Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
page 1
Astrological houses are the twelve divisions of the visible sky, fixed from the local
horizon. There's six houses above the horizon, six below. Stand out of doors and
point straight up. That's the 10th house cusp (more or less). Point to the eastern
horizon. That's the Ascendant, or first house cusp. It extends down into the
ground. The sky immediately above it is part of the 12th house. Somewhere
between the 10th and 1st houses are the 11th and 12th house boundaries
(cusps). These boundaries, one about every 30 degrees, stay in the same place
all day with respect to the horizon. They're fixed. As the earth turns around its
axis, the sun and planets, rising in the east and setting in the west, appear to
wander through them during the course of the day. These twelve sections of the
daily sky color the planets as they pass through them. This will not be surprising
to those who know the difference between the colors of sunrise and sunset.
Indicates a book on our Top Ten list. If you would like to find more books like it,
click on the star.
combination of planet & house got its own full page. Sun in the
third, a full page. Mercury in the 12th, full page. Jupiter in the
second, full page, etc. All the same text is here in the new
edition, but the slightly smaller format means the individual
delineations no longer fit neatly on a single page.
What do I think now?
Well, if you need a good, basic book on what planets mean
when they fall in specific houses, this book will do. Herbst
understands that houses are not the same as signs, though his
grasp of houses is not as strong as I would like. In places theory
gets in the way of a good delineation. Here is part of Mars in the
4th:
"inner link" parent
Here we see a contradiction, a masculine symbol in the
mother's area. It can indicate a number of distinctly different
possibilities. If your mother was feminine on the surface, you
still felt her masculinity assert itself often. She might have been
a woman of high energies, the natural ruler of the roost,
someone who could easily have moved her talents into the
external world of cultural power. On the other hand, your father
may have taken over some of the classical duties of
motherhood. Or you could have imprinted on the urgency of
your relationship for him, with desire spilling over into
interaction. This placement sometimes indicates long-standing
disagreement or bitterness with parents, often resulting from a
conflict in the parent-child roles. However, even when that is
the case, there is a sense of strength that pervades the
imprints. (pgs. 243-4)
And here, for contrast, is Alan Oken:
Mars in the Fourth House as a constant undertone of highstrung emotions, irritability, or the urge to dominate. A poorly
aspected Mars in this position can ofen indicate strife in the
domestic sphere, an overly dominant parent, or certain
difficulties surrounding the changing of residences. (Alan
Oken's Complete Astrology, pg. 327)
Oken has the better grasp, but you have to hunt through his
book to find it.
Here are some of Herbst's rules for judging houses:
In an EMPTY house, the sign in which the planetary ruler is
10
THE 8TH HOUSE: Powers of the Soul, Sex & Money - Marc
Robertson, $14.00
Contents:
In this book there is no table of contents, but there are pages with
big printing on them. So I have adapted some to fit the bill:
Out of the darkness of self
Simple transits for timing investments
The signs of business
The soul & 8th house mysteries
Dying a little
Powers of 8 in transit activation & development
Becoming an individual through sex
Comment:
Once you get past the crude, distracting HEY LOOK AT ME!!!
typesetting, you will find this to be an amazingly good book. Vasty
better than Haydn Paul's effort (immediately below). Robertson
starts with investment - 8th house. He then looks at transcendence,
ie, the ability to change the purely physical into the wholly spiritual,
which is 8th house. Robertson fudges the 8th house & death (well,
wouldn't we all like to fudge just a bit right about here?) but he does
say you won't get through the 8th house unscathed, nor should you.
Robertson says he always feared September, but was always
grateful when October came round. As the author died some years
ago, I took the time to find his date of death: September 26, 1984.
He was found nine days later, which, true to form, was October.
Always a better month!
The final section, Becoming an Individual Through Sex, is exactly
right. Sex for the sake of amusement is 5th house. Sex as something
that changes you forever, that's 8th house, and the concept is
brilliant. Here, Robertson delineates signs on the cusp, and pairs
them with the complimentary signs on the 2nd.
A book full of ideas & insights.
AFA, 76 pages.
11
Bibliography
Index
Comment:
This blast from the past was first published in 1993, and is now
(2009) again in print.
The book deals with 8th house issues from a psychological and new
age point of view. The 8th house is broken down into varius
categories, as you can see by the table of contents, above. In each,
a general discussion of the topic, followed by the effects of the
various planets (signs) in the house. In the fifth chapter, on sex, the
introductory remarks are extensive, followed by extensive remarks
on each of the planets, and then discreet delineations of the twelve
signs. Sex is the primary focus of the book as a whole. This is true,
even in chapter 8, on death, where the format changes a bit & we
are now given delineations of transiting planets in the 8th house.
