Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
local
130
Introduction
The current financial and economic crisis has spurred a demand for greater
accountability in public administrations (Carmeli, 2003), especially in local
governments. There is generally acknowledged to be a need for more financial
transparency in order to achieve a stable financial balance (Burritt and
Schaltegger, 2010; Martinsen and Beg Jorgensen, 2010). In fact, public
administrations are being pressured for the disclosure of higher quality and
transparency of financial information with the aim of controlling the use of public
resources (Pina et ah, 2010; Rodriguez et ah, 2007), detecting financial distress in
local governments (Zafra et al., 2009), and achieving the sustainable financial
balance in the public administration (Dollery and Grant, 2011).
One of the best instruments currently available for helping public administrations
to improve transparency and accountability in the use of public financial resources
has been the implementation of information and communication technologies
(ICTs) (Heeks, 2005; Kraemer and King, 2006), which could improve government
responsiveness and empower individual citizens to improve democratic
governance (Cullen and Sommer, 2011; Mutula and Wamukoya, 2009).
Therefore, in recent years, a growing body of literature has been developed with
the aim of identifying the key factors underlying a higher level of economicfinancial information disclosure, particularly by local public organisations (Caba
et al., 2008; Carcaba and Garcia, 2010; Evans and Patton, 1987).
Nevertheless, despite the best endeavors of previous research, there exists
considerable heterogeneity in the results obtained, and conclusive evidence has yet
to be obtained regarding the influence of the above-mentioned factors to clearly
establish their influence, in quantitative terms, on the disclosure of public financial
information. Possible inconsistency in study design could account for the uneven
results obtained (Pomeroy and Thornton, 2008). Whatever the reason, there is as
yet insufficient empirical evidence of the validity and generality of these results to
clearly establish the influence of the above-mentioned factors, in quantitative
terms, on the disclosure of public financial information.
Although prior research has addressed the general area of determining factors for
disclosing public sector financial reporting, there is no study in which drivers for
disclosing financial reporting are examined in detail and that erases moderator
variables that could influence the results in prior research. For this purpose, many
advantages are offered by the meta-analysis technique, which is aimed at enabling
statistically significant conclusions by exploring the causes of the inconsistency
identified in earlier published results and the moderator variables responsible for
the heterogeneous results reported (Hunter and Schmidt, 2004; Lipsey and Wilson,
2001). In this regard, the application of the meta-analysis technique could be
relevant to feature different models and variables accounting for the nature and
131
Since the mid-1970s, various studies have been made of the factors promoting
more and better disclosure of public financial information. These studies are
mainly based on agency theory, legitimacy theory, and institutional theory
(Carpenter and Feroz, 2001; Collin et al., 2009; Feroz et al., 2007; Zimmerman
1977). Agency relations within public sector organisations have been argued to
constitute an incentive for public managers to voluntarily disclose the information
that will allow their actions to be monitored and analysed. In recent years, along
with agency theory, institutional theory has been applied to explain the adoption
of innovations in management accounting (Ribeiro and Scapens, 2006; Carpenter
and Feroz, 2001). According to this theory, organisations respond to external
pressures by adopting structures and practices that are considered legitimate and
socially acceptable, thus producing homogeneous practices and structures
(DiMaggio and Powell, 1983; Feroz et al., 2007).
In this context, information disclosure is a symbol of trust and modernity,
constituting a trend that governments adopt in response to external factors
(Hoffman, 1999) requiring greater transparency of public functions, and also to
project an image of good governance. Thus the governments reputation is
enhanced, and hence voters trust in it. Regarding the determinant factors of public
information disclosure, they could be classified into two main groups: institutional
factors (financial condition, intergovernmental subsidies, and political
competition) and environmental factors (municipal size and income level for the
municipality). This approach enables us to determine whether information
transparency and accountability policies applied by local public organisations,
through the greater disclosure of public financial information, depend mainly on a
132
decision taken within the institutional area of the organisation or whether, on the
contrary, the environment affecting these local governments is of greater
significance.
2.1
Institutional factors
Regarding the institutional factors, the most commonly analysed in the academic
literature is the question of financial condition, taking municipal debt as the
principal measure used. Following Robbins and Austin (1986) and Evans and
Patton (1987), financial condition is positively associated with the motivation of
the public manager to provide greater information transparency in local public
administration. This variable is included in the analysis of financial information
disclosure, because it is an integral component of the financial credibility of public
administrations vis-a-vis external agents (Baber 1983; Ingram, 1984). It is also
integral to the governments capacity to meet its payment commitments (Giroux
and Deis, 1993), meaning that public managers must respond to greater demands
for information disclosure in order to minimise conflicts of interest (Baber and
Gore, 2008; Baber and Sen, 1986; Gore, 2004; Zimmerman, 1977). Indeed, in the
public sector, the voluntary provision of information has been seen as a way of
limiting conflicts between citizens and politicians and forms part of agency theory
(Zimmerman, 1977). Under this theory, in order to generate positive signals about
their performance, public managers are promoted to disclose public financial
information as a mechanism for monitoring their actions (Carcaba and Garcia,
2008).
