Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Project Assessment
(Task Specification Schedule, Task and Marking Rubrics )
Code and Course :
Time Frame:
(6 weeks)
Programme :
Group:
Prepared by:
Confirmed by :
Course Coordinator
Date:
Semester /Year:
Semester 1 Tahun 3
Intake:
JAN 2014
Head of Department
:
:
:
:
:
13 April 2016
Date of
Submission
3 May 2016
Analyse a selected scene and characters in the chosen play and their significance to the development of the plot and theme
Apply knowledge of the elements in plays/drama and interpretative skills in order to perform a 30-minute dramatisation of the chosen play.
Apply the principles of stagecraft in the performance.
Write a critical reflection on insights and personal experiences gained in the dramatisation process, and performance.
TASK
TOPIC
Task 1- Individual (50 marks)
a) Portfolio (25 marks)
b) Scriptwriting (25 marks)
DESCRIPTION
WEIGHTAGE
25%
25%
Assessment criteria:
Based on holistic marking
(Refer to scoring rubrics)
Commitment:
Quality of involvement and engagement in
completing project
20%
Assessment criteria:
Holistic marking (Refer to scoring rubrics)
1. Reflective essay
Assessment criteria:
Based on holistic marking
(Refer to scoring rubrics)
30%
NOTES/REMARKS
Name
Code &Course:
LGA 3043E
Semester/Year : 1 Year 3
Date Set
Date of
Submission
Objectives of Project :
1.
Analyse the scenes and characters in the selected play and comment on their significance
to the development of the plot and theme
2.
3.
4.
This project is aimed at enhancing your appreciation for drama/plays and to introduce the basics
of stagecraft: technical skills like script-writing, lighting, stage management, props and
costumes, and publicity. You will learn the fundamentals of acting and drama while developing
your interpretative and analytical skills in the learning process.
Overview
The course endeavours to upskill Englsh Language trainees in terms of exploiting plays and
drama as a resource for the ESL classroom, through the tasks set. (Shift 2, Malaysia Education
Blueprint 2013-2025). It also seeks to develop trainees potential and proficiency as an ESL
teacher. Apart from that, it hopes to enable trainees to reflect upon their performances and
aspire to become value-driven Malaysians (Shift 3, Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025).
Task 1- Portfolio (25%) - Individual
a) You are required to compile selected or adapted drama techniques and activities in
dramatisation of play such as on the elements listed below:
Original/Adaptation
Organisation
Identifying roles
Stagecraft
Interpretative/ Adaptation skills
Teamwork / Collaboration
b) You are also required to write a 1000 words script for a play suited to be performed by your
targeted/chosen primary school pupils.
Detailed requirements:
1.
2.
Length of the written essay should not be more than 1000 words. It should be
typed using font Arial size 11, and 1.5 spacing.
3.
4.
5..
Name of student
Index number and ID
Class/Group
Code and Subject
Title of Coursework
Lecturers name
Submission date
6. You should adhere to the deadline. Late submission of script will be penalised and
downgraded to the next band.
Task 2- Dramatisation of play
1. Perform the dramatisation using appropriate stagecraft and fundamentals of acting.
2.
3.
Length of the written essay should not be more than 1000 words. It should be
typed using font Arial size 11, and 1.5 spacing.
4.
5.
6.
The cover page (appended) should contain the following information :
Name of student
Index Number /Identity Card No.
Course Code
Title of Coursework
Name of Lecturer
Date of submission
Marking Criteria
This project will be assessed against the marking criteria for this coursework.
Prepared by:
(______________________)
(SABARIAH BINTI MORAD)
Course Coordinator TSL1064
Verified by:
(_________________)
(HJH. ROZITA BINTI DATO HJ.RASHID)
Subject Matter Expert
Validated by:
(_____________________)
Dramatization
STAGECRAFT GROUP
DRAMATISATION
ROLE-PLAY
HD
(27-30)
D
(23-26)
C
(18-22)
P
(15-17)
Extremely
creative and.
effective
throughout
the play.
Highly creative
and effective
throughout the
play.
Creative and
is effective
throughout
the play.
Poor
stagecraft
skills and no
creativity
evident.
Outstanding
performance
and actors
display very
commendabl
e stage
presence.
Very clearly
illustrative of
the cultural
and societal
setting of the
play selected.
Good and
actors display
good stage
presence.
Clearly
illustrative of
the cultural and
societal setting
of the play
selected.
Partially
illustrative of
the cultural
and societal
setting of the
play selected.
Stagecraft
creativity is
fairly
satisfactory
and is
effective for
most part of
the play.
Reasonably
good and
actors
display
satisfactory
stage
presence.
Quite
illustrative of
the cultural
and societal
setting of the
play
selected.
Some
cooperation
shown
among the
team
members in
terms of
staging the
play and
preparation
Limited or no
cooperation
shown among
the team
members in
terms of
staging the
play and
preparation of
props,
COOPERATION
Excellent
Very good
cooperation
cooperation
among the
among the
team
team members
members in
in terms of
terms of
staging the play
staging the
and preparation
play and
of props,
preparation of costumes and
props,
setting of
Reflective Writing (20%)
Scale
HIGH DISTINCTION
(17-20)
Good
cooperation
among the
team
members in
terms of
staging the
play and
preparation
of props,
F
(0-14)
Llimited and
unimpressive.
Is not
illustrative of
the cultural
and societal
setting of the
play selected.
Criteria
Excellent critical analysis with lucid, interesting and reflective
insights shared.
Communicates extremely effectively and efficiently with
hardly any grammatical errors.
Is able to identify strengths and weaknesses of ones role
played / task assigned and make very relevant and
appropriate recommendations.
Shows a very high degree of maturity and ability to think
critically.
10
Scale
DISTINCTION
(13-16)
CREDIT
(9-12)
PASS
(5-8)
FAIL
(0-4)
Criteria
Very good critical analysis with lucid, interesting and
reflective insights shared.
Communicates very effectively and efficiently with very few
grammatical errors.
Is able to identify strengths and weaknesses of ones role
played / task assigned and make relevant recommendations.
Shows a high degree of maturity and ability to think critically.
Good critical analysis with some lucid, interesting and
reflective insights shared.
Communicates proficiently with some minor errors.
Is able to identify some strengths and weaknesses of the role
played/task assigned and make some relevant
recommendations.
Shows some maturity of thought and ability to think fairly
critically.
Satisfactory reflection with some interesting insights shared.
Communicates fairly well but with some major language
errors.
Is able to identify a few strengths and weaknesses of the role
played/task assigned and an attempt to make
recommendations is evident.
Shows limited maturity of thought and logical thinking.
Weak effort made in reflecting with generally descriptive
statements evident.
Communicates adequately with many major errors.
Shows limited ability to identify strengths and weaknesses of
the role played/task assigned. Makes some
recommendations but at times takes little account of
identified weaknesses.
Shows little maturity of thought and logical thinking.
11