Transiting Saturn, among other things, limits our ability to have sex,
though the author is not quite so blunt as that.
I regret to say there is nothing at all in this book about your
partner's fiances, nor is there any serious mention of physical death
(far less, any discussion of it), and only passing remarks as to 8th
house psychism.
Here is an excerpt: Capricorn, from chapter 5, on sex:
Passion & Capricorn are uncomfortable companions, and you may
feel vulnerable to emotional involvement, as indicated by inner
12
13
are so many empty houses. When I read charts, I suck a lot of meaning from
empty houses, but it seems I am fated to not write the definitive book on the
subject. Since Ruiz has, or has attempted to do so, I only wish the AFA had
held her feet to the fire & made her finish what amounts to a promising start.
Only the first house does Ruiz treat in a comprehensive fashion: Empty Aries
first house, ruler Mars in each of the twelve houses, empty Taurus first
house, ruler Venus in each of the twelve houses, etc. For the remaining
eleven houses, she is sketchy. Empty second house with Aries on the cusp: A
note that one is likely to be an impulse spender, and, oh, by the way, if Mars
is in the 11th, or is aspecting Neptune, this or that situation may arise. This
is hardly more than a tease. Regrettably, this is how she treats empty houses
2-12. She also fails to note the obvious: If Aries is on the cusp of the second,
then the 11th house Mars may well be exalted in Capricorn, adding its
Saturnine flavor to the mix. She uses Uranus as ruler of Aquarius, Neptune of
Pisces, Pluto of Scorpio. On the other hand,
Maybe the limitations of this book will encourage you to do the work & figure
it out for yourself. Back in the mid-1990's, I did. Now I amaze people with
what I can tell them about their "empty" houses. They are a fascinating
study.
AFA, 201 pages.
twelve
twelve
twelve
twelve
twelve
twelve
twelve
twelve
twelve
twelve
twelve
houses
houses
houses
houses
houses
houses
houses
houses
houses
houses
houses
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
Aries
Taurus
Gemini
Cancer
Leo
Virgo
Libra
Scorpio
Sagittarius
Capricorn
Aquarius
15
Houses, page 2
16
Comment:
Garrett is the first (and only) author I have found who understood
the mechanics of interceptions, which gives her small book a great
advantage over all others.
Going chapter by chapter, the first chapter, on house systems, is a
typical, and unsatisfying, survey of various house methods. Garrett,
like most, has no concept of individual house systems, they are all
just pretty faces in a crowd. This is a pity, because not only do
interceptions change from house system to house system (mine
change from Placidus to Koch), but interceptions also change when
charts are rectified. These points Garrett does not cover. Instead, we
are told, again and again, that almost all house systems fail above
66 degrees north latitude (also beyond 66 degrees south latitude),
but are never told there are very few people born at such latitudes,
virtually no significant events which happen at such latitudes, and
that the peoples who live in these extreme places rarely venture
very far south and so are virtually unknown to the rest of us. (Few
people, small towns, no transportation, etc.) Why there is such fuss
made about 66 north I do not know. Back when I ran charts for a
living (some 10,000 charts over four years, 1986-90, in New York),
there was precisely one person who had this problem. She was
Norwegian, I remember her well. She was a frequent customer, I had
to set all her charts in Equal. In Garrett's list of Interception/House
System Facts on pgs. 4 - 5, of the 12 points, four of the points deal
only with extremely rare polar charts.
In chapter 2, we get rules. Here, Garrett shines. Interceptions are
things that are, well, intercepted. Instead of the quarterback passing
the ball to the wide receiver, his pass is intercepted by the opposing
team. The result is interruption, interference, misdirection. Garrett's
rules are simple & direct:
What areas of life, in other words, what houses have the
interceptions?
What signs are intercepted? These are what are missing in your life.
