Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Physical characteristics of yoghurts made using exopolysaccharideproducing starter cultures and varying casein to whey protein ratios
T. Amatayakula, A.L. Halmosb, F. Sherkatb, N.P. Shaha,
a
Faculty of Science Engineering and Technology, School of Molecular Sciences, Victoria University, Werribee Campus, PO Box 14428,
Melbourne City MC, Victoria 8001, Australia
b
Department of Food Science, RMIT University, City Campus, GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Victoria, Australia
Received 12 February 2004; accepted 11 January 2005
Abstract
This study investigated the physical characteristics of set and stirred yoghurts made at 9% (w/w) total solids with various casein
(CN)-to-whey protein (WP) ratios and with exopolysaccharide (EPS)-producing starter cultures (capsular or ropy) during storage.
The yoghurt was evaluated for composition, rmness and syneresis of set yoghurt, and for the ow curve and the area of hysteresis
loop between the upward and downward curve of stirred yoghurt. Viable counts of starter bacteria and concentrations of lactic acid
and EPS in the yoghurt were also determined. EPS concentration did not decrease during storage for 28 d. Firmness and syneresis of
set yoghurt decreased when the CN-to-WP ratio was reduced from ratio 4:1 to 1:1 and when EPS starter cultures (especially ropy
EPS) were used. Stirred yoghurt with a CN-to-WP ratio of 3:1 and made using ropy EPS-producing starter cultures had a higher
shear stress and hysteresis loop area than yoghurt made using capsular EPS- or non-EPS-producing starter cultures. The results
suggested that the physical characteristics of set and stirred yoghurts can be improved by varying CN-to-WP ratio and by the use of
EPS-producing starter cultures.
r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Yoghurts; Exopolysaccharide; Texture; Rheology; Storage
1. Introduction
Appearance and physical characteristics are important quality parameters of yoghurt. Good quality
yoghurt should be thick and smooth with no signs of
syneresis. Set yoghurt with a high level of syneresis on
the surface may be regarded as a low quality product,
even though this is a natural phenomenon. Conventionally, syneresis is reduced by increasing the total solids of
yoghurt mix to around 14% (w/w) with dry dairy
ingredients (Tamime & Deeth, 1980) or by using
stabilizers. Dry dairy ingredients such as skim milk
powder (SMP), whey protein isolate (WPI), whey
Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 9216 8289;
fax: +61 3 9216 8284.
E-mail address: nagendra.shah@vu.edu.au (N.P. Shah).
0958-6946/$ - see front matter r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.01.004
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T. Amatayakul et al. / International Dairy Journal 16 (2006) 4051
41
ARTICLE IN PRESS
42
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T. Amatayakul et al. / International Dairy Journal 16 (2006) 4051
43
Table 1
Compositional parameters of milk blends used in the manufacture of yoghurtsa
Compositional parameters
3:1
2:1
1:1
8.8970.01a
3.0870.07a
o 0.1a
4.9770.07a
0.4070.21a
4.3670.25a
8.8770.12a
3.0770.26a
o 0.1a
4.9970.11a
0.4570.01a
2.9870.03b
8.8570.04a
3.0970.02a
o 0.1a
4.9670.05a
0.4070.07a
2.1370.01c
9.0670.17a
3.0670.02a
o 0.1a
5.0170.09a
0.3670.12a
1.2170.02d
a
Milks were prepared by blending the desired levels of reconstituted low heat skim milk powder, whey protein concentrate (76% protein) and
