Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
9%
6%
9%
25%
Seam 4
Marpol
Mar Law
Mar Pow
Figure 2.0
English
Filipino
ICT
6%
75%
PP2
Electro 3
AuxMach
Thermo 3
PersMan
Filipino
Figure 2.1
In Figure 2.0 and 2.1 shown the percentage of courses that indicates the courses that are
common or prone to change or to have an absent in the courses of Class 2016 Deck and Engine
Department. In the Deck department, the common subject that doesnt have a regular instructor
is the Seamanship 4 31% and Marine Pollution 25%. While the ICT course indicates that there
was no answer wherein it doesnt have an instructor.
Department. The pie shows clearly that the cadets had a problem in the Powerplant2 that has
75% in the figure. And the other subject like Thermodynamics and Filipino doesnt show results
that they had no instructor or changed instructor.
IAMSAR
Deckwatchkeeping
3%Personnel
9% Management
LCH
9%
Reseach
21%
Marine Environment
3%
3%
Filipino
Social Science 2
Social Science 3
27%
Philosophy
9%
3%
3%
9%
Figure 2.3
Electro 3
EW Auto 1
19%
Main & Repair MR
Reseach 1
31%
19%
Philosophy 1
4%
4%
15%
8%
Filipino 1
Math 1
Figure 2.4
In Figure 2.3 and 2.4 shown the percentage of courses that indicates the courses
that are common or prone to change or to have an absent in the courses of Class 2017 Deck and
Engine Department. The Deck Departments graph shows that the top 2 subjects that had
encountered changes and absences are the Personnel Management 28% and Social Science 2
21%. While the Engine Department side, the Philosophy 1 has the greater absence followed by
the Automation 1 and Engine Watchkeeping. Then Math 1 and Powerplant 3 indicates there were
no absences or problem in changing the instructor.
19%
19%
50%
Cel Nav
E Nav
Deckwatch 2
CH
Math 3
Mechanics
PE 3
IT
Figure 2.5
English 3
36%
50%
Thermo
AuxMach
Electro 3
MachShop
Mechanics
English 3
PE 3
IT
Math 3
Figure 2.6
In Figure 2.5 and 2.6 shown the percentage of courses that indicates the courses
that are common or prone to change or to have an absent in the courses of Class 2018
Deck and Engine Department. The pie graph of the Deck Department shows that the
Deck Watchkeeping 2 had the most number of absences or change of instructor that has
50% then the English 3 and Cargo Handling with 19% each. The Subjects Celestial
Navigation shows no absences or problems. In the Engine Department, it is shown that
the Electro 3 was the subject that has the biggest problem. Wherein it got 50% in the
whole subject that had encountered to have no instructor or an absent instructor. While
subjects Thermodynamics, Machine Shop, Math 3 Mechanics and IT had no problems.
3%
7%
3%
7%
37%
27%
3%
Nav 1
Seam 1
Mar En
English 1
Social science 1
Math 1
Nat Sci 1
PE 1
Figure 2.7
14%
14%
21%
E Mats
Mar Draw
Nav Arch
Mar En
Filipino 1
Math 1
Nat Sci 1
PE 1
Figure 2.8
English 1
In Figure 2.7 and 2.8 shown the percentage of courses that indicates the courses that are
common or prone to change or to have an absent in the courses of Class 2019 Deck and Engine
Department. The Deck Departments graph shows that the top 2 subjects that had encountered
changes and absences are the Marine Environment which has 37% and Social Science 1 with
27%. While the Engine Department side, English 1 has the greater absence which has a
percentage of 25 followed by the Navigational Architecture which has a percentage of 22. Then
P.E 1 and Engng. Materials indicate that there were no absences or problem in changing the
instructor.
22
24
20
20
17
16
12
11
10
7
8
4
0
Class 2016 0
Affliations
Class 2017
Class 2018
Trainings/Seminar
Personal
3
1
Class 2019 0
Others
Figure 3.0
This shows the bar graph of the respondents rating towards the question what are the
reasons given to them when there is a change or absent instructor. Most instructors are absent or
changed because of their Trainings or Seminars. Second top reason is due to their Affiliation
followed by their Personal reasons. And a very few gave others as reason for absences or change
of instructors.
