Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Trichomonas vaginalis is a common sexually transmitted infection (STI) causing vaginitis. Microscopy has poor sensitivity but is
used for diagnosis of trichomoniasis in resource-poor settings. We aimed to provide a more reliable diagnosis of trichomoniasis
by investigating an association with leukorrhea. Women presenting for evaluation of vaginal discharge, STI exposure, or preventative gynecologic examination were evaluated for Trichomonas infection. Vaginal pH was determined and microscopy was performed by the provider, who recorded the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNLs) per epithelial cell and the presence of clue cells, yeast, and/or motile trichomonads. Leukorrhea was defined as greater than one PMNL per epithelial cell.
Culture and a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) were used to detect T. vaginalis. Patients were evaluated for Chlamydia
trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae using NAATs and bacterial vaginosis using Gram stains. Two hundred ninety-four
women were enrolled, and 16% were found to have Trichomonas (46/294). Trichomonas infection was more common in parous
non-Hispanic, black women, who reported low rates of contraceptive use (33% versus 17%; P 0.02) and a STI history (85%
versus 55%; P 0.002). These women were more likely to report vaginal discharge (76% versus 59%; P 0.02) and have an elevated vaginal pH (87% versus 48%; P < 0.001) and gonorrhea infection (15% versus 4%; P 0.002). Leukorrhea was associated
with a 4-fold-increased risk of Trichomonas infection. Leukorrhea on microscopy was associated with Trichomonas vaginitis.
Patients with leukorrhea should be evaluated with more-sensitive tests for T. vaginalis, preferably NAATs, if microscopy is
negative.
nant and pregnant women (relative risk [RR], 59; 95% confidence
interval [CI], 8 to 413; versus RR, 16; 95% CI, 7 to 32) (7). The
absence of leukorrhea has a high negative predictive value (95%) for
the diagnosis of upper genital tract infection, i.e., endometritis (8).
There are currently no studies in the English literature for
which a correlation between leukorrhea in vaginal secretions and
Trichomonas infection is reported. This information would be
clinically useful when evaluating vaginal discharge and lower genital tract symptoms. Microscopy is the most common method
used to diagnose trichomoniasis, but the sensitivity is poor (55%;
35 to 77%) (1316). The presence of leukorrhea in the absence of
motile trichomonads could potentially be presumed to be cervicitis and empirically treated without further evaluation for
Trichomonas. A known significant relationship between leukorrhea on microscopy and Trichomonas might prompt clinicians to
screen women in this clinical scenario for this common infection
using more-sensitive methods.
The objective of this study was to determine an association
between the presence of leukorrhea on microscopy of vaginal secretions and Trichomonas infection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was approved by the Medical University of South Carolina
Institutional Review Board (HR no. 19180). Two hundred ninety-four
p. 23232327
jcm.asm.org
2323
Lazenby et al.
2324
jcm.asm.org
Value
28 9
1.4 (08)
74 (216/293)
0.6 (2/293)
90 (260/290)
98 (287/292)
16 (46/286)
63 (170/272)
20 (58/292)
7 (22/294)
58 (169/292)
14 (41/292)
17 (47/275)
24 (68/278)
61 (179/292)
60 (175/292)
49 (84/170)
40 (66/170)
62 (106/170)
37 (61/166)
12 (21/170)
Some patient characteristic data were not available for all participants.
Regular menstrual cycles defined as monthly menses every 21 to 35 days.
c
Surgical contraception may include female tubal ligation or male vasectomy.
d
Defined as 1 partner in the 12 months preceding evaluation.
b
RESULTS
TABLE 2 Comparison of women with Trichomonas infection and those not infected
Value for groupa
Characteristic
Trichomonas infection
No Trichomonas
P valuee
29.3 (10.8)
2 (06)
27.7 (8.6)
1 (08)
0.34
0.001
93 (43/46)
91 (41/45)
98 (45/46)
20 (9/45)
49 (19/39)
33 (15/46)
4 (2/46)
15 (7/46)
26 (11/42)
85 (39/46)
76 (35/46)
87 (40/46)
78 (36/46)
87 (40/46)
43 (20/46)
7 (3/46)
15 (7/46)
70 (173/247)
89 (219/245)
98 (242/246)
15 (37/241)
65 (151/233)
17 (43/246)
8 (20/248)
17 (40/229)
24 (57/236)
55 (136/246)
59 (144/246)
48 (120/248)
49 (118/240)
69 (167/243)
41 (99/243)
4 (11/248)
4 (9/248)
0.0004
0.7
0.8
0.4
0.06
0.02
0.5*
0.7
0.7
0.002
0.02
0.0001
0.0003
0.01
0.7
0.5*
0.002
For the Trichomonas-infected group, n 46; for the uninfected group, n 253.
