Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction
Dire warnings regarding children having access to "pornograp h y " on the Internet, and stories o f children being lured into sexual
exploitation b y adults prowling the Internet bring to m i n d the experience o f listening to a morning current affairs s h o w featured on the
Australian B r o a d c a s t C o r p o r a t i o n ( A B C ) R a d i o National in 1996.
T h e host was talking to a 15-year old girl f r o m W e s t e r n Australia
a b o u t the worlds the Internet had o p e n e d up for her. After ascertaining that the girl was using her brother's a c c o u n t through a uni31
32
versity (the improper nature of this apparently was lost on the host),
the second question was whether the girl had accessed pornography via the Web. Her response was something along the lines of:
No. It's a little like X-rated videos. You can get them by ordering from
Finland, but if you don't want them, they won't find you.
The innocence of the girl regarding the fact that X-rated videos
were legally available by mail-order from either the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory (as well as allegedly a mysterious black van in her own city) was outweighed by the simple
observation that, if you don't go looking for them, they aren't likely
to find you.
The host of the program, who expressed disbelief that the girl
had not accidentally encountered smut on the Internet, then turned
to questions about being propositioned or asked to meet strangers
via the Internet. Again, the girl stated that, although no such encounters had occurred, if they had she would simply follow the
same approach she would if a stranger called her and asked her on
a blind date. She would arrange to meet in a public place accompanied by trusted friends until she came to know the person well
enough to feel safe going anywhere with them. Again, sensibility
on the part of the girl seemed to be the order of the day. The crusade by the host continued unabated with a more sympathetic academic guest who was more than willing to emphasize the dangers
associated with the Interuet and sex.
The Australian version of Time (Elmer-Dewitt, 1995; see also
Elmer-Dewitt, 1993, 1994) had just recently published a cover story
on Cyberporn that featured prominently stories of "unsolicited"
thumbnail pictures of pornographic acts being emailed to pre-teen
children and the contact of young boys by pedophiles seeking prey.
Stories of library computers being used by school boys to find and
down-load "pornography" were then being featured in the Australian media as almost staple "filler" for slow news days. Generally
these referred to the same incident at a metropolitan school, with
requisite interviews with local school librarians who would agree
that, yes, the same thing could happen here. To a person, however,
33
they always noted that it had not yet happened as far as they knew.
In fact, there were very few documented cases of school-aged children accessing "pornographic" sites either at school, public libraries, or in their homes.
It was at this point that we became interested in the role that
children, "pornography" and the Internet were playing in the shaping of public opinion ahead of governmental policy on the regulation of the Internet in Australia. This was toward the end of the
Australian Federal Parliamentary inquiry into the regulation of OnLine Services. Upon returning to the United States, the debate over
the Communications Decency Act (CDA) had just resulted in the
passing of that act. Shortly after, the law suits began that ultimately
led to the Supreme Court of the United States nullifying the CDA.
What became interesting in both instances was the "generation gap"
in knowledge about the new technology between children and parents and the role that sexual content played in establishing the "danger" of the new technology. That there was precious little systematic
empirical evidence to back the isolated "horror stories" led us to
examine the role that "mythology" about the sexual content of the
Intemet was playing in warning parents about the dangers of allowing their children unsupervised and unregulated access to this
new technology. Therein lies the crux of this article.
34
A Synopsis
35
36
g a m e s s h o w n or h i r e d in Australia. T h e s e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s i n c l u d e
an " X " rating for v i d e o s a n d C a t e g o r i e s 1 (e.g., P l a y b o y ) a n d 2
(i.e., " h a r d c o r e " s e x u a l l y explicit) f o r print literature, as well as
the r e a s o n s w h y m a t e r i a l m i g h t be " r e f u s e d c l a s s i f i c a t i o n "
(banned), w h i c h specify the level o f sexual content allowable (See
A p p e n d i x ) . T h e results o f this r e s e a r c h i n c l u d e d ( A B A , 1995:
39-40):
No child pornography located after seven hours of specific searching;
An extensive list of bomb-making recipes was found after one hour of
searching;
Categories 1 and 2 material was advertised as being available or was suggested to be available on the Web. However, after searching for seven
hours, none was able to be immediately downloaded;
Approximately 90 percent of the category 1 and category 2 level listings
on the Web had on-screen warnings of content and an age recommendation, while 10 percent had no specific warnings but contained material of
an unrestricted (non-sexual) nature when accessed;
Approximately 60 percent of sites required the searcher to apply to an
address with details and/or credit information before the material could be
obtained;
Eight hours of searching in Usenet found 17 still photos of refused classification level material including pornography, bestiality, bondage and
instruction in matters of crime (bestiality, extreme bondage, and instructions in matter of crime are banned in Australia);
No specific warnings accompanied the site addresses in the Usenet environment, though the names of the addresses themselves suggested the
content (e.g., alt.binaries.bondage). Some of the material accessed in the
Usenet environment had to be decompressed before it could be viewed
(requiring reasonable experience with a variety of decompression software tools);
"The OFLC informal search indicated that the likelihood of on-line users
being involuntarily exposed to material at the refused classification level,
category 1 publication level or category 2 publication level, to be low"
M o r e recently, the A B A (ABA, 2000) c o m m i s s i o n e d a study to
e x a m i n e the views o f children (age 10-15) about m e d i a h a r m (tele-
37
38
39
40
41
42
cents (though certainly societies with different class structures attempt the same process in the socialization process).
