Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Separation of alkanes and alcohols with supercritical uids. Part II. Inuence of
process parameters and size of operating range
C.E. Schwarz, G.J.K. Bonthuys, R.F. van Schalkwyk, D.L. Laubscher, A.J. Burger, J.H. Knoetze
Department of Process Engineering, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 3 March 2011
Received in revised form 5 July 2011
Accepted 5 July 2011
Keywords:
Pilot plant
Optimisation
1-Dodecanol
n-Tetradecane
Ethane
Carbon dioxide
Supercritical
a b s t r a c t
This paper is the continuation of a previous study on the investigation of the separation of detergent range
alkanes and alcohols with supercritical uids. Specically this paper presents results on the optimisation
of the process parameters for the separation of n-tetradecane and 1-dodecanol with supercritical carbon
dioxide and ethane. The optimum operating conditions were determined from the results of a study
of the inuence of the process parameters, as well as an investigation into the size of the operating
range. The results showed that the optimum temperature is a balance between good separation at lower
temperatures and better control at higher temperatures. The solvent-to-feed ratio should be kept low
(within the range of vapour-continuous operation) as lower solvent-to-feed ratios result in improved
separation, as well as lower energy requirements. The use of reux is necessary for good separation
when using carbon dioxide as solvent, but is not required with ethane as solvent. An analysis of the
operating range showed that a process using ethane is easier to control. Ethane as solvent is technically
superior to carbon dioxide yet, depending on the exact process and location, costs, safety and logistics
may favour the use of carbon dioxide.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Long chain alcohols (C12C14), for use in the detergent and
cosmetic industries, are usually produced from their corresponding alkanes. However, complete conversion from alkane to alcohol
does not occur, necessitating the use of a post-production separation process. Due to low vapour pressures, cross-over melting
and boiling points, as well as problems associated with traditional
organic solvents, conventional separation processes such as distillation, crystallisation and liquidliquid extraction are costly and
difcult, if not impossible, to implement for the separation of these
alkanes and alcohols.
The aim of this series is to present results on the investigation
of the ability of supercritical uid extraction to separate detergent range alkanes and alcohols. Previous studies on the processing
of high molecular mass compounds (as liquids) with supercritical
uids include the following:
Corresponding author. Tel.: +27 21 808 4488; fax: +27 21 808 2059.
E-mail address: jhk@sun.ac.za (J.H. Knoetze).
0896-8446/$ see front matter 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.supu.2011.07.005
Nomenclature
1-C12-OH
nC14
S
xnC14,O
xnC14,B
353
1-dodecanol
n-tetradecane
selectivity
n-tetradecane composition of the overheads
product
n-tetradecane composition of the bottoms
product
Table 1
Pilot plant results for carbon dioxide as solvent (part 1).
Run
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Feed position
Reux
Reux ratio
Pressure (MPa)
Temperature ( C)
Solvent ow rate (kg/h)
Feed ow rate (kg/h)
Solvent/feed ratio
Overheads/feed ratio
% tetradecane in feed
% tetradecane in overheads
% tetradecane in bottoms
Selectivity
% maximum capacity
Top
No
14.80
80.6
17.1
0.48
36
0.56
50
66
36
1.8
47
Top
Yes
8.8
13.20
80.7
16.0
0.28
57
0.50
50
68
29
2.3
68
Top
No
14.40
81.0
16.0
0.48
33
0.48
50
68
35
1.9
44
Mid
No
14.91
81.3
13.1
0.46
28
0.52
50
68
36
1.9
38
Mid
Yes
6.6
15.00
81.1
13.1
0.46
28
0.41
50
67
40
1.7
55
Top
No
8.68
40.4
18.0
0.17
106
0.53
50
72
24
3.0
36
Top
No
0
11.65
70.1
17.0
0.48
35
0.16
50
71
43
1.7
45
Top
No
0
11.65
70.1
17.0
0.48
35
0.19
56
73
53
1.4
45
Top
No
9.05
40.1
16.3
0.30
55
0.55
50
77
3.1
25
42
Top
No
9.03
40.8
16.9
0.34
50
0.23
50
77
47
1.7
42
Top
No
9.03
41.9
16.8
0.35
48
0.17
50
78
41
1.9
41
Top
No
9.04
42.6
16.8
0.33
51
0.12
50
77
48
1.6
40
354
Table 2
Pilot plant results for carbon dioxide as solvent (part 2).
