INTERNATIONAL TRADE ORGANIZATIONS

Some of the most important International Trade Organizations include:

• WTO (World Trade Organization)

• ICC (International Chamber of Commerce)

• UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade & Development)

The most prominent and active of all the organizations working towards the enhancement and
encouragement of international trade and having an extensive membership base is the WTO
(World Trade Organization)

WTO (World Trade Organization)

The World Trade Organization (WTO) is an international organization designed to supervise and
liberalize international trade. The WTO came into being on January 1, 1995, and is the successor
to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which was created in 1947, and
continued to operate for almost five decades as a de facto international organization.

The World Trade Organization deals with the rules of trade between nations at a near-global
level; it is responsible for negotiating and implementing new trade agreements, and is in charge
of policing member countries' adherence to all the WTO agreements, signed by the bulk of the
world's trading nations and ratified in their parliaments.

The WTO is governed by a Ministerial Conference, which meets in every two years; a General
Council, which implements the conference's policy decisions and is responsible for day-to-day
administration; and a director-general, who is appointed by the Ministerial Conference. The
WTO's headquarters are in Geneva, Switzerland.

MISSION, FUNCTIONS AND PRINCIPLES

The WTO's stated goal is to improve the welfare of the people of its member countries,
specifically by lowering trade barriers and providing a platform for negotiation of trade.

Its main mission is "to ensure that trade flows as smoothly, predictably and freely as possible".

This main mission is further specified in certain core functions serving and safeguarding five
fundamental principles, which are the foundation of the multilateral trading system.

FUNCTIONS

Among the various functions of the WTO, these are regarded by analysts as the most important:

• It oversees the implementation, administration and operation of the covered agreements.

 • It provides a forum for negotiations and for settling disputes.
• Additionally, it is the WTO's duty to review the national trade policies, and to ensure the
coherence and transparency of trade policies through surveillance in global economic
policy-making.
• Another priority of the WTO is the assistance of developing, least-developed and low-
income countries in transition to adjust to WTO rules and disciplines through technical
cooperation and training.
• The WTO is also a center of economic research and analysis: regular assessments of the
global trade picture in its annual publications and research reports on specific topics are
produced by the organization.
• Finally, the WTO cooperates closely with the two other components of the Bretton
Woods system, the IMF and the World Bank.

PRINCIPLES OF THE TRADING SYSTEM

The WTO establishes a framework for trade policies; it does not define or specify outcomes.
That is, it is concerned with setting the rules of the trade policy games. Five principles are of
particular importance in understanding both the pre-1994 GATT and the WTO:

• Nondiscrimination. It has two major components: the most favoured nation (MFN) rule,
and the national treatment policy. Both are embedded in the main WTO rules on goods,
services, and intellectual property, but their precise scope and nature differ across these
areas. The MFN rule requires that a WTO member must apply the same conditions on all
trade with other WTO members; i.e. a WTO member has to grant the most favorable
conditions under which it allows trade in a certain product type to all other WTO
members. "Grant someone a special favor and you have to do the same for all other WTO
members." National treatment means that imported and locally-produced goods should be
treated equally (at least after the foreign goods have entered the market) and was
introduced to tackle non-tariff barriers to trade (e. g. technical standards, security
standards et al. discriminating against imported goods).

• Reciprocity. It reflects both a desire to limit the scope of free-riding that may arise
because of the MFN rule, and a desire to obtain better access to foreign markets. A
related point is that for a nation to negotiate, it is necessary that the gain from doing so be
greater than the gain available from unilateral liberalization; reciprocal concessions
intend to ensure that such gains will materialize.

• Binding and enforceable commitments. The tariff commitments made by WTO

members in a multilateral trade negotiation and on accession are enumerated in a
schedule (list) of concessions. These schedules establish "ceiling bindings": a country can
change its bindings, but only after negotiating with its trading partners, which could mean
 compensating them for loss of trade. If satisfaction is not obtained, the complaining
country may invoke the WTO dispute settlement procedures.

• Transparency. The WTO members are required to publish their trade regulations, to
maintain institutions allowing for the review of administrative decisions affecting trade,
to respond to requests for information by other members, and to notify changes in trade
policies to the WTO. These internal transparency requirements are supplemented and
facilitated by periodic country-specific reports (trade policy reviews) through the Trade
Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM). The WTO system tries also to improve
predictability and stability, discouraging the use of quotas and other measures used to set
limits on quantities of imports.

• Safety valves. In specific circumstances, governments are able to restrict trade. There are
three types of provisions in this direction: articles allowing for the use of trade measures
to attain noneconomic objectives; articles aimed at ensuring "fair competition"; and
provisions permitting intervention in trade for economic reasons.

FORMAL STRUCTURE

According to WTO rules, all WTO members may participate in all councils, committees, etc.,
except Appellate Body, Dispute Settlement panels and committees.

Highest level: Ministerial Conference

The topmost decision-making body of the WTO is the Ministerial Conference, which has to meet
at least every two years. It brings together all members of the WTO, all of which are countries or
separate customs territories. The Ministerial Conference can make decisions on all matters under
any of the multilateral trade agreements.

Second level: General Council

The daily work of the ministerial conference is handled by three groups: the General Council, the
Dispute Settlement Body, and the Trade Policy Review Body. All three consist of the same
membership - representatives of all WTO members - but each meets under different rules.
1. The General Council, the WTO’s highest-level decision-making body in Geneva, meets
regularly to carry out the functions of the WTO. It has representatives (usually ambassadors or
equivalent) from all member governments and has the authority to act on behalf of the
ministerial conference which only meets about every two years. The council acts on behalf on
the Ministerial Council on the entire WTO affairs. The current chairman is Amb. Muhamad Noor
Yacob (Malaysia).