In addition, citizens wish to know the use made of financial resources obtained
from municipal indebtedness, especially with respect to financing the provision of
public services and programmes (Styles and Tennyson, 2007). In this respect,
Liider (1994) and Laswad et al. (2005), among others, have found a positive
association between municipal debt and the voluntary disclosure of public
financial information, because when indebtedness becomes a significant burden,
financial difficulties appear. Thus, there is a greater need to publish reports
reflecting the financial situation and the management policies adopted in this
respect by the organisation. Accordingly, the following hypothesis is proposed:
Hp There is a positive relation between the financial condition o f local
governments and the disclosure ofpublic financial information
Another variable to be considered is the question of the inter-governmental
transfers received by public organisations. These funds are argued to constitute an
essential factor in the disclosure of financial information, in order to control by the
public administrations providing them (Copley, 1991; Ingram and DeJong, 1987;
Robbins and Austin, 1986). In the U.S., researchers have found that the presence
of a substantial proportion of a state's funding by the federal government may
serve to increase federal influence and monitoring of the state's financial
133
Environmental factors
134
(Copley, 1991; Giroux and McLelland, 2003; Gore, 2004; Styles and Tennyson,
2007). Therefore, the following hypothesis is proposed:
H4: There is a positive relation between the size o f local public administrations
and the disclosure o f public financial information
To conclude this analysis of environmental factors, among the external variables
that may influence the disclosure of financial information is income levels in the
municipality (Malone, 2006). Prior research has demonstrated that when residents
income increases they expect to receive better services and a greater amount of
information to confirm that the taxes paid are being implemented effectively
(Giroux, 1989; Giroux and McLelland, 2003). Therefore, the following hypothesis
is proposed:
Hs: There is a positive relation between income levels in the municipality and the
disclosure ofpublic financial information
3
Administrative culture
135
and its relationship with its citizens. This in turn contributes to the importance
granted to transparency and the duty of accountability owed by public
administrations (Kickert, 1997; Pollitt and Bouckaert, 2004; Torres, 2004). The
political and legal setting (Chan and Rosenbloom, 2010), the situation of
administrative and fiscal/financial autonomy (Venugopal and Yilmaz, 2010;
Yilmaz et al., 2008), and the socio-political and ideological contexts (Chan and
Rosenbloom, 2010) are crucial to understanding local government accountability
and the different implementation of NPM reforms.
Prior research has highlighted differences in public administrations degree of
involvement with their citizens, the emphasis on the implementation of NPM
reforms, and their bureaucratic structures and legal systems. It has also highlighted
differences in administrative cultures that affect the evolution of e-Govemment
(Rodriguez et al., 2011), both in providing online public services (Torres et al.,
2005; 2006) and in the public disclosure of financial information (Pina et al.,
2007; 2009; 2010; Rodriguez et al., 2006). Therefore, we would expect a meta
analysis to reveal discrepancies in the disclosure of public financial information
between different countries, in accordance with the corresponding administrative
culture.
EMy. The differences between administrative cultures moderate the relationship
between incentives and the level o f disclosure ofpublic financial information
b)
136
therefore accountability of these (Caba et ah, 2008; Carcaba and Garcia, 2008;
Pina et al., 2007).
The above reasons led us to enquire whether the results obtained in each
individual study might be influenced by the means of disclosure through which
information was accessed. Empirical evidence of this heterogeneity can be
observed when the variables being analysed are citizens per capita income (see
Christiaens, 1999 and Giroux and McLelland, 2003 versus Caba et al., 2008 and
Gandia and Archidona, 2008) or the transfers received from other public
administrations (see Ingram and DeJong, 1987 and Robbins and Austin, 1986
versus Laswad et al., 2005 and Caba et al., 2008).
EM2: Differences in formats o f presentation and disclosure moderate the relation
between incentives and the level ofpublic financial information disclosure
c)
In the sample analysed, the initial studies addressed the role played by economic
and political factors in the choice of accounting policies, auditing levels, and
voluntary disclosure practices (Dwyer and Wilson, 1989; Evans and Patton, 1987;
Giroux, 1989). These studies were based on agency theory (Jensen and Meckling,
1976), legitimacy theory (Preston and Post, 1975), and political factors
(Zimmerman, 1977), and identified various factors affecting accounting and
auditing practices, chief among which was the decision by U.S. public-sector
entities to adopt GAAP. From this research, there began to emerge studies
supported by complementary theories, such as the economic interest group theory
of government (McCormick and Tollison, 1981) or economic factors (Evans and
Patton, 1983; 1987). This enables us to distinguish a first group of studies those
published in the period 1983-1999 and those published more recently.
Other studies have examined how administrative reforms have improved
transparency and accountability, and how this process has been enhanced by new
IT systems. These studies have also identified the determinants favoring greater
financial disclosure by means of the Internet. As shown in Table 1, the first study
to analyse the dissemination of public sector financial information via the Internet
was McLelland and Giroux (2000). Later articles considered public sector reforms
introduced in accordance with NPM principles, and showed that the adoption of
web-based technologies improves public transparency and accountability (Caba et
al., 2008; Carcaba and Garcia, 2008; Pina et al., 2007). Therefore, it is possible to
distinguish a second group of studies those published in the period 2000-2013.
The above considerations led us to enquire whether the results obtained in each
study might be influenced year by when the research was carried out. Empirical
evidence of this heterogeneity can be observed when the variables being analysed
137
are per capita income (see Christiaens, 1999 and Giroux and McLelland, 2003
versus Caba et al., 2008 and Gandia and Archidona, 2008) or the transfers
received from other government agencies (see Ingram and DeJong, 1987 and
Robbins and Austin, 1986 versus Laswad et al., 2005 and Caba et al., 2008).
