Sie sind auf Seite 1von 41

A PROJECT REPORT

ON
HYDRAULIC DISC
BRAKES

1. Introduction
The disc brake or disc brake is a device for slowing or stopping the rotation of a wheel. A
brake disc usually made of cast iron or ceramic composites is connected to the wheel and
the axle. To stop the wheel, friction material in the form of brake pads is forced
mechanically, hydraulically, pneumatically or electromagnetically against both sides of
the disc. Friction causes the disc and attached wheel to slow or stop. But in our project
hydraulic energy is used as the source of power, due to high applied force and torque
Here we are using the wheel disc with the inner arrangement of master cylinder and brake
pad as well as return spring arrangement. The air from the compressor is used to operate
the master cylinder at the certain pressure, here the solenoid valve is used to operate the
master cylinder and it is controlled by the control unit. whenever the brake apply the
control unit will activate the solenoid valve to supply the sir from the compressor and it
passed through the master cylinder then it will extern the piston rod which is inside of the
master cylinder after releasing the control unit activate the solenoid valve to stop the
supply from the compressor, then the master cylinder will released the piston rod to the
original position by the above process were doing the hydraulic disc braking system

2. Hydraulics
Hydraulics is a topic in applied science and engineering dealing with the mechanical
properties of liquids. At a very basic level hydraulics is the liquid version of pneumatics.
Fluid mechanics provides the theoretical foundation for hydraulics, which focuses on the
engineering uses of fluid properties. In fluid power, hydraulics is used for the generation,
control, and transmission of power by the use of pressurized liquids. Hydraulic topics
range through some part of science and most of engineering modules, and cover concepts
such as pipe flow, dam design, fluidics and fluid control circuitry, pumps, turbines,
hydropower, computational fluid dynamics, flow measurement, river channel behavior
and erosion.
The question "What is hydraulics?" can be answered in the following way.
Hydraulics is the transmission and control of forces and motions through the medium of
fluids.
Hydraulic systems and equipment have wide-spread application throughout industry.

For example:
- machine tool manufacturing
- press manufacturing
- plant construction
- vehicle manufacturing
- aircraft manufacturing
- shipbuilding
- injection molding machines
Prerequisites that hydraulics requires of the user and serviceman:
- knowledge of the basic physical laws of hydrostatics and hydrodynamics
- knowledge of the symbols of hydraulic control elements
- knowledge of hydraulic circuit diagrams
- knowledge of the maintenance of a hydraulic system
Hydraulic to Electrical Analogy
Hydraulics and electrics are analogous, because they both deal with flow, pressure and
load. The components in each type of circuit perform similar functions and therefore can
be related.
Various forms of energy are converted to accomplish mechanical movement in the
injection molding machine. Electrical energy is converted to mechanical energy, which in
turn is converted to hydraulic energy to operate and control the moving components of
the machine. The hydraulic energy is converted to mechanical energy to achieve the final
desired result, which may be "mold clamping pressure" or "material injection". The figure
above summarizes the energy conversions for an injection molding machine. Click on the
thumbnail for a larger view.
2.1. Pascals Law
Pascal's Law states that a pressure acting on a confined fluid is transmitted equally and
undiminished in all directions. In the figure below, a 10 pound force acting on a 1 square
inch area generates a pressure of 10 pounds per square inch (psi) throughout the container
acting equally on all surfaces.

This principle is important to remember, that the pressure in any portion of an hydraulic
system is equal throughout that system. This statement is valid with the omission of the
force of gravity, which would have to be added, according to the fluid level. Due to the
pressures
that
hydraulic
systems
operate
at,
this
smaller
amount need not be considered e.g. a 32 foot head of water approximately equals 14.5
psi. (a 10 meter head of water approximately equals 1 bar.)
2.2. Area and Force
As the clamp piston is moved forward during the clamp close function, the pressure
developed acts upon the clamping piston which has a certain size or area.

A basic formula in hydraulics states that pressure multiplied by area to which that
pressure is applied equals force. i.e. pressure x area = force
p x A= F
The formula can be manipulated to calculate any one of the three variables p, A or F, if
any of the other two variables are known.

As follows:
p x A= F
F/p=A
F / A= p

2.3. Pressure
Hydraulic pressure is generated when a flowing fluid meets resistance which is generally
related to the load that is being moved.

A force is applied via the lever to produce system pressure (p = F/A or F = p x A).
If more force is applied, the system pressure rises until the load moves, if the load
remains constant the pressure will increase no further. The load can therefore be moved if
the necessary pressure is generated. The speed at which the load moves will be dependent
upon the volume of fluid which is fed to the load cylinder. For example, as the mold is
opening or closing, the pressure generated in the system represents the resistance of the
toggle lever to movement. Adding to that resistance would be the weight (i.e. mass) of the
mold and toggle lever and also the friction between the toggle lever bushings and the
tiebars. When the two mold halves touch and the toggle begins to straighten out, the
increasing pressure represents that which is required to stretch the tiebars in the
generation of a particular clamp force. Similarly when injecting material into the mold
the pressure generated in the injection system represents the resistance of the injection
ram to movement. Adding to that resistance would be the mass of the injection ram and
screw, the friction between all moving components and the resistance of the plastic melt
as it is forced quickly into the mold cavity.

3. Problem with Mechanical Disc Brakes


All of my initial experiences with disc brakes were with Avid mechanical discs. This was
simply because they were popular and easy to work on at home since they used the same
brake housing and cables I was used to. That meant I could overhaul my bike at 3am
without a visit to a LBS for help bleeding hydraulic brakes. To their credit these brakes
work well. I find the stopping power of a set of quality v-brakes and Avid mechanical
discs comparable. In the dry I can flip my bike over with both and in the wet they both
stop the bike well albeit not as well as when dry.
I wont argue there is no difference at all between a good set of v-brakes and a good set
of mechanical discs, but the difference has not been in the range that it matters to me one
bit which I use.
One issue Ive had with mechanical discs is that after the initial part of the lever travel
that does stop the bike reasonably well there is a very mushy feel to the lever as you keep
pulling that seems to have little additional braking effect. Its worse on the rear wheel
although that wheel isnt particularly important for stopping the bike. Since they work
fine its not something Ive spent too much time worrying about. Then one day Bicycle
Quarterly published an article that explained why I was experiencing this.
If you imagine that a rim brake is really a disc brake with a very big rotor. This gives it a
lot of leverage to stop the bike. So that generating the same braking force on a disc
brake bike takes more pressure on the brake pads than for a rim brake bike. Just the same
as if you used a long and a short pry bar to open a wooden crate you have to push harder
on the short pry bar to generate the same force at the far end of the lever. In some ways
the higher pad pressure of a disc brake system is a good thing since this is what is
supposed to give it better wet weather braking as the pads squeeze water off the disc rotor
more effectively than the lighter pressure from the rim brake pads on the bigger rotor that
is the rim.
The problem is that the housing used for the mechanical brake cable is only able to resist
the compression forces of the brake lever to a certain point. Before that point most of the
power you put into the lever gets to the disc pad and squeezes the rotor resulting in good
braking. Beyond that point more and more of the extra force you put into the lever goes
into compressing the brake housing. This means as you double the force you only get a
small increasing in brake effect at the rotor. This explains why after some
good initial braking the mechanical disc brake lever feels mushy and doesnt seem to
have much effect. It also explains why you can brake effectively with rim brakes since
they dont require the same high forces. Rear disc brakes also tend to use a long full run
of cable housing which exacerbates the problem.