Run
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Feed position
Reux
Reux ratio
Pressure (MPa)
Temperature ( C)
Solvent ow rate (kg/h)
Feed ow rate (kg/h)
Solvent/feed ratio
Overheads/feed ratio
% tetradecane in feed
% tetradecane in overheads
% tetradecane in bottoms
Selectivity
% maximum capacity
Top
No
9.02
40.0
21.4
0.34
63
0.64
50
74
1.2
61
37
Top
No
9.03
43.3
16.8
0.31
54
0.16
50
78
45
1.7
39
Top
No
8.20
40.1
17.1
0.31
55
0.06
50
79
47
1.7
39
Top
No
8.41
40.1
17.1
0.31
55
0.10
50
79
49
1.6
39
Top
No
8.57
40.1
16.5
0.30
55
0.14
50
72
46
1.6
39
Top
No
8.81
40.0
16.6
0.30
55
0.27
50
76
39
2.0
38
Top
No
9.09
40.3
16.9
0.30
56
0.77
50
74
0.0
40
Top
No
9.99
69.6
17.0
0.48
35
0.06
56
76
55
1.4
43
Top
No
12.88
70.6
17.0
0.48
35
0.36
56
71
46
1.6
45
Top
No
14.11
70.0
17.1
0.48
36
0.77
56
72
11
6.4
46
Top
No
9.03
39.9
8.0
0.30
27
0.22
50
76
43
1.8
49
Top
No
89.9
40.0
13.0
0.35
37
0.29
50
76
44
1.7
37
Top
No
90.3
39.2
16.9
0.35
48
0.62
50
76
2.6
29
38
xnc14,O
xnc14,B
(1)
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
Feed position
Reux
Reux ratio
Pressure (MPa)
Temperature ( C)
Solvent ow rate (kg/h)
Feed ow rate (kg/h)
Solvent/feed ratio
Overheads/feed ratio
% tetradecane in feed
% tetradecane in overheads
% tetradecane in bottoms
Selectivity
% maximum capacity
Top
No
9.23
70.8
10.2
0.48
21
0.73
50
64
3
23
32
Mid
No
8.93
70.5
9.5
0.57
17
0.55
50
78
19
4.1
33
Top
Yes
9.2
8.30
70.6
9.5
0.32
30
0.42
50
81
30
2.7
52
Top
No
6.26
42.0
10.4
0.57
18
0.60
50
81
1.0
81
34
Mid
Yes
4.5
8.93
70.5
9.5
0.56
17
0.48
50
80
26
3.1
33
Mid
No
8.00
69.9
9.5
0.25
38
0.46
50
79
28
2.8
27
Top
No
8.60
57.7
9.9
0.48
21
0.80
50
62
3
19
31
Top
No
8.60
61.2
10.0
0.48
21
0.71
50
71
3
25
32
Top
No
8.55
81.4
10.0
0.48
21
0.27
50
72
38
1.9
34
Top
No
8.64
69.8
9.6
0.48
20
0.55
50
68
31
2.2
37
Top
No
8.34
70.6
10.1
0.48
21
0.38
50
77
29
2.6
33
Top
No
7.79
70.0
10.2
0.48
21
0.22
50
80
42
1.9
34
355
Table 4
Energy requirement for SCF processing of alkanealcohol mixture for optimised
experimental conditions.
Solvent
CO2
Ethane
Reux ratio
Operating temperature
Operating pressure
Tetradecane overheads
(solvent free)
Overheads-to-feed ratio
(solvent free)
Solvent-to-feed ratio
Separator pressure
Without energy integration
Pump duties (kJ/kg feed)
C
MPa
g/g
10
55
11.0
0.80
0
55
7.5
0.80
g/g
0.5
0.5
g/g
MPa
20
5.7
20
3.8
P1
P2
P3
14
111
37
9
179
HX1
HX5
HX6
82
3585
1974
82
4659
3180
HX2
HX3
HX4
830
3941
800
1445
5392
1122
11,374
16,068
1146
2333
2439
1408
3585
3251
6496
9566
43%
40%
HX5b
HX3b
HXI
Overheads/Feed
Overheads nC14
Booms nC14
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
356
Overheads nC14
Booms nC14
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
Overheads nC14
Overheads/Feed
Booms nC14
Overheads/Feed
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
8.0
8.2
8.4
8.6
8.8
9.0
9.2
357
Overheads nC14
Booms nC14
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Overheads/Feed
Overheads nC14
Booms nC14
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Overheads/Feed
Overheads nC14
Booms nC14
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
closer to the upper limit than the lower limit of the operating range
and in the case of the lower temperature (40 C) is within 1 bar. This
observation is due to the increasing gradient of the overheads-tofeed ratio line as pressure increases and may have its origin in the
phase behaviour. For carbon dioxide an increase in temperature
at constant composition results in an increase in pressure at an
increasing rate [15].
With respect to the composition, it is once again noted that
the overheads composition is not very dependent on the pressure, while the bottoms initially remains reasonably constant with
increasing pressure, but then increases in gradient as pressure
increases. It should be noted that the runs used to compile Fig. 2(b)
were conducted with a 56% nC14 feed. This difference in feed is
not expected to change the results signicantly except for a slight
Fig. 3. Plot of the overheads-to-feed ratio, overheads nC14 mass fraction and bottoms nC14 mass fraction as a function of solvent-to-feed ratio for carbon dioxide
at 9.0 MPa, 40 C and solute ow rate 0.32 kg/h (see runs 23, 27, 37 and 38 for
details).