EM3: Differences in the year o f publication moderate the relation found between
incentives and the level o f disclosure o f public financial information
d)
Finally, the measure used to quantify different determinant factors could account
for the inconsistent results obtained in previous studies (Pomeroy and Thornton,
2008). In this respect, Serrano et al., (2009) observed that, depending on the
measure used, the relation between political competition and the disclosure of
public financial information gave rise to contradictory reports. Similarly, when the
financial condition is measured by the fiscal stress provides a direct association
(Giroux and Deis, 1993), while this association is not significant when the
financial condition is measured by the ratio of total debt (Evans and Patton, 1983;
Giroux and McLelland, 2003; Ingram and DeJong, 1987).
EM4: Differences in methods used to measure the variables considered moderate
the relation between incentives and the level o f disclosure o f public financial
information
To sum up, Table 2 shows the incentives analysed in prior research, the
moderating effects on empirical investigations of incentives to the disclosure of
public financial information, and the hypotheses tested in this paper as regards
their influence on the results obtained.
4
Empirical research
4.1
In the present study, a comprehensive analysis was first made of all the
publications listed in the categories of Public Administration, Information
Science, Computer Science, Information Systems, Economics, and Business and
Finance, indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information for the period 19802011. To do this, we examined the title, abstract (Lan and Anders, 2000; Plumper
and Radaelli, 2004), keywords (Hartley and Kostoff, 2003), and introduction of
each article to ensure that the studys research goals were relevant to our
investigation. In the few cases in which application of these discrimination criteria
was not decisive, we read the entire article.
138
Then, a systematic search was made of the ABI/INFORM, EJS Ebsco, Blackwell,
Scopus, Emerald/Insight, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, Social Science Research
Network (SSRN), Econlit, Ecopapers, and Business Source Premier databases
using descriptors and keywords such as public financial reporting practices,
voluntary disclosure, government accounting, local government, and
accounting disclosure, among others. We then selected the most relevant papers
identified in the first search and performed an exhaustive analysis of the
references cited in them.
All the studies that met the above inclusion-exclusion requirements were
examined to determine whether their aim was to analyse the determinant factors of
the presentation and disclosure of financial information by public organisations,
analysing the theoretical relations applicable. Of the articles resulting from this
search, we discarded studies that did not analyse the determinants of economic
and financial disclosure in local governments. The reason for focusing on research
on local governments is due to the following reasons: a) the local government
context is a fundamental focus in many public sector reforms (Pallot, 2001; Smith,
2004); b) the local government context is a fundamental focus for detecting
financial distress (Zafra et al., 2009) and for achieving the sustainable financial
balanced in the public administration (Dollery and Grant, 2011); and c) the local
government is considered the closest tier (level) of government to citizens because
it is mostly concerned with the daily life of the people (Cegarra et al., 2012). All
this leads local governments to be a central focus on demand on public sector
financial information as a main tool to accomplish their duty of accountability
(Carcaba and Garcia, 2010; Pina et al., 2010; Ryan et al., 2002).
Some of the articles extracted did not provide the statistical information needed
for the meta-analysis technique, and so the authors in question (Carcaba and
Garcia, 2008; 2010; Pina et al., 2007, 2009, 2010) were contacted and requested to
supply the missing information. Thus, all 36 of the articles initially identified were
included in the sample for final analysis. It should be noted that the meta-analysis
technique does not require a large number of studies to produce useful results
(Lipsey and Wilson, 2001), because what is really important is to have a sufficient
number of observations that allow us to undertake meta-analytic study. Therefore,
our review of previous research produced some meta-analytical studies based on a
smaller sample than our own (Bel and Fageda, 2009; Bel et al., 2010; Garcia and
Sanchez, 2010; Longhi et al., 2010; Pomeroy and Thornton, 2008).
For inclusion in our sample, the articles examined had to provide the Pearson or
Spearman (r) correlations addressing the relation between the different variables
considered and the disclosure of public economic and financial information. When
r statistics were not reported, but other statistics transformable into r statistics
were, we applied formulas given by Lipsey and Wilson (2001) and Rosenthal
(1991). Thus, we have a total sample of 30 published studies for final analysis for
139
over three decades. From this sample, we estimated the sign of the relations
between the different variables and the strength of this relation, determining the
sources of difference among the studies. Note: the meta-analysis technique does
not require a large number of studies to produce useful results (Lipsey and Wilson,
2001 ).
4.2
Meta-Analytic Technique
140
141
To evaluate whether empirical correlations are homogeneous, two tests were used:
(1) the 75% rule, according to which if 75% of the observed variance across
studies can be explained by sampling errors [(100) S2e / S2r > 75], there is no true
variance in the studies, and thus the association is non-modulated and
homogeneous; and (2) the Q statistic [(&) (S2r) / (S2e) = (N S2r) / (1 - p2)2], where k
is the number of effect sizes included in the analysis, S2r the total observed
variance, S2e the sampling error variance, N the total sample size of the effect
sizes, and p the mean correlation coefficient. This statistical function has a chisquare distribution with (k -1) degrees of freedom, and a significant Q would
indicate rejection of the null hypothesis of homogeneity.
