Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DOI 10.1007/s00170-014-6562-4
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 29 July 2013 / Accepted: 28 October 2014 / Published online: 12 November 2014
# Springer-Verlag London 2014
1 Introduction
The increasing demand for miniaturized products in various
applications, such as biomedical implants, integrated circuits
and micro-satellites, leads to the development of tool-based
micromachining processes. Tool-based micromachining,
commonly known as mechanical micromachining, is a
manufacturing technology that uses a solid micro-tool with
geometrically defined cutting edges, in the subtractive fabrication of devices or features with at least some of their
dimensions in the micrometer range (1999 m) [1].
Subsequently, the dimension is adapted to 500 m [2, 3]. A
tool-based micromachining differs from macro-regime machining in terms of size effect and uncut chip thickness [4].
Microendmilling is one of the tool-based micromachining
processes, used for producing micro-components such as
micro-moulds, micro-dies, micro-channels, micro-gears, micro-propellers, micro-fluidic devices, micro-heat sinks and
micro-heat exchangers. In microendmilling, normally, the diameter of the endmill is comparable to the size of the cutting
edge radius or material grain size. Microendmilling is carried
out with a microendmill, of a size less than 500 m, with a
cutting edge radius of up to 2 m. The advantage of
microendmilling is that it is capable of removing a wide range
of materials in three dimensions with complex features and
high aspect ratios [4, 5]. However, the quality of the
microendmilled components as well as the formation of chips
and their morphology depends upon the condition (good or
worn out) of the tool. Therefore, monitoring the tool wear,
chip formation mechanism and chip morphology is an
1500
1501
microturning of steel. Prakash et al. [28] studied the correlation between the AERMS and chip morphology, during the
microendmilling of aluminum alloy. They have observed the
transition of chips from continuous type to segmental type,
during the increase in the tool wear from initial to progressive
wear regions.
Researchers made attempts to correlate the chip formation mechanism with the acquired AE signals
[2932]. Jackson [29] observed that the chip formation
mechanism in microendmilling is due to the influence
of the machining parameters (tool materials, tool angles,
edge geometries, etc.) and machining environments (machine tool deflections, cutting fluids, etc.). Lee et al.
[30] categorized the various sources of AE generation,
according to the size of the material removal (Fig. 1).
Mian et al. [31] investigated the chip formation mechanisms using discrete wavelet transformation (DWT) of
the AE signals in the microendmilling of different workpiece materials (copper, steel, titanium and nickel alloys). They have decomposed the AE signals into different frequency bands such as D1 (5001000 kHz), D2
(250500 kHz), D3 (125250 kHz), D4 (62.5-125 kHz)
and D5 (32.2562.5 kHz), which are all related to
intergranular micro-fracture, inclusions, cleavage/microfracture, shearing and microvoids, respectively. They
have also computed the AE-specific energies of the
decomposed signals in different frequency bands to correlate with the chip formation mechanisms. From the
literature review, it is observed that the application of
the AE sensor for TCM has not been fully explored in
microendmilling, even though it is reliable. Therefore,
in this work, an attempt has been made to study the
Table 1 Machining
parameters
Speed
(rpm)
Feed
(m/flute)
Depth of
cut (m)
2800
50
1502
1
2
3
4
5
6
Machining
time (s)
240
480
720
960
1200
1440
Tool wear
[VB] (m)
0
2.5
11.0
12.5
16.5
27.5
Surface roughness
[Ra] (m)
0.502
0.274
0.683
1.000
0.427
0.283
Acoustic emission
[AERMS] (mV)
14.1
10.9
11.2
51.4
12
12.6
Chip width
(m)
110
112
100
92
83
72
D1
D2
D3
D4
D5
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.05
0.03
0.04
0.80
0.65
0.56
0.94
0.68
0.77
8.15
9.24
9.28
9.61
6.14
8.32
8.08
9.31
8.99
9.39
6.31
8.56
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
60
Tool wear
AERMS
1.2
Ra
40
0.8
20
0.4
Ra( m)
0
0
240
480
720
960
1200
0.0
1440
1503
s; t jsj 2
ht i
s
The main advantage of the wavelets is that they are localized in space. In this work, the DWT is utilized for
decomposing the acquired AE signal
For the given AE signal f (t), the DWT can be written as
follows:
c j f t ht *c j1 f t
d j f t gt *c j1 f t
c0 f t f t
where h (t) and g (t) are the high-pass and low-pass filters
derived from the wavelet function (t), while cj and dj are the
110 m
100 m
100 m
(Fresh tool)
100 m
100 m
100 m
d) Elemental chip
(Tool wear at 12.5 m)
100 m
1504
X
k
hk 2t
gk 2t
k
d j f t G c j1 f t
t1
V Di t 2 dt
10
t0
Chip
Sliding
Sticking
specific energy has been used by researchers for identifying the chip formation mechanism [22, 32].
