Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
If Prosky/Lee Methods are used to measure dietary fiber, Galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), Raffinose and Stachyose
are not measured at all while Polydextrose, Resistant Maltodextrins, Inulin, FOS, Pectin, Arabinogalactan and
Resistant Starch are partially measured. This poses a challenge for food science analysts because if, for example,
Resistant Starch is measured using AOAC 2002.02 and the value obtained is added to the value for Total Dietary
Fiber measured using AOAC 985.29, this results in a quantity of resistant starch being double counted leading to an
artificially high value for dietary fiber.
The solution to this problem is to replace the Prosky/Lee methods (AOAC 985.29/AOAC 991.43) with the McCleary
methods (AOAC 2009.01/2011.25). These methods correctly measure all components of dietary fiber.
Under these conditions the DF values obtained for most samples were very similar to those obtained with AOAC
Method 2009.01. However, higher (more physiologically relevant) values were obtained for certain phosphate crosslinked starch samples such as Fibersym and for native high amylose maize starch (e.g. Hylon VII ). In addition,
under these revised incubation conditions, the problematic resistant maltodextrins were not formed on hydrolysis of
starch. To achieve complete separation of fructotriose (in FOS) from disaccharides, HPLC was performed on a
TSKgel G2500PWxL gel permeation column from Tosoh Biosciences LLC (as recommended by Matsutani Chemical
Company) instead of on a Waters Corporation Sugar-Pak column. Glycerol was used as the internal standard in
place of sorbitol, because on the TSKgel G2500PWxL column, sorbitol coelutes with glucose. This resulted in a
requirement to exclude glycerol from enzyme preparations, which has been accomplished for the Rapid Integrated
Total Dietary Fiber assay kit (K-RINTDF). Finally, with the shorter incubation time, microbial infection of the incubation
solutions is not a concern, which means that sodium azide can be excluded from the incubation buffer. These results
were published recently.5
In conclusion, the new Rapid Integrated Total Dietary Fiber method (K-RINTDF) removes all of the limitations that
have been identified with AOAC Method 2009.01. It is expected that this method will undergo interlaboratory
evaluation in 2016.
References:
1
Prosky, L., Asp, N-G., Furda, I., DeVries, J. W., Schweizer, T. F. & Harland, B. F. (1985). Determination of total dietary
fiber in foods and food products: Collaborative study. J. AOAC Chem., 68(4), 677-679. Link to article
2
McCleary, B. V., DeVries, J. W., Rader, J. I., Cohen, G., Prosky, L., Mugford, D. C. & Okuma, K. (2010). Determination
of total dietary fiber (CODEX definition) by enzymatic-gravimetric method and liquid chromatography: Collaborative
study. J. AOAC Int., (93)1, 221-233. Link to article
3
McCleary, B. V., Sloane, N., Draga, A. & Lazewska, I. (2013). Measurement of Total Dietary Fiber Using AOAC
Method 2009.01 (AACC International Approved Method 32-45.01): Evaluation and Updates. Cereal Chem., 90, 396414. Link to article
McCleary, B. V. (2007) An integrated procedure for the measurement of total dietary fibre (including resistant starch),
non-digestible oligosaccharides and available carbohydrates. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 389(1), 291-308. Link to article
5
McCleary, B. V., Sloane, N., & Draga, A (2015). Determination of total dietary fibre and available carbohydrates: A
rapid integrated procedure that simulates in vivo digestion. StarchStrke 67 (9-10), 860883. Link to article