Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Identified
Risk No.
Risk Identification
03.02.2016
03.02.2016
03.02.2016
03.02.2016
03.02.2016
03.02.2016
03.02.2016
03.02.2016
03.02.2016
03.02.2016
10
03.02.2016
11
03.02.2016
12
03.02.2016
13
03.02.2016
13
03.02.2016
15
03.02.2016
16
03.02.2016
17
03.02.2016
18
03.02.2016
19
03.02.2016
20
03.02.2016
20
03.02.2016
21
03.02.2016
22
03.02.2016
23
03.02.2016
24
03.02.2016
25
03.02.2016
26
03.02.2016
27
03.02.2016
28
03.02.2016
29
03.02.2016
29
03.02.2016
30
03.02.2016
31
32
03.02.2016
03.02.2016
33
03.02.2016
34
03.02.2016
35
03.02.2016
36
03.02.2016
37
03.02.2016
38
03.02.2016
39
03.02.2016
40
03.02.2016
41
03.02.2016
42
03.02.2016
43
03.02.2016
44
03.02.2016
45
03.02.2016
46
03.02.2016
48
03.02.2016
49
03.02.2016
50
03.02.2016
51
03.02.2016
52
03.02.2016
53
03.02.2016
54
03.02.2016
55
03.02.2016
56
03.02.2016
Prepared By:
Risk Reg
Critical
Success
Factor
Risk
Description
Risk Identification
Insufficient funding
Impractical timeframe
Probity issues
Probity issues
Biased specification
Inadequate statement of
requirements
Breaches of security
Fraud
Risk of Compliances of
State/Central Legal Requirement
Risk of Work Environment
Safe Work Environment for all
Employee/Interested Parties
Risk Register
Limited Suppliers
Lack in understanding
requirments
Probability
Insufficient Information of
Purchase article
Consequence
Cause
Risk Assessment
Purchase of unsuitable
product or service
Money wasted
Need not satisfied
Greater expense
Poor competition
1
1
2
2
Totally unacceptable
purchase or not most
suitable product or service
Time lost
Increased costs
Possible downtime
Delay in making the
planning for projected purchases
purchase
Additional costs for repayment term conditions
order
1
1
1
1
1
Reduced competition
Increased procurement
costs
Inventory control
Misuse of resources
Product compromise
Fewer alternatives
Increased costs
1
1
1
Inadequate responses
from quotations
Variety of offers
Insufficient responses
Purchase on goodwill
understanding requirement of
indents
Disruption
Low response
1
1
Withdrawal of offers
Withdrawal of offers
Mistrust by tenderers
Purchase on goodwill
Purchase on goodwill
1
1
1
Reduced competition
Increased costs of
products or services
Inconsistent evaluations
conflict of interest
inappropiate planning
Claims of unethical or
unfair practices
Additional costs
Delay in delivery
1
1
Contract disputes
Delivery delays
Cost variations
Reduction in value for
money
Purchase of less suitable
product
1
2
2
Delays in delivery
Need to restart
procurement
Possible cost of legal
action
Delays in delivery
Variations in cost
1
1
2
2
1
1
Delays in delivery
Requirement to negotiate
with other ranked suppliers
Contract disputes
Invalidity of contract
Legal action
Poor supplier/customer
relationship
Contract disputes
Legal action
1
1
Poor supplier/customer
relationship
Committing to other
associated work prior to
main contract existing
Fluctuations in Global/Indian
share market
Cost overruns
1
1
Delays in delivery
Need to restart
procurement
Purchase on goodwill
Purchase on goodwill
Contract disputes
Delays in delivery
Downtime
Legal action
Cost increases
Failure of contract
1
1
1
3
3
Delivery of unsatisfactory
product
Contract/supply disputes
Unanticipated cost
increases
Loss of commercial
opportunity
Customer (Inetrnal/External)
requirements not addressed eg.
Record retention /confidentiality / Unwarranted reliance on
customer property etc
supplier for product
support
Legal action
Delays in delivery
1. Lack of information on contract Downtime
2. Packaging/ vechile basic
conditions
Liability disputes
Man depedency
3
3
3
Misuse of resources
Legal action
Disruption to procurement
activities
Progress on project
disrupted
Less expertise
2
2
Failure to improve
procurement and
management processes
Complete Shut
Down/Panelty
2
2
1
Driving License
3
1
Complete Shut
Down/Panelty
1
2
Environment Pollution
2
2
Approved By:
Low
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
6
Very Low
Very Low
Low
Low
Very Low
3
3
3
3
3
3
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Current
Controls
Risk Score
Risk LevelL.M.H
Impact
Risk Ranking
Risk Assessment
Low
Low
Low
Very Low
Very Low
4
4
4
4
4
4
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
4
4
4
4
Very Low
Very Low
Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Low
Low
Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
4
4
4
4
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Low
3
3
3
3
6
6
Very Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
4
4
4
4
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
5
5
5
5
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
10
Medium
Very Low
5
5
5
3
3
5
5
5
9
9
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
12
Medium
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
5
5
15
15
High
High
15
High
Very Low
Very Low
Very Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Very Low
Very Low
5
2
2
2
very low
5
4
4
2
2
3
very low
very low
very low
very low
4
15
medium
oved By:
2
4
6
4
low
very low
very low
5
5
10
low
10
low
10
low
Risk
Treatment
Method