358
lar results are expected for ethane as solvent. Considering the effect
of solvent-to-feed ratio, as presented above, it can be seen that
similar trends are observed for both carbon dioxide and ethane. In
both cases the change in solvent ow rate, and as a result solventto-feed ratio, were extreme (one solvent-to-feed ratio double the
other). However, for both solvents, although changes in the selectivity were noted, these were not very large and of the same order
of magnitude. Therefore the results of the operating range analysis
as presented for carbon dioxide are in all likelihood also applicable
to ethane as supercritical solvent.
As was the case for the investigation of the inuence of the
process parameters, the changes in process parameters were not
adjusted to ensure constant hydrodynamic capacity. Typically, during operation, the column geometry of a separation column is xed
and hence the approach used here is justied: a process parameter will change without changing the geometry of the column.
However, during design the hydrodynamics of the column and the
efciency of the packing needs to be taken into account.
Taking the results of the operating range into account it seems
like ethane may be the superior solvent. With regard to temperature and pressure the results show that a process using ethane is
easier to control than a process using carbon dioxide while indications are that the solvent-to-feed ratio has a much smaller effect
on the operating range than what temperature and pressure have.
3.3. Optimum operating conditions
Based on the experimental results, both supercritical ethane and
carbon dioxide are able to achieve the desired separation and there
are no technical problems associated with either of these solvents
that can eliminate one of them. However, with respect to technical viability, ethane is superior. Ethane is able to achieve a sharper
separation, does not necessitate the use of reux if the correct operating conditions are selected, requires a lower operating pressure
and seems to be easier to control due to a larger operating range and
a more regular relationship between the input parameters and the
product quality. On the other hand, a process run with carbon dioxide will have lower operating costs as the energy requirements, as
calculated in Part I [7], are less and the cost of the make-up solvent
will be lower. In terms of capital costs, a detailed costing needs to
be conducted. Ethane requires lower operating pressures and does
not require the additional equipment associated with reux, yet
due to its ammability, equipment such as pumps may be more
expensive. Both ethane and carbon dioxide processes can be operated safely, but the ammability of ethane must undoubtedly be
taken into consideration during the design of the process and during operation. The exact location of the process may also contribute
to the decision as to whether ethane or carbon dioxide should be
used: should such a plant be located within a larger petrochemical complex, where other ammable liquids and gasses are being
processed, the use of ethane should not be a problem, since general safety precautions and procedures for working with ammable
components (such as ethane) should already be in place.
The experimental results show that for both solvents, an
increase in temperature leads to a decrease in selectivity (as dened
above) and thus, based on selectivity alone, the temperature should
be as low as possible. However, a number of other aspects favour
higher operating temperatures. From the analysis of the size of the
operating range it is seen that a process is easier to control at higher
operating temperatures. Additionally, at higher operating temperatures, the operating pressure is higher and hence there is a larger
difference in the pressure between the process and the separation
vessel resulting in better separation and, for ethane, less process
problems due to product entrainment into the recycle section. For
both solvents, at higher temperatures, the energy requirements are
lower once energy integration has been applied (see Part I [7]). Tak-
359
Table 5
Comparison of ethane and carbon dioxide as supercritical solvent for the separation of detergent range alkanes and alcohols.
Separation efciency
Temperature
Temperature control
Pressure
Pressure control
Reux
Energy costs
Safety
Solvent costs
Ethane
Carbon dioxide
Not required
Acceptable
Flammable
Non-toxic
Lower pressures
High
simpler process. In addition, lower pressures are required. However, carbon dioxide does hold some advantages: it requires less
energy, the solvent costs are lower and it is safer to operate. The
nal decision on a solvent would, however, have to take all these
aspects, in conjunction with a detailed costing, into account.
To date the study has shown that it is technically possible to separate nC14 and 1-C12-OH with reasonable energy requirements.
However, the study of detergent range alkanes and alcohols is far
from complete and future work includes, but is not limited to, the
following:
Investigation of a feed containing a range of alkanes and alcohols,
as well as the presence of non-primary alcohols with between 12
and 14 carbon atoms.
Investigating the effect of side branching of both alkanes and
alcohols on the separation.
Modelling of the process with a process simulator, such as
AspenPlus , including the incorporation of more advanced thermodynamic models.
Detailed economic analysis including estimation of the capital
costs.
Acknowledgements
The nancial assistance of Sasol Technology (Pty) Ltd. and the
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) of South Africa through the
Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme (THRIP)
towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed
and conclusions arrived at are those of the authors and are not
necessarily to be attributed to the sponsors.
References
[1] C.A. Eckert, M.P. Ekart, B.L. Knutson, K.P. Payne, D.L. Tomasko, C.L. Liotta, N.R.
Foster, Supercritical uid fractionation of a non-ionic surfactant , Industrial and
Engineering Chemistry Research 31 (1992) 11051110.
818 MPa
Very sensitive especially at higher
values: optimum within 0.5 MPa of
upper limit
Required
Good (33% lower than ethane)
Non-ammable
Non-toxic
Higher pressures
Low