Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
GUIDE
Reference
The recommended reference for this publication is:
Department of Mines and Petroleum, 2012, Evaluation
of asset integrity management system (AIMS) guide:
Resources Safety, Department of Mines and Petroleum,
Western Australia, 23 pp.
ISBN 978 1 921163 98 2
Department of Mines and Petroleum 2012
Except where the Copyright Act otherwise allows,
reproduction in whole or part of this publication will be
permitted only with the prior written permission of the
Department of Mines and Petroleum. Applications for
permission should be addressed to the Communications
Manager, Resources Safety.
This publication is also available in digital format (PDF)
online at www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety
Further details of publications produced by Resources
Safety can be obtained by contacting:
Resources Safety Publications
Department of Mines and Petroleum
100 Plain Street
EAST PERTH WA 6004
Telephone +61 8 9358 8002 (general queries)
+61 8 9358 8154 (publication orders)
NRS 13 36 77
Facsimile +61 8 9358 8000
Email ResourcesSafety@dmp.wa.gov.au
(general queries)
RSDcomms@dmp.wa.gov.au
(publication orders)
Disclaimer
The information contained in this publication is provided in
good faith and believed to be reliable and accurate at the
time of publication. However, the information is provided
on the basis that the reader will be solely responsible for
assessing the information and its veracity and usefulness.
The State shall in no way be liable, in negligence or
howsoever, for any loss sustained or incurred by anyone
relying on the information, even if such information is or
turns out to be wrong, incomplete, out-of-date or misleading.
In this disclaimer:
State means the State of Western Australia and includes
every Minister, agent, agency, department, statutory body
corporate and instrumentality thereof and each employee or
agent of any of them.
Information includes information, data, representations,
advice, statements and opinions, expressly or implied set out
in this publication.
Loss includes loss, damage, liability, cost, expense, illness
and injury (including death).
iv
Foreword
An asset integrity management system (AIMS) allows
operators, particularly those with large-scale petroleum
facilities, to demonstrate that, as far as is reasonably
practicable, they have ensured the integrity of their assets.
This guide is based on Departmental tools for assessment
of safety system documentation. It comprises a section
answering frequently asked questions in relation to managing
the integrity of assets for petroleum operations, a checklist
to help operators evaluate an AIMS, and a series of diagrams
and information to help operators develop an effective AIMS.
Other resources
Further information on asset integrity is available at:
www.oilandgasuk.co.uk/knowledgecentre/AssetIntegrity.cfm
www.ogp.org.uk/pubs/415.pdf
Contents
Foreword....................................................................................................................... iv
1 Frequently asked questions.........................................................................................2
2 AIMS evaluation checklist............................................................................................5
Overview....................................................................................................................................................... 5
Considerations.............................................................................................................................................. 5
3 Guidance.................................................................................................................20
Introduction................................................................................................................................................. 20
1. Fitness for purpose (FFP) graph............................................................................................................... 20
2. Risk-based inspection (RBI) wheel........................................................................................................... 22
3. RBI flowchart......................................................................................................................................... 23
Overview
Documentation isQ.Q.Q.
Y/N
Comments
Considerations
AIMS evaluation and considerations
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
Distribution list
1.4
Revision procedure
Contents
2.1
2.2
Table of contents
2.3
Introduction
3.1
Purpose
3.2
Scope
3.2.1
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
3.2.2
Y/N
3.3
Objectives
3.4
Location details
General
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
5.1
General
5.1.1
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
5.1.3
lighting
water
fuel supply
power
communications
fire protection, suppression and detection
office and control rooms
processing, storage and handling areas
6.1
General
6.1.1
6.1.3
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
6.1.5
6.2
6.2.2
6.2.3
6.2.5
6.3
10
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
Maintenance issues are discussed between the sitebased technicians or supervisors and office-based
support staff
There is a daily communication protocol between
site frontline staff and office-based support staff
There is a mechanism for problems encountered on
site by the technicians to be discussed and resolved
with office based support staff
Contact can be made:
daily for immediate issues
monthly for planning purposes
quarterly and annually for medium- and longterm planning
7.1
General
7.1.1
7.1.2
7.1.3
11
7.2.3
8.1
8.1.2
12
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
8.2
8.2.2
8.2.3
13
8.2.5
14
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
Y/N
8.2.6
8.2.7
8.2.8
8.2.9
8.2.10
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
8.3.2
8.3.3
8.3.4
8.3.5
8.3.6
15
Workplace environment
8.4.1
9.1
General
9.1.1
9.1.2
9.1.3
10
10.1
16
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
10.1.3
10.1.4
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
10.2
10.1.6
10.1.7
10.1.8
10.1.9
10.2.2
17
11.1
18
11.1.1
11.1.2
11.1.3
11.1.4
11.1.5
11.1.6
11.1.7
11.1.8
11.1.9
11.1.10
11.1.11
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
Y/N
Comments
(N/A not applicable)
11.1.13
11.1.14
11.1.15
19
3 Guidance
Introduction
The three guidance diagrams included here are not suitable for all industrial applications, operations, and facilities. Care should
be exercised in their use as they are only provided for guidance on the basic principles of integrity or fitness for purpose and
risk-based inspection.
for
tness
Decreasing
failure frequency
Fi
DECOMMISSIONING
DESIGN LIFE
EXTENSION OR
PLANNED
OBSOLESCENCE
COMMISSIONING
INSTALLATION
DESIGN
Failure frequency
ose
purp
Increasing
failure frequency
INSPECTION
AND
CORROSION
MONITORING
ASSET
INTEGRITY
MANAGEMENT
Design reappraisal
Additional measures
Time
20
The pressure vessel will be subject to design reappraisal when considering a change from planned inspection and monitoring
intervals as referenced in Australian Standard AS/NZS 3788:2006 Pressure equipment In-service inspection to RBI intervals.
For the pressure vessel in this example, the change to an RBI regime will not occur for at least five years, after the vessel has
been inspected at commissioning, and there have been internal inspections after one year and then a further four years of
operation. After this five-year period, the following information will be available, allowing an informed decision to be made about
whether to retain the standards-based inspection and monitoring regime, or decrease or increase the intervals under an RBI
approach.
The vessel walls will have undergone baseline ultrasonic testing (UT), with documented results.
Quality assurance or quality control (QA /QC) design and/or fabrication flaws (if any) will have been detected and repaired.
Non-destructive test (NDT) results will have been established for corrosion rate calculations.
The suitability of design and materials for operational conditions will have been confirmed (refer to sections 4.4.3 and
4.4.4.1 of AS/NZS 3788:2006 for guidance).
Design excursions (e.g. levels above and below design pressures, temperature, sweet to sour transition) and operational
history will have been established.
The inspection frequencies determined at the project inception and/or design reappraisal stages may need to be increased
when:
the remaining life assessment is conducted following completion of 60 per cent of the design life. Where no design life
is evident, refer to section 5.1 of AS/NZS 3788:2006 for guidance (e.g. 100,000 operating hours or second inspection
interval)
the failure or repair rates increase
the vessel sustains damage.
Note: Wastage rates are considered to be the controlling factor in pressure vessel life expectancy, and may be determined from
UT readings over a period of time (refer to section 4.4.4.2 of AS/NZS 3788:2006 for guidance).
To extend the design life of the pressure vessel, additional measures may be required in the form of additional safety
equipment, procedures, practices, inspections, monitoring, testing, revisions of recommended practices and standards, and
analysis and calculation of the rates of corrosion, fatigue, creep and hydrogen attack if the vessel is re-lifed.
At some point, a finite asset life is achieved when the key performance indicators (e.g. frequency of failure at inspection, number
of repairs, wastage) reach levels that are considered to be intolerable, with associated risks and hazards not being as low as
reasonably practicable (ALARP). The asset is then decommissioned.
21
ENT
SM
ES
SS
11.
Feedback 1. Review
RIS
KA
2.
Design
reappraisal
10.
Verification
3.
Development
GE
ME
PE
ANA
Reporting
6.
Data
C TI
5.
7.
4. RBI
matrices
Inspection
SE
NT
IN S
RIS K M
8. Statement
ON
9. Define
RIS
A
K-B
22
3. RBI flowchart
D = diameter
P = pressure
T = temperature
V = volume
v = velocity
23
Resources Safety
Department of Mines and Petroleum
100 Plain Street
EAST PERTH WA 6004
RSDJul12_808