On the other hand, we know that children become the danger of
the future, especially if not protected from corrupting influences.
The two primary institutions of socialization, family and school,
seek to minimize this corruption, if only for the ease of maintaining
order in the home or class room (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990).
These two institutional settings are also viewed by various perspectives as the most effective settings for the reproduction of dominant societal values. Depending upon one's philosophical
orientation, these dominant societal values are either necessary or
repressive. Much of this task of "effective" socialization falls to
parents. Parenting becomes a major educational industry aimed at
preventing "improper" behavior. There is no underestimating the
volume of material available to guide parents in this task, from the
technical to the moral/philosophical. Thus, controlling the types of
information to which children are exposed becomes an important
task for parents and moral entrepreneurs. Nowhere is this more
apparent than in the media attention devoted to the subject of
"cyberporn" and "on-line sex." What is interesting here is that, for
once, the target of the admonitions over protecting children from a
particular evil are aimed primarily at middle-class parents, rather
than being imposed on the working-class parents.
Leong (1991) provides an analysis of one parental rights' or "empowerment" movement which began in the 1980s, but which maintains a presence in the current debate over sexual content on the
Internet. She examines the role played by the Parents' Music Resource Center (PMRC) in the initial attempts to have the lyrics
of pop music, especially rap and heavy metal genres, rated or
classified. The PMRC also lobbied to have the lyrics on the
album or C.D. published in a place where they could be read by
parents prior to the purchase of the product. Similar attempts
with regard to music occurred in Australia in the mid-1990s, especially following the impact of U.S. rap music on the Australian
teen subculture. In all of these instances, the advocates of such
measures talk in terms of parental empowerment, not censorship
nor control of the media.
43
Much of the support for the CDA throughout its short-lived existence was framed by parents' rights groups in terms of parental
empowerment. However, even faced with a proliferation of software products to "block" access to sexual content on the Intemet
(and the ability of children to by-pass such [ABA, 2000]), classification schemes for Internet sites developed by industry (sexual content providers and others), and increasing evidence that if you don't
go looking for it you won't find it, the parental groups continue to
complain of a lack of empowerment in this area. One commentator
in Kentucky lamented the inability to "zone" the Internet like communities in order to place sexual content sites off-limits for children. Yet, America On-Line and others are doing exactly that. The
"responsible" providers of "adult materials" are also engaged in
self-policing efforts in order to maintain their position in the virtual
marketplace. So, why does the concern continue? We would argue
that it is partly due to the confluence of two of the most powerful
symbols in late Twentieth Century U.S. (in particular) society:
Children and Pornography.
44
activity and attitudes toward sexual behavior. They argue that each
technological innovation produces new ways of experiencing sexuality. Among the examples they cite are the opportunities for sexual
liaisons presented by the mobility of the automobile, the proliferation of sexually explicit videos following the mass marketing of
video cassette players, and the development of "phone sex" following developments in telephone services. They go on to speculate about the future of "cybersex" as virtual reality technology
improves with computer design changes. Throughout their discussion they note the anxiety each innovation produces in segments of
the population regarding the danger posed by the new developments. However, they do not address how these perceived dangers
are expressed by the public generally and moral entrepreneurs specifically. For a move from the more concrete to the symbolic, we
turn to the work of Gary Alan Fine.
45
46
telephone bills and credit card charges for downloaded information from a bulletin board in some other part of the world. It is
much more likely that middle-class parents would not question such
charges showing up on their bills. And that is the point of the urban
mythology--such parents should be taking a closer notice of their
children's activity,
Like much historically recent mythology, the urban mythology
that is emerging from the moral panic surrounding cyberporn is
aimed at reinforcing "good parenting" in the present time. Cyberpom
represents the newest danger in a long line of dangers to the innocence of childhood. It is also the latest in a long line of challenges to parental authority and notions of what it is to be a
"good" parent. In a time when many parents are finding it difficult to spend any time with their children, let alone "quality
time," cyberporn is a moral prick to the conscience of those who
would be good parents.
47
48
(http://www. theaustralian.com.au/common/story_page/
0, 4 511,1486 5 30% 5 E8882, 00.html).