4. Master cylinder

In mechanical engineering, the master cylinder is a control device that converts nonhydraulic pressure (commonly from a driver's foot) into hydraulic pressure. This device
controls slave cylinders located at the other end of the hydraulic system. As piston move
along the bore of the master cylinder, this movement is transferred through the hydraulic
fluid, to result in a movement of the slave cylinder(s). The hydraulic pressure created by
moving a piston (inside the bore of the master cylinder) toward the slave cylinder(s)
compresses the fluid evenly, but by varying the comparative surface-area of the master
cylinder and/or each slave cylinder, one can vary the amount of force and displacement
applied to each slave cylinder, relative to the amount of force and displacement applied to
the master cylinder.
The most common uses of master cylinders are in brake and clutch systems. In brake
systems, the operated devices are cylinders inside of brake calipers and/or drum brakes;
these cylinders may be called wheel cylinders or slave cylinders, and they push the brake
pads towards a surface that rotates with the wheel (this surface is typically either a drum,
or a disc, a.k.a. a rotor) until the stationary brake pad create friction against that rotating
surface (typically the rotating surface is metal or ceramic/carbon, for their ability to
withstand heat and friction without wearing-down rapidly). In the clutch system, the
device which the master cylinder operates is called the slave cylinder; it moves the throw
out bearing until the high-friction material on the transmission's clutch disengages from
the engine's metal (or ceramic/carbon) flywheel. For hydraulic brakes or clutches alike,
flexible high-pressure hoses or inflexible hard-walled metal tubing may be used; but the
flexible variety of tubing is needed for at least a short length adjacent to each wheel. A
reservoir above each master cylinder supplies the master cylinder with enough brake
fluid to avoid air from entering the master cylinder (even the typical clutch uses brake
fluid, but it may also be referred to as "clutch fluid" in a clutch application). Most modern

light trucks and passenger cars have one master cylinder for the brakes which contains
two pistons; but many racing vehicles, as well as some classic and antique cars, have two
separate master cylinders, each with only one piston (much like hydraulic clutches
typically have only 1 piston per master cylinder). Each piston in a master cylinder
operates a brake circuit, and for modern light trucks and passenger cars, usually a brake
circuit leads to a brake caliper or shoe on only two of the vehicle's wheels, and the other
brake circuit provides brake-pressure to power the other two brakes. For safety, this is
done so that usually only two wheels lose their braking ability at the same time; it results
in longer stopping distances and should be fixed immediately, but at least gives some
braking ability, which is preferable to having no braking ability.

Basic brake system hydraulics is very simple and very dependable. Occasionally
something goes wrong and a bit of knowledge goes a long way in finding solutions.
In a very basic form, hydraulics is a means of transferring motion. It works because brake
fluid cannot be compressed. Moving a piston in one cylinder will cause motion in other
cylinders connected to it. This is the basis of most hydraulic brake operation.

For instance, when the brake pedal is pushed, pistons in the master cylinder move.
Movement of the pistons forces fluid into the system. This fluid causes the pistons in the
wheel cylinders and/or brake calipers to move. When the pedal is released, the pistons
retract and fluid returns to the brake master cylinder reservoir.

Actual braking is accomplished by the brake pads and shoes. The hydraulic system
simply transfers the motion needed to apply them. As the brake pads and shoes wear,
additional fluid is taken into the system. Fluid comes from the master cylinder reservoir
and remains in the calipers and wheel cylinders. Pad and shoe wear causes the fluid level
to drop in the master cylinder over time.
Even with such a basic system thing still go wrong. Brake fluid is normally made of
alcohol to absorb moisture. In time this moisture can no longer be held and attacks the
metal surfaces of the brake cylinders.

Corrosion in the cylinders can cause them to leak. Fluid can run past the internal seals.
When this happens, the cylinder needs to be replaced. The external seal is in place to
keep debris out of the cylinder. It is not designed to hold fluid. Fluid behind the outer
wheel cylinder seal shows failure of the cylinder.

Leaking wheel cylinders can also allow air to enter the system when the brakes are
released. This often occurs after replacing brake shoes and not replacing the wheel
cylinders. Air is compressible and results in a spongy brake pedal. Pedal motion that
would have applied the brakes is now taken by compressing the air in the system. Brake
calipers can cause the same type problem.
When air enters the system, it has to be purged out with brake fluid. This process is
known as bleeding the brakes. With pressure applied, a screw is opened at a high point in
the system. The air rises to the highest point and is forced out through the opening. The
screw is then tightened and the pressure released.

Because of the huge variation in braking systems, several different methods are used. The
order in which the wheels are bled and the means of applying pressure vary greatly. Some
systems require the right rear wheel to be bled first. Other systems may start with the left
front and so on. Bleeding the system out of sequence will not remove the air and may
cause additional air to enter.
Cleanliness of the brake system is imperative. Brake fluid becomes contaminated over
time and should be replaced. Debris comes from wearing components and sludge builds

up over time. Because these materials are heavier than the brake fluid, they collect in the
calipers and wheel cylinders.

The old practice of pushing brake pistons in, when replacing brake pads can cause many
problems. Modern brake systems use several delicate and expensive components. Antilock brake system or ABS modulators can be ruined by the back-flush of debris caused
when caliper pistons are pushed in.
A much better practice is thoroughly flushing old fluid from the system before any brake
work is done. The bleeder screw should also be opened when pushing caliper pistons in,
to expel debris. Close the bleeder screw once the piston is all the way in. Many shops do
not follow this simple procedure and a great many problems are caused as a result.

The basic idea behind any hydraulic system is very simple: Force that is applied at one
point is transmitted to another point using an incompressible fluid. The fluid is
almost always an oil of some sort. The force is almost always multiplied in the process.
The picture below shows the simplest possible hydraulic system:

5. Motor
In any electric motor, operation is based on simple electromagnetism. A current-carrying
conductor generates a magnetic field; when this is then placed in an external magnetic
field, it will experience a force proportional to the current in the conductor, and to the
strength of the external magnetic field. As you are well aware of from playing with
magnets as a kid, opposite (North and South) polarities attract, while like polarities
(North and North, South and South) repel. The internal configuration of a motor is
designed to harness the magnetic interaction between a current-carrying conductor and an
external magnetic field to generate rotational motion.
Let's start by looking at a simple 2-pole electric motor (here red represents a magnet or
winding with a "North" polarization, while green represents a magnet or winding with a
"South" polarization).
Every motor has six basic
parts -- axle, rotor, stator,
commutator,

field

magnet(s), and brushes.


In most common motors,
the

external

magnetic

field is produced by highstrength

permanent

magnets1. The stator is the stationary part of the motor -this includes the motor casing, as well as two or more
permanent

magnet

pole

pieces.
Figure 3.1.1 motor

the rotor (together with the axle and attached commutator)

rotate with respect to the stator. The rotor consists of windings (generally on a core), the

windings being electrically connected to the commutator. The above diagram shows a
common motor layout -- with the rotor inside the stator (field) magnets.
The geometry of the brushes, commutator contacts, and rotor windings are such that
when power is applied, the polarities of the energized winding and the stator magnet(s)
are misaligned, and the rotor will rotate until it is almost aligned with the stator's field
magnets. As the rotor reaches alignment, the brushes move to the next commutator
contacts, and energize the next winding. Given our example two-pole motor, the rotation
reverses the direction of current through the rotor winding, leading to a "flip" of the
rotor's magnetic field, driving it to continue rotating.
In real life, though, motors will always have more than two poles (three is a very
common number). In particular, this avoids "dead spots" in the commutator. You can
imagine how with our example two-pole motor, if the rotor is exactly at the middle of its
rotation (perfectly aligned with the field magnets), it will get "stuck" there. Meanwhile,
with a two-pole motor, there is a moment where the commutator shorts out the power
supply (i.e., both brushes touch both commutator contacts simultaneously). This would
be bad for the power supply, waste energy, and damage motor components as well. Yet
another disadvantage of such a simple motor is that it would exhibit a high amount of
torque "ripple" (the amount of torque it could produce is cyclic with the position of the
rotor).
As each brush transitions from one commutator contact to the next, one coil's field will
rapidly collapse, as the next coil's field will rapidly charge up (this occurs within a few
microsecond). We'll see more about the effects of this later, but in the meantime you can
see that this is a direct result of the coil windings' series wiring: The use of an iron core
armature (as in the Mabuchi, above) is quite
common, and has a number of advantages. First off,
the iron core provides a strong, rigid support for the
windings -- a particularly important consideration
for high-torque motors. The core also conducts heat
away from the rotor windings, allowing the motor to
be driven harder than might otherwise be the case.
Iron core construction is also relatively inexpensive

compared with other

Figure 3.1.2 Iron Core

construction types.
But iron core construction also has several disadvantages. The iron armature has a
relatively high inertia which limits motor acceleration. This construction also results in
high winding inductances which limit brush and commutator life.
In small motors, an alternative design is often used which features a 'coreless' armature
winding. This design depends upon the coil wire itself for structural integrity. As a result,
the armature is hollow, and the permanent magnet can be mounted inside the rotor coil.
Coreless DC motors have much lower armature inductance than iron-core motors of
comparable size, extending brush and commutator life.

