Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
& 2003 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved 0007 0920/03 $25.00
www.bjcancer.com
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan;
Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; 3Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaragi 305-8575, Japan
We analysed the expression of the fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene in cervical cancer to evaluate its clinical relevance in relation to
human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. A total of 73 women with cervical cancer of stage Ib or more advanced (67 squamous cell
carcionomas, four adenocarcinomas, two adenosquamous carcinomas) were examined for Fhit expression by immunohistochemistry.
They were further analysed for the presence of HPV and its subtype. Abnormal expression of Fhit (absent or reduced Fhit
expression) was observed in 52 cases (71.2%). The high-risk HPV DNAs for cervical cancer, including type 16, 18, 31, 33, 51, 52, 58,
68, were identified in 63 cases (86%). The abnormal Fhit expression was not related to the clinicopathological factors including
histology, tumour stage, and HPV type. Notably, the 5-year survival of patients showing the abnormal Fhit expression was significantly
poorer than those showing normal Fhit expression (64 versus 87%, P 0.035). Interestingly, the mean age of the patients with the
abnormal Fhit expression was significantly less than those with the normal Fhit expression (51.6 versus 58.7 years of age, P 0.027,
students t-test). These data imply that the aberrant Fhit expression could be a poor prognostic factor independent of HPV. In the
light of a high incidence of abnormal Fhit expression in younger patients and HPV as a key player in cervical carcinogenesis, abnormal
Fhit expression may accelerate carcinogenesis in concert with HPV.
British Journal of Cancer (2003) 88, 1213 1216. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600892 www.bjcancer.com
& 2003 Cancer Research UK
Keywords: cervical cancer; Fhit expression; HPV
1214
After washing in deionised water, endogenous peroxidase was
blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 5 min. The tissue sections
were further blocked with 10% normal pig serum (NPS) (Kohjin
Bio, Japan) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min at room
temperature to saturate nonspecific binding sites. Then, they were
incubated with diluted primary antibody, anti-FHIT (ZYMED, San
Francisco, CA, USA) at 1 : 200 in PBS overnight at 41C. For negative
control, the slides were incubated with 10% NPS. The slides were
rinsed in PBS, and incubated with biotinylated F(ab0 )2 fragment of
swine anti-rabbit immunoglobulins (DAKO, Tokyo, Japan) at
1 : 500 in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. The slides were
rinsed in PBS, incubated with peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin
(DAKO, Tokyo, Japan) at 1 : 500 in PBS for 30 min at room
temperature, followed by rinsing in PBS, incubation with DAB
(20 mg 3,30 -diaminobenzidine, tetrahydrochloride) for 5 min at
room temperature, and counterstaining with haematoxylin for
1 min.
The degree of Fhit expression was evaluated semiquantitatively
measuring both intensity (no expression or very weak, 1;
moderate, 2; strong positive, 3) and extent (per cent of positive
staining; o10%, 1, 10 50%, 2, 450%, 3). The score of the
intensity was multiplied by the score of the extent to give the total
score for the immunohistochemical staining of Fhit. The total
score of 4 9 was judged as normal based on observations of
noncancerous tissues of the uterine cervix.
Statistical analysis
Survival of patients was analysed by the Kaplan Meier technique.
Comparison of mean age was done by Students t-test. Other
statistical analysis methods conducted in this study were w2 test
and multivariate analysis based on the stratified Cox proportional
hazards model.
RESULTS
The intensity of Fhit expression was judged based on a three-tiered
scale comparing Fhit expression between cancers and normal
tissues, that is, the uterine cervix of unaffected women or
histologically normal tissues adjacent to cancers. Fhit was
expressed diffusely in the cytoplasm of epithelial and stromal cells
in the normal tissues (Figure 1A and B). Of the 73 cases with
cervical cancer, 52 cases (71.2%) showed abnormal expression of
Fhit protein. Abnormal Fhit expression, that is, marked reduction
or an absence of Fhit protein expression, is shown in Figure 1C and
D, respectively. The survival of the patients was compared between
the normal Fhit expression and the abnormal Fhit expression using
the Kaplan Meier technique. The 5-year survival of the abnormal
group was significantly poorer than the normal group (64 versus
87%, P 0.035, Figure 2). The mean age of the abnormal group
Figure 1 Immunohistochemical staining of Fhit protein in cervical cancer. (A, B) Normal Fhit expression in cervical cancer. The Fhit expression scores
were 6 (A) and 9 (B). (C) Absent Fhit expression in cervical cancer. Fhit expression in the cervical cancer tissue was negative (score 0). Note that Fhit is
expressed normally in the normal stromal tissue. (D) Marked reduced Fhit expression in cervical cancer. The Fhit expression score in cancer tissue was 3.
British Journal of Cancer (2003) 88(8), 1213 1216
1215
Table 1
Number of patients
Age
p50
450
Histology
Squamous cell cancer
Adenocarcinoma
Adenosquamous cancer
HPV types
16
18
Others
Negative
DISCUSSION
At present, only a small body of existing literature has described
the clinical implication of normal Fhit expression in cervical
cancer. The present data seem to be in keeping with a previous
report by Krivak et al (2001) who claimed that abnormal Fhit
expression was a poor prognostic factor in patients whose clinical
stages were restricted to stage II or III. Here, we extended this
finding such that abnormal Fhit expression is an independent poor
prognostic factor for all clinical stages inclusive. In contrast, the
data by Helland et al (2000) failed to demonstrate the abnormal
Fhit expression as an independent poor prognostic factor
unrelated to HPV infection. This disparity may be explained, in
part, by the difference of the breakdown of histology or HPV
subtype examined.
