification.
Stock solutions of the metal ions (1 mg ml1 each) were prepared by dissolving appropriate amounts of analytical grade
nitrates in distilled water, and further diluted prior to use. The
buffer solutions were prepared by addition of dilute NH4 OH or
HNO3 to 0.1 M ammonium acetate solution.
2.2. Preparation of the resin
The target chelating resin was synthesized as follows
(Scheme 1).
Resin I was obtained according to the similar procedure
described in literature [23]: 30.0 g of PS-Cl was reacted with
urotropine (96.0 g) in a mixture of ethanol and water (34:20,
v/v) at 90 C for 36 h. Then 250 ml of hydrochloric acid was
added and the mixture was stirred at 90 C for 9 h. After filtration, the residue was washed with distilled water and ethanol
and dried under vacuum at 50 C. 32.9 g of resin I was obtained.
Elemental analysis (%): N, 3.58.
Table 1
Operating parameters used for recording AAS for different metal ionsa
Metal ion
Wavelength (nm)
Ag+
4.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
5.0
5.0
4.0
7.0
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.2
338.1
228.8
217.9
253.7
279.8
283.3
232.0
248.3
Cd2+
Cu2+
Hg2+
Mn2+
Pb2+
Ni2+
Fe3+
a
The flame type of AAS used in this paper was air-acetylene (oxidizing).
197
Resin I (32 g) was reacted with 2-mercaptoethanol in a mixture of ethanol and hydrochloric acid (2:1, v/v) at 50 C for 72 h.
Then the product was filtered off and washed with distilled water
and ethanol. After drying under vacuum at 50 C, 37.0 g of resin
II was obtained. Elemental analysis (%): N, 2.94; S, 15.33.
Resins III and IV were synthesized according to the same
reaction condition described in literature [24]. 5.5 g of resin
II were swollen in 100 ml of acetone for 30 min, then 11.2 g
of hydrogen peroxide was added dropwise within 10 min. The
mixture was stirred mechanically for 6 h. Then the reaction was
heated to reflux for 2 h. Finally, the product was filtered off and
washed with distilled water and ethanol and then was dried under
vacuum at 50 C. 6.1 g of resin III was obtained. Elemental
analysis (%): N, 2.55; S, 14.12.
A mixture of 6.0 g of resin III and 100 ml of pyridine was
cooled in an ice-water bath, and 20.6 ml of BsCl was added
dropwise. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h.
Then the reaction were filtered and washed with distilled water
and ethanol and then was dried under vacuum at 50 C. 6.7 g
of resin IV was obtained. Elemental analysis (%): N, 2.52; S,
13.94.
At the last step, resin IV (6.5 g), 2-mercaptobenzothiazole
(14.7 g) and K2 CO3 (4.1 g) were suspended in DMF (150 ml),
the mixture was stirred at 85 C for 24 h. Then the reaction was
filtered off and washed with distilled water, ethanol and dried
under vacuum at 50 C. 5.7 g of resin V was obtained. Elemental
analysis (%): N, 3.16; S, 13.47.
2.3. Water regain
Water regain was defined as the amount of water absorbed by
1 g of polymer [20]. It was measured according to the method:
approximately 1 g of the resin was stirred in double distilled
water for 48 h, then filtered off by suction, weighted, dried
at 80 C for 48 h. After cooling in a desiccator, the resin was
reweighed. The water regain was calculated as (mw md )/md ,
where mw was the weight of water swollen polymer and md was
the dry weight.
2.4. Resin stability test
Fifty milligrams of the resin was shaken continuously with
25 ml of 15 M hydrochloric acid or alkaline solutions, respec-
tively for 7 days, then filtered off and washed with distilled water
until neutral. After drying, the adsorption capacity of the resin
for Hg2+ was measured by batch method.
2.5. Batch experiment
Thirty milligrams of the resin was added to 20 ml of metal ion
solution (5 103 M) adjusted to the desired pH and the mixture
was shaken for 24 h at 25 C. The mixture was filtered off and
the concentration of the solution was determined by FAAS. The
adsorption capacities were calculated according to the following
equation:
Q=
(C0 C)V
W
198
China). The sample was immediately filtered through a Millipore cellulose nitrate membrane (45 m), acidified to pH 2.0
with 2.0 mol l1 HNO3 and neutralized and then buffered to
the desired pH. The content of the sample was determined by
FAAS. For separation, 100 ml of the sample was passed through
the column containing 300 mg of the resin. Hg2+ was subsequently eluted with 10 ml of 5% thiourea in 0.1 M HNO3 , the
concentration of Hg2+ in eluent was determined by FAAS.
199
Table 2
Adsorption capacity of the resin for different metal ions vs. pH (mmol g1 )
pH
Ag+
Cu2+
Hg2+
Zn2+
Pb2+
Ni2+
Cd2+
Fe3+
Mn2+
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
0.71
0.66
0.71
0.77
0.95
0.96
0.58
0.54
0.51
0.39
0.47
0.46
1.49
1.36
1.23
1.31
1.28
1.35
0.09
0.07
0.05
0.07
0.08
0.11
0.13
0.31
0.27
0.35
0.25
0.37
0.11
0.14
0.07
0.09
0.19
0.24
0.15
0.18
0.24
0.16
0.35
0.36
0.18
0.13
0.17
0.16
0.21
0.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fig. 2. Adsorption rate curve of the resin for Hg2+ and Ag+ .
200
Table 3
Separation of Hg2+ and Ag+ from binary mixtures at corresponding pH of maximum adsorptiona
Metal ion
Recovery (%)
Ag(I)
Hg(II)
Batch method
Cu2+
Zn2+
Pb2+
Ni2+
Cd2+
Mn2+
Fe3+
95.7
98.3
95.4
98.8
98.9
97.1
95.3
1.5
1.4
1.1
2.3
3.5
2.3
1.6
Column method
97.0
98.6
100
98.7
97.6
98.3
94.5
2.3
2.7
2.6
3.1
2.5
1.4
2.0
Batch method
97.5
98.8
100
98.7
98.5
99.2
96.3
1.3
2.9
1.5
4.2
2.3
1.8
3.3
Column method
98.6
99.0
99.6
99.4
98.6
100
97.8
1.4
3.4
2.3
2.7
3.4
5.6
4.3
The amount of Hg2+ and Ag+ in binary mixture was 250 g and the amount of interferences such as Cu2+ , Zn2+ , Pb2+ , Ni2+ , Cd2+ , Fe3+ and Mn2+ was 500 g,
respectively.
a
Table 4
Recovery of Hg2+ from natural waters and industrial wastewater
Sample
Measured value (g l1 )
River water
River water
Ground water
Ground water
Wastewater
0.1
0.1
0.05
0.05
538.4
50.0
100.0
50.0
100.0
49.6
98.5
50.0
99.1
50.0
3.9
1.5
1.8
1.9
2.3
Recovery (%)
99.2
98.5
100.0
99.1
92.9
7.8
1.5
3.6
1.9
2.3
201
[25] Y.Z. Shi, X.Z. Sun, Y.H. Jiang, T.N. Zhao, H.X. Zhu, Spectroscopy and
Chemical Identification of Organic Compounds, Jiangsu Science and Technology Press, Jiangsu Province of China, 1988, p. 138.
[26] R.G. Pearson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85 (1963) 3533.
[27] R.W. Stanley, G.E. Cheney, Talanta 13 (1966) 1619.