Figure 3.1.3 Coreless armature winding


The coreless design also allows manufacturers to build smaller motors; meanwhile, due
to the lack of iron in their rotors, coreless motors are somewhat prone to overheating. As
a result, this design is generally used just in small, low-power motors. Beamers3 will
most often see coreless motors in the form of pager motors.

5.1.

Working

Of

Motor
The direct current
motor is one of the
first

machines

devised to convert

electrical power into mechanical power. Permanent magnet (PM) direct current convert
electrical energy into mechanical energy through the interaction of two magnetic fields.
One field is produced by a permanent magnet assembly, the other Figure 3.2.1 working of
dc motor

field is produced by an

electrical current flowing in the motor windings. These two fields result in a torque which
tends to rotate the rotor. As the rotor turns, the current in the windings is commutated to
produce a continuous torque output. The stationary electromagnetic field of the motor can
also be wire-wound like the armature or can be made up of permanent magnets.
In either style (wound-field or permanent magnet) the commutator, acts as half of a
mechanical switch and rotates with the armature as it turns. The commutator is composed
of conductive segments (called bars), usually made of copper, which represent the
termination of individual coils of wire distributed around the armature. The second half
of the mechanical switch is completed by the brushes. These brushes typically remain
stationary with the motor's housing but ride (or brush) on the rotating commutator. As
electrical energy is passed through the brushes and consequently through the armature a
torsional force is generated as a reaction between the motor's field and the armature
causing the motor's armature to turn. As the armature turns, the brushes switch to
adjacent bars on the commutator. This switching action transfers the electrical energy to
an adjacent winding on the armature which in turn perpetuates the torsional motion of the
armature.
Permanent magnet (PM) motors are probably the most commonly used motors, but there
are also some other type of motors (types which use coils to make the permanent
magnetic field also) .motors operate from a direct current power source. Movement of the
magnetic field is achieved by switching current between coils within the motor. This
action is called "commutation". Very many motors (brush-type) have built-in
commutation, meaning that as the motor rotates, mechanical brushes automatically
commutate coils on the rotor. You can use dc-brush motors in a variety of applications. A
simple, permanent-magnet dc motor is an essential element in a variety of products, such
as toys, servo mechanisms, valve actuators, robots, and automotive electronics. There are
several typical advantages of a PM motor. When compared to AC or wound field motors,
PM motors are usually physically smaller in overall size and lighter for a given power

rating. Furthermore, since the motor's field, created by the permanent magnet, is constant,
the relationship between torque and speed is very linear. A PM motor can provide
relatively high torque at low speeds and PM Field provides some inherent self-braking
when power to the motor is shutoff. There are several disadvantages through, those being
mostly being high current during a stall condition and during instantaneous reversal.
Those can damage some motors or be problematic to control circuitry. Furthermore, some
magnet materials can be damaged when subjected to excessive heat and some loose field
strength if the motor is disassembled.
A simplest method to control the rotation speed of a motor is to control its driving
voltage. The higher the voltage is, the higher speed the motor tries to reach. In many
applications a simple voltage regulation would cause lots of power loss on control circuit,
so a pulse width modulation method (PWM) is used in many motor controlling
applications. In the basic Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) method, the operating power
to the motors is turned on and off to modulate the current to the motor. The ratio of "on"
time to "off" time is what determines the speed of the motor. When doing PWM
controlling, keep in mind that a motor is a low pass device. The reason is that a motor is
mainly a large inductor. It is not capable of passing high frequency energy, and hence will
not perform well using high frequencies. Reasonably low frequencies are required, and
then PWM techniques will work. Lower frequencies are generally better than higher
frequencies, but PWM stops being effective at too low a frequency. The idea that a lower
frequency PWM works better simply reflects that the "on" cycle needs to be pretty wide
before the motor will draw any current (because of motor inductance). A higher PWM
frequency will work fine if you hang a large capacitor across the motor or short the motor
out on the "off" cycle (e.g. power/brake pwm) the reason for this is that short pulses will
not allow much current to flow before being cut off. Then the current that did flow is
dissipated as an inductive kick - probably as heat through the fly-back diodes. The
capacitor integrates the pulse and provides a longer, but lower, current flow through the
motor after the driver is cut off. There is not inductive kick either, since the current flow
isn't being cut off. Knowing the low pass roll-off frequency of the motor helps to
determine an optimum frequency for operating PWM. Try testing your motor with a
square duty cycle using a variable frequency, and then observe the drop in torque as the

frequency is increased. This technique can help determine the roll off point as far as
power efficiency is concerned.
Besides "brush-type motors, there is another motor type: brushless motor. Brushless
motors rely on the external power drive to perform the commutation of stationary copper
winding on the stator. This changing stator field makes the permanent magnet rotor to
rotate .A brushless permanent magnet motor is the highest performing motor in terms of
torque / vs. weight or efficiency. Brushless motors are usually the most expensive type of
motor. Electronically commutated, brush-less motor systems are widely used as drives for
blowers and fans used in electronics, telecommunications and industrial equipment
applications. There is wide variety of different brush-less motors for various applications.
Some are designed to rotate at constant speed (those used in disc drives) and the speed of
some can be controlled by varying the voltage applied to them (usually the motors used
in fans). Some brushless motors have a built-in tachometer which gives out pulses as the
motor rotates (this applies to both disc drive motors and some computer fans). In general,
users select brush-type motors when low system cost is a priority, and brushless motors
to fulfill other requirements (such as maintenance-free operation, high speeds, and
explosive environments where sparking could be hazardous). Brush type motors are used
in very many battery powered appliances. Brushless motors are commonly used in
applications like powered fans and disc drive rotation motors.
5.2. Motor
Motor is a device that creates motion, not an engine; it usually refers to either an
electrical motor or an internal combustion engine. It may also refer to:

Electric motor, a machine that converts electricity into a mechanical motion


o AC motor, an electric motor that is driven by alternating current
Synchronous motor, an alternating current motor distinguished by
a rotor spinning with coils passing magnets at the same rate as the
alternating current and resulting magnetic field which drives it
Induction motor, also called a squirrel-cage motor, a type of
asynchronous alternating current motor where power is supplied to
the rotating device by means of electromagnetic induction
o DC motor, an electric motor that runs on direct current electricity
Brushed DC electric motor, an internally commutated electric
motor designed to be run from a direct current power source

Brushless DC motor, a synchronous electric motor which is


powered by direct current electricity and has an electronically
controlled commutation system, instead of a mechanical
commutation system based on brushes
Electrostatic motor, a type of electric motor based on the attraction and
repulsion of electric charge
Servo motor, an electric motor that operates a servo, commonly used in
robotics
Internal fan-cooled electric motor, an electric motor that is self-cooled by
a fan, typically used for motors with a high energy density

o
o
o

Other uses:

Actuator, a mechanical device for moving or controlling a mechanism or system


Hydraulic motor, a machine that converts the energy of pressurized liquid flow
into mechanical motion
Rocket motor, usually refers to solid rocket engines
Molecular motor, the agents of movement in living organisms
o Synthetic molecular motor, molecular machines capable of rotation under
energy input
Motor language, extinct since the 1840s, a Uralic language that was spoken in the
northern region of the Sayan Mountains in Siberia
Motor system, the physiological system that is responsible for physical movement
o Motor neuron, neurons that originate in the spinal cord and synapse with
muscle fibers
o Motor skill, the ability of an organism to use the motor system effectively
Nanomotors, a molecular device capable of converting energy into movement
Pneumatic motor, a machine that converts the energy of compressed air into
mechanical motion
The Motors, a British pub rock/punk band, formed in 1977 by Nick Garvey, Andy
McMaster, Ricky Slaughter and Rob Hendry, who was replaced by Bram
Tchaikovsky the same year