N
Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Performance
120
1
5
3.13
.859
Attitude
120
1
5
3.49
.619
Learning
120
1
5
3.68
.729
Outcome
Table 1. Mean of Respondents Effects of Changes of Instructors to the Academic Performance
On the forgoing table, it shows the mean of cadet respondents score on the factor
Performance, Attitude and Learning Outcome. As seen, the total number of respondents
computed for this table is 120 respondents. Furthermore, it can be noted that the minimum or the
lowest score is 1 and the maximum or the highest score is 5. In the Performance, it has a mean of
3.13 and the standard deviation of the score on is 0.856. In the Attitude, it has a mean of 3.49 and
a standard deviation of 0.619. And in the Learning Outcome, it has a mean of 3.68 and the
standard deviation of 3.68.
As seen on the given table above, the mean of all the factors affecting the academic
performance of the cadets every time instructors are change have a slightly positive result. The
means of the three factors are all above the average between Neither agree nor disagree to
Agree. With this it can be concluded that the change of instructors may affect or not affect the
Performance, Attitude and the Learning Outcome of the cadets when it is encountered in the
class depending also to the kind or type of subject that is left by the instructor to the new.
Summary of Findings
From the selected questions, the following data were collected:
1
almost all of their course changed instructors except for Math 1, NatSci 1 and
2
Physical Education 1.
Reasons of absence or change of instructors given to the cadets
- The most common reason there are absences of instructors or even the need to change
the instructor for a certain subject is due to their Trainings and Seminars. While
Conclusions
After all the surveys and procedures were conducted a conclusion has been derived, the
academic performance, attitude and learning outcomes of cadets who have experienced
changes/absences of instructors have a slightly positive result based on the data gathered from
different classes. It may also be concluded that changing of instructor may also be a reason for
the cadets performance, attitude and learning outcome vary depending to the change that will be
done.
Recommendations
To the future researchers who would like to work on the same field, the following
recommendations will be of great help:
1 Further analysis on different factors with regards to the effects of the problem to the
2
3
4
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A
Curriculum Vitae
CALICA, IVAN TIMOTHY ROSALES
Dili Bauang, La Union
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Elementary:
High School:
PERSONAL INFORMATION
Nickname:
Ivan
Age:
21
Gender:
Male
Civil Status:
Single
Date of Birth:
Place of Birth:
Name of Father:
Samson F. Calica
Name of Mother:
Lani R. Calica
APPENDIX A
Curriculum Vitae
PIDO, JOHN CASPER LAUDE
Pandanan, Valderrama Antique
09066713708
johncasper0995@yahoo.com
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Casper
Age:
20
Gender:
Male
Civil Status:
Single
Date of Birth:
September 9, 1995
Place of Birth:
Name of Father:
June T. Pido
Name of Mother:
Helen L. Pido
APPENDIX A
Curriculum Vitae
QUIRANTE, DANICO NUMBRERA
B10 L31 Zamboanga St., Primavera Homes, Brgy. San Luis, Antipolo City
09065652488
dnquirante@gmail.com
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Nico
Age:
20
Gender:
Male
Civil Status:
Single
Date of Birth:
Place of Birth:
Mandaluyong City
Name of Father:
Danilo R. Quirante
Name of Mother:
Belen N. Quirante
APPENDIX A
Curriculum Vitae
RIVERA, JAN LORENZ TABULA
B5 L13 Phase 1B San Lorenzo South City of Sta. Rosa, Laguna
09774626120
zneerool@gmail.com
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Lorenz, Renz
Age:
19
Gender:
Male
Civil Status:
Single
Date of Birth:
Place of Birth:
Quezon City
Name of Father:
Name of Mother:
Liflor T. Rivera
APPENDIX A
Curriculum Vitae
SINONGCO, KEVIN TUAZON
#155 Soriano St., Daan Bilolo, Orion, Bataan
09308854302
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Kevin
Age:
22
Gender:
Male
Civil Status:
Single
Date of Birth:
Place of Birth:
Orion, Bataan
Name of Father:
Ricardo V. Sinongco
Name of Mother:
Merly T. Sinongco