Where are the rulers of the intercepted signs? This tells who or what
are responsible (from pgs. 10-11)
Garrett then hits on two very important points: When the ruler of the
intercepted sign is itself intercepted, and when the ruler of the
intercepted sign is found in one of the pairs houses which have
duplicate signs on them. Garrett's basic concept is that intercepted
signs "come to light" when the house cusps behind them, by
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Erin Sullivan
Melanie Reinhart
Index
Comment:
This is one of the longest books ever written on houses. Sasportas
overlays psychology onto the usual planet/sign pairings (Mercury,
Gemini & Virgo all being about the same, for example, see the list
of contents, above), as well as the usual "first house is sort of like
Aries, the second is kinda like Taurus, the third must be like
Gemini", etc. Specifically, we are born, take our first breath on the
ascendant & forever after, that is how we see the world, through
our ascendant. (Isn't that backwards? Isn't the ascendant how
others see us? Nevermind.) The second house is when the
newborn infant discovers it has a body, the third is when it learns
to walk. The fourth is home. The fifth is fun. The sixth is a reaction
to the fifth, the seventh is a contrast to the first, the eighth is
what we share with a partner, the ninth is our reward for putting
up with the eighth, the tenth is the ninth brought down to earth
(?), or what we want to be known for, or maybe how we packge
our career. The 11th is the Uranian/Aquarian house where we
want to be bigger than ourselves. It is full of invisible organizing
fields, and, oh, yes, friends. The twelfth is God & the Womb,
which takes us back to where we started, ie, the ascendant (the
ending of Kubrick's 2001, anybody?) And karma & reincarnation &
all of that. Such are Sasportas's fundamental view of the twelve
houses, in brief.
A good example of Sasportas's point of view comes in chapter 15,
Grouping the Houses.
The 2nd - 5th square:
A number of conflicts can be stirred if planets in the 2nd square
planets in the 5th. The need for security & a regular income (2nd)
could interfere with time spent on more creative & recreational
activities (5th). Conversely, the struggling artist or 'resting' actor
(5th) often suffers from the lack of a stable income (2nd). Some
people with squares between the 2nd & the 5th derive their sense
of power, worth & importance (5th) solely through what they own
& possess (2nd). Children (5th) might be treated as possessions
(2nd) or experienced as a drain on resources. (pg. 93)
All of this may be true, but first we need to determine the specific
25
signs which are in square to one another, and then consider the
planets forming the square. In chapter 15 we also learn that
houses 1, 5 & 9 are fire, houses 2, 6 & 10 are earth, houses 3, 7 &
11 are air, and 4, 8 & 12 are water. Which is the "houses as signs"
parallel.
The final section of the book, giving delineations of each of the
planets through each of the houses, is reasonably good. When
Sasportas attempts to delineate signs on the cusps, the results
are largely unsatisfactory. Sakoian & Acker do a better job of
that. The problem with planet-in-house delineations, in general, is
that they are only a fragment, a frustrating fragment, of the
whole. On pages 109-110, Sasportas covers my own personal
method of reading houses, but does so in a cursory fashion, as if
he had never actually tried the technique. For example,
In the example chart, the sixth house is empty. Following the
three steps outlined above, much can be learned about that
house. Sagittarius is on the cusp of the 6th house: on one level,
this could mean that Elliot should develop skills (6th) of a
Sagittarian nature - techniques for expanding or broadening the
vision of other people, for instance. The ruler of Sagittarius is
Jupiter, which is placed in the 11th house of groups. The group
setting could be an appropriate place to employ his skills (ruler of
the 6th in the 11th). Since Jupiter is in Taurus & conjunct Mars, his
temperament is suited to leading (Mars) the groups he might
establish (Taurus). But we mustn't forget that Capricorn is also in
the 6th house. Therefore Saturn's position in the chart will exert
influence in relation to the 6th house as well.... (pg. 110)
If Howard had ever actually tried this technique, he would have
discovered it to work rather well. He would have discovered, for
example, that the tiny fragment of Capricorn in the 6th (the last
11 degrees) has no significant effect, at least, so far as the 6th is
concerned. But he also would have been writing actual
delineations, which, from the books of his that I've looked at, he
rarely attempts. Sagittarius, for example, is first of all about
enthusiasm. Ruler in the 11th, Elliot takes his enthusiasm for
foreign foods & new medical techniques & shares them with his
many friends. Or tries to, as Mars, debilitated in Taurus, hammers
ceaselessly on frontal attack: You must like this new dish! A flaw
which Jupiter, only one degree away, magnifies to Elliot's
detriment. Howard uses this as an example of how to read an
empty house. To me, Elliot's chart is more interesting for the
mutual reception between Mars, in Taurus, and Venus, in Aries.
Watch out for mutual receptions between those two!
26
27
13.
14.
15.
16.