3 Experimental details
The MIKROTOOLS made DT110 Integrated Multi Process
Micromachining Machine Tool has been used for the experiment (Fig. 2). The machine tool has an X-Y table of resolution
0.1 m, with the maximum traverse range of 200, 100 and
100 mm in the X, Y and Z axes, respectively. Microendmilling
is performed, using a two-flute carbide endmill (Model:
UMIE 3052; Make: Speed Tiger Precision Technology,
Taiwan) of 500-m diameter, with 1.93-m nose radius (obtained using the SEM image), which is coated with aluminum
titanium nitride (AlTiN) of 400-nm thickness. The workpiece
material is aluminum alloy 1100 (AA 1100), and its chemical
composition is aluminum 99.22 %, copper 0.011 %, silicon
0.014 %, iron 0.425 % and manganese 0.05 %, which are
measured using optical emission spectroscopy. AA1100 is
typically used in the manufacturing of micro-heat exchangers,
which need microslots. The metallographic study of the aluminum workpiece is carried out using a metallurgical microscope to identify its homogeneity (Fig. 3). The microhardness
1505
of the workpiece material is measured, using the microVickers hardness tester (Make: Wilson Wolpert, Germany)
in four different locations, and the average is recorded. The
average Vickers hardness of the workpiece is found to be
80.85 HVat 0.5-kg load. The microendmilling is carried out in
dry conditions. The experimental parameters (Table 1) used in
this study were selected, based on the preliminary experimental results obtained, using the design of experiment approach
[33].
AE signals are acquired with the help of an AE sensor
(Model: 8152, Make: Kistler,) in the frequency range of 50
900 kHz mounted on the workpiece by means of screw
(Fig. 2). Piezotron coupler (Model: 5125B, Make: Kistler) is
used to process the acquired high-frequency AE signals. The
AE signals are acquired at a sampling frequency of 2 MHz.
Thereafter, the AE signals are converted into digital ones,
using National Instruments make (Model: PCI-6133), 16-bit
multi-channel analog-to-digital conversion card. During the
preliminary trials, it is observed that the AE events occur
significantly at 150300 kHz (Fig. 12). Therefore, the signals
were analysed up to the frequency range of 600 kHz. For the
signal processing, the first one million data points are collected for the analysis, during each machining trial. Among the
one million data points, the first 65,536 data points were
a) Fresh tool
Buildup edge
B
Buildup edge
1506
a) Fresh tool
1507
0.03
0.02
Amplitude (V)
0.01
0
-0.01
-0.02
-0.03
-0.04
-0.05
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
x 10
-3
-3
0
-5
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0
-0.05
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0
x 10
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
-3
0
-2
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
1508
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
700
800
900
1000
700
800
900
1000
700
800
900
1000
700
800
900
1000
1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
100
200
300
400
500
600
100
200
300
400
500
600
100
200
300
400
500
600
Fig. 11 FFT of the decomposed AE signal at different frequencies (tool wear 27.5 m)
the tool wear is found to be lesser in value than that of macroregime endmilling. This is due to the size of the microendmill.
The same is also observed by Malekian et al. [11]. From
Figs. 4 and 5, it is observed that, during 720 s of the machining
time, significant changes start to appear in the chip formation
and in the tool wear. During the machining period up to 720 s,
mostly tight curl chips are observed (Fig. 5ac); after that (i.e.
from 721 to 1440 s), elemental or short comma chips are
observed (Fig. 5df). Therefore, it can be deduced, which up
to 720 s of machining time (i.e. the tool wear up to 11 m) can
be considered as the initial wear region, and the machining
time from 721 to 1440 s (i.e. the tool wear from 11 to 27.5 m)
can be considered as the progressive wear region. The accelerated wear region is not observed within the machining time
from the present study.
Figure 4 and Table 2 also indicate a non-uniform trend of
Ra, AERMS and chip width with respect to machining time. In
conventional macro-regime machining, generally, it is observed that as the tool wear increases, the Ra is found to
increase [34, 35]. However, in tool-based micromachining,
due to the size of the microendmill, the Ra is found to have a
non-uniform trend. The non-uniform trend may be due to the
formation of interrupted chips that occur between the cutting
edge and the workpiece and also may due to the formation of
the buildup edge in the tool flank. This is also similarly
observed by Barry et al. [24], Kim et al. [25] and Simoneau
et al. [26]. From Figs. 6, 7 and 8, it is observed that the
continuous removal of material from the workpiece during
microendmilling leads to the formation of a buildup edge,
which is found to be attached and then detached at the sliding
1509
-100
Machining frequency
Power/frequency (dB/Hz)
-102
-104
Fresh tool
Tool wear at 2.5 m
Tool wear at 11 m
Tool wear at 12.5 m
Tool wear at 16.5 m
Tool wear at 27.5 m
-106
-108
-110
-112
-114
-116
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
Frequency (MHz)
0.4
0.45
0.5
In order to identify the chip formation mechanism, the AEspecific energy was computed from the decomposed signals
of D1D5 levels at different tool wear stages, namely fresh
tool and tool wear with 2.5, 11, 12.5, 16.5 and 27.5 m
(Fig. 12 and Table 2). From Fig. 12, it is observed that the
higher AE-specific energy is distributed within the
decomposed signals of the D3 and D4 levels, while low
energy is distributed in the decomposed signals of the D1,
D2 and D5 levels. The occurrence of high AE-specific energy
distribution at D3 and D4 levels indicates that the AE activities are due to the shearing or microfracture mode of the chip
formation mechanisms (Fig. 1). Figure 12 also indicates that
there is an increase in the trend of the AE-specific energy, with
the increase in the tool wear during first minute to 960 minutes
(tool wear up to 12.5 m). This may be attributed to the
effective interaction of the tool edge radius of the
microendmill with the workpiece material. A similar observation is made by Mian et al. [31]. However, there is a decreasing trend of the AE-specific energy with tool wear of 16.5 m
at D3 as well as D4 levels (Fig. 12). This may be due to the
-4
2.7x10
-4
Region of
elemental chip
formation
1.8x10
-5
150
To
ol
we
ar
(
Region of
curl chip
formation
0.0
27.5
16.5
12.5
9.0x10
11
2.5
Fresh tool
200
250
Frequency (kHz)