The hypothesis of homogeneity is rejected in many cases, and so to limit the Type
I error rate a random effect model is used (Hunter and Schmidt, 2000; Shadish and
Haddock, 1994) using V (S2r / k) as the standard error in order to create a 95%
confidence interval around the mean effect size, and to assess the significance of
the null hypothesis, H0: p = 0). In our analysis, no correction is made for statistical
artifacts other than sampling error, such as range restriction and measurement
unreliability, because this information was not provided in the studies analysed.
This is a characteristic limitation of research studies in the financial accounting
field, which nevertheless are not usually subject to the problems of reliability that
affect other areas such as psychology or business management (Garcia and
Sanchez, 2 0 10). Moreover, some researchers do not believe this type of correction
should be applied (Rosenthal, 1994).
4.3
Results analysis
Table 3 shows the global meta-analytic results for the relations between
institutional characteristics (financial condition, inter-governmental grants, and
political competition), environmental factors (size of public administrations and
income level for the municipality), and the level of disclosure of public economic
and financial information.
4.3.1
a)
Institutional factors
Financial Condition
142
Inter-governmental grants
The grant funds received by local public administrations constitute a factor that
has been widely examined by researchers, as shown by a mean correlation of
0.117, and a confidence interval of 0.107,0.127 (see Table 3). Although in some
studies the authors conclude that the receipt of funds from other administrations
may discourage public managers from disclosing economic and financial
information (Giroux and Deis, 1993), the results indicate that the association is
statistically significant and positive (z =14.38; p<0.001). This confirms hypothesis
H2. However, there does exist a high degree of heterogeneity (Q 112.953; p<0.01),
which suggests the existence of factors moderating the relation in question.
Table 5 shows that the explanatory power of the variance of the error has
increased, with heterogeneity disappearing in all cases. Therefore, we conclude
that administrative culture, means of information disclosure, year of publication of
research, and measure used all influence the results achieved in individual studies.
Thus, the hypotheses proposed in this meta-analytic study EMb EM2, EM3, and
EM4 should be accepted.
143
Referring to these results, it should be noted that studies examining the public
financial disclosure by non-Anglo-Saxon municipalities and the Internet are
scarce. Although there is statistical evidence that administrative culture and means
employed for the disclosure of information influence the results, we cannot
generalise due to the low number of observations. However, we note how in the
more recent studies, transfer funds received by municipal governments exert a
greater influence on public managers to disclose information (r = 0.125> r =
0.002). Also, our results show that the measure used does influence the individual
results (and hence, EM4 must be accepted), and that study of this factor alone
revealed a statistically significant positive relationship with respect to current and
capital transfers (r = 0.126, p <0.001).
c)
Political Competition
144
Size
The highest mean correlation of all the incentives considered was that obtained for
the first environmental factor, that is, the size of the public administration, with a
value of 0.173 and a confidence interval of 0.156,0.190, revealing a positive and
statistically significant relation (z = 8.56; p<0.001) (Table 3). The data obtained
lead us to accept hypothesis H4, although the Q value (440.910; p<0.001) suggests
the existence of other factors that could modulate this association. Table 7
illustrates the moderator variables present. The results confirm that the size of the
local government exerts a statistically significant relationship, except for the nonAnglo-Saxon governments. In addition, the explanatory power of the variance of
the error remains low, and heterogeneity of the results persists in all cases. From
these results, we must reject hypotheses EMb EM2, EM3, and EM4. In this regard,
the association is greater when information is disseminated through the Internet (r
= 0.309, p <0.001), recently published articles (r = 0.215, p <0.001), and the
measure used is the total revenue (r = 0.357, p <0.001).
e)
The income level for the municipality presents a statistically significant, positive
relation (z = 3.58; p<0.001), as shown by its confidence interval (0.046,0.121).
This leads us to accept hypothesis H5 (Table 3). Thus, we conclude that the
economic status of the population has a positive and statistically significant
influence (r = 0.084; p <0.001), moderating the disclosure of economic and
financial information in the public sector, although the Q value (39.387; p<0.05)
suggests the existence of other factors that could influence this association.
Table 8 illustrates the influence of the moderator variables considered in this
empirical research. The explanatory power of the variance of the error has
increased and the variability in results has decreased in all cases, so we accepted
all hypotheses EM|, EM2, EM3, and EM4. Although the administrative culture
and dissemination of information exert a noticeable influence, it must be borne in
mind that the few studies that address this variable, in particular when the
disclosure is made via the Internet by non-Anglo-Saxon local governments. In this
regard, income level for the municipality has increasingly become over time a
determinant of financial disclosure by the local governments (r = 0.148, p <0.001),
and when researchers use the per capita citizens' income as the measure used (r =
0.082, p <0.001).
145
This study investigates the statistical validity of empirical results of prior research
on determinants of financial information transparency in municipal public
administrations as a key aspect for accountability, making use of the meta-analysis
technique. The findings indicate that the characteristics of each research study do
influence the results obtained. The prevailing administrative culture, means of
disclosure adopted, year of publication of research, and measure used all influence
the strength and significance of the statistical relations considered. Our empirical
study shows that the measure used for institutional and environmental variables in
empirical models is one of the moderator variables that exert the greatest influence
on the results of individual studies irrespective of the variable analysed.