Conclusion
Appendix: Retrograde ephemeris, 1920-1999
Comment: December, 2008: A customer brought this book to
my attention a few days ago. Here are my notes on intercepted
signs:
My view of intercepted signs is that they are house-based. You
have one way of dealing with the house from the sign on the
cusp. But for unclear reasons this doesn't work all that well &
so, perhaps in your teens or early 20's, you found a workaround, by means of the sign intercepted inside that house. You
are then unaware you have two different ways of dealing with
matters of that pair of houses.
Wickenburg is grasping:
However, when signs are intercepted, instead of providing
constructive feedback and encouraging you to investigate the
needs of your intercepted signs ... to delve more deeply into the
experiences available through your intercepted signs ... to
uncover the hidden potentials they define ... the environment
challenges you to move on to the next obvious step in life (the
experiences of the next house). The environment simply does
not see, or understand, the degree of complexity involved with
finding fulfillment in the areas of life shown by the houses
28
29
30
31
32
33
The ruler of the house - the planet ruling the sign on the house
cusp - has authority over the affairs of that house, whether the
house is empty or occupied, and is an active extension on those
affairs. Since each planet rules one or two houses, the affairs of
the ruled house are necessarily implicated in the affairs of the
house occupied by the planets. If a planet is not in the house it
rules, it must adapt to the circumstances of the house it is in,
which modifies what it can do. For example, if the Sun is in the
twelfth house, the solar energy is modified, and the individual
must make certain adjustments in his or her self-expression. If the
Sun is the ruler of the seventh house, then a person's selfexpression relates to the welfare of others.
The more planets that there are in one house, the more complex
are the circumstances. On the other hand, when there are no
planets in a house, the circumstances represented by that house
require less direct attention than the areas of activity indicated by
the houses that do contain planets. The affairs of the unoccupied
houses are woven into those of the occupied houses through the
planets ruling the empty houses. Any activity that relates to an
unoccupied house is integrated into the activity of the house in
which the ruler is located. (pg. 4)
In my view, this is backwards, and muddled as well. Which is why
I never understood the book, and maybe why nobody else ever
has, either. The first problem is that planets do not rule houses,
they rule signs. This is fundamental. A planet does not adapt to
the house it is in, as much as it dominates the house(s) that bear
the sign(s) which it rules. It dominates by means of the sign
(primary) and house (secondary) in which the ruler is placed. By
means of its rulership, it displaces whatever planets may be in the
house(s) it rules. (Which, of course, find themselves occupied with
the signs/houses which they rule.) In the case of stelliums, the
affairs of the houses ruled by the stellium are dominated by the
sign (primary) and house (secondary) where the rulers are
located. Which is why stelliums are so powerful. Most of the chart
can find itself wrapped into a single house. That can be intense.
In Pelletier's example, if the Sun is in the 12th & ruling the 7th,
the seventh house has Leo on the cusp, which puts the Sun in
Capricorn in 12. If this is a female nativity, her husband (or
partner) works (Capricorn) quietly behind the scenes (12th), as
the Sun in a female chart represents the men in her life. If it is a
male nativity, his domineering (Leo) wife (7th house) must put up
with his own self-imposed obscurity (12th) & the work (Capricorn)
34
35
36
case, the Sun's anchor sign, Leo, is beyond the Sun's grasp. Third,
the sign on the cusp of the 9th is Capricorn, not Aquarius. Which
means the sign my Sun is in does not control the house the Sun is
in. Which further strands the Sun. Capricorn on 9 is not
compatible with Sun in Aquarius. In this case, the cusp will not let
the planets in its house get comfortable. Except for cadent
houses, I say that planets in this situation want to be in the next
house, are "running to get into" the next house, in this case the
house with Aquarius on the cusp, but this does not work with
cadent houses and angles. The angles of the chart are walls.
You're either in the angular house, or you're not. When planets in
cadent houses are not in the same sign as what is on the cusp (3,
6, 9, 12), they are stranded: Little power in the house they are in,
no power in the nearby angular house. This is unique to the
cadents, it's what the angles steal from them in order to be
angles.
The net effect, in my personal case, is that I've never really felt
"at home" (4th house), but, Sun debilitated - and stranded - in 9,
the Sun could never quite manage to find a life abroad, either. YES
YOU CAN read this level of detail in a chart. In fact you should be
unsatisfied if you cannot.
Pelletier's book is from 1978. To think what he wrote was the best
that could be done makes me sad. Judging by the books I see on
my shelves, I'm not certain we've come very far since. For some
years now I have been trying to find the concepts which will make
this clear to you.
Whitford, 366 pages, paper.
37
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
38
39