lactose monohydrate to give varying casein-to-whey protein ratios. Presented values are the means of three replicate trials; 7 indicates standard
deviation from the mean. Mean values (7standard deviation) within the same row not sharing a common superscript differ signicantly (Po0.05).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T. Amatayakul et al. / International Dairy Journal 16 (2006) 4051
44
pH
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
0
Table 2
Concentration of lactic acid (%, w/w) in yoghurts prepared from milk blends with varying casein-to-whey protein ratios, as described in Table 1, and
made using non-exopolysaccharide producing (control) cultures, capsular exopolysaccharide-producing starter culture or ropy exopolysaccharideproducing starter culturesa
Starter culture
Casein-to-whey
protein ratio
7
g,A
14
e,A
21
d,e,A
28
d,e,A
0.9570.03d,A
4:1
0.9370.03
3:1
2:1
1:1
4:1
0.8570.04d,e,f,g,A
0.7570.06b,c,d,A
0.6970.04a,,b,c,A
0.8570.03e,f,g,A
0.8870.04d,e,A
0.8570.01c,d,A,B
0.7570.04a,b,c,A,B
1.0170.04e,B,C
0.8770.08b,c,d,e,A 0.9070.06c,d,e,A
0.7970.05a,b,c,d,A,B 0.8970.02b,c,d,e,B
0.6970.03a,A
0.8070.03a,b,c,d,A,B
1.0270.02e,C
0.9770.09e,A,B,C
0.8470.01b,c,d,A
0.8070.06a,b,c,A,B
0.7870.05c,d,A,B
0.8970.04c,d,A,B
3:1
2:1
1:1
4:1
0.8070.05c,d,e,f,A
0.7270.05b,c,A
0.6070.01a,A
0.8970.02f,g,A,B
0.9370.06d,e,B
0.8270.05a,b,c,d,A,B
0.7270.04a,b,A
0.9070.01d,e,A,B
0.9470.03d,e,B
0.8670.05b,c,d,e,B
0.7170.02a,b,A
0.9970.05e,B
0.8070.06a,b,c,A
0.7770.08a,b,c,A,B
0.6970.08a,A
0.8970.02c,d,A,B
3:1
2:1
1:1
0.8470.02d,e,f,g,A 0.9170.05d,e,A
0.7570.04b,c,d,e,A 0.8470.03b,c,d,A
0.6970.01a,b,A
0.7070.04a,A
0.9970.06
0.9570.07
0.9670.09
0.8670.03a,b,c,d,e,A,B
0.7770.02a,b,c,A,B
0.6970.07a,A
0.8670.08b,c,d,e,A
0.9270.06c,d,e,A
0.8970.03c,d,e,A
0.7870.09a,b,c,A 0.7970.08a,b,c,d,A
0.7970.05a,b,c,d,B 0.7270.02a,b,A,B
0.8870.04c,d,A
0.8570.04b,c,d,A
0.7270.03a,b,A,B
a
Presented values are the means of three replicate trials; 7 indicates standard deviation from the mean. For details of starter cultures, see Section
2.2 and 2.3. Mean values (7standard deviation) within the same row not sharing a common superscript (A,B,C) differ signicantly (Po0.05). Mean
values (7standard deviation) within the same column not sharing a common superscript (a,b,c,d,e,f,g) differ signicantly (Po0.05).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T. Amatayakul et al. / International Dairy Journal 16 (2006) 4051
45
Table 3
Viable counts (log10 cfu g 1) of S. thermophilus (ST) and L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus (LB) in yoghurts prepared from milk blends with different
casein-to-whey protein ratios, as described in Table 1, and made using different starter culturesa
Starter culture
Casein-to-whey
protein ratio
4:1
3:1
2:1
1:1
4:1
3:1
2:1
1:1
4:1
3:1
2:1
1:1
14
21
28
ST
LB
ST
LB
ST
LB
ST
LB
ST
LB
8.89
8.94
8.94
8.78
8.85
8.79
8.84
8.63
8.82
8.80
8.85
8.81
7.73
7.53
7.65
7.01
7.64
7.71
7.51
7.59
7.73
7.85
7.76
7.11
8.86
8.88
8.86
8.89
8.84
8.56
8.70
8.44
9.05
8.84
9.03
8.89
7.79
7.86
7.68
7.62
7.69
7.69
7.46
7.32
7.82
7.67
7.64
7.45
8.41
8.56
8.75
8.70
8.61
8.53
8.56
8.41
8.70
9.33
8.69
8.90
7.86
7.85
7.54
6.91
7.74
7.66
7.59
7.51
8.09
8.03
7.59
7.09
8.00
7.73
8.58
8.64
7.71
8.35
8.61
8.36
8.37
8.53
8.58
8.67
6.88
7.63
6.74
6.61
6.67
7.11
6.95
6.51
7.69
7.46
7.74
7.28
7.88
7.90
8.38
8.58
7.44
8.18
8.52
7.72
8.53
8.49
7.73
7.72
5.45
7.51
6.68
5.29
6.37
6.68
6.47
6.46
7.50
7.67
7.22