Accordingly, it would be interesting to establish a homogeneous definition of the
variables to enable comparisons among studies, and thus facilitate consistency and
achieve models favoring information transparency and compliance by local public
administrations with their duty of accountability.
With respect to financial condition, public managers feel pressured to disclose and
justify their management role by reporting financial information. Moreover, recent
studies have shown that public managers face increasing demands from citizens
for financial information, especially in view of rapid changes taking place in
society and the technological innovations that have led to an abundance of new,
alternative mechanisms of accountability (Schillemans et al., 2013). Perhaps this
increase in demand for public financial information, provided online, is due to the
perceived influence of information disclosure on public debt and the economy,
and its value as a tool for assessing the accountability and effectiveness of public
administration (Carcaba and Garcia, 2010; Yang, 2012). This influence is exerted
more strongly in countries where the administrative culture is of the Anglo-Saxon
type.
The results obtained in our meta-analysis show that the influence of financial
condition is greater within Anglo-Saxon public administrations, and that this
factor motivates public managers to disclose financial information. This
association is modulated by the administrative culture, a finding that is consistent
with previous studies (Pina et al., 2009; 2010; Rodriguez et al., 2006; 2013),
according to which the level of information disclosure by public bodies is higher
where the Anglo-Saxon tradition prevails. This is because in common-law
countries the government relies heavily on markets as sources of capital (La Porte
et al., 2006), and so there is a more highly developed tradition of public financial
accountability and transparency. Therefore, public managers, especially in AngloSaxon countries, should establish financial transparency policies to reduce the
pressure to which they are exposed.
146
In addition, our results indicate that, over time, the governments financial
condition is increasingly pushing local public managers to disclose financial
information in order to defend the policies adopted, and to show that the
governments situation is financially sustainable (Rodriguez et al., 2014). This
result may be a consequence of the economic and financial crisis that has
impacted severely on local governments and society in recent years. Moreover,
social and technological changes have established the publics right to know what
the government is planning, what it hopes to achieve, and what this will mean to
the population, and subsequently, the extent to which goals have been achieved
and how the budget has been distributed (Schillemans et al., 2013). These findings
underline the need to create transparency policies and portals to communicate
financial information effectively.
With respect to inter-governmental transfers, our findings confirm the existence of
a strong positive association with the disclosure of financial information when this
disclosure is made in hardcopy format. In this case, the level of public
administration and the type of administrative culture exert moderating effects on
the data achieved in studies examining information disclosure as hardcopy.
However, when information is made available online, the relation between this
disclosure and the level of inter-governmental transfers, although positive, is not
significant, possibly due to the scant number of studies examining this
relationship; this aspect might limit the validity of our findings in this respect.
These results highlight the importance of disseminating public financial
information by local authorities to account for transfers received from national or
supra-national administrations, usually in hardcopy format. In fact, due to the
financial dependence of local governments, these entities are particularly
motivated to disclose public economic and financial information, and to
demonstrate that the funds received have been used in accordance with the
requirements of the programme for which they were assigned (Copley, 1991;
Ingram and DeJong, 1987). This would have the effect of corroborating the
efficiency of their management and the good use made of these resources
(Robbins and Austin, 1986; Ltider, 1992). In this sense, the fact of being
subsumed today in an economic and financial crisis has increased pressure on
local governments for more transparent financial reporting, as evidenced by the
results of our study in relation to the importance attached to year of publication as
a key element for the association between inter-government transfers and public
financial disclosure.
Moreover, it seems clear that the economic variables, such as financial condition
and inter-governmental grants, have a marked effect on the results obtained by
individual studies. These variables have a traditional legal value of accountability
and are influenced by administrative culture, and different results are explained by
agency theory (Feroz et al., 2007; Zimerman, 1977). Thus, these variables have a
147
148
However, this factor is where the highest level of variability was detected, and the
influence of the moderating factors is important, especially regarding the measure
used and means of disclosure chosen to distribute information. The association is
greater when information is disclosed by means of the Internet, because large
cities offer programmes and services to a greater number of residents and consume
a greater quantity of resources (Christiaens, 1999; Copley, 1991; Giroux and
McLelland, 2003; Giroux and Shield, 1993). Thus, their populations are more
likely to demand a greater volume of financial reports and services (Moon and
Norris, 2005). As the previous variable, the application of new technologies offers
better support for economic and financial disclosure by municipal agencies, as the
associations are strongest and statistically positive in most recent studies and when
these studies analysed the dissemination via the Internet.
Finally, the results obtained confirm that municipal wealth is a variable that is
positively associated with the level of disclosure of public information, and so
municipalities with a higher per capita income disclose a greater volume of public
financial information (Giroux and McLelland, 2003; Ingram, 1984). In addition,
previous investigations have shown that it is in wealthier public administrations
where there is greater access to this information, through the implementation of
new technologies. Thus, there is a relation between per capita income and access
to new technologies (Ho, 2002); hence the association found in our meta-analytic
study is stronger with respect to information disclosed online. Therefore, access to
the Internet, and the public financial information disclosed via this medium,
depend to a large extent on municipal wealth and the per capita income of the
population (Serrano et al., 2009; Tennyson and Styles, 2007).