An electric motor uses electrical energy to produce mechanical energy, very typically
through the interaction of magnetic fields and current-carrying conductors. The reverse
process, producing electrical energy from mechanical energy, is accomplished by a
generator or dynamo. Many types of electric motors can be run as generators, and vice
versa. For example a starter/generator for a gas turbine or Traction motors used on
vehicles often perform both tasks.
Electric motors are found in applications as diverse as industrial fans, blowers and
pumps, machine tools, household appliances, power tools, and disc drives. They may be
powered by direct current (for example a battery powered portable device or motor
vehicle), or by alternating current from a central electrical distribution grid. The smallest
motors may be found in electric wristwatches. Medium-size motors of highly
standardized dimensions and characteristics provide convenient mechanical power for
industrial uses. The very largest electric motors are used for propulsion of large ships, and
for such compressors, with ratings in the millions of watts. Electric motors may be
classified by the source of electric power, by their internal construction, by their
application, or by the type of motion they give.
The physical principle of production of mechanical force by the interactions of an electric
current and a magnetic field was known as early as 1821. Electric motors of increasing
efficiency were constructed throughout the 19th century, but commercial exploitation of
electric motors on a large scale required efficient electrical generators and electrical
distribution networks.
Some devices, such as magnetic solenoids and loudspeakers, although they generate
some mechanical power, are not generally referred to as electric motors, and are usually
termed actuators and transducers, respectively.

5.3. The Principle


The conversion of electrical energy into mechanical energy by electromagnetic means
was demonstrated by the British scientist Michael Faraday in 1821. A free-hanging wire
was dipped into a pool of mercury, on which a permanent magnet was placed. When a
current was passed through the wire, the wire rotated around the magnet, showing that the
current gave rise to a circular magnetic field around the wire. This motor is often
demonstrated in school physics classes, but brine (salt water) is sometimes used in place
of the toxic mercury. This is the simplest form of a class of devices called homopolar
motors. A later refinement is the Barlow's Wheel. These were demonstration devices only,
unsuited to practical applications due to their primitive construction.

Jedlik's "lightning-magnetic self-rotor", 1827. (Museum of Applied Arts, Budapest.)


In 1827, Hungarian nyos Jedlik started experimenting with electromagnetic rotating
devices he called "lightning-magnetic self-rotors". He used them for instructive purposes
in universities, and in 1828 demonstrated the first device which contained the three main
components of practical direct current motors: the stator, rotor and commutator. Both the
stationary and the revolving parts were electromagnetic, employing no permanent
magnets. Again, the devices had no practical application.
5.4. The First Electric Motors
The first commutator-type direct current electric motor capable of turning machinery was
invented by the British scientist William Sturgeon in 1832.Following Sturgeon's work, a
commutator-type direct-current electric motor made with the intention of commercial use
was built by Americans Emily and Thomas Davenport and patented in 1837. Their
motors ran at up to 600 revolutions per minute, and powered machine tools and a printing
press. Due to the high cost of the zinc electrodes required by primary battery power, the
motors were commercially unsuccessful and the Davenports went bankrupt. Several
inventors followed Sturgeon in the development of DC motors but all encountered the
same cost issues with primary battery power. No electricity distribution had been
developed at the time. Like Sturgeon's motor, there was no practical commercial market
for these motors.

In 1855 Jedlik built a device using similar principles to those used in his electromagnetic
self-rotors that was capable of useful work. He built a model electric motor-propelled
vehicle that same year. There is no evidence that this experimentation was communicated
to the wider scientific world at that time, or that it influenced the development of electric
motors in the following decades.
The modern DC motor was invented by accident in 1873, when Znobe Gramme
connected the dynamo he had invented to a second similar unit, driving it as a motor. The
Gramme machine was the first electric motor that was successful in the industry. In 1886
Frank Julian Sprague invented the first practical DC motor, a non-sparking motor capable
of constant speed under variable loads. Other Sprague electric inventions about this time
greatly improved grid electric distribution [prior work done while employed by Edison],
allowed power from electric motors to be returned to the electric grid, provided for
electric distribution to trolleys via overhead wires and the trolley pole, and provided
controls systems for electric operations. This allowed Sprague to use electric motors to
invent the first electric trolley system in 1887-88 in Richmond VA, the electric elevator
and control system in 1892, and the electric subway with independently powered
centrally controlled cars, which was first installed in 1892 in Chicago by the South Side
Elevated Railway where it became popularly known as the "L". Sprague's motor and
related inventions led to an explosion of interest and use in electric motors for industry,
while almost simultaneously another great inventor was developing its primary
competitor, which would become much more widespread.
In 1888 Nikola Tesla invented the first practicable AC motor and with it the polyphase
power transmission system. Tesla continued his work on the AC motor in the years to
follow at the Westinghouse company.[citation needed]
The development of electric motors of acceptable efficiency was delayed for several
decades by failure to recognize the extreme importance of a relatively-small air gap
between rotor and stator. Early motors, for some rotor positions, had comparatively huge
air gaps which constituted a very high reluctance magnetic circuit. They produced farlower torque than an equivalent amount of power would produce with efficient designs.
The cause of the lack of understanding seems to be that early designs were based on
familiarity of distant attraction between a magnet and a piece of ferromagnetic material,
or between two electromagnets. Efficient designs, as this article describes, are based on a
rotor with a comparatively small air gap, and flux patterns that create torque.
Note that the armature bars are at some distance (unknown) from the field pole pieces
when power is fed to one of the field magnets; the air gap is likely to be considerable.
The text tells of the inefficiency of the design. (Electricity was created, as a practical
matter, by consuming zinc in wet primary cells!)
In his workshops Froment had an electromotive engine of one-horse power. But, though
an interesting application of the transformation of energy, these machines will never be
practically applied on the large scale in manufactures, for the expense of the acids and the
zinc which they use very far exceeds that of the coal in steam-engines of the same force.

motors worked by electricity, independently of any question as to the cost of


construction, or of the cost of the acids, are at least sixty times as dear to work as steamengines.
Although Gramme's design was comparatively much more efficient, apparently the
Froment motor was still considered illustrative, years later. It is of some interest that the
St. Louis motor, long used in classrooms to illustrate motor principles, is extremely
inefficient for the same reason, as well as appearing nothing like a modern motor. Photo
of a traditional form of the motor: [3] Note the prominent bar magnets, and the huge air
gap at the ends opposite the rotor. Even modern versions still have big air gaps if the rotor
poles are not aligned.
Application of electric motors revolutionized industry. Industrial processes were no
longer limited by power transmission using shaft, belts, compressed air or hydraulic
pressure. Instead every machine could be equipped with its own electric motor, providing
easy control at the point of use, and improving power transmission efficiency. Electric
motors applied in agriculture eliminated human and animal muscle power from such
tasks as handling grain or pumping water. Household uses of electric motors reduced
heavy labor in the home and made higher standards of convenience, comfort and safety
possible. Today, electric motors consume more than half of all electric energy produced.

Categorization Of Electric Motors

The classic division of electric motors has been that of Alternating Current (AC) types
v/s Direct Current (DC) types. This is more a de facto convention, rather than a rigid
distinction. For example, many classic DC motors run on AC power, these motors being
referred to as universal motors.
Rated output power is also used to categories motors, those of less than 746 Watts, for
example, are often referred to as fractional horsepower motors (FHP) in reference to the
old imperial measurement.
The ongoing trend toward electronic control further muddles the distinction, as modern
drivers have moved the commutator out of the motor shell. For this new breed of motor,
driver circuits are relied upon to generate sinusoidal AC drive currents, or some
approximation thereof. The two best examples are: the brushless DC motor and the
stepping motor, both being poly-phase AC motors requiring external electronic control,
although historically, stepping motors (such as for maritime and naval gyrocompass
repeaters) were driven from DC switched by contacts.
Considering all rotating (or linear) electric motors require synchronism between a
moving magnetic field and a moving current sheet for average torque production, there is
a clearer distinction between an asynchronous motor and synchronous types. An
asynchronous motor requires slip between the moving magnetic field and a winding set to
induce current in the winding set by mutual inductance; the most ubiquitous example
being the common AC induction motor which must slip to generate torque. In the

synchronous types, induction (or slip) is not a requisite for magnetic field or current
production (e.g. permanent magnet motors, synchronous brush-less wound-rotor doublyfed electric machine).
6. Comparison of Motor Types
Type
AC Induction
(Shaded Pole)
AC Induction
(split-phase
capacitor)
AC
Synchronous