300
-4
3.6x10
1510
5 Conclusions
In this work, the effects of tool wear on Ra, chip formation
mechanisms and chip morphology during the
microendmilling of aluminum alloy (AA1100) are studied
with the acquired AE signals. The AE signal is analysed in
References
1. Mahalik NP (2007) Micromanufacturing and nanotechnology.
Springer, India
2. Donfeld D, Min S, Takeuchi Y (2006) Recent advances in mechanical micromachining. Ann CIRP 55(2):745768
3. Alting L, Kimura F, Hansen HN, Bissacco G (2003) Micro engineering. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(2):635657
4. Camara MA, Campos Rubio JC, Abrao AM, Davim JP (2012) State
of the art of micromilling of materials, a review. J Mater Sci Technol
28(8):673685
5. Bissacco G, Hansen HN, De Chiffre L (2005) Micromilling of
hardened tool steel for mould making applications. J Mater Process
Technol 167:201207
6. Asad ABMA, Masaki T, Rahman M, Lim HS, Wong YS (2007)
Tool-based micro-machining. J Mater Process Technol 192193:
204211
7. Filiz S, Conley CM, Wasserman MB, Ozdoganlar OB (2007) An
experimental investigation of micro-machinability of copper 101
using tungsten carbide micro-endmills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:
10881100
8. Takacs M, Vero B, Meszaros I (2003) Micromilling of metallic
materials. J Mater Process Technol 138:152155
9. Dolinsek S, Kopac J (1999) Acoustic emission signals for tool wear
identification. Wear 225229:295303
10. Haber RE et al (2004) An investigation of tool-wear monitoring in a
high-speed machining process. Sensors Actuators A 116:539545
11. Malekian M, Park SS, Jun MBG (2009) Tool wear monitoring of
micro-milling operations. J Mater Process Technol 209:49034914
1511
24. Barry J, Byne G, Lennon G (2001) Observations on chip formation
and acoustic emission in machining Ti6Al4V alloy. Int J Mach Tools
Manuf 41:10551070
25. Kim CJ, Mayor JR, Ni J (2004) A static model of chip formation in
microscale milling. Trans ASME 126:710718
26. Simoneau A, Ng E, Elbestawi MA (2006) Chip formation during
microscale cutting of carbon steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:467481
27. Segreto T, Simeone A, Teti R (2012) Chip form classification in
carbon steel turning through cutting force measurement and principal
component analysis. Procedia CIRP 2:4954, 1st CIRP Global Web
Conference: Interdisciplinary Research in Production Engineering
(CIRPE2012)
28. Prakash M, Kanthababu M (2013) In-process tool condition monitoring using acoustic emission sensor in microendmilling. Int J Mach
Sci Technol 17(2):209227
29. Jackson MJ (2005) Primary chip formation during the
micromachining of engineering materials. ProQuest Sci J 219245
30. Lee DE, Hwang I, Valente CMO, Oliveira JFG, Dornfeld DA (2006)
Precision manufacturing process monitoring with acoustic emission.
Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(2):176188
31. Mian AJ, Driver N, Mativenga PT (2011) Chip formation in microscale milling and correlation with acoustic emission signal. Int J Adv
Manuf Technol 56:6378
32. Mian AJ, Driver N, Mativenga PT (2011) Identification of factors that
dominate size effect in micro-machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:
383394
33. Prakash M, Kanthababu M, Moorthy TV (2010) Effect of
microendmilling parameters on surface roughness in steel alloy.
Proceedings of 3rd International and 24th AIMTDR Conference,
Vishakhapatanam.
34. Nakamoto K, Katahira K, Ohmori H, Yamazaki K, Aoyama T (2012)
A study on the quality of micro-machined surfaces on tungsten
carbide generated by PCD micro end-milling. CIRP Ann Manuf
Technol 61:567570
35. Kuram E, Ozcelik B (2013) Multi-objective optimization using
Taquchi based grey relational analysis for micro-milling of Al 7075
material with bass nose end mill. J Meas 46:18491864