In conclusion, our study empirically shows that most of the hypotheses contained
in the academic literature are confirmed, although the influence of each of the
variables considered is subject to moderator variables, the most significant of
which is the measure used. This may account for much of the inconsistency
present in the results obtained in previous research (Pomeroy and Thornton,
2008). This factor is followed in importance by means of information disclosure
examined and year of publication of research, and in most cases stronger
associations are found when information disclosure via the Internet is analysed
and recent studies.
In this article, we set out to establish a basis for subsequent analysis. Our findings
show that the five variables analysed (financial condition, inter-governmental
grants, political competition, size of government, and income level per capita)
should be considered in future research. In addition, when new variables are found
to meet the requirements for the application of meta-analysis techniques, they
could be included in the analysis, with the aim of designing an econometric model
including all the variables that influence information disclosure. Future research
could usefully identify the main stakeholders influencing information disclosure
149
and make use of surveys to directly examine the need for public sector financial
information. Nevertheless, the present article represents a first step toward
achieving a framework to design the complex econometric model previously
mentioned, and our findings show that the five variables analysed should be
included in any future econometric model in this area.
This study seeks to determine which variables are important in explaining the
models considered in previous research, and how local public managers could take
action to improve financial information disclosure. One strategy that could be used
to promote greater information transparency would be to make greater use of IT to
meet social demands more efficiently and effectively, making management
systems more transparent, democratic, and participatory. In this way, citizens
would be better informed and could play a more active advisory role in public
affairs, and the better governance achieved would contribute to social and
economic development.
All these considerations lead us to inquire whether it is possible to construct a
single model of incentives for the disclosure of public financial information that is
valid for all environments. Future studies should investigate such aspects further,
adding new variables and effects that might modulate the relations we have
examined, and subsequently develop a framework enabling public managers and
citizens to obtain a useful instrument facilitating accountability by public
administrations.
References
Baber, W. R. (1983) Towards understanding the role of Auditing in the public sector,
Journal o f Accounting and Economics, 5(3), pp. 213-227.
Baber, W. R. & Gore, A. K. (2008) Consequences o f GAAP Disclosure Regulation
Evidence from Municipal Debt Issues. The Accounting Review, 83(3), pp. 565-592, doi:
10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.565.
Baber. W. R. & Sen. P. K. (1984) The role of generally accepted reporting methods in the
public sector: An empirical test, Journal o f Accounting and Public Policy, 3(2). pp. 91106, doi: 10.1016/0278-4254(84)90002-4.
Ball. R.. Kothari, S. P. & Robin, A. (2000) The effect of International Institutional Factors
on properties of accounting earnings, Journal o f Accounting and Economics, 29( 1). pp.
1-51, doi: 10.1016/SO165-4101 (00)00012-4.
Bel, G. & Fageda. X. (2009) Factors explaining local privatization: a meta-regression
analysis, Public Choice, 139(1-2). pp. 105-119. doi: 10.1007/s 11127-008-9381 -z.
Bel, G., Fageda, X. & Warner, M. (2010) A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and
water services, Journal o f Policy Analysis and Management, 29(3), pp. 553-577, doi:
10.1002/pam. 20509.
Brown D, (2005) Electronic government and public administration. International Review o f
Administrative Sciences, 71(2), pp. 241-254. doi: 10.1177/0020852305053883.
Burritt, R. L. & Schaltegger, S. (2010) Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or
trend?, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829-846, doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513571011080144.
150
Caba, C., Rodriguez, M. P. & Lopez, A. M. (2008) e-Government process and incentives
for online public financial information, Online Information Review, 32(3), pp. 379-400,
doi: 10.1108/14684520810889682.
Carcaba. A. & Garcia, J. (2008) Factors behind the Disclosure of Accounting Information
Online on Behalf of Local Governments, Revista Espahola de Financiacion y
Contabilidad -Spanish Journal o f Finance and Accounting, 38(137), pp. 63-84.
Carcaba, A. & Garcia, J. (2010) Determinants of Online Reporting of Accounting
Information by Spanish Local Government Authorities, Local Government Studies,
36(5): pp. 679-695, 10.1108/14684520810865976.
Carmeli, A. (2003) Introduction: Fiscal and financial crises of local governments,
International Journal o f Public Administration, 26(13), pp. 1423-1430, doi:
10.1081 /PAD-120024404#tabModule.
Carpenter, V. L. (1991) The influence of Political Competition on the Decision to Adopt
GAAP, Journal o f Accounting and Public Policy, 10(2), pp. 105-134, doi:
10.1016/0278-4254(91 >90008-8.
Carpenter, V. L. & Feroz, E. H. (2001) Institutional Theory and Accounting Rule Choice:
An Analysis of Four US State Governments Decision to Adopt Generally Accounting
Accepted Principles, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7-8). pp. 565-596, doi:
10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00038-6.
Cegarra, J. G., Cordoba, J. R. & Moreno, J. L. (2012) E-govemment and citizens
engagement with local affairs through e-websites: The case of Spanish municipalities,
International Journal o f Information Management, 32(5), pp. 469-478, doi:
10.1016/j.ij infomgt.2012.02.008.
Chan H. S. & Rosenbloom, D. H. (2010) Four Challenges to Accountability in
Contemporary Public Administration: Lessons From the United States and China,
Administration
and
Society,
42( 1Suppl),
pp.
11S-33S,
doi:
10.1177/0095399710361851.