It was reported that Fhit protein expression was markedly
reduced or absent in 67 out of 95 (71%) invasive cancer tissues, 17
out of 33 (52%), and eight out of 38 (21%) in high-grade CIN
tissues associated or unassociated with invasive cancer, respectively (Connolly et al, 2000). Considering this and the findings
from our laboratory, the alteration of FHIT expression could occur
at the stage of high-grade CIN and could be, along with HPV, an
important molecular event pertinent to the progression of invasive
cervical cancer.
Human papillomavirus infection is thought to serve as an
initiator for cervical cancer. It follows that HPV infection occurs
well before the alteration of Fhit expression. On the other hand, the
present study demonstrated the abnormal Fhit expression as a
Stage
Ib
II
III
IV
The high-risk HPVs including HPV type 16, 18, 31, 33, 51, 52, 58,
and 68 were identified in 63 cases (86%). The abnormal Fhit
expression was observed in 20 out of the 28 cases positive for HPV
16 (71%), in four out of the nine cases positive for HPV 18 (44%),
in 19 out of the 26 cases infected with the other types of HPV (type
31, 33, 51, 52, 58, and 68) (73%), and in nine out of the 10 cases
without HPV infection (90%). The abnormal Fhit expression was
not related to the detection of HPV or its type. The multivariate
analysis with respect to the clinical stage and the age at onset
revealed that the abnormal Fhit expression remains as an
independent poor prognostic factor (Po0.05).
Abnormal
Fhit expression
Normal
Fhit expression
73
52
21
27
46
23(85%)
29(63%)
4(15%)
17(37%)
0.043
67
4
2
48(72%)
1(25%)
2(100%)
19(28%)
3(75%)
0(0%)
0.289
20
36
13
4
15(75%)
24(67%)
10(77%)
3(75%)
5(25%)
12(33%)
3(23%)
1(25%)
0.528
28
9
26
10
20(71%)
4(44%)
19(73%)
9(90%)
8(29%)
5(56%)
7(27%)
1(10%)
0.201
was significantly younger than the normal group (51.6 years versus
58.7 years, P 0.027). In patients at the age of 50 years or older, the
abnormal Fhit expression was detected in 29 out of 46 (63%). In
contrast, 23 out of 27 cases (85%) had the abnormal Fhit
expression in patients lesser than 50 years of age, the difference
reaching statistical significance (Po0.05, Table 1). We further
analysed the relation between the Fhit expression and the mean
age at onset by dividing patients into four groups according to the
Fhit expression score (Table 2). The mean age at onset showed a
tendency of increase along with the rise of the Fhit expression
score. Then we looked at whether Fhit expression is related to the
clinical staging. The abnormal Fhit expression was observed in 15
out of the 20 cases with stage Ib (75%), in 24 out of the 36 cases
with stage II (67%), in 10 out of the 13 cases with stage III (77%),
and in three out of the four cases with stage IV (75%). There was
no significant statistical difference in the rates of the abnormal Fhit
expression among different clinical stages. We next analysed the
relation between the abnormal Fhit expression and HPV infection.
1216
Table 2
Number of cases
Mean age at onset
Negative (0)
Low (1 3)
Medium (4 6)
High (7 9)
Total
3
42.7
40
52.3
25
57.0
5
67.0
73
54.5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This study was supported by Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research
from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan.
REFERENCES
Connolly DC, Greenspan DL, Wu R, Ren X, Dunn RL, Shah KV, Jones RW,
Bosch FX, Munoz N, Cho KR (2000) Loss of fhit expression in invasive
cervical carcinomas and intraepithelial lesions associated with invasive
disease. Clin Cancer Res 6: 3505 3510
Greenspan DL, Connolly DC, Wu R, Lei RY, Vogelstein JT, Kim YT, Mok
JE, Munoz N, Bosch FX, Shah K, Cho KR (1997) Loss of FHIT expression
in cervical carcinoma cell lines and primary tumors. Cancer Res 57:
4692 4698
Hadaczek P, Siprashvili Z, Markiewski M, Domagala W, Druck T, McCue
PA, Pekarsky Y, Ohta M, Huebner K, Lubinski J (1998) Absence or
reduction of Fhit expression in most clear cell renal carcinomas. Cancer
Res 58: 2946 2951
Helland A, Kraggerud SM, Kristensen GB, Holm R, Abeler VM, Huebner K,
Borresen-Dale AL, Lothe RA (2000) Primary cervical carcinomas show 2
common regions of deletion at 3P, 1 within the FHIT gene: evaluation of
allelic imbalance at FHIT, RB1 and TP53 in relation to survival. Int J
Cancer, 88: 217 222
Hendricks DT, Taylor R, Reed M, Birrer MJ (1997) FHIT gene expression in
human ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer cell lines. Cancer Res
57: 2112 2115
Krivak TC, McBroom JW, Seidman J, Venzon D, Crothers B, MacKoul PJ,
Rose GS, Carlson JW, Birrer MJ (2001) Abnormal fragile histidine triad
(FHIT) expression in advanced cervical carcinoma: a poor prognostic
factor. Cancer Res 61: 4382 4385
Nakagawa S, Yoshikawa H, Kimura M, Kawana K, Matsumoto K, Onda T,
Kino N, Yamada M, Yasugi T, Taketani Y (1999) A possible involvement