Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Flow Processes into the Scour Hole around the Bank Protection Works
Mohammad Nazim Uddin1 and Md. Munsur Rahman2
1
Dept. of Civil Engg., Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh
2
IWFM, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh
ABSTRACT
Different bank protection works are constructed along the bankline or normal to the bankline of a river. Three
dimensional (3D) complex flow structures are generated near a bank protection works. The flow processes
continuously changes if the river is very dynamic. The main objective of the present study is to investigate the flow
processes into the scour hole near a bank protection work. A revetment-like structure (hardpoint) is selected in the
Jamuna River for the present study. Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) is used to measure the hydraulic data
into the scour hole. The measured hydraulic data is analyzed and represented by velocity vectors. It is found that the
primary and secondary vortices are present into the scour hole. These vortices act as a vacuum cleaner. The amplified
shear velocity is also present into the scour hole. The bed materials are washed out from the scour hole. The developed
deep scour hole near a bank protection structure is a great threat for the stability of the structure.
KEYWORDS: Flow, scour hole, bank protection works, ADCP
1. INTRODUCTION
River bank erosion is generally protected by different types
of bank protection works like revetment, groin, bandal etc.
When this type of structure is constructed protruding from
bank line towards the river, it is well known that 3-D
complex flow field is generated around the structure. This
phenomenon has been studied in laboratory model and real
field. The complexity is further accentuated by the dynamic
interaction between the flow field and the movable bed with
the development of scour hole in the vicinity of the
structure. Numerous researches were conducted on the flow
field and scouring process around abutments, groin-like
structures, piers by many researchers [3, 9, 14, 15, 16, 18,
21, 26, 27, 30]. Most of the studies were performed in the
laboratory or numerical simulation, and very few in field
condition. The flow and scouring process around spur
dykes and other similar structures such as bridge piers and
abutments is shown in Fig. 1. The flow field around a
groin-like structure, revetment or abutment-like structure
and pier is characterized by several vortex systems of
different sizes, which initiates and controls the local scour
and provides the basic scour mechanism [7, 11, 14, 15, 18,
22, 26, 31]. Due to the blockage effect, the flow will be
divided into two parts as it approaches the groin-like
structure. One part approaches the edge of the groin-like
structure and separates. Another part goes directly ahead of
33
DUET Journal
Rajaratnam and Nwachukwu [23] and Ahmed and
Rajaratnam [1, 2] investigated the flow fields at piers and
abutment respectively. They found that the shear stresses at
the abutment corner were amplified up to five times as
compared to the approach shear stress. The increase in the
shear stress above the critical value that is required for
Fig. 1: Schematic diagram of the flow and local scour around abutment or groin like structure (Courtesy: Zhang, 2005).
34
DUET Journal
discharge and about 6% of bankfull discharge. The average
water surface slope is 7 cm/km. The range of variation of
Brice braiding index of the Jamuna River is 4 to 6 [12]. Due
to dynamic nature it always changes its platform within
braid belt. Erosion is a major problem along both bank of
the river. From 1973 to 2009, erosion and accretion along
the Jamuna river was 90,830 ha and 10,140 ha respectively
[4]. The variation of the rate of erosion depends on the
hydrological parameters and time. From 1970 to1990 the
Jamuna River widened at a very high rate; both the banks
migrated outward at an average rate of about 70 m/year.
Since the early 1990s, the rate of outward migration of both
banks has reduced to 30-50 m/year [5]. To protect bank
erosion, more than thirty numbers of bank protection
structures (hardpoint, groin and RCC spur) have been
constructed along both banks of the Jamuna River. Almost
every year a number of structures face different types of
failure problems. Out of fifteen number of the RCC spurs
about seven of them have been totally damaged. The
Sirajgang hardpoint was damaged in 1998 (which was just
after construction), 2008, 2009 and 2010.
DUET Journal
36
DUET Journal
u
y
= 5.75 Log
+6
u
kS
*
(1)
Fig 4: Flow velocity along line d-d through the scour hole
37
DUET Journal
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
4.3.2
Fig 6: Variation of ratio of the sher velocity along vertical section f-f.
38
DUET Journal
REFERENCES
[19] Nagata, N., Hosoda, T., Nakato, T., and Muramoto, Y.,
Three-Dimensional Numerical Model for Flow and
Bed Deformation around River Hydraulic Structures,
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 131,
No. 12, pp. 1074-1087, 2005.
[20] Ouillon, S. and Dartus, D., Three-Dimensional
Computation of Flow around Groyne, Journal of
Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 123, No. 11, pp.
962-970, 1997.
[21] Rahman, M.M., Studies on Deformation Process of
Meandering Channels and Local Scouring around
Spur-Dike-Like Structures, Unpublished PhD thesis,
Kyoto, Japan, 1998.
[22] Raudkivi, A.J., Loose Boundary Hydraulics, 3rd
edition, Pergamon Press, 1990.
[23] Rajaratnam, N. and Nwachukwu, B. A., Flow near
groin-like structures, Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering, ASCE, 109(3), 463-480, 1983.
[24] Rasheduzzaman, M., Nakagawa, H., Zhang, H.,
Rahman, M.M. and Muto, Y., Flow and Sediment
Transport around Bandals under Live-Bed Scour
Condition, Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,
JSCE, Vol. 51, February, 2007.
[25] Rouse, H., Engineering Hydraulics, Proceedings of the
4th Hydraulic Conference, 1949.
[26] Salaheldin, T.M., Imran, J. and Chaudhry, M. H.,
Numerical Modeling of Three-Dimensional Flow
Field Around Circular Piers, Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 130, No. 2, pp. 91 -100,
February 1, 2004.
[27] Tingsanchali, T. and Maheswaran, S., 2-D DepthAveraged Flow Computation near Groyne, Journal of
Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol.116, No.1, pp. 7186, 1990.
[28] Uijttewaal, W. S. J., Effects of Groyne Layout on the
Flow in Groyne Fields: Laboratory Experiments, Journal
of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE Vol. 131, No. 9, pp.
782-791, September 1, 2005.
39
DUET Journal
[29] Unger, J and Hager, W.H.: Riprap failure at circular
bridge piers, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol.
132, No.4, 2006.
40