Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
com
http://www.engineeringcivil.com/concrete-quality-control-during-construction.html
Ref.: 1
S.No.
Class
Origin
Relative
cost
1.
Lignosulphonates
2.
Sulphonated
melamine
formaldehyde
(SMF)
3.
Sulphonated
naphthalene
formaldehyde
(SNF)
4.
Polycarboxylic
ether (PCE)
180 kg/m3
2. Cement, PPC =
3. Sand =
410 kg/m3
750 kg/m3
4. 5 mm crushed aggregate =
5. 20 mm crushed aggregate =
6. Normal superplasticizer =
-
500 kg/m3
540 kg/m 3
5.800 kg/m3
Total =
2385.8 kg/m3
Note: With cement brand No. 3 and SP (B) 28 days laboratory cubes average density found to be 2394 kg/m 3.
4. All the 150 mm cube samples are the average of 3 cubes and they are with in + 15% of the average value.
5. For conclusion of Lab trials the cubes compressive strength is given in Table 3.
6. The mix design is carried out from references 2 and 3.
7. The above given design mix is used in all the Lab trial mixes. The same design mix along with cement brand
3 with superplasticizer (B) is followed in the construction. Site cube results are given in Table 4.
CONCLUSION
1. If we are producing concrete into superplasticizer, then we can achieved 11% more strength compare to normal
concrete with respect to about 4% increments in cost per cubic meter. This is very important superplasticizer must
be compatiable with the cement proposed to be used in the construction.
2. On the basis of laboratory experimental investigations and studies carried out in the present work, it is concluded
that though the concrete mix proportion is the same in all the trial mixes, the workability, compressive strength and
setting times of cement concrete are considerably different depending on the brand of the cement and brand of
superplasticizer.
3. If superplasticizer is not compatiable with the cement lower strength will be obtained. This can be seen in Table 3.
4. The results given in this paper are our findings other researchers/sites should draw conclusions by testing with
their own site materials, and not depend upon the test results of this paper.
5. In the mix design cement is 410 kg/m3. With the present set of materials this cannot be reduce, as per reasons
given below:
(a) Water = 180 kg + 3.654 kg water in the superplasticizer total water = 183.654 kg/m3. Free W/c ratio =
183.654/410 = 0.45.
(b) For workability consideration water cannot be reduce. For durability requirements free W/c ratio also cannot be
increase from 0.45.
(c) The dosage of superplasticizer cannot be increase due to retardation of setting time of concrete.
REFERENCES
1. R. Rixom and N. Mailvaganam, Chemical Admixture for Concrete, E & FN Spon, London 1999.
2. Kishore Kaushal, Mix Design for Pumped Concrete, Journal of Central Board of Irrigation and Power, Vol. 49.
No.2, Apr. 1992, pp. 81-92.
3. Kishore Kaushal, Mix Design for Pumped Concrete, NBM & CW Sept. 2010, pp. 204-217.
4. IS: 456-2000, Plan and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice (Fourth Revision) BIS, New Delhi.
5. IS: 1489, Specifications for Portland Pozzolana Cement, BIS, New Delhi.
6. IS: 9103-1999, Specification for Admixtures for Concrete (First revision) BIS, New Delhi.
Table 2. Test report of site aggregates
Percentage passing by mass
I.S. Sieve size
Sand
(crushers)
Crushed Agg
Combine grading of
mix
42%
12.5
m
20
mm
28%
30%
40 mm
100
100
100
100
100
20 mm
100
100
94
98
100
12.5 mm
85
10 mm
100
58
60
60-73
4.75 mm
92
40
40-58
2.36 mm
80
34
28-46
1.18 mm
50
21
18-35
600 Micron
36
15
12-25
300 Micron
21
7-15
150 Micron
10
2-06
Specific gravity
2.65
2.65
2.65
Water
absorption %
0.9
0.6
0.5
Bulk density
kg/lit
1.67
1.40
1.39
3 days
7 days
28 days
3 days
7 days
28 days
3 days
7 days
28 days
23.8
27.3
39.9
23.9
24.5
32.9
24.9
25.2
35.1
27.2
32.5
40.7
22.1
30.0
42.5
25.9
30.8
41.8
19.3
25.9
35.7
16.0
21.6
35.3
23.6
26.0
39.7
15.9
19.7
29.6
17.7
21.2
27.7
18.9
23.6
30.0
20.0
23.5
34.0
18.9
23.9
33.2
23.3
26.9
33.0
Note:
1. Cement brand 2 and 3 found to be achieving the designed target strength of 38.3 N/mm2 with superplasticizer
brand (B). As cement brand 3 is found to be available in bulk at site. Hence cement brand 3 and superplasticizer
brand (B) is allowed in the construction.
2. Manufacturer of all the 5 brands of PP cement claims, cement conforms to IS: 1489 Manufacturer of 2 brands of
superplasticizer claims, their product conforms to IS: 9103-1999.
Table 4 : Cube compressive strength construction site results with cement brand number 3 and
superplasticizer brand SP (B). All the samples are of M-30 grade concrete of the same site.
Sample Number 28 days compressive strength in N/mm 2
1
39.5
31.0
39.9
39.7
41.7
34.4
39.1
35.6
37.1
10
37.8
11
39.5
12
40.1
REMARKS
1. Characteristic compressive strength compliance requirements IS: 456-2000 with amendments Table 11 (clause
16.1 and 16.3)
Specified
grade
Mean of group of 4
N/mm2 Mi
1)
2)
3)
M15 and
above
0.5 N/mm 2)
or
> fck + 3 N/mm2
whichever is greater
RESULT : The site concrete have the compliance of M-30 grade of concrete.
2. With the present sets of material further economy in cement cannot be obtained. See item 5 of conclusion of this
paper.