Stepper DC

Brushless DC
Brushed DC
Pancake DC

Advantages

Disadvantages

Least expensive Rotation slips from


Long life
frequency
high power
Low starting torque
High power
Rotation slips from
high starting
frequency
torque
Rotation in-sync
with freq
More expensive
long-life
(alternator)
Precision
positioning
Requires a
High holding
controller
torque
Long lifespan
High initial cost
low maintenance Requires a
High efficiency controller
Low initial cost High maintenance
Simple speed
(brushes)
control
Low lifespan
Compact design
Medium cost
Simple speed
Medium lifespan
control

Typical Application

Typical
Drive

Fans

Uni/Polyphase AC

Appliances

Uni/Polyphase AC

Industrial motors
Clocks
Audio turntables
tape drives

Uni/Polyphase AC

Positioning in
printers and floppy
drives

DC

Hard drives
CD/DVD players
electric vehicles

DC

Treadmill exercisers Direct DC or


automotive starters PWM
Office Equip
Fans/Pumps

Direct DC or
PWM

6.1. Servo Motor


A servomechanism, or servo is an automatic device that uses error-sensing feedback to
correct the performance of a mechanism. The term correctly applies only to systems
where the feedback or error-correction signals help control mechanical position or other
parameters. For example, an automotive power window control is not a servomechanism,
as there is no automatic feedback which controls positionthe operator does this by
observation. By contrast the car's cruise control uses closed loop feedback, which
classifies it as a servomechanism.

6.2. Synchronous Electric Motor


A synchronous electric motor is an AC motor distinguished by a rotor spinning with coils
passing magnets at the same rate as the alternating current and resulting magnetic field
which drives it. Another way of saying this is that it has zero slip under usual operating
conditions. Contrast this with an induction motor, which must slip to produce torque. A
synchronous motor is like an induction motor except the rotor is excited by a DC field.
Slip rings and brushes are used to conduct current to rotor. The rotor poles connect to
each other and move at the same speed hence the name synchronous motor.
6.3. Induction Motor
An induction motor (IM) is a type of asynchronous AC motor where power is supplied to
the rotating device by means of electromagnetic induction. Another commonly used name
is squirrel cage motor because the rotor bars with short circuit rings resemble a squirrel
cage (hamster wheel). An electric motor converts electrical power to mechanical power in
its rotor (rotating part). There are several ways to supply power to the rotor. In a DC
motor this power is supplied to the armature directly from a DC source, while in an
induction motor this power is induced in the rotating device. An induction motor is
sometimes called a rotating transformer because the stator (stationary part) is essentially
the primary side of the transformer and the rotor (rotating part) is the secondary side.
Induction motors are widely used, especially polyphase induction motors, which are
frequently used in industrial drives.
6.4. Electrostatic Motor (capacitor motor)
An electrostatic motor or capacitor motor is a type of electric motor based on the
attraction and repulsion of electric charge. Usually, electrostatic motors are the dual of
conventional coil-based motors. They typically require a high voltage power supply,
although very small motors employ lower voltages. Conventional electric motors instead
employ magnetic attraction and repulsion, and require high current at low voltages. In the
1750s, the first electrostatic motors were developed by Benjamin Franklin and Andrew
Gordon. Today the electrostatic motor finds frequent use in micro-mechanical (MEMS)
systems where their drive voltages are below 100 volts, and where moving, charged
plates are far easier to fabricate than coils and iron cores. Also, the molecular machinery
which runs living cells is often based on linear and rotary electrostatic motors.
6.5. DC Motors
A DC motor is designed to run on DC electric power. Two examples of pure DC designs
are Michael Faraday's homopolar motor (which is uncommon), and the ball bearing
motor, which is (so far) a novelty. By far the most common DC motor types are the
brushed and brushless types, which use internal and external commutation respectively to

create an oscillating AC current from the DC sourceso they are not purely DC
machines in a strict sense.
6.5.1. Brushed DC Motors
The classic DC motor design generates an oscillating current in a wound rotor, or
armature, with a split ring commutator, and either a wound or permanent magnet stator. A
rotor consists of one or more coils of wire wound around a core on a shaft; an electrical
power source is connected to the rotor coil through the commutator and its brushes,
causing current to flow in it, producing electromagnetism. The commutator causes the
current in the coils to be switched as the rotor turns, keeping the magnetic poles of the
rotor from ever fully aligning with the magnetic poles of the stator field, so that the rotor
never stops (like a compass needle does) but rather keeps rotating indefinitely (as long as
power is applied and is sufficient for the motor to overcome the shaft torque load and
internal losses due to friction, etc.)
Many of the limitations of the classic commutator DC motor are due to the need for
brushes to press against the commutator. This creates friction. At higher speeds, brushes
have increasing difficulty in maintaining contact. Brushes may bounce off the irre
crossing the gaps. Furthermore, the inductance of the rotor coils causes the voltage across
each to rise when its circuit is opened, increasing the sparking of the brushes.) This
sparking limits the maximum speed of the machine, as too-rapid sparking will overheat,
erode, or even melt the commutator. The current density per unit area of the brushes, in
combination with their resistivity, limits the output of the motor. The making and
breaking of electric contact also causes electrical noise, and the sparks additionally cause
RFI. Brushes eventually wear out and require replacement, and the commutator itself is
subject to wear and maintenance (on larger motors) or replacement (on small motors).
The commutator assembly on a large machine is a costly element, requiring precision
assembly of many parts. On small motors, the commutator is usually permanently
integrated into the rotor, so replacing it usually requires replacing the whole rotor.
Large brushes are desired for a larger brush contact area to maximize motor output, but
small brushes are desired for low mass to maximize the speed at which the motor can run
without the brushes excessively bouncing and sparking (comparable to the problem of
"valve float" in internal combustion engines). (Small brushes are also desirable for lower
cost.) Stiffer brush springs can also be used to make brushes of a given mass work at a
higher speed, but at the cost of greater friction losses (lower efficiency) and accelerated
brush and commutator wear. Therefore, DC motor brush design entails a trade-off
between output power, speed, and efficiency/wear.

A: shunt
B: series
C: compound
f = field coil
There are five types of brushed DC motor:
A. DC shunt wound motor
B. DC series wound motor
C. DC compound motor (two configurations):

Cumulative compound
Differentially compounded

D. Permanent Magnet DC Motor (not shown)


E. Separately-excited (sepex) (not shown).
6.5.2. Brushless DC Motors
Some of the problems of the brushed DC motor are eliminated in the brushless design. In
this motor, the mechanical "rotating switch" or commutator/brushgear assembly is
replaced by an external electronic switch synchronised to the rotor's position. Brushless
motors are typically 85-90% efficient or more (higher efficiency for a brushless electric
motor of up to 96.5% were reported by researchers at the Tokai University in Japan in
2009), whereas DC motors with brushgear are typically 75-80% efficient.
Midway between ordinary DC motors and stepper motors lies the realm of the brushless
DC motor. Built in a fashion very similar to stepper motors, these often use a permanent
magnet external rotor, three phases of driving coils, one or more Hall Effect sensors to
sense the position of the rotor, and the associated drive electronics. The coils are
activated, one phase after the other, by the drive electronics as cued by the signals from
either Hall effect sensors or from the back EMF (electromotive force) of the undriven
coils. In effect, they act as three-phase synchronous motors containing their own variablefrequency drive electronics. A specialized class of brushless DC motor controllers utilize
EMF feedback through the main phase connections instead of Hall effect sensors to
determine position and velocity. These motors are used extensively in electric radiocontrolled vehicles. When configured with the magnets on the outside, these are referred
to by modelers as out runner motors.
Brushless DC motors are commonly used where precise speed control is necessary, as in
computer disc drives or in video cassette recorders, the spindles within CD, CD-ROM
(etc.) drives, and mechanisms within office products such as fans, laser printers and
photocopiers. They have several advantages over conventional motors:

Compared to AC fans using shaded-pole motors, they are very efficient, running
much cooler than the equivalent AC motors. This cool operation leads to muchimproved life of the fan's bearings.
Without a commutator to wear out, the life of a DC brushless motor can be
significantly longer compared to a DC motor using brushes and a commutator.
Commutation also tends to cause a great deal of electrical and RF noise; without a
commutator or brushes, a brushless motor may be used in electrically sensitive
devices like audio equipment or computers.
The same Hall effect sensors that provide the commutation can also provide a
convenient tachometer signal for closed-loop control (servo-controlled)
applications. In fans, the tachometer signal can be used to derive a "fan OK"
signal.
The motor can be easily synchronized to an internal or external clock, leading to
precise speed control.
Brushless motors have no chance of sparking, unlike brushed motors, making
them better suited to environments with volatile chemicals and fuels. Also,
sparking generates ozone which can accumulate in poorly ventilated buildings
risking harm to occupants' health.
Brushless motors are usually used in small equipment such as computers and are
generally used to get rid of unwanted heat.
They are also very quiet motors which is an advantage if being used in equipment
that is affected by vibrations.

