Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
https://www.grades4u.com/phl-410-c171.php
Complete the following 10 items. The exercises are located at the end of each section in the
textbook.
Ch. 1 of Introduction to Logic
Exercise 1.2, passages 5, 8
Exercise 1.4, passages 3, 4
Exercise 1.6, passages 1, 2
Ch. 2 of Introduction to Logic
Exercise 2.1, passages 2, 7
DQ 1
DQ 2
In everyday contexts, we are confronted with arguments in a variety of different spheres ---political, religious, legal, medical, and so on. Do you think it is important to be able to analyze
and assess these arguments with logic, or is common sense good enough?
Complete of the following exercises. The exercises are located at the end of each section in the
textbook.
APA format is not necessary.
Review the requirements for the final Learning Team project due in Week Five.
Select a multimedia presentation format with your teammates for your fallacy advertisement.
Consider the following suggestions:
You can create a video, a website, a podcast, a Microsoft PowerPointpresentation, a
Microsoft Word brochure, or any other multimedia presentation approved by your facilitator.
Follow these guidelines when creating your presentation:
Video: 3 to 5 minutes
Website: must fill up the entire computer screen, scrolling down is not required
Podcast: 2 to 4 minutes
DQ 1
DQ 2
2. When was the last time you made a post hoc ergo propter hoc (false cause) error? Describe it.
Why did you use it?
Each team member selects five fallacies from the textbook that can be used to advertise the
product or service the team selected.
Write a 50- to 100-word explanation of how you could use each of the fallacies that have been
selected to advertise the product or service you have chosen for your final project.
Compile all of the fallacies from all of the students on the team.
DQ 1
. Think of an example of a statement you have made or heard in the past few days that you
would consider to be a categorical proposition masquerading in ordinary language.
What translation into a standard form categorical proposition can you give it --- as A, E, I or O?
DQ 2
. One of the fallacies of syllogistic reasoning, as stated in chapter 6, consists of violating the rule
of "Distribute the middle term in at least one premise".
Complete the following exercises. The exercises are located at the end of each section in the
textbook.
APA format is not required.
Select five fallacies from the list of fallacies provided by all team members in preparation for
your final Learning Team assignment.
Write a 150- to 350-word total summary of the five you have selected and your rationale.
DQ 1
1. A hard truth function to understand is the conditional: If A then B is true for all truth values
of A and B except when A is true and B is false.
DQ 2
Provide a demonstration of how the method of logical analogy functions in symbolic logic using
an original example.
Complete the following exercises. The exercises are located at the end of each section in the
textbook.
Create a multimedia presentation advertisement for a product or service that commits at least five
informal fallacies.
You can create a video, a website, a podcast, a Microsoft PowerPointpresentation, a
Microsoft Word brochure, or any other multimedia presentation approved by your facilitator.
Follow these guidelines when creating your presentation:
Video: 3 to 5 minutes
Website: must fill up the entire computer screen, scrolling down is not required
Podcast: 2 to 4 minutes
Microsoft PowerPointpresentation: 8 to 10 slides
Microsoft Word brochure: 350 to 700 words with appropriate graphics
The advertisement must employ five fallacies.
The assignment will be graded not only on whether you correctly employ and identify the five
fallacies, but also on how neat, how creative, and how original your advertisement is, as well as
how creatively and originally you use the fallacies.
DQ 1
1. Let us take the case of the example in section 9.4, page 349, where a formal proof of validity
of a complex argument is given as follows (the special characters will not show up in this forum;
so I am using "If - then" and "Therefore"):
If D then E
DF
Therefore E
This is similar to Modus Ponens, where the conclusion, E is the "then" part of the first premise,
and it follows from the first and the second, if the second is true.
The second premise is a conjunction, which is true only if both of its components (called
"conjuncts") are true.
So, one can use the rule of simplification on the second premise, and obtain D as true.
DQ 2
. For the following formal argument, with the Indirect Proof of Validity, provide an example.
Formal argument:
If (G V H) then not-G
Therefore, not-G
https://www.grades4u.com/phl-410-c171.php
Contact us
In case you have some questions relating to these policies and circumstances of their
application, do not wait to contact as by email sny2100@gmail.com
If you have not found any course you need for your study, do not wait to use our
service. We will offer you way out for any assignment in 24 hours at reasonable
price! You just need to send us your assignment and course code, and we will offer
you the best A+ solution.
Be sure, our Support Team is working 24 hours per 7 days so you will get an
answer as soon as it is possible.
Website: https://www.grades4u.com
Email id : sny2100@gmail.com
Like us on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/Grades4u
Follow us on Twitter
https://twitter.com/grades4u