Chan, J. L. (2003) Government accounting: an assessment of theory, purposes and
standards. Public Money and Management, 23(1), pp. 13-20, doi: 10.1111/14679302.00336#. VLl-syuG_T8.
Christiaens, J. (1999) Financial accounting reforms in Flemish municipalities: An empirical
investigation, Financial Accountability and Management, 15(1), pp 21-40, doi:
10.1111/1468-0408.00072.
Collin, S. O., Tagesson, T., Andersson, A., Cato, J. & Hansson, K. (2009) Explaining the
Choice of Accounting Standards in Municipal Corporations: Positive Accounting
Theory and Institutional Theory as Competitive or Concurrent Theories, Critical
Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2). pp. 141-174, doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.003.
Cooper, H. M. & Hedges, L. V. (eds.) (1994) The Handbook o f Research Synthesis (New
York: Sage).
Cooper, H. M. & Hedges, L. V. (eds.) (1994) The Handbook o f Research Synthesis (New
York: Sage).
Copley. P. A. (1991) The Association between Municipal Disclosure Practices and Audit
Quality, Journal o f Accounting and Public Policy 10(4), pp. 245-266, doi:
10.1016/0278-4254(91 )90001-Z.
Cuillier, D. & Piotrowski. S. J. (2009) Internet information-seeking and its relation to
support for access to government records, Government Information Quarterly, 26(3),
pp. 441-449. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2009.03.001.
Cullen, R. & Sommer, L. (2011) Participatory' democracy and the value of online
community networks: An exploration of online and offline communities engaged in
151
152
153
154
155
156
AUTHOR /STUDIES
COUNTRY
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
NLANDS
USA
ONLINE VS.
HARDCOPY
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Online
1032-977-269-839
99
151-145-148-444
97
69-73-47-95
127
129
119
110
50
293
100
92
+;Non-Significant
"
USA
USA
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
36
92
+;Non-Sign./Sign
USA
USA
USA
N.ZELAND
USA
USA
USA
USA
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Hardcopy
Hardcopy/Online
Hardcopy
Online
Online
Hardcopy
+;Significant
+;Non-Sign./Sign.
Mixed results
+;Non-Significant
+;Significant
PORTUGAL
EU
ITALY
SPAIN
Hardcopy
Online
Hardcopy
Online
87-175
66-48
107
60
57
104
162
6573-6848-7197-74108169
175
76
287
130
SPAIN
SPAIN
EU
EU
SPAIN
SPAIN
SPAIN
SPAIN
SPAIN
Online
Online
Online
Online
Online
Online
Online
Online
Online
65
334
75
57
92
334
100
103
33
+;Non-Significant
Mixed Results
POLITICAL COMPETITION
SAMPLE SIZE
SIZE
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
Mixed results
+;Significant
+;Significant
-;Non-Sign./Sing.
+;Significant
+;Significant
-
Mixed results
-
+;Significant
Mixed results
-
+;Non-Significant
Mixed Results
+; Non-Significant
+;Non-Significant
+;Non-Significant
MUNICIPAL WEALTH
157
-;Non-significant
Mixed results
-;Non-significant
+;NonSign./Sign.
+;Significant
Mixed results
-;Non-Significant
Mixed results
+;Non-significant
+;Non-significant
^Significant
Mixed results
+;Significant
+;NonSignificant
-;Non-Sign./Sign.
+;Significant
Mixed results
Mixed results
-;Non-Significant
+;Significant
+;Significant
+;Significant
+;NonSignificant
+;Significant
+;Significant
+;NonSign./Sign.
Mixed results
+;Significant
+;Significant
+;NonSignificant
+;NonSignificant
+;Significant
+; Significant
+;Significant
+;Non-Significant
+;Non-Significant
Mixed results
+;Non-Significant
+;Significant
+;Significant
Mixed results
+;Significant
+;NonSignificant
+;Non-Significant
+;NonSignificant
-;Non-Significant
+;Non-Significant
Mixed results
+;Significant
+;Significant
+;Significant
+;Significant
+;Significant
+;Significant
+;Significant
+;Significant
+;Significant
+; Significant
+; Significant
Mix Results
+:Significant
+;Significant
+;NonSignificant
NOTE: The studies contribute more than one observation to the sample because they include different
estimations with different data sets, different explanatory variables or different models
158
Table 2:
M oderator Variables
C ulture
Administrative EM.
Means employed
for the disclosure of
public financial
information (online vs.
hardcopy EMZ
Y ear of publication
EM3
M easurement of
variables EM 4
Table 3:
Independent Variable
\
/
Meta-analytic data on the relations between the variables considered and the
disclosure of public financial-economic information
K
Mean
Correlation
% Se2/ S r2
(r)
Financial Condition
80
0.098+
Inter-governmental
34
0.117+
Grants
Political Competition
36
0.026
79
Size
0.173+
Municipal Wealth
25
0.084+
*p <0.1 * * p < 0 .0 5 * * * p < 0 .0 1 + p < 0.001
Table 4:
47.27
30.10
68.26
17.92
63.47
Confidence Interval
(95%)
Min.
Max.