7.47
Presented values are the means of three replicate trials. For details of starter cultures, see Sections 2.2 and 2.3.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T. Amatayakul et al. / International Dairy Journal 16 (2006) 4051
46
Table 4
Concentration of exopolysaccharide (mg L 1) in yoghurts prepared from milk blends with different casein-to-whey protein ratios, as described in
Table 1, and made using different starter culturesa
Starter culture
Casein-to-whey
protein ratio
4:1
7
a,A
9.1072.11
14
10.3071.19
a,A
21
a,A
9.4870.09
28
a,A
10.4471.34
8.5473.71a,A
3:1
2:1
1:1
4:1
8.0370.71a,A
9.2071.04a,A,B
7.9571.20a,A
32.4170.73b,c,B
9.7470.14a,A
9.0470.51a,A,B
10.0170.26a,A
28.8970.94b,A
9.6870.97a,A
8.8670.81a,A,B
8.8571.90a,A
30.8672.96b,c,A,B
8.2770.86a,A
9.7070.83a,B
8.2872.47a,A
36.9071.00b,c,C
9.6871.40a,A
7.9670.71a,A
8.7671.69a,A
33.5170.71b,B
3:1
2:1
1:1
4:1
32.5470.31b,c,A,B
29.1672.84b,A
38.3578.56b,c,d,A
41.5778.19c,d,e,A
29.3770.93b,A
28.8371.27b,A
31.8573.80b,A
47.7873.42d,A
33.4373.92b,c,B
28.5373.43b,A
32.8574.22b,c,A
49.69713.75d,e,A
30.3471.55b,A,B
31.4870.87b,A
36.1572.17b,c,A
53.9775.63d,e,A,B
32.4071.06b,A,B
31.8675.66b,A
36.0671.80b,A
66.4575.49d,B
3:1
2:1
1:1
43.2073.04d,e,A
48.6279.99e,A,B
36.6474.15b,c,d,A
47.7272.02d,A,B
41.4874.78c,A
42.4773.81c,A,B
60.06711.79e,B,C
58.4178.79e,B
42.3974.02c,d,A,B
63.21712.47e,B,C
50.13711.59d,A,B
44.7072.72c,d,B
75.4176.70e,C
62.1372.67c,d,B
57.3372.38c,C
a
Presented values are the means of three replicate trials; 7 indicates standard deviation from the mean. For details of starter cultures, see Section
2.2 and 2.3. Mean values (7standard deviation) within the same row not sharing a common superscript (A,B,C) differ signicantly (Po0.05). Mean
values (7standard deviation) within the same column not sharing a common superscript (a,b,c,d,e) differ signicantly (Po0.05).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T. Amatayakul et al. / International Dairy Journal 16 (2006) 4051
10.0
(a)
Firmness (N)
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0
1.0
14
21
6.0
4.0
2.0
28
10.0
(b)
Syneresis (%, w/w)
Firmness (N)
(d)
8.0
0.0
0.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
14
21
28
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
14
21
28
14
21
28
14
21
28
14
21
28
(e)
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
10.0
(c)
8.0
1.0
Firmness (N)
47
(f)
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
0
Fig. 2. Firmness (a, b, c) and syneresis (d, e, f) of yoghurts made using non-exopolysaccharide-producing (control) cultures (a, d), capsular
exopolysaccharide-producing starter cultures (b, e), or ropy exopolysaccharide-producing starter cultures (c, f). The yoghurts were prepared from
milk blends with varying casein-to-whey protein ratios of 4:1 (J), 3:1 (K), 2:1 (E), and 1:1 (E). Each value is the mean of three replicate trials; error
bars represent standard deviations from the mean. See details of starter culture and milk blends composition in Section 2.2 and Table 1, and details of
tests in Sections 2.7 and 2.8.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T. Amatayakul et al. / International Dairy Journal 16 (2006) 4051
48
200
18
Loop area (Pa s-1)
(a)
14
10
6
150
100
50
2
10
20
30
40
(d)
50
1
200
18
14
21
28
14
21
28
14
21
28
(e)
(b)
14
10
6
100
50
0
2
10
20
30
40
50
200
18
(c)
Loop area (Pa s-1)
150
14
10
6
2
(f)
150
100
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
-1
Shear rate (s )
Fig. 3. Shear stress as a function of increasing and decreasing shear rate (a, b, c) for yoghurts that were prepared from milk blends with varying
casein-to-whey protein ratios of 4:1 (J), 3:1 (K), 2:1 (B), and 1:1 (E). Loop area as a function of the corresponding areas of shear stress/shear rate
hysteresis loops (d, e, f) for yoghurts that were prepared from milk blends with varying casein-to-whey protein ratios of 4:1 (T), 3:1 (), 2:1 ( ), and
1:1 ( ). Yoghurts were made using non-exopolysaccharide-producing (control) starter cultures (a, d), capsular exopolysaccharide-producing starter
cultures (b, e), or ropy exopolysaccharide-producing starter cultures (c, f). Each value is the mean of 3 replicate trials; error bars represent standard
deviations from the mean. See details of starter culture and milk blend composition in Section 2.2 and Table 1, and details of tests in
Section 2.9.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T. Amatayakul et al. / International Dairy Journal 16 (2006) 4051
49
to-WP ratios. For stirred yoghurts made using EPSproducing starter cultures (both capsular and ropy), the
highest shear stress was found at a CN-to-WP ratio of 3:1.
The area of hysteresis loop between the up and down
shear rate versus shear stress curves was determined. The
hysteresis loop area of stirred yoghurts made with ropy
EPS-producing starter cultures (Fig. 3f) was higher than
those made with non-EPS- (Fig. 3d) and capsular EPSproducing starter cultures (Fig. 3e). As all stirred yoghurts
had the same level of total solids and were made using the
same procedure and given the incompatibility between
EPS and milk proteins (de Kruif & Tuinier, 2001), the
presence of ropy EPS could be solely responsible for the
results observed. According to Morris (1995), most
polysaccharides exist in solution as random coils and can
form entangled networks depending on their numbers
(proportion to concentration) and molecular volume (size).
The entangled network causes an increase in the viscosity
of solution (Sworn, 2004).
Hassan, Frank, and Qvist (2002) observed the
microstructure before and after stirring of milk fermented with a single strain of L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricuss
RR (ropy starter culture). They reported that the EPS
segregated from the proteins and the EPS formed a
more extensive structure in the stirred gel compared with
the set gel. They suggested that stirring promoted the
interactions between molecules of ropy EPS. However,
they did not specify whether the interactions are
chemical or physical (entanglement) type. However, it
is likely that the interactions, as stated by Hassan et al.
(2002), are physical types or the entanglement of
polysaccharides. The entangled networks of ropy EPS
are also expected to occur in our study.
Theoretically, the area of hysteresis loop between
upward and downward ow curves represents the
structural breakdown of stirred yoghurt during shearing
(Halmos & Tiu, 1981; Ramaswamy & Basak, 1991;
Hassan et al., 1996a, 2003). The formation of entangled
networks of ropy EPS, as an additional structure in
stirred yoghurt, may explain the increase in the area of
hysteresis loop of products made using ropy EPSproducing starter cultures. It also implies that there was
no entangled network of EPS formed in the products
made using capsular EPS-producing starter cultures as
the value of hysteresis loop was comparable to that in
yoghurt made with non-EPS-starter cultures.
The area of hysteresis loop of stirred yoghurts made
using non-EPS- or capsular EPS-producing starter
cultures decreased as the CN-to-WP ratio was decreased. As the presence of capsular EPS did not
contribute to the hysteresis loop area, the results can
be interpreted as a decrease in structural breakdown of
proteins during shearing or an increase in the damage of
protein structure of initial stirred yoghurts made with
low CN-to-WP ratios compared with yoghurts with high
ratios. In this study, stirred yoghurt was produced by
ARTICLE IN PRESS
50
4. Conclusions
A decrease in the ratio of CN-to-WP of set yoghurt
reduced the level of syneresis and rmness. The use of
EPS-producing starter cultures also reduced the level of
syneresis and gel rmness. In stirred yoghurt made using
ropy EPS-producing starter cultures, there was an
increase in shear stress and the area of hysteresis loop
between the up and down shear rate versus shear stress
curves; the increase in loop area represents an additional
structure of EPSEPS in stirred yoghurt. The results of
this study suggest that there is a possibility of reducing
the level of added dairy ingredients and stabilizers in the
manufacture of stirred yoghurt by using ropy EPSproducing starter cultures. For set yoghurt, a CN-toWP ratio of 3:1 and the use of non-EPS-producing
starter cultures gave optimal rmness and syneresis
levels.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Mr. Micheal
Kakoullis, Laboratory Manager, Department of Food
Science, RMIT University, City Campus, Melbourne,
Australia for the assistances in using texture analyser
and rheometer.
References
AOAC. (1995). Official methods of analysis of AOAC international
(16th ed.). Arling, VA, USA: AOAC International.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T. Amatayakul et al. / International Dairy Journal 16 (2006) 4051
Hassan, A. N., Frank, J. F., Schmid, K. A., & Shalabi, S. I. (1996b).
Textural properties of yogurt made with encapsulated nonropy
lactic cultures. Journal of Dairy Science, 79, 20982103.
Hassan, A. N., Frank, J. F., & Qvist, K. B. (2002). Direct observation
of bacterial exopolysaccharide in dairy products using confocal
scanning laser microscopy. Journal of Dairy Science, 85,
17051708.
Hassan, A. N., Ipsen, R., Janzen, T., & Qvist, K. B. (2003).
Microstructure and rheology of yogurt made with cultures differing
only in their ability to produce exopolysaccharides. Journal of
Dairy Science, 86, 16321638.
Hess, S. J., Roberts, R. F., & Ziegler, G. R. (1997). Rheological
properties of nonfat yogurt stabilized using Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus producing exopolysaccharide or using
commercial stabilizer systems. Journal of Dairy Science, 80,
252263.
Jaros, D., Rohm, H., Haque, A., Bonaparte, & Kneifel, W. (2002).
Inuence of the starter cultures on the relationship between dry
matter content and physical properties of set-style yogurt.
Milchwissenschaft, 57, 325326.
Lucey, J. A. (2001). The relationship between rheological parameters
and whey separation in milk gels. Food Hydrocolloids, 15, 603608.
Marshall, V. M., & Rawson, H. L. (1999). Effects of exopolysaccharide-producing strains of thermophilic lactic acid bacteria on the
texture of stirred yoghurt. International Journal of Food Science and
Technology, 34, 137143.
Modler, H. W., Larmond, M. E., Lin, C. S., Froehlich, D., &
Emmons, D. B. (1983). Physical and sensory properties of yogurt
stabilized with milk proteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 66, 422429.
Morris, E. R. (1995). Polysaccharide rheology and in-mouth perception. In A. M. Stephen (Ed.), Food polysaccharides and their
applications (pp. 517546). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Perry, D. B., McMahon, D. J., & Oberg, C. J. (1997). Effect of
exopolysaccharide-producing cultures on moisture retention in low
fat mozzarella cheese. Journal of Dairy Science, 80, 799805.
Pham, P. I., Dupont, I., Roy, D., Lapointe, G., & Cerning, J. (2000).
Production of exopolysaccharide by Lactobacillus rhamnosus R and
analysis of its enzymatic degradation during prolonged fermentation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 23022310.
Puvanenthiran, A., Williams, R. P. W., & Augustin, M. A. (2002).
Structure and visco-elastic properties of set yoghurt with altered
casein to whey protein ratios. International Dairy Journal, 12,
383391.
Ramaswamy, H. S., & Basak, S. (1991). Rheology of stirred yogurts.
Journal of Texture Studies, 22, 231241.
Remuef, F., Mohammed, S., Sodini, I., & Tissier, J. P. (2003).
Preliminary observations on the effects of milk fortication and
51