Abnormal vaginal pH is defined as a pH of 4.5.
c
Bacterial vaginosis is defined as a Nugent score of 7 (17).
d
Determination of Chlamydia and gonorrhea infection was based on positive NAATs.
e
, result of Fishers exact test for small sample size. Otherwise, P values were calculated using chi-square tests.
a
b
Univariate
Multivariatea
Parous
Non-Hispanic, black race
Not currently using contraception
History of at least one STI
Reported vaginal discharge
Abnormal vaginal pHb
PMNLs on microscopy
PMNLs on Gram staining
Gonorrhea infection
3.8 (1.69.3)
6.1 (1.820.4)
2.3 (1.14.6)
4.5 (1.910.5)
2.3 (1.14.6)
7.1 (2.917.4)
3.7 (1.87.8)
3.2 (1.37.8)
4.8 (1.713.5)
2.2 (0.85.8)*
3.0 (0.811.2)*
2.2 (1.14.7)*
3.1 (1.37.4)*
1.5 (0.73.2)
6.0 (2.415.1)
1.8 (0.84.2)
2.7 (1.06.7)
3.6 (1.111.6)
a
, multivariate logistic regression model controlling for patient characteristics
associated with Trichomonas infection: parity, race, contraceptive use, and history of
STIs. The remaining variables were used in a separate multivariate logistic regression
model to determine clinical findings associated with Trichomonas infection.
b
Abnormal vaginal pH as defined by a pH of 4.5.
jcm.asm.org 2325
Lazenby et al.
TABLE 4 Diagnostic techniques for the detection of Trichomonas compared to nucleic acid amplification testsa
Method or target
b
Culture
Motile trichomonads
Leukorrhea on microscopyc
Motile trichomonads or leukorrhea
PMNLs on Gram stainingd
% Sensitivity
% Specificity
% PPV
% NPV
93 (38/41)
51 (21/41)
78 (32/41)
78 (32/41)
90 (37/41)
100 (205/205)
98 (200/204)
51 (102/199)
53 (109/207)
33 (68/207)
100 (38/38)
84 (21/25)
25 (32/129)
25 (32/130)
21 (37/176)
99 (205/208)
91 (200/220)
92 (102/111)
92 (109/118)
94 (68/72)
Parenthetical numbers are no. of correct results/no. tested. PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.
InPouch Trichomonas culture was more sensitive and specific than microscopy for the diagnosis of Trichomonas.
Leukorrhea, 1 PMNL per epithelial cell per hpf (400).
d
PMNLs on Gram staining, 1 PMNL per hpf (1,000).
b
c
2326
jcm.asm.org
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge Gen-Probe, Inc., for their support and funding of this
research.
We thank the staff of the MUSC Microbiology and Molecular Pathology labs for their tireless work in analyzing the additional specimens required for this study. We especially recognize April Kegl.
The coinvestigator Fredrick Nolte has been a member of the GenProbe Scientific Advisory Board from 2007 to the present. The annual
compensation associated with this activity is approximately $10,000. GenProbe products were used to determine the Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis infection status of the patients described in our article.
REFERENCES
1. Sutton M, Sternberg M, Koumans EH, McQuillan G, Berman S,
Markowitz L. 2007. The prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection
among reproductive-age women in the United States, 20012004. Clin.
Infect. Dis. 45:1319 1326.
2. Johnston VJ, Mabey DC. 2008. Global epidemiology and control of
Trichomonas vaginalis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 21:56 64.
3. Munson E, Napierala M, Olson R, Endes T, Block T, Hryciuk JE, Schell
RF. 2008. Impact of Trichomonas vaginalis transcription-mediated amplification-based analyte-specific-reagent testing in a metropolitan setting
of high sexually transmitted disease prevalence. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:
3368 3374.
4. Nye MB, Schwebke JR, Body BA. 2009. Comparison of APTIMA
Trichomonas vaginalis transcription-mediated amplification to wet
mount microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis
of trichomoniasis in men and women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 200:
188.e1188.e7.
5. Verteramo R, Calzolari E, Degener AM, Masciangelo R, Patella A. 2008.
Trichomonas vaginalis infection: risk indicators among women attending
for routine gynecologic examination. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 34:233
237.