Modern DC brushless motors range in power from a fraction of a watt to many kilowatts.
Larger brushless motors up to about 100 kW rating are used in electric vehicles. They
also find significant use in high-performance electric model aircraft.
6.5.3. Coreless or Ironless DC Motors
Nothing in the design of any of the motors described above requires that the iron (steel)
portions of the rotor actually rotate; torque is exerted only on the windings of the
electromagnets. Taking advantage of this fact is the coreless or ironless DC motor, a
specialized form of a brush or brushless DC motor. Optimized for rapid acceleration,
these motors have a rotor that is constructed without any iron core. The rotor can take the
form of a winding-filled cylinder, or a self-supporting structure comprising only the
magnet wire and the bonding material. The rotor can fit inside the stator magnets; a
magnetically-soft stationary cylinder inside the rotor provides a return path for the stator
magnetic flux. A second arrangement has the rotor winding basket surrounding the stator
magnets. In that design, the rotor fits inside a magnetically-soft cylinder that can serve as
the housing for the motor, and likewise provides a return path for the flux.
Because the rotor is much lighter in weight (mass) than a conventional rotor formed from
copper windings on steel laminations, the rotor can accelerate much more rapidly, often
achieving a mechanical time constant under 1 ms. This is especially true if the windings
use aluminum rather than the heavier copper. But because there is no metal mass in the
rotor to act as a heat sink, even small coreless motors must often be cooled by forced air.

Related limited-travel actuators have no core and a bonded coil placed between the poles
of high-flux thin permanent magnets. These are the fast head positioners for rigid-disc
("hard disc") drives.
6.5.4. Printed Armature or Pancake DC Motors
A rather unique motor design the pancake/printed armature motor has the windings
shaped as a disc running between arrays of high-flux magnets, arranged in a circle, facing
the rotor and forming an axial air gap. This design is commonly known the pancake
motor because of its extremely flat profile, although the technology has had many brand
names since it's inception, such as Servo Disc.
The printed armature (originally formed on a printed circuit board) in a printed armature
motor is made from punched copper sheets that are laminated together using advanced
composites to form a thin rigid disc. The printed armature has a unique construction, in
the brushed motor world, in that is does not have a separate ring commutator. The brushes
run directly on the armature surface making the whole design very compact.
An alternative manufacturing method is to use wound copper wire laid flat with a central
conventional commutator, in a flower and petal shape. The windings are typically
stabilized by being impregnated with electrical epoxy potting systems. These are filled
epoxies that have moderate mixed viscosity and a long gel time. They are highlighted by
low shrinkage and low exotherm, and are typically UL 1446 recognized as a potting
compound for use up to 180C (Class H) (UL File No. E 210549).
The unique advantage of ironless DC motors is that there is no cogging (vibration caused
by attraction between the iron and the magnets) and parasitic eddy currents cannot form
in the rotor as it is totally ironless. This can greatly improve efficiency, but variable-speed
controllers must use a higher switching rate (>40 kHz) or direct current because of the
decreased electromagnetic induction.
These motors were originally invented to drive the capstan(s) of magnetic tape drives, in
the burgeoning computer industry. Pancake motors are still widely used in highperformance servo-controlled systems, humanoid robotic systems, industrial automation
and medical devices. Due to the variety of constructions now available the technology is
used in applications from high temperature military to low cost pump and basic servo
applications.
6.6. Universal Motors
A series-wound motor is referred to as a universal motor when it has been designed to
operate on either AC or DC power. The ability to operate on AC is because the current in
both the field and the armature (and hence the resultant magnetic fields) will alternate
(reverse polarity) in synchronism, and hence the resulting mechanical force will occur in
a constant direction.

Operating at normal power line frequencies, universal motors are very rarely larger than
one kilowatt (about 1.3 horsepower). Universal motors also form the basis of the
traditional railway traction motor in electric railways. In this application, to keep their
electrical efficiency high, they were operated from very low frequency AC supplies, with
25 and 16.7 hertz (Hz) operation being common. Because they are universal motors,
locomotives using this design were also commonly capable of operating from a third rail
powered by DC.
An advantage of the universal motor is that AC supplies may be used on motors which
have some characteristics more common in DC motors, specifically high starting torque
and very compact design if high running speeds are used. The negative aspect is the
maintenance and short life problems caused by the commutator. As a result, such motors
are usually used in AC devices such as food mixers and power tools which are used only
intermittently, and often have high starting-torque demands. Continuous speed control of
a universal motor running on AC is easily obtained by use of a thyristor circuit, while
(imprecise) stepped speed control can be accomplished using multiple taps on the field
coil. Household blenders that advertise many speeds frequently combine a field coil with
several taps and a diode that can be inserted in series with the motor (causing the motor
to run on half-wave rectified AC).
Universal motors generally run at high speeds, making them useful for appliances such as
blenders, vacuum cleaners, and hair dryers where high RPM operation is desirable. They
are also commonly used in portable power tools, such as drills, circular and jig saws,
where the motor's characteristics work well. Many vacuum cleaner and weed trimmer
motors exceed 10,000 RPM, while Dremel and other similar miniature grinders will often
exceed 30,000 RPM.
Motor damage may occur due to overspeeding (running at an RPM in excess of design
limits) if the unit is operated with no significant load. On larger motors, sudden loss of
load is to be avoided, and the possibility of such an occurrence is incorporated into the
motor's protection and control schemes. In some smaller applications, a fan blade
attached to the shaft often acts as an artificial load to limit the motor speed to a safe
value, as well as a means to circulate cooling airflow over the armature and field
windings.
6.7. AC Motors

In 1882, Nikola Tesla discovered the rotating magnetic field, and pioneered the use of a
rotary field of force to operate machines. He exploited the principle to design a unique
two-phase induction motor in 1883. In 1885, Galileo Ferraris independently researched
the concept. In 1888, Ferraris published his research in a paper to the Royal Academy of
Sciences in Turin.
Tesla had suggested that the commutators from a machine could be removed and the
device could operate on a rotary field of force. Professor Poeschel, his teacher, stated that

would be akin to building a perpetual motion machine.[17] Tesla would later attain U.S.
Patent 0,416,194, Electric Motor (December 1889), which resembles the motor seen in
many of Tesla's photos. This classic alternating current electro-magnetic motor was an
induction motor.
Michail Osipovich Dolivo-Dobrovolsky later invented a three-phase "cage-rotor" in
1890. This type of motor is now used for the vast majority of commercial applications.
6.7.1. Components
A typical AC motor consists of two parts:

An outside stationary stator having coils supplied with AC current to produce a


rotating magnetic field, and;
An inside rotor attached to the output shaft that is given a torque by the rotating
field.