2. The Dispute Settlement Body is made up of all member governments, usually represented by
ambassadors or equivalent. The current chairperson is H.E. Mr. Mr. Bruce Gosper (Australia).

3. The WTO General Council meets as the Trade Policy Review Body (TPRB) to undertake
trade policy reviews of Members under the TRPM. The TPRB is thus open to all WTO
Members. The current chairperson is H.E. Ms. Claudia Uribe (Colombia).

Third level: Councils for Trade

The Councils for Trade work under the General Council. There are three councils - Council for
Trade in Goods, Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, and Council
for Trade in Services - each council works in different fields. Apart from these three councils, six
other bodies report to the General Council reporting on issues such as trade and development, the
environment, regional trading arrangements and administrative issues.

1. Council for Trade in Goods- The workings of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT) which covers international trade in goods, are the responsibility of the Council for Trade
in Goods. It is made up of representatives from all WTO member countries. The current
chairperson is Amb. Yonov Frederick Agah (Nigeria).

2. Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights- Information on intellectual

property in the WTO, news and official records of the activities of the TRIPS Council, and
details of the WTO’s work with other international organizations in the field.

3. Council for Trade in Services- The Council for Trade in Services operates under the guidance
of the General Council and is responsible for overseeing the functioning of the General
Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). It’s open to all WTO members, and can create
subsidiary bodies as required.

Fourth level: Subsidiary Bodies

There are subsidiary bodies under each of the three councils.

1. The Goods Council- subsidiary under the Council for Trade in Goods. It has 11 committees
consisting of all member countries, dealing with specific subjects such as agriculture, market
access, subsidies, anti-dumping measures and so on. Committees include the following:

• Information Technology Agreement (ITA) Committee

• State Trading Enterprises
• Textiles Monitoring Body - Consists of a chairman and 10 members acting under it.
• Groups dealing with notifications - process by which governments inform the WTO
about new policies and measures in their countries.

2. The Services Council- subsidiary under the Council for Trade in Services which deals with
financial services, domestic regulations and other specific commitments.

3. Dispute Settlement panels and Appellate Body- subsidiary under the Dispute Settlement
Body to resolve disputes and the Appellate Body to deal with appeals.

The WTO operates on a one country, one vote system, but actual votes have never been taken.
Decision making is generally by consensus, and relative market size is the primary source of
bargaining power. The advantage of consensus decision-making is that it encourages efforts to
find the most widely acceptable decision. Main disadvantages include large time requirements
and many rounds of negotiation to develop a consensus decision, and the tendency for final
agreements to use ambiguous language on contentious points that makes future interpretation of
treaties difficult.

DISPUTE SETTLEMENT BODY

Dispute settlement is regarded by the WTO as the central pillar of the multilateral trading
system, and as a "unique contribution to the stability of the global economy". WTO members
have agreed that, if they believe fellow-members are violating trade rules, they will use the
multilateral system of settling disputes instead of taking action unilaterally.

The operation of the WTO dispute settlement process involves

The DSB panels, the Appellate Body, the WTO Secretariat, arbitrators, independent experts and
several specialized institutions.

The General Council discharges its responsibilities under the DSU through the Dispute
Settlement Body (DSB). Like the General Council, the DSB is composed of representatives of all
WTO Members. The DSB is responsible for administering the DSU, i.e. for overseeing the entire
dispute settlement process. If a member state considers that a measure adopted by another
member state has deprived it of a benefit accruing to it under one of the covered agreements, it
may call for consultations with the other member state. If consultations fail to resolve the dispute
within 60 days after receipt of the request for consultations, the complainant state may request
the establishment of a panel. It is not possible for the respondent state to prevent or delay the
establishment of a panel, unless the DSB by consensus decides otherwise. The panel, normally
consisting of three members appointed ad hoc by the Secretariat, sits to receive written and oral
submissions of the parties, on the basis of which it is expected to make findings and conclusions
for presentation to the DSB. The proceedings are confidential, and even when private parties are
directly concerned, they are not permitted to attend or make submissions separate from those of
the state in question.

The final version of the panel's report is distributed first to the parties, and two weeks later it is
circulated to all the members of the WTO. The report must be adopted at a meeting of the DSB
within 60 days of its circulation, unless the DSB by consensus decides not to adopt the report or
a party to the dispute gives notice of its intention to appeal. A party may appeal a panel report to
a standing Appellate Body, but only on issues of law, and legal interpretations developed by the
panel. Members may express their views on the report of the Appellate Body, but they cannot
derail it: an Appellate Body report shall be adopted by the DSB and unconditionally accepted by
the parties, unless the DSB decides by consensus within thirty days of its circulation not to adopt
the report.

ACCESSION AND MEMBERSHIP

The process of becoming a WTO member is unique to each applicant country, and the terms of
accession are dependent upon the country's stage of economic development and current trade
regime. The process takes about five years, on average, but it can last more if the country is less
than fully committed to the process or if political issues interfere. As is typical of WTO
procedures, an offer of accession is only given once consensus is reached among interested
parties.

Members and Observers

The WTO has 151 members (almost all of the 123 nations participating in the Uruguay Round
signed on at its foundation, and the rest had to get membership).

Conclusion:
The WTO when analyzed for its practices and overall role in the past years, one can find it to be
more inclined towards the interests of the few developed countries. The concept of free markets
is far from being actually realized when it comes to the interests of the developing nations.
Reciprocity although is considered to be an integral part of the role of WTO, but the trade
agreement between the developed and the developing nations seem to be unjust, when you
consider the actual value that the developing nations would be able to derive from the various
trade agreements. But one cannot wholly negate the positive role that the WTO plays in
enhancing trade through the settlement of disputes amongst various nations.