6. Demirezen S, Safi Z, Beksac S. 2000. The interaction of trichomonas
vaginalis with epithelial cells, polymorphonuclear leucocytes and erythrocytes on vaginal smears: light microscopic observation. Cytopathology
11:326 332.
7. Hakakha MM, Davis J, Korst LM, Silverman NS. 2002. Leukorrhea and
bacterial vaginosis as in-office predictors of cervical infection in high-risk
women. Obstet. Gynecol. 100:808 812.
8. Yudin MH, Hillier SL, Wiesenfeld HC, Krohn MA, Amortegui AA,
Sweet RL. 2003. Vaginal polymorphonuclear leukocytes and bacterial
vaginosis as markers for histologic endometritis among women without
symptoms of pelvic inflammatory disease. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 188:
318 323.
9. Critchlow CW, Wolner-Hanssen P, Eschenbach DA, Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA, Stevens CE, Holmes KK. 1995. Determinants of cervical ectopia
and of cervicitis: age, oral contraception, specific cervical infection, smoking, and douching. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 173:534 543.
10. Larsson PG, Platz-Christensen JJ. 1991. The vaginal pH and leucocyte/
epithelial cell ratio vary during normal menstrual cycles. Eur. J. Obstet.
Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 38:39 41.
11. Wah RM, Anderson DJ, Hill JA. 1990. Asymptomatic cervicovaginal
leukocytosis in infertile women. Fertil. Steril. 54:445 450.
12. Hill JA, Anderson DJ. 1992. Human vaginal leukocytes and the effects of
vaginal fluid on lymphocyte and macrophage defense functions. Am. J.
Obstet. Gynecol. 166:720 726.
13. Schwebke JR, Burgess D. 2004. Trichomoniasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
17:794 803, table of contents.
14. Van Der Pol B, Kraft CS, Williams JA. 2006. Use of an adaptation of a
commercially available PCR assay aimed at diagnosis of chlamydia and
gonorrhea to detect Trichomonas vaginalis in urogenital specimens. J.
Clin. Microbiol. 44:366 373.
15. Huppert JS, Batteiger BE, Braslins P, Feldman JA, Hobbs MM, Sankey
HZ, Sena AC, Wendel KA. 2005. Use of an immunochromatographic
assay for rapid detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in vaginal specimens. J.
Clin. Microbiol. 43:684 687.
16. Campbell L, Woods V, Lloyd T, Elsayed S, Church DL. 2008. Evaluation
of the OSOM Trichomonas rapid test versus wet preparation examination
for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis vaginitis in specimens from
women with a low prevalence of infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:3467
3469.
17. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. 1991. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:297301.
18. Workowski KA, Berman SM. 2011. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention sexually transmitted disease treatment guidelines. Clin. Infect.
Dis. 53(Suppl 3):S59 S63.
19. Schwebke JR, Hobbs MM, Taylor SN, Sena AC, Catania MG, Weinbaum BS, Johnson AD, Getman DK, Gaydos CA. 2011. Molecular
testing for Trichomonas vaginalis in women: results from a prospective
U.S. clinical trial. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:4106 4111.
20. Levine WC, Pope V, Bhoomkar A, Tambe P, Lewis JS, Zaidi AA, Farshy
CE, Mitchell S, Talkington DF. 1998. Increase in endocervical CD4
lymphocytes among women with nonulcerative sexually transmitted diseases. J. Infect. Dis. 177:167174.
21. Hardick A, Hardick J, Wood BJ, Gaydos C. 2006. Comparison
between the Gen-Probe transcription-mediated amplification
Trichomonas vaginalis research assay and real-time PCR for
Trichomonas vaginalis detection using a Roche LightCycler instrument with female self-obtained vaginal swab samples and male urine
samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:4197 4199.
22. Andrea SB, Chapin KC. 2011. Comparison of Aptima Trichomonas
vaginalis transcription-mediated amplification assay and BD affirm VPIII
for detection of T. vaginalis in symptomatic women: performance parameters and epidemiological implications. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:866 869.
23. Huppert JS, Mortensen JE, Reed JL, Kahn JA, Rich KD, Miller WC,
Hobbs MM. 2007. Rapid antigen testing compares favorably with transcription-mediated amplification assay for the detection of Trichomonas
vaginalis in young women. Clin. Infect. Dis. 45:194 198.
jcm.asm.org 2327