6.8. Torque Motors


A torque motor (also known as a limited torque motor) is a specialized form of induction
motor which is capable of operating indefinitely while stalled, that is, with the rotor
blocked from turning, without incurring damage. In this mode of operation, the motor
will apply a steady torque to the load (hence the name).
A common application of a torque motor would be the supply- and take-up reel motors in
a tape drive. In this application, driven from a low voltage, the characteristics of these
motors allow a relatively-constant light tension to be applied to the tape whether or not
the capstan is feeding tape past the tape heads. Driven from a higher voltage, (and so
delivering a higher torque), the torque motors can also achieve fast-forward and rewind
operation without requiring any additional mechanics such as gears or clutches. In the
computer gaming world, torque motors are used in force feedback steering wheels.
Another common application is the control of the throttle of an internal combustion
engine in conjunction with an electronic governor. In this usage, the motor works against
a return spring to move the throttle in accordance with the output of the governor. The
latter monitors engine speed by counting electrical pulses from the ignition system or
from a magnetic pickup [18] and, depending on the speed, makes small adjustments to the
amount of current applied to the motor. If the engine starts to slow down relative to the
desired speed, the current will be increased, the motor will develop more torque, pulling
against the return spring and opening the throttle. Should the engine run too fast, the
governor will reduce the current being applied to the motor, causing the return spring to
pull back and close the throttle.

6.8.1. Slip Ring


The slip ring is a component of the wound rotor motor as an induction machine (best
evidenced by the construction of the common automotive alternator), where the rotor
comprises a set of coils that are electrically terminated in slip rings. These are metal rings
rigidly mounted on the rotor, and combined with brushes (as used with commutators),
provide continuous unswitched connection to the rotor windings.
In the case of the wound-rotor induction motor, external impedances can be connected to
the brushes. The stator is excited similarly to the standard squirrel cage motor. By
changing the impedance connected to the rotor circuit, the speed/current and speed/torque
curves can be altered.
(Slip rings are most-commonly used in automotive alternators as well as in synchro
angular data-transmission devices, among other applications.)
The slip ring motor is used primarily to start a high inertia load or a load that requires a
very high starting torque across the full speed range. By correctly selecting the resistors
used in the secondary resistance or slip ring starter, the motor is able to produce
maximum torque at a relatively low supply current from zero speed to full speed. This
type of motor also offers controllable speed.
Motor speed can be changed because the torque curve of the motor is effectively
modified by the amount of resistance connected to the rotor circuit. Increasing the value
of resistance will move the speed of maximum torque down. If the resistance connected
to the rotor is increased beyond the point where the maximum torque occurs at zero
speed, the torque will be further reduced.
When used with a load that has a torque curve that increases with speed, the motor will
operate at the speed where the torque developed by the motor is equal to the load torque.
Reducing the load will cause the motor to speed up, and increasing the load will cause the
motor to slow down until the load and motor torque are equal. Operated in this manner,
the slip losses are dissipated in the secondary resistors and can be very significant. The
speed regulation and net efficiency is also very poor.
6.9. Stepper Motors
Closely related in design to three-phase AC synchronous motors are stepper motors,
where an internal rotor containing permanent magnets or a magnetically-soft rotor with
salient poles is controlled by a set of external magnets that are switched electronically. A
stepper motor may also be thought of as a cross between a DC electric motor and a rotary
solenoid. As each coil is energized in turn, the rotor aligns itself with the magnetic field
produced by the energized field winding. Unlike a synchronous motor, in its application,
the stepper motor may not rotate continuously; instead, it "steps" starts and then
quickly stops again from one position to the next as field windings are energized and
de-energized in sequence. Depending on the sequence, the rotor may turn forwards or

backwards, and it may change direction, stop, speed up or slow down arbitrarily at any
time.
Simple stepper motor drivers entirely energize or entirely de-energize the field windings,
leading the rotor to "cog" to a limited number of positions; more sophisticated drivers can
proportionally control the power to the field windings, allowing the rotors to position
between the cog points and thereby rotate extremely smoothly. This mode of operation is
often called microstepping. Computer controlled stepper motors are one of the most
versatile forms of positioning systems, particularly when part of a digital servo-controlled
system.
Stepper motors can be rotated to a specific angle in discrete steps with ease, and hence
stepper motors are used for read/write head positioning in computer floppy discette
drives. They were used for the same purpose in pre-gigabyte era computer disc drives,
where the precision and speed they offered was adequate for the correct positioning of the
read/write head of a hard disc drive. As drive density increased, the precision and speed
limitations of stepper motors made them obsolete for hard drivesthe precision
limitation made them unusable, and the speed limitation made them uncompetitivethus
newer hard disc drives use voice coil-based head actuator systems. (The term "voice coil"
in this connection is historic; it refers to the structure in a typical (cone type) loudspeaker.
This structure was used for a while to position the heads. Modern drives have a pivoted
coil mount; the coil swings back and forth, something like a blade of a rotating fan.
Nevertheless, like a voice coil, modern actuator coil conductors (the magnet wire) move
perpendicular to the magnetic lines of force.)
Stepper motors were and still are often used in computer printers, optical scanners, and
digital photocopiers to move the optical scanning element, the print head carriage (of dot
matrix and inkjet printers), and the platen. Likewise, many computer plotters (which
since the early 1990s have been replaced with large-format inkjet and laser printers) used
rotary stepper motors for pen and platen movement; the typical alternatives here were
either linear stepper motors or servomotors with complex closed-loop control systems.
So-called quartz analog wristwatches contain the smallest commonplace stepping motors;
they have one coil, draw very little power, and have a permanent-magnet rotor. The same
kind of motor drives battery-powered quartz clocks. Some of these watches, such as
chronographs, contain more than one stepping motor.
Stepper motors were upscaled to be used in electric vehicles under the term SRM
(Switched Reluctance Motor).
6.10. Linear Motor
A linear motor is essentially an electric motor that has been "unrolled" so that, instead of
producing a torque (rotation), it produces a straight-line force along its length by setting
up a traveling electromagnetic field.

Linear motors are most commonly induction motors or stepper motors. You can find a
linear motor in a maglev (Transrapid) train, where the train "flies" over the ground, and in
many roller-coasters where the rapid motion of the motorless railcar is controlled by the
rail. On a smaller scale, at least one letter-size (8.5" x 11") computer graphics X-Y pen
plotter made by Hewlett-Packard (in the late 1970s to mid 1980's) used two linear stepper
motors to move the pen along the two orthogonal axes.
7. Feeding and windings
7.1. Doubly-fed Electric Motor

Doubly-fed electric motors have two independent multiphase


windings that actively participate in the energy conversion
process with at least one of the winding sets electronically
controlled for variable speed operation. Two is the most
active multiphase winding sets possible without duplicating
singly-fed or doubly-fed categories in the same package. As
a result, doubly-fed electric motors are machines with an
effective constant torque speed range that is twice
synchronous speed for a given frequency of excitation. This
is twice the constant torque speed range as singly-fed
electric machines, which have only one active winding set.
A doubly-fed motor allows for a smaller electronic converter but the cost of the rotor
winding and slip rings may offset the saving in the power electronics components.
Difficulties with controlling speed near synchronous speed limit applications.
7.2. Singly-fed electric motor
Singly-fed electric motors incorporate a single multiphase winding set that is connected
to a power supply. Singly-fed electric machines may be either induction or synchronous.
The active winding set can be electronically controlled. Induction machines develop
starting torque at zero speed and can operate as standalone machines. Synchronous
machines must have auxiliary means for startup, such as a starting induction squirrel-cage
winding or an electronic controller. Singly-fed electric machines have an effective
constant torque speed range up to synchronous speed for a given excitation frequency.
The induction (asynchronous) motors (i.e., squirrel cage rotor or wound rotor),
synchronous motors (i.e., field-excited, permanent magnet or brushless DC motors,
reluctance motors, etc.), which are discussed on this page, are examples of singly-fed
motors. By far, singly-fed motors are the predominantly installed type of motors.
8. Nanotube Nanomotor

Researchers at University of California, Berkeley, recently developed rotational bearings


based upon multiwall carbon nanotubes. By attaching a gold plate (with dimensions of
the order of 100 nm) to the outer shell of a suspended multiwall carbon nanotube (like
nested carbon cylinders), they are able to electrostatically rotate the outer shell relative to
the inner core. These bearings are very robust; devices have been oscillated thousands of
times with no indication of wear. These nano electromechanical systems (NEMS) are the
next step in miniaturization and may find their way into commercial applications in the
future.
9. Efficiency
To calculate a motor's efficiency, the mechanical output power is divided by the electrical
input power:

,
where is energy conversion efficiency, Pe is electrical input power, and Pm is
mechanical output power.
In simplest case Pe = VI, and Pm = T, where V is input voltage, I is input current, T is
output torque, and is output angular velocity. It is possible to derive analytically the
point of maximum efficiency. It is typically at less than 1/2 the stall torque. Implications
Because a DC motor operates most efficiently at less than 1/2 its stall torque, an
"oversized" motor runs with the highest efficiency. IE: using a bigger motor than is
necessary enables the motor to operate closest to no load, or peak operating conditions.
10. Torque Capability of Motor Types
When optimally designed for a given active current (i.e., torque current), voltage, polepair number, excitation frequency (i.e., synchronous speed), and core flux density, all
categories of electric motors or generators will exhibit virtually the same maximum
continuous shaft torque (i.e., operating torque) within a given physical size of
electromagnetic core. Some applications require bursts of torque beyond the maximum
operating torque, such as short bursts of torque to accelerate an electric vehicle from
standstill. Always limited by magnetic core saturation or safe operating temperature rise
and voltage, the capacity for torque bursts beyond the maximum operating torque differs
significantly between categories of electric motors or generators.
Note: Capacity for bursts of torque should not be confused with Field Weakening
capability inherent in fully electromagnetic electric machines (Permanent Magnet (PM)
electric machine are excluded). Field Weakening, which is not readily available with PM
electric machines, allows an electric machine to operate beyond the designed frequency
of excitation without electrical damage.

Electric machines without a transformer circuit topology, such as Field-Wound (i.e.,


electromagnet) or Permanent Magnet (PM) Synchronous electric machines cannot realize
bursts of torque higher than the maximum designed torque without saturating the
magnetic core and rendering any increase in current as useless. Furthermore, the
permanent magnet assembly of PM synchronous electric machines can be irreparably
damaged, if bursts of torque exceeding the maximum operating torque rating are
attempted.
Electric machines with a transformer circuit topology, such as Induction (i.e.,
asynchronous) electric machines, Induction Doubly-Fed electric machines, and Induction
or Synchronous Wound-Rotor Doubly-Fed (WRDF) electric machines, exhibit very high
bursts of torque because the active current (i.e., Magneto-Motive-Force or the product of
current and winding-turns) induced on either side of the transformer oppose each other
and as a result, the active current contributes nothing to the transformer coupled magnetic
core flux density, which would otherwise lead to core saturation.
Electric machines that rely on Induction or Asynchronous principles short-circuit one port
of the transformer circuit and as a result, the reactive impedance of the transformer circuit
becomes dominant as slip increases, which limits the magnitude of active (i.e., real)
current. Still, bursts of torque that are two to three times higher than the maximum design
torque are realizable.
The Synchronous WRDF electric machine is the only electric machine with a truly dual
ported transformer circuit topology (i.e., both ports independently excited with no shortcircuited port). The dual ported transformer circuit topology is known to be unstable and
requires a multiphase slip-ring-brush assembly to propagate limited power to the rotor
winding set. If a precision means were available to instantaneously control torque angle
and slip for synchronous operation during motoring or generating while simultaneously
providing brushless power to the rotor winding set (see Brushless wound-rotor doublyfed electric machine), the active current of the Synchronous WRDF electric machine
would be independent of the reactive impedance of the transformer circuit and bursts of
torque significantly higher than the maximum operating torque and far beyond the
practical capability of any other type of electric machine would be realizable. Torque
bursts greater than eight times operating torque have been calculated.
11. Materials
There is an impending shortage of many rare raw materials used in the manufacture of
hybrid and electric cars (Nishiyama 2007) (Cox 2008). For example, the rare earth
element dysprosium is required to fabricate many of the advanced electric motors used in
hybrid cars (Cox 2008). However, over 95% of the world's rare earth elements are mined
in China (Haxel et al. 2005), and domestic Chinese consumption is expected to consume
China's entire supply by 2012 (Cox 2008).[citation needed]
While permanent magnet motors, favored in hybrids such as those made by Toyota, often
use rare earth materials in their magnets, AC traction motors used in production electric

vehicles such as the GM EV1, Toyota RAV4 EV and Tesla Roadster do not use
permanent magnets or the associated rare earth materials. AC motors typically use
conventional copper wire for their stator coils and copper or aluminum rods or bars for
their rotor. AC motors do not significantly use rare earth materials.
12. Motor Standards
The following are major design and manufacturing standards covering electric motors:

International Electrotechnical Commission: IEC 60034 Rotating Electrical


Machines
National Electrical Manufacturers Association (USA): NEMA MG 1 Motors and
Generators
Underwriters Laboratories (USA): UL 1004 - Standard for Electric Motors

13. Uses
Electric motors are used in many, if not most, modern machines. Obvious uses would be
in rotating machines such as fans, turbines, drills, the wheels on electric cars, locomotives
and conveyor belts. Also, in many vibrating or oscillating machines, an electric motor
spins an irregular figure with more area on one side of the axle than the other, causing it
to appear to be moving up and down.
Electric motors are also popular in robotics. They are used to turn the wheels of vehicular
robots, and servo motors are used to turn arms and legs in humanoid robots. In flying
robots, along with helicopters, a motor causes a propeller or wide, flat blades to spin and
create lift force, allowing vertical motion.
In industrial and manufacturing businesses, electric motors are used to turn saws and
blades in cutting and slicing processes, and to spin gears and mixers (the latter very
common in food manufacturing). Linear motors are often used to push products into
containers horizontally.
Many kitchen appliances also use electric motors to accomplish various jobs. Food
processors and grinders spin blades to chop and break up foods. Blenders use electric
motors to mix liquids, and microwave ovens use motors to turn the tray food sits on.
Toaster ovens also use electric motors to turn a conveyor to move food over heating
elements.
14. Conclusion
We can modulate hydraulics better and it takes more skill to keep mechanicals from
locking up
They have the same terminal stopping power.
Mechanicals are easier to adjust, maintain and repair but properly set up hydraulics
almost never need adjustment, maintenance or repair. Hydraulics tend to give us more

braking power and have a smoother feel to them but most riders- I don't care who they
are unless they are competing- don't need hydraulics.
References
1.

^ Slade, Tim (2004). Original Mercedes-Benz Coupes and Cabriolets and


V-8 Sedans 19601972. MBI Publishing. p. 61. ISBN 978-0-7603-1952-9.
Retrieved 2010-11-11.
2.
^ Jacobsson, H. (1996), "High speed disc brake judder the influence of
passing through critical speed", In EuroMech 2nd European Nonlinear
Ocillation Conference, Prague, no. 2, pp. 7578.
3.
^ Jacobsson, H. (1997), "Wheel suspension related disc brake judder",
ASME, no. DETC97/VIB-4165, pp. 110.
4.
^ Jacobsson, H. (1999), SAE Technical Paper Series, no. 1999-01-1779,
pp. 114.
5.
^ Stringham, W. et al. (1993), "Brake roughness disc brake torque
variation", disc distortion and vehicle response, SAE Technical Paper Series, no.
930803.
6.
^ Thoms, E. (1988), "Disc brakes for heavy vehicles", IMechE, pp. 133
137.
7.
^ Anderson, E., et al. (1990), "Hot spotting in automotive friction
systems", Wear, v. 135, pp. 319337.
8.
^ Barber, R., J. et al. (1985), "Implications of thermoelastic instabilities
for the design of brakes", J. Tribology, v. 107, pp. 206210.
9.
^ Inoue, H. (1986), Analysis of brake judder caused by thermal
deformation of brake discs, SAE Technical Paper Series, no. 865131.
10.
^ a b Rhee, K.S. et al. (1989), "Frictioninduced noise and vibration of disc
brakes", Wear, v. 133, pp. 3945.
11.
^ J. Slavi, M.D. Bryant and M. Boltear (2007), "A new approach to
roughness-induced vibrations on a slider.", J. Sound and Vibration, Vol. 306,
Issues 35, 9 October 2007, pp. 732750.
12.
^ Kim, M.-G. et al. (1996), "Sensitivity analysis of chassis system to
improve shimmy and brake judder vibration on the steering wheel", SAE
Technical Paper Series, no. 960734.
13.
http://www.ebcbrakes.com/automotive_product_news/brakes_dust.shtml

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen