Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Selecting Microsoft
versus Google
Table of Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Microsoft Office 365 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Google Apps Premier Edition (GAPE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Email and Calendaring Migration and Coexistence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Migration and Coexistence Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
The End Users Migration Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
End User Adoption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Microsoft Outlook Integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Unified Messaging, Instant Messaging, and User Presence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Offline Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Migrating Applications and Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Application Platform Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Application Data Migration Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Full Lotus Notes/Domino Retirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Links and Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Microsoft Links . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Customer Case Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Microsoft Migration Partners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Introduction
More and more users of legacy IBM Lotus Notes and Lotus Domino systems today are considering migrating to other
systems. The advent of cloud computing makes this migration much easier to consider. For Lotus Notes/Domino users,
cloud-based, hosted messaging and application services can provide the latest technologies along with an attractive
alternative to costly upgrades. But if your organization is considering migrating to the cloud, you should carefully examine
which hosted services can most easily inherit existing technology investments, and identify tradeoffs that might adversely
impact IT teams and end users.
This white paper showcases the migration approaches and challenges involved in moving from IBM Lotus Notes and Lotus
Domino to either of two cloud-based options: Microsoft Office 365 (the predecessor of Microsoft Business Productivity
Online Suite, or BPOS), and Google Apps Premier Edition. We will clarify the differences between the two options, and
describe their benefits in detail to help you make an informed decision about them.
Microsoft Lync Online: Cloud-based instant messaging (IM), presence, and online meeting experiences with screen sharing, and voice conferencing and
videoconferencing
Migrating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino to the Cloud: Selecting Microsoft versus Google
In a five-month
timeframe, we migrated
roughly 30,000 people
to a hosted [Microsoft]
solution, without
impacting their business
or interrupting their
day-to-day operations.
Migrating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino to the Cloud: Selecting Microsoft versus Google
Email Data Migration from Lotus Notes to Exchange Online versus Google Apps Premiere Edition
Migrated content
or feature
Exchange Google
Online
Apps
Gmail Differences
E mail (messages
with read state)
Yes
Yes
Mail folders
Yes
Partial
Attachments and
rich formatting
Yes
Partial
Flags, reminders,
and importance
Yes
No
Inbox rules
Yes
No
Signatures
Yes
No
Delegations and
sharing
Yes
No
Encrypted mail
Yes
No
Lotus Notes users must decrypt all email before the migration to
either BPOS or GAPE.
Calendar
(all calendars)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Attendees and
responses
Yes
Yes
Event reminders
Yes
Yes
Attachments and
formatting
Yes
No
Personal Contacts
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Attachments, notes,
and links
Yes
No
Global Contacts
(GAL)
Yes
Yes
Tasks
Yes
No
Migrating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino to the Cloud: Selecting Microsoft versus Google
Migrating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino to the Cloud: Selecting Microsoft versus Google
Robust security features. Gmail does not offer enterprise-grade security features such as Digital Rights
Management, message encryption, digital signatures,
and policy-based email management, which Exchange
with Outlook includes at extra cost.
Offline features. Offline features that Outlook supports such as out-of-office responses, recalling sent
messages, recovering deleted items, and personal
distribution lists do not synchronize with Gmail.
Scheduling features. Gmail does not offer suggested
meeting times, conference room availability, optional
attendees and other scheduling features that Outlook
includes.
Migrating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino to the Cloud: Selecting Microsoft versus Google
Offline Capabilities
Microsoft applications present security-enhanced offline
capabilities. Outlook users have the same client experience
while disconnected from the Internet. Office users can
make changes to documents offline and synchronize just
the delta updates when they are online by using SharePoint
Workspace 2010. This allows users to take full SharePoint
list types, including: Discussion, Announcements, Links, and
Custom Lists offline. Even workflows can be taken offline
so that every time a user synchronizes it will correctly
trigger any workflows that are idle and listening to activity.
Microsoft Business Connectivity Services (BCS) allow lineof-business application data to be pulled offline. Combine
BCS with the support for InfoPath forms inside of Outlook
and SharePoint Workspace 2010, and users can work with
all corresponding business data and applications whether
online or offline.
By contrast, Google Apps lack of offline capabilities are a
big gap in Googles offerings. Google Apps users are much
less productive when they cannot connect to the Internet.
Googles answer to this problem is Google Gears, a browser
add-in for which Google abandoned support on May 4,
2010 and which the GAPE SLA does not support. GAPE
provides offline caching for mail and calendaring ONLY. All
creation and updates to documents, spreadsheets, or presentations must be done while connected to the Internet.
Google Gears must be deployed for every user, and data is
stored locally in an unencrypted state.
Migrating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino to the Cloud: Selecting Microsoft versus Google
Migrating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino to the Cloud: Selecting Microsoft versus Google
Developers in the Windows Azure platform can build applications that use the Microsoft .NET Framework, unmanaged code, or other approaches. Developers can write
these applications in popular programming languages
such as C#, Visual Basic, C++, and Java, using Visual Studio
or another development tool. Developers can create web
applications, using technologies such as ASP.NET, Windows
Communication Foundation (WCF), and PHP, applications
that run as independent background processes, or applications that combine the two.
Migrating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino to the Cloud: Selecting Microsoft versus Google
10
Migrating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino to the Cloud: Selecting Microsoft versus Google
11
Microsoft Links
Migrating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino to the Cloud: Selecting Microsoft versus Google
12
Godiva Chocolates
Godiva Chocolatier is a premier purveyor of hand-crafted
chocolates, available from its 400-plus global boutique
stores, other retailers, and over the Internet. Godiva is
based in New York City and has 1,400 employees.
Business Situation
Godiva needed to upgrade its aging IBM Lotus Notes email
system, but felt that the move would be expensive and
consume valuable IT staff time. Also, users were dissatisfied
with the Notes interface. Godiva also looked at LotusLive, a
cloud-based email service from IBM, and Google Gmail.
Solution
Godiva licensed the Microsoft Business Productivity Online
Standard Suite, part of Microsoft Online Services, which
provides Microsoft communications and collaboration programs for a monthly per-user fee. They worked with Binary
Tree, a Microsoft Gold Certified Partner, to migrate their
email into the cloud, using Microsoft Online Services.
By delivering email over the Internet, Godiva eliminated
U.S.$250,000 in annual Notes maintenance and hosting
fees, achieved cost-effective email scalability, and freed its
IT staff to focus on supporting business growth.
Benefits
Migrating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino to the Cloud: Selecting Microsoft versus Google
2010 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN THIS SUMMARY.
13