0.081
0.115
0.107
0.127
0.000
0.156
0.046
0.052
0.190
0.121
xVi
169.240+
112.953+
52.743**
440.910+
39.387**
K
Independent Variable
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
Administrative Culture
64
Anglo-Saxon
Non Anglo-Saxon
16
Dissemination of Information
Paper
65
Digital
16
Year of Publication
1980-1999
39
41
2000-2013
Mean
Correlation
% Se2/ S r2
(r)
Confidence Interval
(95%)
Min.
Max.
x2k_,
0.099+
0.094*
55.97
28.36
0.080
0.054
0.118
0.135
114.354+
56.425+
0.096+
0.112**
51.85
33.18
0.077
0.065
0.114
0.159
125.363+
45.214+
0.079+
0.134+
57.54
42.99
0.101
0.163
67.781***
95.381+
0.058
0.105
Measurement of variables
Financial viability
11
0.068**
Ratio total debt
48
0.115+
Leverage
8
0.048
*p<0.1 **p < 0.05 *** p < 0.01 + p < 0 .0 0 1
Table 5:
49.14
78.76
72.61
0.124
0.135
0.105
22.383**
78.761**
11.018
Independent Variable
K
Mean
% Se2/ Sr2
INTERCorrelation
GOVERNMENTAL
(r)
GRANTS
Administrative Culture
Anglo-Saxon
27
0.118+
25.49
Non Anglo-Saxon
7
0.071***
100
Dissemination of Information
Paper
30
0.118+
28.44
Digital
7
0.071**
100
Year of Publication
1980-1999
17
0.002
29.00
2000-2013
16
0.125+
95.33
Measurement of variables
Current and capital
transfers
12
0.126+
89.15
Ratio inter
22
0.010
36.89
governmental receipts
*p < 0.1 **p < 0.05 ***p < 0.01 + p < 0.001
Table 6:
0.011
0.094
-0.009
159
xY,
Confidence Interval
(95%)
Min.
Max.
0.108
0.008
0.128
0.134
105.94+
4.840
0.108
0.008
0.128
0.134
105.490
4.803
-0.038
0.115
0.042
0.135
58.618+
16.783
0.116
0.136
-0.027
0.046
13.461
59.639+
Independent Variable
K
POLITICAL
COMPETITION
Administrative Culture
Anglo-Saxon
27
Non Anglo-Saxon
9
Dissemination of Information
Paper
23
Digital
13
Year of Publication
1980-1999
19
2000-2013
17
Measurement of variables
Ratio
candidates
/
available position
9
Mean
Correlation
% Se2/
sr2
(r)
Confidence Interval
(95%)
Min.
Max.
xY,
-0.013
0.153+
100
100
-0.043
0.102
0.016
0.205
19.135
4.297
-0.009
0.118+
100
80.43
-0.153
0.092
0.135
0.166
17.666
16.164
-0.020
0.111 +
100
93.33
-0.052
0.069
0.012
0.155
11.363
18.214
0.054
87.30
0.006
0.143
10.309
160
Dichotomous variable
21
0.003
78.82
-0.028
Inverse of index____________ 3______ 0.130+________ [00_______ 0.069
*p< 0.1 **p <0.05 ***p <0.01 + p < 0.001
Table 7:
Meta-analytic data on the relations between the size of the local public
administration and the disclosure of public financial-economic information
Independent
K
Mean
% Se2/ S r2
Variable
Correlati
SIZE
on (r)
Administrative Culture
Anglo-Saxon
57
0.170+
25.63
14
Non Anglo-Saxon
18.34
0.027
Dissemination of Information
Paper
58
0.133+
18.93
Digital
21
0.309+
33.09
Year of Publication
1980-1999
32
0.142+
18.15
2000-2013
47
0.215+
18.62
M easurem ent of variables
Registered
17
0.268+
28.22
inhabitants
Population logarithm
51
0.129+
18.41
Total revenue
8
0.357+
48.46
*p<0.1 **p < 0.05 ***p<0.01 + p < 0 .0 0 1
Table 8:
0.033
26.641
0.191______0.646
^
V 2
A k-1
Confidence
Interval (95%)
Min.
Max.
0.150
-0.019
0.189
0.052
222.370+
76.335+
0.114
0.275
0.153
0.342
306.389+
63.458**
0.119
0.189
0.164
0.229
176.275+
252.436+
0.234
0.302
60.239+
0.109
0.272
0.150
0.443
276.98+
16.507**
Independent Variable
K
Mean
MUNICIPAL
Correlation
WEALTH
(r)
Administrative Culture
Anglo-Saxon
23
0.081 +
Non Anglo-Saxon
4
0.086
Dissemination of Information
Paper
19
0.052**
Digital
6
0.157+
Year of Publication
1980-1999
12
0.014
2000-2013
13
0.148+
M easurement of variables
Per
capita
citizens
22
0.082+
income
Own revenue per capita
6
0.011
*p <0.1 **p < 0.05 ***p < 0.01 + p < 0.001
% Se2/ S r2
Confidence Interval
(95%)
Min.
Max.
XV,
74.57
43.78
0.041
-0.013
0.120
0.185
30.842
9.137**
81.30
60.53
0.007
0.090
0.098
0.224
23.371
9.912*
84.54
97.50
-0.040
0.096
0.069
0.199
14.194
13.333
60.69
0.061
0.121
36.249**
100
-0.072
0.095
5.599
Copyright of Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government is the property of Institute for
Local Self-Government & Public Procurement Maribor and its content may not be copied or
emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written
permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.